Mick Hume
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
Prince Harry may have been fighting for real in Afghanistan, but the furore over the media pact of silence has been a phoney war of words with both sides firing blanks.
On one side, the Prince's more bombastic champions have offered no decent defence of the deal. Prince Harry's mission was a shoot-now- broadcast-later PR operation, not a military necessity. Shipping him into the desert for a “secret” photo opportunity is rather different from the secret D-Day invasion. There are surely already too many restrictions on freedom of expression in the UK without volunteering for more.
On the other side, the claim by the shriller critics that this is the thin edge of an Orwellian wedge has missed the target. The exceptional pact surprised many, precisely because it goes against the grain today. Indeed, in our tell-all age of daily leaks, 24-hour multimedia and public cynicism, the wonder is that such a deal lasted longer than ten minutes, never mind ten weeks.
Perhaps most importantly, the Harry carry-on should not be the big story claimed by all sides. While a phoney war rages over these images, there is little serious debate about the real war in Afghanistan. It's not just Prince Harry whose role should be under scrutiny. What good are the other British troops doing there?
Since the US-UK invasion of 2001, the Government's rationale for the war has shifted from pursuing al-Qaeda to stopping the drugs trade or defending Afghanistan's alleged democracy. The Afghan intervention symbolises the lack of clear purpose behind the War on Terror. Those pictures of Prince Harry firing his machinegun into the desert at unseen targets brought to mind Joseph Conrad's description, in Heart of Darkness, of watching a French warship blindly “firing into a Continent” off the African coast.
If the Government's main aim in Afghanistan really is to protect the Prince and his fellow troops, an obvious response might be: then why send him (or them) to war in somebody else's country in the first place? There are other issues that deserve some more serious attention.
Fighting for free speech and defending a free press should be an everyday cause in our illiberal, conformist culture, not reduced to striking radical poses over some one-off images of HRH in a helmet. The role of the monarchy in modern society also requires more serious criticism than petty sniping about what a prince gets up to either in a nightclub or an army tent.
Some of my fellow republicans argue that the Harry carry-on shows that the Prince should never have been allowed to serve in the Army. But the interviews confirm that he is a born soldier. The real problem is that he is also the born third in line to be head of state in supposedly a 21st-century democracy.

Mick Hume is Britain's only self-confessed libertarian Marxist newspaper columnist. His Notebook column appears on Fridays, and he also writes a weekly Thunderer column. He is also editor-at-large of spiked-online.com. which he launched as the online descendant of Living Marxism magazine. Hume is an ex-grammar school boy from Woking with a season ticket at Manchester United who lives in London
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Wow, from the responses, I'm suddenly curious: did anyone here actually read the main article, or are you all just interested in mindlessly spouting your own lame opinion about vaguely-related subjects?
Eugene, Pittsburgh, PA
Presumably Afghanistan is somewhat less contentious than Iraq. But if you guys are getting off on Rambo III, wait until you see Rambo IV. "Burma's a war zone." Not at the Strand Hotel in downtown Yangon (Rangoon), where standard rooms will set you back some $300 a night. Looking to Rambo for political insight surely indicates you are facing a steep learning curve on the path to maturity and enlightenment.
Andrew Milner, Yokohama, Japan
We here much about fightig the Taliban, but how much of the problem is Troops of the variuos warlords protecting their poppy crops. An organisation as the Taliban, if organisation exists, has no avalable rolls, no recognised uniform, how do we know who we are fighting. To fully pacify even one province requires enough boots on the ground, which we have never had.
We need to be told the achievable objectives.
KW, Bognor Regis, England
In Regards to Ms. Lyndon's comment on the lack of upper crust and congressional son's support of the war. There are eight Congressmen today with children in Iraq, just over twenty children of Congressmen with terms spanning this war have served. The Son of Senator McCain has had two tours as a Marine Platoon Commander in Iraq. You are correct however, in stressing the importance of sending a royal to war. This was indeed a bold and deeply meaingful act.
Now, Mr. Hume. There is a marked difference between Conrad's description of blind fire, and the rules of engagement used today in Iraq/Afghanistan. In the media flooded world we live in today, one cannot afford to Fire blindly into a continent.
Alex, Toronto, Ontario
If the Taliban knew the Prince was in a Afghanistan, they would try everything to kill or capture him, putting the lives of British Soldiers at risk needlessly. Is getting your own citizens killed needlessly so you can sell some more papers worth it? With freedom of speech comes great responsibility. Just how was withholding this story a threat to free speech? The only request was to delay the story not bury it and the request was reasonable as people could become targets because of it. Some of the press showed great restraint and maturity in dealing with this story, it is sad that a soldier had to leave his comrades behind during a war because someone wanted to sell a few more papers.
Colin, Vancouver, Canada
i have also wondered before about mr chapman's suggestion but can western govt's really afford to buy ALL the Afghan opium crop? Correct me if i'm wrong but doesn't majority of the world's opium come from afghanistan, and since the heroin trade is a multi-billion dollar industry, that's a huge outlay..
p willis, london,
Why there at all? Mr Hume, I'm sure you consider yourself an intelligent and creative sort. I'm sure you can think of some possible reasons, even if you don't agree with them.
i.e., Norwich, England
One of the main reasons Afghans support the Taliban is economic. The Taliban provide a market for the opium poppies which is the only profitable crop . Western allies destroying a profiatable crop are never going to win friends. The solution is very simple. There is a shortage of opiates for medicinal use in the West. Simply pay a fair market rate to the Afghans for their crop and the taliban will lose their hold. If contracts were made for quantities to nbe delivered according to known yield per acre with a bonus paid for production in excess of this, the farmers would have an incentive to deliver all their crop to thw West. This would surely be more economically effective than waging war, not to mention the side effects of releasing troops from the field and reducing the supply of illegal drugs to the West.
Why does noone take this simple pragmatic view? It would work to the benfit of everyone - the basis of any good agreement.
c chapman, corridonia, italy
Good point Tedward -
Rambo 3 should definitely have been used by Tony Blair before invading Afghanistan (!!). I hear the Rambo films are renound for their realism and political accuracy.
T Jeanes, London,
I'm a Canadian steeped in confusion about the war, but I think you republican writer has missed the convoy here. In the United States, few, if any of the fighters in Iraq or Afghanistan come from the families of senators, congressmen or governors. I have heard no news stories of any active US military personnel named Bush. President Bush himself avoided overseas duty in Vietneam by avoiding duty in the National Guard. Ah, but don't they all support the troops.
Bravo Britain -- you sent your third in line to the throne. Monarchies are closer to the heart. Here is an example of why.
Susan Lyndon, Toronto, Ontario
I was watching Rambo 3 tonight and was struck by the nature of some of the dialog of the film. The way the Taliban were portraid as freedom fighters who would rather die than be ruled by a outside force. The little guy the Americans go to help. Perhaps Tony Blair should have watched this film before sending our troops out to die in this hellhole of a country. The Taliban attack and then sneak back across the border into Pakistan. The people in the border of this region are the Taliban. The west knows this but can't do anything to rock the political boat. The idea of creating political change in the region is quite the most stupid idea I have ever heard. The country has never had, and will never have a western style of government. When we finally leave this devastated country, the warlords and the Taliban will just carry on as usual growing poppies and selling to the west. We of course will insist that we won the battles, but we will have lost the war.
Tedward, Gosport, England