Melanie Reid
2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now
Stomach churning a little? Sudden onset of a dull headache? Yearning for the chance to put your head on a cool pillow and close your eyes? Yes, thought as much. It’s only Monday but you’re about to become this week’s 57,824th victim of novovirus, the winter vomiting bug; and you should head home pronto, put a bucket beside your bed, and clear the flight path between bed and lavatory. The next three days or so are going to be a bit gruesome.
Not gruesome in a proper sense, of course. Compared, say, with getting cancer, or lying in the First World War trenches with your leg blown off and rats crawling over you, or learning you’ve been appointed as Princess Beatrice’s police protection officer, a minor bout of projectile vomiting and diarrhoea doesn’t really merit prizes for noble suffering.
The one certainty, however, is that plenty of us are about to have both our aim and our nobility tested. According to officials at the Health Protection Agency, who love to sex these things up because it keeps them in a job, the novovirus is rampant across the UK. It’s said that up to 200,000 people can expect to go down with it this week, and we are being cautioned to keep away from our doctors’ surgeries, wash our hands compulsively and — this is the best bit — avoid going back to work until 48 hours after the last symptoms have finished.
Yes, you heard that right. No return to work for 48 hours after the last symptoms have finished. Nothing less than an astonishing two-day holiday, when you are feeling fine, authorised by the Government. A glorious, officially sanctioned, windfall that will more than make up for the mewling and puking of the preceding three days. You can tell these people work for a quango.
In the public sector, where absenteeism is endemic, there is an implicit understanding that one is entitled to at least two weeks off every winter, regardless of any actual illness. Local authority flu, it’s commonly called.
But for the rest of us, this is fantasy stuff. Forty-eight hours off! In the private sector, for years now, workers have abided by a 48-hour rule, all right, but with the opposite application, taking ourselves back to work well before we were fully recovered. Our reputations, our careers, our shareholders and our bonuses depend on it. At least two days before the cough has stopped, or the phlegm cleared, or the throat abated, duty-bound fools drag shaky bodies back to work, believing that any more time off will hit profits, or at the very least put unbearable strain on already overburdened colleagues. I didn’t want to let you down, we croak, warmed by the glow from our own martyrdom as much as from the residue of fever.
There is no doubt that the machismo of the modern work culture has changed attitudes to ill health. It is not acceptable to say it publicly, but nothing makes a worker less attractive than the whisper that they are ill a lot; or that they suffer from regular migraines; or that they have cancer; that they always go off just before the weekend. Give me, cries the exasperated executive — and who can blame her? — someone who wants to work!
Hence the etiquette of being sick has unavoidably changed. Common illness has been rationalised, restructured and made fit for purpose in the 21st century. An internet survey last weekend showed that 60 per cent of people, asked if they would stay off work when sick, said they would not.
So what is the new etiquette for being ill? One golden rule is never to leave the office without finishing the important task in hand, even if you are dying. This will win eternal gratitude from your colleagues. Crucially, never return if you appear to be still infectious, for this will rebound on you.
One young man, from a different culture, and anxious to please, hurried back to his office, and proceeded to cough over everyone until they were all infected. Instead of making himself look good, his reputation was badly damaged with his boss and his co-workers.
The other important issue is jargon: what to call your affliction. Just “having a cold” is now such a tiny, effete, downgraded thing that no one could take time off with one. Colds, like lunch, are for wimps.
Instead, we have the rise of the “bug” or “the lurgy” — which implies something much more serious. These are beautifully vague, expansive terms that announce a raised temperature and a bad cough, and the justification of some time in bed.
Then there is “flu”, usually employed to justify more than three days off, when “a bug”, even “a nasty bug” (technical term), falls a bit short on drama. “Flu” means anything you want it to mean, from an apocalyptic avian pandemic to a feverish cold. (If you are a man, the two are interchangeable.) And there is always the ace — that “serious upper respiratory tract infection” — to be used with an Alpha boss who is never, ever, sick.
Me, I went down with something over new year, which my mate the health visitor informally reckons I can call flu. It went into my lungs and forced me to lie in bed without reading for two days: a measure, for me, of some gravity.
And when I did feel well enough to pick up a book, it was Andrew Lycett’s biography of Conan Doyle, and I was riveted, in my fragile state, by his first wife Louise, a consumptive invalid who declined for decades. A lifetime passed, lived in holiday resorts in the Alps, years during which Conan Doyle gave up the pretence and took a mistress. A lifetime of sick leave! And here I am, agog at the thought of 48 hours’ reprieve from the hamster wheel. The etiquette of illness, for sure, has evolved.

Melanie Reid reports and commentates for The Times from Scotland. Before joining the paper, she was an award-winning columnist and senior assistant editor at The Herald in Glasgow
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Deaths & Marriage announcements
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
Up to £30,000
GLE
London
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Ahh the public sector - always indignant at any hint of criticism, whatever the facts. The facts are that they do have more time off - mainly without fear as it is nigh on impossible to get rid of a public sector worker. In addition - the public sector have enjoyed higher pay rises over the past 5 years than many in the private sector. I have 2 friends who have gone from private to public and they can't believe their luck. They are stunned at the lack of application by many - although certainly not all.
Labour have just turned the dole queue into jobs in the public sector and incapacity benefit. No wonder people sometimes get confused about which one they opted for.
Pat, Blackpool,
We self-employed have a saying: better a leg off than a day off.
Reg Hollis, London,
Yeah just what we need, people coming in when still sick and infecting the rest of us. Great.
Laura, Notts,
Peter Wilson - oh dear oh dear. Hey heres a thought lets fine people for taking lunch breaks - that'll incentivise them. Going for a cuppa? Dock their wages.
I've had three years without a day sick. The adoption of the Bradford system by many PS organisations shows the absent and they are dealt with acording to agreed procedures. Sick people don't belong in the office, making others sick.
We work more hours than the rest of Europe and have the worst productivity. No wonder theres some taking sickys and others getting legless all the time.
Francis Valentine, Glasgow,
To all the Public Sector Martyrs who have commented upon their own superhuman absentee records, I would just point out that EVERY survey ever carried out has found that the average number of days lost in the public sector always exceeds those lost in the private sector (including those carried out by public sector bodies).
This is an indisputable fact, and not some personal anecdote. Any sane, reasonable person would accept these findings as a more accurate reflection of the true position, but why let the facts get in the way of your emotive outpourings?
So, to you martyrs, keep up the excellent standards and the fine example, but do not be blinded to the truth that unjustifiable absenteeism exists all around you.
glenn ex-pat, Auckland, NZ
Huh. In my job/world. If I don't show up for work, I don't get paid. Period. When that laughably pitiful weekly pay packet is one's only income, folks like me have to be very sick indeed, to miss work. Maybe you Brits should take away absentee pay, ey? Or, at least make them prove they're sick, if they want their money. If they don't want to work, why don't they give their jobs to someone who does both want--and need, the employement?
In 30+ years of full and part-time employment, I only played hookey once...and felt so guilty, I went and did some overtime on a Saturday. All the other times I have been absent was for very legitmate reasons.
Nancy, NY state, USA
Oh well, at least you'll get rid of the christmas weight and then pass it on to your grateful colleagues who wish to do the same.
Elizabeth, Sydney,
Is there actually any evidence for this? Quite apart from much lower pay in the public sector - nurses and midwives come to mind, which is well accounted for.
I do not deny that UK workers often prefer to go working rather than stay home. But blaming the public sector as if this were one homogeneous group without actually quoting any evidence at all is disingenuous to say the least.
Longest working hours in Europe and among the lowest in productivity - perhaps a wee bit of sick leave does wonders for the amount of work you actually do. Signing the social charter of the EU would be a step in the right direction, but oh no, the Evil Empire cannot possibly be right about something.
Fred Caprivi, Manchester,
The best cure for a stomach bug is self-employment.
Frank Upton, Solihull,
The NHS may help you have that chip on your shoulder removed. A lot of public sector workers never have time off either and some private sector workers have their statutory two weeks. It's not fair to generalise and absenteeism figures are dropping in the public sector.
Judy , Liverpool, england
Yet another diatribe against the public sector. Is there anything that privatisation can't cure?
Des, Dublin,
"In the public sector, where absenteeism is endemic, there is an an implicit understanding that one is entitled to at least two weeks off every winter, regardless of any actual illness. Local authority flu, itâs commonly called."
What a load of rot!!
The vast majority of us come to work. It's just a few bad, free-loading apples that spoil it for the rest of us. The trouble is they're almost impossible to remove from employment.
Graham, Leeds, England
I hope I'm not alone in finding this grossly offensive.
Maybe the author- who certainly does not have to attend a miserable job for long hours day in, day out- thinks it's a good thing to encourage us to ignore our own most overriding interest: our health. Maybe readers of the Times are happy to spread infections around without the slightest sense of resonsibility. But that does not make such recklessness any less stupid, antisocial or dangerous.
Something is seriously wrong with an attitude that making money is more important than protecting ones life.
Sean, London, UK
'Novovirus'? Do you mean 'norovirus'?
Never mind about viruses, you'd be better starting off with a decent spell-checker.
Harold Halloway, Hessle, UK
It may have escaped your notice that the purpose of the advice to stay away is to avoid passing on this unpleasant bug to the rest of the workforce.
Melanie Reid may believe she is doing her bit for national productivity but anyone following her exhortation is likely to achieve the opposite.
John, Lisbon,
Only in paragraph seven did the sexism appear - 'Give me, cries the exasperated executive â and who can blame HER?'
Come on Melanie - you can do better than that. Paragraph 3 at the latest if you are following the Times style guide.
Peter, Sittingbourne,
The most sensible answer to this problem would be to apply rules which meant there was some financial penalty to taking sick leave. That is commonly the case in the private sector (certainly in smaller firms); in the public sector employees generally do not lose any pay whatsever even when taking substatnial amounts of sick leave. Even if only a limited propertion of pay was docked for taking time off, I am sure there would be a significant reduction in sick leave. I am, by the way, self employed, and like most others in that position get paid nothing if ill.
Peter Wilson, Bridgnorth, England
A mildly amusing article which, if written by a man, would not have included a pointless and silly comment about the tendency for women to act like hypocondriacs. During my working life it has always been women who've had to be carried by the rest of the staff. What was the point?
Marion Morrison, Cheltenham,
What amazing comments......one person complains about the author swiping at men by doing the same to women (and I must have missed the original swipe), one person is total ignorant of the irony in the article and yet another seems to think that people bunking off work is a criminal matter rather than one of recruitment.
Why on earth do people get so wound up by articles written for the general public and make themselves looks silly by quoting personal experiences. By doing that you are being as general as the author!
J. Wilkes, Gloucester,
When I was a student I often took holiday work at a city hospital, in admin or reception. Several members of staff spoke quite blatantly, about their plans to 'take a sickie' the following week. When challenged on the appropriateness of this, they would indignantly reel off the names of several colleagues who had taken long periods off work due to illness, so it was 'only fair' that they all had the same benefits. The cases quoted included a woman recovering from chemotherapy and someone who had depression following the death of her baby. I never heard medical staff talk in that way, nor the senior managers, but a whole lot of people on whom the infrastructure rests - cleaners, supplies clerks, postmen etc. - felt it was their right. NOT the majority - but enough to make everyone else's lives difficult not to mention its subtle long-term effect on patients.
Clare, Nottingham,
I recruit for a private firm in the public sector - its very hard to get anything done half the time because the HR staff and hiring managers seem to take it in turns to be off ill!
To the angry PS staff offended by statements like this - you are martyrs to the cause and sadly in a minority!
ITRecruiter, Coventry,
My husband worked at THE PORT OF LIVERPOOL for THIRTY EIGHT years, becoming Managing Director, and then Chairman, and in all time he had FOUR DAYS off work due to illness.
Rosemary Fitzpatrick, RUTHIN, DENBIGHSHIRE
What rubbish. When I was a school secretary I never had time off. Yes, I did go into the job because I needed school holidays having no help with child care at all. The one occasion I stayed away (genuine, loose a stone, can't think straight or stand up, flu), the head came round and put work through my letter box!!!
Sarah Finham, RUGBY,
I worked in the public sector for 38yrs and never had one day off that I was not fully entitled to. In fact I gave up leave many times in order to respond to work demands. Get your facts right!
Colin, Sarlat, France
Skiving off might sound like a bit of a laugh, but it is actually theft.
Employers have a duty to treat staff well and to understand when a person is genuinely ill but when a person is caught stealing (that's what they're doing when they "throw a sickie") it should be treated more seriously, perhaps even as a criminal offence
Mike, London,
Apart from the usual obligatory swipes at men in this piece you do make one interesting omission. The overwhelming proportion of public sector malingererers are of the female persuasion.
In my town hall the women monitor each other's sick days closely and there is hell to pay if one is seen to be taking more than the three or four days a month minimum.
B Grant, Edinburgh,
Articles like this make me so angry. If medical advice is to stay at home until 48 hours after the disappearance of symptoms, there is a good reason for it - namely, to stop the spread of infection. Why can't people just listen and take note? There's nothing clever or heroic about insisting on going out and infecting other people: we are now in a situation where hospital wards have been closed because of this outbreak. And Norovirus is not particularly trivial - see how you feel when you go down with it! Four or five days of sickness and diarrhoea leaves most people feeling pretty low.
Helene, Strasbourg, France
I have worked in the public sector for over 14 years. I have never been aware that " ...there is an implicit understanding that one is entitled to at least two weeks off every winter, regardless of any actual illness. " I wish you would stop talking such uninformed rubbish. I know many colleagues in the public sector who work very hard and take very few days off sick. In the last copule of years I have only had three days off sick and my example is not untypical.
And bonuses? You just don't have clue do you?
AMIT SEN, Epsom, Surrey, U. K.
A fun read, although the symptoms that you describe in the first paragraph are also associated with hangovers...
Neel, London,