Michael Gove
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
If Norman St John Stevas can count as a royal expert because he once wrote a foreword to a book on the constitution, and if James Whitaker can be deployed as the final arbiter on all matters constitutional because he used to write about Princess Margaret’s holidays for the Mirror, then I should like to lay claim to a slice of the action in the great Kate Middleton media-fest by outing myself as an authority on the class system.
My qualifications? Well, actually it’s vulgar to ask personal questions like that — as you would know if you’d been properly brought up. But, since you ask, I used to work for Tatler, the magazine known as Britain’s society bible. Since then I have been interviewed for Channel 4’sToff at the Top — and yes, I put in a pretty abject performance, but that’s not the point here — so on the basis of having discussed Etonians on telly once and worked for a glossy mag, I think my credentials as an expert on social class are as flawless as Sarah Montague’s cut-glass accent. In any case, they are no worse than those of other commentators who have piled in to the Great Debate precipitated by William’s ditching of Kate, at the heart of which is the cruelly simple question: was she just too middle class?
Over the past few days there has been a torrent of revelations designed to show up Kate and, in particular, her mother (never mum under any circs, just possibly mummy in conversation) Carole (ooh, the vulgar obtrusiveness of that final e!) as simply too bourgeois for the royals. Mrs Middleton is in trade (she runs a mail-order firm!), she used to work for an airline (which caused William’s friends to herald Kate’s arrival with cries of “doors to manual”), she chews gum (the hussy!) and, worst of all, she refers to the lavatory as the toilet.
The shock induced by the last of these revelations is, I have to say, in its own way revealing to those of us with close and detailed knowledge of the nuances of the British class system. Ever since Nancy Mitford produced her classic vial of pure, triple-distilled snobbery in book form, Noblesse Oblige, in which she outlined those dreadful phrases (toilet, mirror, perfume) that mark their user as irredeemably common (non-U), the certainty with which she pronounced has been progressively undermined. I remember at Tatler the great care with which one editor chose her words to ensure that not a single non-U phrase passed her lips, in the hope that no one could discern her distinctly middle-class Metro-land origins. But the very care with which she chose her words, her clothes, even her holiday destinations, betrayed someone who was picking her way through a social minefield with just too much circumspection. Her studied immersion in all the little rituals of snobbery, which she thought signified a confident grasp of what was required by her status, only undermined the impression of ease and confidence that she sought. It wasn’t long before, partly in reaction to her preciousness about these things, junior staff at the magazine started referring to loos as toilets, napkins as serviettes and jams as preserves. The poor woman was in the unfortunate position of a sailor who has mas- tered the art of rigging a topsail just as the first steamship is glimpsed on the horizon — her skills were hard-won, her mastery of them impressive but she was simply outpaced by changes that she didn’t quite grasp.
What she failed most of all to grasp, however, and what so many commentators in the wake of the Great Kate Break-Up have failed to grasp, is that those with the most class mind least. It is, in short, rather vulgar to notice someone’s class background, let alone to refer to it or to judge someone on that basis. Now there is a subtlety here (or what passes for a subtlety in the frenzied world of snob-commentary), in that the original anathema pronounced on toilet (or acts such as the use of fish-knives) was a way of stigmatising the act of trying too hard for a certain mimsy gentility. To be too decorous or euphemistic was to be that fretful, frightful thing, a bourgeois, and therefore of less distinction than a couldn’t-give-a-toss, call-a-spade-a-spade aristo.
Actually, even to remark on the language that someone is using, to take the trouble to worry about whether their mum was an air hostess or a hot heiress, is to take yourself down the social scale several notches. All those commentators trying to pigeonhole Kate’s mother are saying far more about themselves, far more damningly, than anything they reveal about this admirable, entrepreneurial and really incredibly good-looking-for-her-age Berkshire mother.
As for Kate herself, she obviously has tremendous poise, natural beauty and a loving family. Having been through the fire of media pressure she has retained her cool in a way that proves she is a class act.
But what sort of woman would now willingly expose herself and her family to the level of scrutiny that Kate has endured? And what does that mean for the type of person likely to make a beeline for the newly single Prince William? Each man, Oscar Wilde wrote, kills the thing he loves. What are the media doing to our monarchy?
Brothers and sisters, I’m off
I have been a member of a trade union for nearly 20 years now. The union to which I belong, the National Union of Journalists, kept me fed and watered when I was a young trainee and out on strike. I was grateful for the support and camaraderie of its members and appreciated the virtues of solidarity. As time has worn on I’ve kept faith with the union because it kept me going at a difficult time.
With the benefit of hindsight I realise that the strike for which I came out in support was mishandled. Better men and women than I, with much more to lose, lost it in a vain struggle. Yet they made those sacrifices in defence of a principle in which they believed, and they thought that their actions would protect younger journalists like me most. So it would have been more than churlish to fail to respect their sacrifice.
But now, reluctantly, I fear that I will have to part company with the union, even as I continue to respect the men and women who went out on strike, in its name, in Aberdeen nearly two decades ago. Because the NUJ recently passed a motion at its conference calling for a boycott.
This boycott is not of a repressive state that outlaws free expression (of which, sadly, there are still too many) but of one of the few states in the Middle East with a proper free press: Israel.
The NUJ exists to defend, among other virtues, freedom of speech. That virtue is better defended in Israel than in any other nation of the Middle East and it comes under assault daily from forces driven by fanaticism.
Now is a time, for all sorts of reasons, for showing solidarity with those defending democracy in that region, not for passing on the other side of the road. So, with no little sadness, I feel that I have to leave.
Michael Gove is Conservative MP for Surrey Heath. He worked on The Times from 1995-2005. He makes regular appearances on BBC Radio 4's The Moral Maze and The Late Review on BBC2, and has written a biography of Michael Portillo
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
it's not so much that the nuj has chosen the wrong target for its boycott (or perhaps wrongly chosen it as the only targetl), but rather the fact that it considers such resolutions to be any business of a union.
there are so many examples of injustice in the world against which people should take a stand and about which voices should be raised. but the political use of an organisation which ought to be concerned for the welfare of its members seems ridiculous. although only marginally less useful than the un.
if journalists want to do something worthwhile, perhaps they could concentrate on putting, say, the atrocities in darfur on the front pages instead of the (rather delightful) miss middleton?
jem, london, uk
Mirror -a very useful verb!
A. N. Lowes, Tauanga, New Zealand
Athena you talk of Zionist brutality by which i presume you mean Israeli military response to acts of terrorism including the use of homicide bombers who target civilians in buses restaurants and shopping malls etc. Approximately 2000 Israelis have been murdered since the start of the 'Intifada'. Pro rata if this figure was applied to the United Kingdom it would represent 20,000 dead civilians in an area liitle more then Greater London. Perhaps you would care to ponder for a moment our governments response had such numbers been achieved by the IRA.
Why do you single out Israel to be without the right to respond to such heinous acts of barbarism. You must by now be aware that there has been a lull in the spate of bombings and Israeli respose.Ican assure you Athena that it is not due to a sudden change in policy by the Palestinians but instead as a result of the defence wall elimination of the terrorist infrastructure and sadly for the Palestinians restriction of their day to day lives
harvey garfield, london, united kingdom
Dear Mr Gove, can you please tell your friend Peter Hitchens that "It is, in short, rather vulgar to notice someones class background, let alone to refer to it or to judge someone on that basis." and "Actually, even to remark on the language that someone is using ... is to take yourself down the social scale several notches." But maybe you're right: "those with the most class mind least."
Maybe some toffs get to the top because they belong there.
Philipa, Middle, England
To Athena Murphy:
Since you are so convinced that Israel is the only violator of UN resolutions, what about teh fact that Israel was declared by the UN in 1947, but when the State was declared the Arab states did not accept the resolution? And since we are at it, at what time in history has a Palestinian entity existed? Even Syria regards these territories as Southern Syria. But irrespective of the fact that there has never been a Palestinian entity as such, and that Jerusalem has never been an administration center in all Muslim history in the Middle East, I do think that there should be a Palestinian State alongside Israel, and that this state should abide by various agreements, for example by abolishing terrorism.
Israel is the only country in the Middle East with real fredom of speech. A boycott on this country by a journalist Union of all Unions is more than ridiculous, it's an insult to common sense.
sensei2004
Farid Morgan, Kamigori/Hyogo, Japan
Michael, you are a man of principle and I applaud your decision.
I am not familiar with all the NUJ resolutions and am wondering if they boycott all things British? After all, Britain has not been the nicest guys on the block and have done their fair share of killing and maiming people around the world.
Steve, Toronto, Canada
Why any true aristo calls a spade a toilet - this reminds me of an incident when I was very young (now being in my mid-sixties).
I had been invited out by one of H.M's horseguards with some of his pals and their girlfriends. This was supposed to be a great honoout he was doing me as I was but a mere bourjoise! During the course of the evening conversation, I recollect talking about some food that "had gone off" - there was a deadly silence and all seven pairs of eyes looked at me in wonder, when my escort suddenly said "Off, off, oh you mean orrrfff". I politely corrected him in my naiivity and said" whichever way it was pronounced by them, in my world off was pronounced off and I didn't think there was an r in that word".
I was never invited out by him again - I wonder why?
Jeanine Leon Soon, Wembley, Middlesex
"General Assembly resolutions (passed by a huge Islamic/Soviet majority) are non-binding, there is no such thing as a Palestiniah nationality (as seen by no state ever being in existence when Arabs controlled the land) and the inhabitants of Gaza/West Bank have received billions in aid. They choose to throw it away on fighting Israel and more recently each other.
educating athena murphy, London, uk"
Typical propaganda. Of course UN resolutions are binding. Duh! You can't pick and choose which ones you abide by, however much Israel would like to think they are above world opinion. The resolutions are not passed by a 'huge Islamic/Soviety majority' either!
The rubbish you spout about Palestine is typical guff as well. Of course they are recognised, (as much as you would wish that they weren't). And they have a LEGAL right of return under that minor thing called international law. Sorry.
Get your head out of those books full of myths, they are filling your head with nonsense.
The well educated Athena Murphy, London, UK
Perhaps members of the NUJ should read Israeli newspapers. If they did, they would find a wide breadth of political points of view, healthy critsism of government policies and an openess unseen in other parts of the Middle East. Are they aware that women, Israelis of all faiths including Islam, and gays have freedom of speech, religion and political representation? Apparently not. I applaud Mr. Gove for taking a stand that must be painful.
Lisa Y., Houston, Texas, USA
Athena Murphy and Marco just don't get it: by singling out Israel for unique criticism that is not directed against countries with far worse human rights records, the NUJ is guilty of international bigotry. Israel is, in fact, a flourishing multiethnic democracy that affords all its citizens - Jews, Muslims, and Christians - far better lives and opportunities than those afforded by any Arab or Muslim nation. Shame on the NUJ for jumping on the band wagon of boycott, condemnation, and demonisation of the Jewish State. Mr Gove understands the issues and has acted according to his conscience. He does not need to give anybody any explanation.
Lesley Klaff, Sheffield, England
I must have missed the NUJ's boycott of all the arab countries who forbid freedom of speech, any kind of liberation for women and toleration of other religions. What about arab countries helping the Palestinians? Why is no Palestinian allowed citizenship of any other arab country even if he/she marries one of their nationals. How hypocritical can he NUJ be?
leila, london, uk
"When a country consistently violates international law, ignores countless UN resolutions and continues to treat an entire people as dirt on the bottom of their shoes (the Palestinians are without doubt one of the most subjugated people on the planet),"
General Assembly resolutions (passed by a huge Islamic/Soviet majority) are non-binding, there is no such thing as a Palestiniah nationality (as seen by no state ever being in existence when Arabs controlled the land) and the inhabitants of Gaza/West Bank have received billions in aid. They choose to throw it away on fighting Israel and more recently each other.
educating athena murphy, London, uk
This is my second attempt to make this point. My last attempt, for some reason, was not posted. ....
Athena Murphy and Marco are missing the point: the NUJ's singling out of Israel for unique criticism that is not directed against other countries with far worse human rights records amounts to international bigotry. Mr. Gove understands this and has acted accordingly. He does not need to give any explanation.
Lesley Klaff, Sheffield, England
I applaud Michael Gove's stand. He may be a voice in the wildernesss, but he is one of the more sensible journalists commenting on the Middle East.
Tired old anti-Zionist rhetoric shows the ignorance of many. Palestine as a country does not exist. The people in the territories have been down-trodden for many years it is true, but it has a lot more to do with their own belief system (i.e. destroy Israel, bomb and maim) and in-fighting than anything else. To equate Israel with apartheid is a nonsense. It is usually people who have never been there who shout the loudest.
The same people who are anti-Israel are making life difficult for Jews in this country - would these people like to say where is the fairness in that. Hypocrites.
Genie, Leeds,
Israel should strictly abide by the boycott by:
Not permitting any members of NUJ to enter the State. This will ensure that all NUJ members abide by the boycott and no member of NUJ inadvertently spends any money in the state.
Confiscating all cell phones, laptops, GPS units, medicines and other technologies or products developed or sold by Israel from all British journalists that enter the State. This will assist the NUJ in enforcing the boycott.
Stuart, Morgan Hill, California
Well done Michael! I decided against re-joining the NUJ when I came back to Britain from abroad in 2001 because a Google search showed a disproportionate tendency by this little organisation to push to the front of various anti-Israel activities. At the time - before the safety secured by the so-called Separation Barrier - Jews were being blown apart on the streets of Israel with tragic regularity. Despite polite pressure from my journalistic colleagues I declined the opportunity to finance those who would morally and politically support Jew killers. And I can't accept the argument that one has to be in the union in order to fight against its radical agenda. NUJ members are part of society and can be approached by anyone with a reasonable argument, whether a fellow member or not. The NUJ vote is an example of how much time and money is wasted by the union movement in pursuing left-wing causes in the hope of radicalising their members.
Calev, London,
I want to commend Mr. Gove on his decision to leave the NUJ in protest of its boycott of Israel. First it was the AUT, then NATFHE, and now the NUJ. What have these unions got against this beleaguered country? It's a good thing that there are people like Mr. Gove who are prepared, as a matter of principle, to take a stand.
Lesley Klaff, Shheffield, England
in the old days (so i like to imagine, at least) a free press mattered in the sense that it allowed citizens to know what was going on and subsequently to put pressure on their respective government to act to some extent with regard to and for the will of their people. These days, with people being apathists (sic - I overheard the word from a native German and like it ) and generally thinking of money, status, celebrity "news" etc. etc. above other (moral) concerns, governments have more 'freedom' to do as they wish (generally filling their pockets and inflating their egos at the cost of humanity) and can be (quite) open about this. It is no coincidence that with the decline of civil society, a politician is no more likely to be kept in rein of morality by 'his' society than a miscreant on the street reprimanded by a fellow citizen!
Marco, bhm, uk
To Malcolm McLean, Bradford, UK:
If "pardon" is an implicit criticism of those who say "eh", then I'm afraid "eh" is an implicit criticism of those who have developed the faculty of speech, in differentiation to animals who merely push air through their voice box, emitting a noise.
Marco, bhm, uk
'so' long as it cuts
Ismael Klata, Edinburgh,
Excellent, Athena Murphy, excellent! I'm not sure what thought process (even this is an assumption) Mr Gove had in his decision - from my perspective, it seems as if, incomprehensibly, he has decided that freedom of the press is the one value in this world to be fought for, at the cost of any other value - such as human life, human rights, etc. etc. etc. If you feel this is the place, Mr Gove, and I think it is an entirely suitable place, an explanation would be appreciated.
Marco, bhm, uk
Finally, a journalist with some integrity. Congratulations on leaving the NUJ for the reasons you did.
LB, London,
Well, regarding Sarah Montague - of all people - as "cut-glass" tells us just about all we need to know about Mr Gove's points of reference.... back to the trawlers and the orphanage, Michael!
Ben , London,
When a country consistently violates international law, ignores countless UN resolutions and continues to treat an entire people as dirt on the bottom of their shoes (the Palestinians are without doubt one of the most subjugated people on the planet), and when that country is fully supported economically and militarily by the world's superpower, it is up to ordinary people across the world to try to take any small steps possible to show that this is unacceptable. I applaud the NUJ on the passing of this motion and urge others groups and organisations of conscience to follow suit.
The world fought apartheid South Africa and now the world must fight Zionist brutality.
Athena Murphy, London, UK
I"m reminded of Charles Laughton's Henry VIII complaining that "Manners are dead" while tossing a half-eaten chicken over his shoulder.
Ian Kemmish, Biggleswade, UK
I was at the NUJ conference and the vote was passed by a very narrow majority.
Please do not throw out the baby with the bathwater - the NUJ is still an excellent union and it is a mark of our democracy that people can still put forward (and unfortunately win) motions like this.
Charlotte White, Chesterfield, UK
"Toilet" is OK here in Yorkshire, as is "mum". I make an exception for "pardon", since it is unnatural, affected, and an implicit criticism of those who say "eh". Oxford usage is "I'm sorry".
Malcolm McLean, Bradford, UK
It'd be silly to deny that the class system exists and that all of us (members of whatever social class) abide by some rules that differentiate us from others (i.e. fish knives).
This said, however, the fact that people criticise Kate's mum because she chews gum is embarrasing. On top of this, if real aristocrats such as William (or Prince Felipe of Spain, who married the divorced grand-daughter of a taxi driver), do not look down on their girlfriends, why should we do that?
Excellent article!
Enrique, Oxford,
As I was once told at school, education is knowing which knife and fork to use. Class is not giving a damn as long as it cuts.
Tom Holmes, London, UK