Mick Hume: Thunderer
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks
If you're an octogenarian Nazi war crimes suspect or Chilean dictator accused of atrocities, you can escape trial and jail in Britain by arguing you are too old and it was all a long time ago. But not if you are an 80-year-old Roman Catholic monk accused of touching some schoolboys more than 30 years ago.
William Manahan, former Abbot of Buckfast Abbey in Devon, has been jailed for 15 months after pleading guilty to eight charges of sexually assaulting boys at the Abbey prep school in the 1970s. He was said to have touched boys with “angelic faces” when they sat on his lap at the front of Latin class, and while he watched television with them or gave them piggy-backs. He also gave them sweets.
As a godless Marxist and a caring parent I hold no brief for the Catholic Church or any pervy priests. But the way this old man has been made an example of, imprisoned and branded “the Beast of Buckfast” decades later, for offences near the lowest point of the scale, suggests somebody is guilty of an unhealthy obsession with child abuse.
Monahan was caught by the new policing practice of trawling for victims of abuse. After an allegation of serious sexual abuse against another monk at the school — since jailed for ten years — the authorities sent out 700 questionnaires cold-calling former pupils about their experiences. Monahan's name was mentioned, and he ended up behind bars.
If the police have so much time on their hands, perhaps they will now ask all school pupils of the Seventies if any teacher ever touched them? The results could also give any underemployed judges and jailers something to do.
But who benefits from dredging up long-forgotten episodes for public display and titillation? The effect on the boys involved — now men in their forties — is questionable. The wider impact on society seems worse. The judge, John Neligan, said that he jailed Monahan because “the message must go out” to “those in a position of trust in schools” today that they face prison if they “prey sexually on the children in their care”. Leaving aside the issue of whether the courts should be used, showtrial style, to send “the message” to others, when that message raises the spectre of sexual predators in our schools it can only do harm.
The notion that our children may be menaced by groping teachers today is as far removed from reality as Buckfast Abbey. The real problem is that everybody is already so scared of allegations of abuse that almost no teacher, however well meaning, would dare to sit a child on his or her knee, let alone give them a piggy back. Such fear and mistrust of adults pose a far bigger risk to growing up in a civilised society.
Or do we want to lock 'em all up and throw away the key? The children, that is.

Mick Hume is Britain's only self-confessed libertarian Marxist newspaper columnist. His Notebook column appears on Fridays, and he also writes a weekly Thunderer column. He is also editor-at-large of spiked-online.com. which he launched as the online descendant of Living Marxism magazine. Hume is an ex-grammar school boy from Woking with a season ticket at Manchester United who lives in London
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Could it be so that monks who have been celibate for their whole life don't really know what's the difference between the real act of sexual abuse and innocent expressions of affection that children also need? Therefore, they don't know how to defend themselves against the accusations like this.
Mikko Jack, Helsinki, Finland
What we know about what the Abbot did is guaranteed to be a small part of the whole so to minimise it and talk about just touching or giving pickybacks is just ignorant of the nature of sexual abuse. Mick has no idea what impact the Abbot's behaviour had on his victims who may have had mental health problems ever since.Mick's attitude does condone the behaviour of a pervy priest even though he denies it. Sexually abusive adults destroy the lives of children and we must do all we can to stop it , we must never condone or turn a blind eye to it and we must always punish the perpetrators no matter how old they are. Priests who sexually abuse children are guilty of the most appalling abuse of their power and hypocrisy beyond belief. Mick Hume is wrong to suggest we should not punish such priests, his message is that we should tolerate the destruction of children's lives by predatory paedophiles dressed up in dog collars. He's gone down a long way in my estimation.
John Williams, Carmarthen, Wales
You can't say that Mick, don't you know that child abuse is everywhere and you're just making excuses for these perverts!!
Well, that seems to be the reaction from some of the comments so far. This obsession with child abuse is very unhealthy. Organizations all over the country are struggling to recruit volunteers because people are afraid of being accused of child abuse. It seems to me that any male below 16 is a victim and any male over 16 is a suspect child abuser. It still remains a fact that most child abuse happens within families and we don't really need messages being sent out by the courts. Courts are there to administer justice.
Fran M, Stockport, UK
What a bizarre article - thoroughly wrong headed, like an excuse for abusing children. Who benefits from prosecuting an elderly Abbott for sexual abuse he carried out long ago? Why, all children who have been scorned and disbelieved, all schools, all those who have been abused by adults who have taunted them with "nobody will ever believe you". So what experience does Nick Hume have, to qualify him for writing such an article? He's a caring parent. Right. Maybe he needs to do a bit of real journalism, interviewing the professionals who investigate these cases. As opposed to dashing off a few thousand words from the comfort of his armchair.
Jon, London, UK
We have a child in the news of the day in America that is repremanded for 'hugging' another child. Sheesh! A hug? A Hug? Please! We have gone too far.
judy corbin smith, portland, maine USA
"Kevin, London" misses Mike Hume's central argument. Sex sells newspapers, fills air time and frightens politicians. The late Dr Anthony Storr, psychiatrist and writer, stated that he never found that molestation was the primary cause of trauma; the damage came from the shame and rejection engendered by concerned adults. Action taken on behalf of a traumatised child within reasonable time scale is very different from such global trawling. Organisations for children are falling apart for lack of supervisors, choir training requires "chaperones", many choirs etc. are folding or have folded, with no taint of molestation, merely the loss of men willing to be accused. Though many children die in house fires, no smoke detectors are needed by UK law. This shows what we really think of child welfare. Yes, sex is profitable for media folk and frightens politicians into over-reaction. That, alongside fat compensation payouts, is what drives this obsessional, prurient farago.
Paul H. , Norwich, UK
What exactly uour suggestion? Let adults touch children intimatl? refuse to punish those that sexually abuse children? Decriminilize the sexual touching of children so long as the adult can ensure that the child is kept silent for a certain number of years? Your whole arguement seems to be that it is wrong to punish people who sexually abuse children because it makes the abuser look bad? Do you think that this man should have gone free if he was convicted of sexually abusing children, vunerable children?
Kevin, london, uk