Magnus Linklater
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
To find tough solutions for tough crime problems, the best place to start is in tough cities. Before we succumb to despair, as we contemplate the almost routine catalogue of violence that stained the nation last weekend, let us see how youth crime is being tackled in four places where violence is hardwired into the landscape, and how fighting it has prompted the most radical solutions anywhere in the world: Chicago, Brooklyn, Glasgow, Belfast.
One theme links all these places as they fight drugs, alcohol, gang culture and random violence: prison, they all agree, is failing to do the job. On the contrary, it is making things worse. To use it as a first resort is the easiest and most useless of all options: it simply breeds the next generation of criminals. This across-the-board consensus comes not from social workers or well-intentioned reformers but from those tackling crime on the front line - the police and the judges.
Here is John Carnochan, head of the Violence Reduction Unit at Strathclyde Police, where knife crime is more than three times higher than in the rest of the UK: “It is a truism that putting people in jail doesn't work,” he says. “It may make the rest of us feel better, but it was never intended to solve the problem, nor does it.”
Judge Alex Calabrese, who presides over the Red Hook Community Justice Centre, set up after the murder of a public school principal in one of Brooklyn's roughest areas: “[The centre] has boosted confidence in the justice system, brought the community together and, most importantly, saved lives.” By keeping kids out of jail and setting them to work in the community itself, it has brought crime down dramatically.
In Belfast, where the aftermath of the Troubles brought a spate of sectarian crime, the process of “restorative” justice, in which criminals are confronted with the impact of their crime and forced to make reparation, has taken the whole process of punishment out of prison and placed it in the very centre of the community. Perhaps only in a place so riven by traditions of hatred could the idea of bringing offender and victim together have caught on and been seen as a solution.
Finally, Chicago. Appropriately enough, the city that became notorious for gang violence, but also produced its own school of free-market economics, has brought both together in a scheme that has made it a national proving ground for early intervention. Since most juvenile crime occurs in families that are dysfunctional and deprived, investing in schooling and support during the very earliest years of life - offering advice and financial help to parents expecting a child, giving health and education advice, teaching them to read if necessary - is sound social policy and saves money. It is the brainchild of the Nobel prize-winning economist James Heckman, who calculated the comparative costs of early education and late imprisonment. He reckoned it was 11 times more expensive to lock up a teenage criminal than it was to educate a young child away from a life of crime. “Even at age 4 or 5 you may be starting too late,” Professor Heckman said.
None of these places rejects prison for serious acts of violence - indeed their sentences are often tougher than those in England and Wales. What is striking, however, is how effectively they expose the sterile counsel of the punitive lobby, which has no answer except to repeat its mind-numbing endorsement of imprisonment as the only solution, to the point where Britain not only jails more people but also presides over the most overcrowded and ineffective penal system in Europe.
The central lesson, and one that cannot be emphasised strongly enough, is that dealing with criminals in the community is not a soft option. On the contrary, it makes far more demands than prison, which removes all responsibility from the inmate and creates a climate of compliance and dependency, making him a soft touch for the nearest drug dealer or criminal recruiter.
Forcing a young offender out into the community where he has committed his crimes, and involving him in the hard graft of working on local projects, has the double effect of introducing him to the reality of labour, while contributing to the improvement of his own home territory. Instead of being hidden away, he is there on show, seeing and being seen - paying his debt to society in the most public way.
In Red Hook, those on community sentences wear distinctive red tracksuits; everyone knows who they are, and why they are there - including their peers. Whereas prison, for a young offender, is considered a badge of honour, community sentences, which may involve restoration work or cleaning up graffiti, are tough, demanding, often banal, but ultimately useful.
And because they are seen to work, they have the backing of every agency involved - judges, probation officers and police. Most important of all, they have begun to command the confidence of the community itself. This, of course, is the stumbling block in Britain - the idea that society has become so frightened of violent crime that it is only interested in longer prison sentences, the lock-'em-up-and-throw-away-the-key approach. The notion that we are a nation of hangers and floggers is a chimera.
Most detailed surveys show that people are fully aware of the limitations of prison. They know that they have become, for the most part, universities of crime, and the public are more interested in schemes that work - that offer treatment to drug addicts, training programmes for young offenders, or properly supervised service to the community. They would probably understand the Sure Start programme, which helps young families, if the Government was prepared to come out and sell it properly. They would not necessarily condemn a politician who spoke up for alternatives to prison if he or she did so with conviction and passion.
No one pretends it is an instant solution. It might not show results for 20 years. But it would be taking us in the right direction, instead of the mean route along which we are travelling in such fear and trepidation.

Magnus Linklater's journalistic career spans 40 years, taking him from editor of Londoner's Diary at the Evening Standard to editor of Spectrum and the Colour Magazine at The Sunday Times and editor of The Scotsman. He joined The Times in 1994 and writes a weekly column on Wednesdays. He was chairman of the Scottish Arts Council from 1996 to 2001, and often writes on Scottish issues
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I THINK
Prison is not the answer. It has its limits! Yes it works to get young offenders off the streets but for how long? It does not deal with the root issues, such as: fear, lack of self esteem, boredom. To see these people contribute positively into the economy a different strategy is needed
Dan Owen, Glasgow,
Send young offenders to third world countries as aid workers; it might put their lives in context. Most importantly give children the best start in life so they do not get into crime in the first place. The Sure Start project should be extended to offer those in need the best help.
Sherry, Birmingham, West Midlands
I note the American methods involve shaming the culprits. Public humiliation is far more effective than a cosy chat with some wet sociology graduate. Why are we so afraid of it?
And where is the army in all this? A spell on work-gangs run by some hard-nut sergeant would make them think again.
PaulD, Essex,
prison does work .. it is a deterrent .. I am living proof .. If it were not for the thought I might get sent to prison I may have committed numerous offences, as would indeed I suspect many of my peers.
The problem relates only to a small proportion of society ..
What is the answer if not Prison
jurgen, St Maixent sur Vie, France
Fixing problems by fighting is not confined to the young. Middle aged paunchy men were laying into the police in Manchester recently. When the economy is driven by personal debt and consumer over spending, and where spivving unearned cash is admired, then cracks of envy and hate start to appear.
Colin Horsman, Cambridge, UK
one strike your out...simple as.
Alexander, london, England
yes but they can't steal my TV while they're there can they?
Michael, London, UK
Yes, build more prisons and/or re-introduce the Death Penalty, and actually start to remove those from Society who do not wish to integrate and conform.
Let the rest of us live in some kind of peace and harmony; then the mistrust might reverse and colour and religion will not be seen as a problem?
Terry, Bagneres, France
I teach 3 to 11 year olds, with many I would confidently say they will never commit more than a parking/ speeding offence. Some I know are going to be using up my tax money. Heckman is right.
Diana, Derby,
A friend was involved in a fight due to excessive drinking. He was trouble free and has a good job, had served in he armed forces as is well educated person.
He was expecting jail for 3 to 6 months He got to 240 hours community service and this helped him address his drinking and lifestyle.
Jay Tee, Oxford, UK
Benefits: There needs to be a birthrate cap, to avoid future imbalances in ethnic and social groups and to avoid overloading all our systems. Prisons would then not be so crowded and should be there primarily to keep undesirables away from law abiders. Any other reason is secondary.
Chris C, Torquay, UK
Prisons do not exist to "cure" criminals.
For the term of an offender's incarceration society is spared further crimes.
Whether or not you agree with the appropriateness of prisons please stop this liberal fallacy that a prisons' success is based on re-offending. That's not the purpose.
Jerome, London, UK
To reduce the number of speeding offences the penalties are increased and to reduce the incidence of overfilled rubbish bins the penalties are increased, yet to deal with serious crime and re-offending the penalties should be reduced! Make every effort to prevent, if that doesn't work get mad.
Terry, Radstock, England
It would work if they were a little harder on these criminals. No T.V., no computers, not gym just hard graph on a chain gang. That is what is needed and until someone wakes up and does something other than pussy footing around with the liberal brigade crime will escalate.
Gilmartin, Bristol, England
This liberal plea misses the point; the legal systems' primary purpose must be to protect the public, not reform the criminal. If this can be done, well and good. But if not removal from the society they prey on will suffice.
Harry O, Lancashire,
Edward Green, above, is just about right. No career criminals should be on the streets. If they cant stop offending, they shouldnt be in society.
TJ, Leeds,
In the past prison went hand in hand with hanging and flogging perhaps these two options might make people reconsider their actions if those are the consequences.
Dan, Winchester, UK
If people reoffend when we let them out the answer is staring us in the face.
Eric Skelton, Cardiff, Wales
Finally, a sensible article on crime and punishment which doesn't provide fuel for the populist punitivism of the last few governments. Magnus is right in asserting that prisons simply do not work but instead make matters worse. We need to improve grass root problems not lock everyone up!
Mark Walters, Oxford,
Prison does not seem to work. Criminals ought to be forced to work in full view of the community in penal gangs. They should be dressed in clothing that humiliates them. The perverted form of dignity they earn among other criminals in gaol should be denied them.
Tam Earl-Aine, Cheltenham,
Ron,
Have you ever considered that it was your generation of 'short sharp shock' that begat what we have today?
Does violence not encourage violence? Does it not encourage 'society has hurt me so I will hurt society' mentalism?
Look at domestic violence and the downward spiral that creates!
AK, Pig Hill,
Let's be plain, people respond to stimuli, if there's no stimulus to great enough to stop them from committing crime they will. Equally you need to see if the stimuli to commit crime is greater than the stimuli to stop committing crime. But most do not see the punishment they receive as a deterant.
duncan, Wokingham,
If offenders work in the community then we need to improve on the 20% who actually complete their community orders in full. There is a case for making custody more onerous so that it is more of a detterrant but also make it an option for those who breach community orders,they will soon get message!
Geoff C, Kingswinford, UK
Alan London UK
Absolutely spot on, I recall making similar comments elsewhere. The problem is the Gov.t does not have the spine to make changes like that.
C Kroustis, London, UK
Forgiveness when someone is truly remorseful can work, but reality, these people with knives and gangs see it as a "got away with it again, only slap on the wrist- let's continue to terrorise".
I've been threatened by a gang of drunks on a plane. The police did not turn up .. what deterrent?
Phil A, Guildford, UK
Magnus,good for the causes of talking about feral youth but hopless in the practice.You espouse what is already attempted and our society (unlike US) is too soft and liberal to impliment.
The worthwhile part of identifying and shaming offenders with red tracksuits is out - human rights you know.
robert everitt, wolverhampton,
Many who endorse imprisonment do so only because capital punishment is, foolishly I think, no longer an option. The high rate of reoffending is, surely, a condemnation of the efficacity of the former, and the clear need for the latter even - perhaps especially - in the case of youth crime.
Michael Broers, Oxford, UK
Punishment is not a deterrent, unless it is extreme and inhumane (maybe some people want this). Being caught is a deterrent.
Despite all of the negative comments if you manage to make one person think then the article is worth writing.
Tony W, Reading,
This man is not required to think. You are not political sir; That is simply not not your job.
Clearly you are as left wing as is practically every single institution in the UK bar the Army.
You are not a political animal. Catch them. That is you're job.
Jay Wallams , Dundee, UK
If politicians are sincere in their belief in alternatives to prison then they need to sell their vision to the public, inspire us and give us confidence. This is a task of leadership but there are no leaders, only managers. Can anyone name a politician who has relentlessly pushed this agenda?
Jon, North West, UK
1) First offenders should certainly, where practical be given restitutive sentences + counselling etc.
2) Second offenders should get a warning prison sentence
3) Three time crooks should be shipped off to a nice cheap gaol in a 3rd world country and locked up there till they die.
Edward Green, Upminster,
The 24/7 medai campaign on knife cimes is to promote the stop and search laws police have aquired,Explain labour concerned about thelives of our teenagrs then spending taxpayer cash on training and guns and knifes for the same generation to kill in vanity wars in iraq etc. ah its the global ec
michael , cahersiveen-adams town, madness
"I speak for all right thinking people when I say bring back corporal punishment."
No you don't; you're no less of a thug than the people you want birching.
Jim, Exeter,
We can certainly learn from the American policy of 'zero tolerance'.
ian cheese, london, uk
The problem is the benefit system. People are encouraged to produce children they do not want and cannot afford by payment of benefits for babies.
The girls so produced go on to replicate this lifestyle and the boys go to prison. And you the law abiding tax payer funds this disaster.
H horse, Jersey,
You Have no concept of what a proper punishment regime can do.
If you go back to the 50-60s military prisons where people were given short sentences, their re-offending rate is miniscule. Just ask any of those old lags what it was like.
Sid Jacques, Durham,
Punishment in the community has a proven lower rate for recidivism, but they remain hard to implement as the offender is not incarcerated an thus cannot be tracked and maintained all the time. I believe prison should be left primarily for those offences which are so serious i.e. murder, GBH, sexual.
Joshua Head, Nottingham, England
The fact that ex-prisoners often commit more crimes is not in itself evidence that 'prison doesn't work'. The same people might have committed even more crimes even if they hadn't gone to jail. Prison at least keeps people out of circulation for a while.
Frank Upton, Solihull,
I totally agree that prison is not the answer to the problem posed by these young offenders. A short sharp shock is what is required and the this would be adequately provided by bringing back the birch or flogging.
I speak for all right thinking people when I say bring back corporal punishment.
Ron Ipstone, Conway, The United Kingdom of Great Britain and NI
Prisons here are too comftable. I overheard two men talking on the train. One said he'd much rather go to prison then pay a fine etc because he had free satellite tv as wella s all his meals, cleaning etc taken care of.
Make the prisoners put right the damage they've done!
Luke, London, UK
Most repeat offenders are people with serious mental health problems masked by drug addiction, and prisons have replaced Victorian lunatic asylums as a place to dump the desperate.
Get these people into real care and then we'd have the time and money to educate and rehabilitate real criminals.
Camilla, Burnley,
It is frankly disingenuous to suggest that prison is not an option, and, if the prisons are full, ship the nasty little thugs off to some thoroughly unpleasant third world country where they can be put to work for a few years until they have learned to toe the line.
Steve, Plymouth, UK
In our society a minority of problem families are responsible for most of the anti social behaviour on the streets. It is not the area but rather the people who live there!
Prison is not the solution . Instead the children need to be taken away from their parents to learn civilised behaviour.
col, bristol, uk
Crime and punishment is not working in the UK because we have crime with no punishment. How can you expect any respect for the law when we have people walking around with over 100+ crimes under their belt. Start punishing for pities sake.
Roger, Surrey.,
The polemics of British society will never be in a position to deal effectively with the causation of crime as our politics encourage the growth of an underclass. I think the answer must be Preventive Detention after the usual attempts at reformation vide Probation Orders etc., have been tried.
Robert El-Cid., Hull., East Yorks.,
We've been hearing this nonsense for over 20 years. Let's look at some facts.
In the USA they increased the numbers in prison dramatically, crime fell dramatically. In the UK we've doubled the numbers in prison, crime has halved (according to the govt.).
Now, let's see those in favour of "talking therapies" come up with similar figures for dealing with serious criminals, not a group of graffiti artists
Richard Evans, Herts, UK
But what about the elephant in the room? Non-custodial sentences expose the public to predatory offenders. The problem isn't prison: the problem is that we let violent people out even when we know they're likely to re-offend. A government's first duty is to protect its citizens. Ours doesn't!
Jack, Glasgow, UK
If the UK were to put offenders in recognisable punishment garb and put them out to work in public view there would be an outcry from the left about human rights and a band of lowlife lawyers making challenges in the courts. I'm sure the EU would have a rule against it as they have about most things
Viv, London, England
Prison as is, does NOT deter people from crime. Hard labour prisons with no association, very restricted visits, no tv, no anything other than the basic requirements to live, would be a very different matter. But we cant possibly treat scum like that can we? They have rights. They should lose them.
Alan, London, England
The "University of Crime" nomenclature is glib and meaningless.
It presupposes outside Prison a recidivist has fruitful , mind improving time discussing such esoterics as "Mongolian ceramaics and its effect on civilisation"
Crime is a life style, better than the daily grihd, hence its popularit
Peter Bolt, Redditch , UK
Prison. Stop and search. We must not antagonise these young nasty minded people? What rubbish, if they are not carrying then what is the problem, if they are carrying, stop and search will save a life. All these goody goody PC people seem to put the rights of thugs and criminals before innocent members of the public. All my life I have been against corporal punishment. But when I hear what these knife carrying yobs have to say for themselves! I believe the only answer to their bravado is to give them a punishment they will fear. Bring back the Birch, for gun and knife carriers. Then full blown hard labour. Not Nu-Labour.
gordon, london , england
The reason that prison does not work is because sentences are based on the idea that the punishment should fit the crime. This is untrue. After stealing 2 cars & getting away with a slap on the wrist, the 3rd car you steal should get you 10 years inside. A simple risk/return calculation.
Sarah Gore, Paris, France
From mankind's earliest law codes of Hammurabi, society hasagreed to protect the individual, agreeing that through society's punishment, the individual was relieved of the obligation seeking personal retribution.
When it fails in the social compact, society returns retribution to the individual.
Bob Evans, Anaheim, California
The data is there: it WORKS. I'm as keen as the next person for national Service, Penal Legions or even contracting out prisons to Russia / Jamaica etc etc...
I have said "what else is there?" Well - here it is. I'm big enough to say I have learnt something today.
Richard, London, England
Prisoners still commit crimes in prison which in turn creates crime on the outside. Its a safe haven for some.
Will , west kirby,
Progress on youth crime will come when we address underlying causes. The youth are just a reflection of us adults.
Youth respect for human dignity whilst our parliamentarians pass laws that deny such dignity? Abortions at 24 weeks;create life for another's sake;create humanimal embryos. All linked
Joseph Ogbonna, London, UK
You fail to appreciate the misery these yobs can cause in communities. Do you really think they care if they are seen in orange jump suits - it is merely saying "don't mess with me". Prison is the only respite communities get.
Pauline Renton, Camberley, UK
The sole purpose of prison is not rehabilitation. Punishment is a factor - these people are in the dock for a reason. Specific deterrence may not work 100%, but general deterrence? A prison sentence deters me from crime. Besides, if they're in prison they're not committing crimes outside.
Steve Jacks, London,