Minette Marrin
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
It is hard not to feel a desperate anger at last week’s news. Nine British Muslims have been arrested on suspicion of plotting to behead a British Muslim soldier, as a traitor to Islam, and to show a videotape of the act on the net to terrify us.
In the same week Policy Exchange, the think tank, has published a poll-based study that shows young British-born Muslims are far more alienated from mainstream society than their parents. Of British Muslims aged 16-24, 37% would prefer to live under sharia in Britain, 37% would like to send their children to Islamic state schools and — most incredibly — 36% think Muslims converting to another religion should be punished by death. Young British Muslims who say they “admire organisations like Al-Qaeda, which are prepared to fight the West” amount to 13%. For British Muslims aged over 55, the figures are much lower, at 17%, 19%, 19% and 3% respectively.
The usual immigrant experience of gradual integration has failed for more than a third of Muslims. All the exhaustive and intrusive efforts of the race relations industry have been counter-productive.
The Policy Exchange report argues that this alienation is largely due to more than 20 years of official multiculturalism. This benighted orthodoxy has emphasised differences and divisions and promoted a sense of grievance that is sometimes almost paranoid. This amounts to full-blown victimhood, whipped up not just by Muslim spokesmen but also by nonMuslim journalists and commentators and human rights activists in the victim industry, who complain, in defiance of the evidence, of growing Islamophobic attacks and persistent police harassment; they make comparisons with Nazi Germany. The mayor of London, no less, called at a recent conference for an end to the “media’s orgy of Islamophobia”.
These inflammatory accusations persist. For example, the supposedly moderate Dr Mohammad Naseem, a champion of interfaith dialogue, an honorary doctor of Birmingham University and chairman of Birmingham Central Mosque, said last Thursday that he believed the government was “pursuing a policy of maintaining a perception of a [terrorist] threat to justify the draconian antiterror laws they have been passing”. It had, he said, embarked on “a campaign to strike terror into the hearts of the Muslim people”, and he compared Blair’s Britain with Nazi Germany and the Stalinist Soviet Union. He is encouraging people to disbelieve the police’s assurances last week that they are “not targeting faith communities but suspected criminals”. This is paranoia gone mainstream.
If this is what comes from a man supposed to be the voice of Islamic moderation, what can one feel but rage? However, unaccustomed though I am to looking on the bright side, I suppose I should try. There are some encouraging signs. This alleged plot to behead a British soldier was uncovered with the help of a brave Muslim soldier who allowed himself to be used as bait to draw out the suspected kidnappers. That was courage and patriotism well beyond the call of duty. We ought to be grateful, too, to the Muslim informants who give police and secret services invaluable information; a source told me last week that there is no lack of volunteers despite the intimidation.
The findings of the Policy Exchange report are not all negative. Despite the sense of victimhood that some Muslims feel and others try to excite, 84% said that on the whole they felt they had been treated fairly in this society, regardless of their beliefs. Even more strikingly, more Muslims (37%) than people in the general population (29%) feel that “one of the benefits of modern society is to criticise other people’s religious or political views, even when it causes offence”.
All the same, there remains a terrifying minority of disaffected young Muslims. What, if anything, can be done that isn’t already being done?
My counterterrorist wish list goes as follows. Silence all imams who break the law in their preaching with incitements to violence (the government’s record has been abysmal). Monitor all mosques; refuse visas to foreign imams who speak poor or no English (the government lost its nerve over this, as over so much). Control and monitor imams visiting prisons (the Prison Service is so shambolic that it is impossible to know whether all its 130 or so visiting imams have been security vetted). Segregate Islamist prisoners in jail (this is done in the best prisons but is out of control in the rest). Isolate radical Islamist prisoners (this is against the Human Rights Act). Stop them having internet access (not all prisons do).
More widely, recognise that the problem now lies with “self-radicalisation” in suburban front rooms. Stop the creation of religious schools (Blair sold the pass on this). Monitor madrasah schools. Restrain the practice of importing brides and bridegrooms in arranged marriages from the Third World (this is well known to inhibit integration, but the government abolished the “primary purpose” rules preventing such marriages, presumably for electoral advantage); this could be done by following the Danish example of strict entry requirements and a minimum age of 24, which enables young people to choose more freely. Spend much more money monitoring young dual-passport Britons’ trips to Pakistan and deport them for attending training camps (these routes are watched but it is expensive and the Pakistani government is unable to help).
Teach schoolchildren the facts about conditions in Muslim countries (as opposed to right-on grievances about the “black hole of Calcutta”). Teach them what happens in jails in Muslim states, compared with what has happened in Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo Bay. Teach schoolchildren and young adults what sharia involves; stop listening to the so-called representative bodies of British Muslims, not least the Muslim Council of Britain. Require the government to reveal the names and CVs of its advisers on Islamic affairs. Censor the violent Islamist recruitment sites on the internet, including the insidious hip-hop and rap sites. America and even China manage it for different reasons.
But all this is too little, too late. How can one not feel a furious, frustrated rage at the betrayal of our civilisation and our safety?
Minette Marrin is a journalist, broadcaster and fiction writer. She is a columnist for The Sunday Times, and has also written for The Sunday and Daily Telegraphs and The Spectator and The Asian Wall Street Journal. She regularly contributes to television and radio programmes
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Please save our Western/judeo chritian civilization from this cancer of intolerance brought to it by the islamic "religion".
Conway, Gerberoy, France
Absolutely true. Minette you are a true spokesperson for the average UK citizen & I hope this rightly causes a debate. I am a resident in the UAE, where I am subject to their tolerant Islamic state laws. The difference here is that we don't want to convert it to a christian/jewish state and because of that respect the wishes of my co-habitants, regardless of their religion. If I don't like it, I will leave - the same should apply to residents in the UK. Why should the UK change it's culture to suit it's guests?
Paul Clarke, Dubai, UAE
Marion's column is nothing we have not seen or read before. Its honest, reflective and full of options based on sense and sensility. Unfortunately the labour government simply is not interested in listening to grounded natives like Marion. Elementry solution vote in a new government at the next oppurtunity, the problem with that is there does not seem to be many decent alternatives. This is about morale courage, nothing else. Britain is not at all racist, it is however growing increasingly concerned and it should be. Islam does not play well with other cultures. Unfortunate but true. Just turn on the TV, all the irrebutable corroborative evidence is there.
ben, london, UK
Thank you Ms. Marrin, for so aptly giving vent to my own frustrations...several thousand miles from London - although I have a daughter and grand children who live in London. I was shocked when I went to pick up my grand daughter...the lady behind the counter had to ask a totally veiled lady to speak again so she 'could tell by her voice' who she was picking up! Could have been a male with a tape recorder. What's wrong with asking ladies to reveal their faces in such a situation...only another lady would have seen her - I wasn't in front of her. The cheek! It would have taken her a minute to undo something head gear. And of course if you insist, then you are 'islamophobic' or 'culturally insensitive'!
Roger Malstead, Wenatchee, Washington
Just as a sheep dog nips at the heels of the herd of sheep and directs them into the fenced-in pen, so are the Islamic suicide bombers. They are our sheep dogs, nudging us into the fenced-in pen of Islam where we will live under sharia whether we want to or not. We sheep keep thinking that if we move away from the dogs they will stop biting us, we think if we appease Muslims they will stop killing us, they won't, they are just herding us into our sharia pens.
Lynn Kristy, Kansas City, USA
Good idea Robert, Islam is unique among the major world religions in that it does not separate church and state. Strip away the catagorisation of religion, and you are left with something which is politically very unpleasant indeed.
Andy, Not Londonistan, UK
This writer is being incredibly disingenuous when she points out that 37% of young Muslims would prefer to live under Sharia Law in Britain while ignoring the fact that 59% of all Muslims would prefer to live under British Law. This is only one blatant example that highlights the anti-Islamic approach that is taken by writers such as Minette Marrin. Perhaps this is what Mayor of London Ken Livingstone was referring to when he called for an end to medias orgy of Islamophobia.
People in the media have a responsibility to tell the truth without spinning it to their own prejudice. Writings such as these do nothing to promote harmony and goodwill but on the contrary fosters suspicion, hatred and discrimination.
Kass, Jeddah,
Also, Pat Buchannon writes in his book " Death of the West" the dangers of this multiculturalism mentality. It is time we wake up before all this PC crap kills us.
Curtis S., Richmond, TX, United States of America
The brilliant author MarK Steyn in his book America Alone reveals the impending collapse of Europe with Londoninstan leading the way. The chickens have come home to roost.
Adam Sparks, San Francisco, Ca,, USA
Ms. Marrin, Is the radical Islam you decry a religion or a political movement? Wishing to force your views on others seems more policical than religious. How about an nice new law: It would define a movement that wishes death to followers-that-stray as being a political movement and strip away any rights that might accrue to it, if it were recognized as a religion. Likewise, a movement that decrees second class citizenship in society to women is defined as merely a political movement and not a religion. Likewise, a movement that wishes to substitute its own system of laws is defined as merely a political movement and not a religion. Etc. Etc. This does not necessarily target Islam, but any movement that pushes these political beliefs is deemed not a religion. And this does not keep anyone from calling whatever they do a religion. It would simply not give it state recognition as it being a religion, if it does these things.
Robert A. Jones, Nashville, Tennessee (USA)
Ms. Marrin, Is the radical Islam you decry a religion or a political movement? Wishing to force your views on others seems more policical than religious. How about an nice new law: It would define a movement that wishes death to followers-that-stray as being a political movement and strip away any rights that might accrue to it, if it were recognized as a religion. Likewise, a movement that decrees second class citizenship in society to women is defined as merely a political movement and not a religion. Likewise, a movement that wishes to substitute its own system of laws is defined as merely a political movement and not a religion. Etc. Etc. This does not necessarily target Islam, but any movement that pushes these political beliefs is deemed not a religion. And this does not keep anyone from calling whatever they do a religion. It would simply not give it state recognition as it being a religion, if it does these things.
Robert A. Jones, Nashville, Tennessee (USA)
I couldn't agree more with this and I'm sure most of the country feels the same way. Unless politicians develop the nerve to do what needs to be done with the Muslim community in this country the sense of rage and frustration amongst ordinary citizens will simply boil over. I take no pleasure in saying that but it's something I feel instinctively. We've seen our people blown up, intimidated, threatened, and a supine media - one that is so terrified it couldn't even bring itself to print a bunch of cartoons - that blithely grants airtime to self-appointed minority 'community leaders' (aka Islamist extremists) to air their 'grievances' and paranoid conspiracy theories every time the police or security services make an arrest. It's just .. what the hell is going on in this country? How did we get into this state?
R Davies, Bournemouth, UK
Ms. Marrin, Is the radical Islam you decry a religion or a political movement? Wishing to force your views on others seems more policical than religious. How about an nice new law: It would define a movement that wishes death to followers-that-stray as being a political movement and strip away any rights that might accrue to it, if it were recognized as a religion. Likewise, a movement that decrees second class citizenship in society to women is defined as merely a political movement and not a religion. Likewise, a movement that wishes to substitute its own system of laws is defined as merely a political movement and not a religion. Etc. Etc. This does not necessarily target Islam, but any movement that pushes these political beliefs is deemed not a religion. And this does not keep anyone from calling whatever they do a religion. It would simply not give it state recognition as it being a religion, if it does these things.
Robert A. Jones, Nashville, Tennessee (USA)