Minette Marrin
Take a trip to New York and see the city from the air
Does Cherie Blair matter? That was one of the pressing questions of last week, although arguably not the most important. There is a lot of her about at the moment, but is she someone we can afford to ignore? The serious-minded answer would presumably be yes. The serious-minded person would of course be missing the guilty pleasures of vulgar gossip, schadenfreude and righteous indignation that Ms Booth Blair has provided so richly for the rest of us and so inadvertently with her appalling memoirs and shameless interviews - her style combines Wag with Pooter - but what is there otherwise that is worthy of attention?
The awkward fact is that Cherie thinks she is going to be a judge and, given her high opinion of her gifts, a top judge at that. She already does some occasional judging as a recorder, although with typical immodesty she refers to herself as a judge already. What she does and says in public, and what private matters she chooses to reveal in public, do matter. It raises the question of what we might expect from a judge and whether she should become one.
Her chances of becoming a proper judge ought to have been finished at the time of her Bristol flats scandal, when her behaviour was tricksy and her public excuses accompanied by tears and ridiculous claims about having too many multi-tasking and mumsy balls in the air to attend to awkward details. Try telling that to the judges at the Court of Appeal: they will not be moved by sobs and lilac eyeshadow.
However, I hadn’t heard any murmurings that she was unfit for judicial office until last week, after extracts from her memoirs had appeared. A former senior judge, Gerald Butler QC, said that Cherie should resign as a recorder and had no chance of becoming a senior judge: “If she wants to tread this path of making money by outrageous comments, that is up to her, but I don’t think this is a job for a judge. It shows a complete lack of any kind of decency. It is the kind of conduct which demeans the legal profession. It is altogether disgraceful.”
More soberly, another lawyer, a senior barrister who sits on the Bar Council, said that “one of the important factors in being a judge is being able to exercise judgment, and part of that judgment is being trusted with confidential material”.
Throughout her time in Downing Street, and especially now in her book, Cherie has shown that her judgment is often abysmal and that she cannot be trusted with confidential material. If you read all the vulgar details about her tubes and ops and spats and hots, the whole gabby, greedy, sorry tale, you realise that she is not merely indiscreet; she simply does not do discretion.
At one point she writes: “I had never been taught the meaning of the phrase ‘discretion is the better part of valour’.” I could not help smiling. That is quite impossible to believe. It may of course be that in her impoverished dysfunctional home, with her saintly nan and mum, discretion was not much discussed, but at her outstandingly good Catholic girls’ grammar she must most certainly have been indoctrinated ceaselessly about the importance of discretion and those many virtues which come under its umbrella – modesty, humility, tact, delicacy, judiciousness, forbearance and truth. However, as with contraception, there are some Catholic teachings that Cherie has decided to ignore or couldn’t abide by. Perhaps temperamentally she is incapable of discretion.
That might not matter. There are plenty of pleasant occupations for people who don’t do discretion, such as journalism or making well-paid speeches. However, if there is one place where discretion is essential, it is the bench. Judges, so far at least, have been admirably discreet, whatever their personal foibles. The fact that Cherie envisaged no danger to her ambitions as a judge in writing and behaving as she has shows in itself that she is not fit to be one.
Some people have expressed surprise that she should have aroused such anger and contempt, particularly among women. The usual explanation for such unsisterly attacks is envy. And certainly there are many things a woman might envy about Cherie’s life. However, I think there is an entirely different and good reason for the resentment. Just as she is a disgrace to the law, she is a disgrace to our sex.
I hate to use the phrase “role model”, but I imagine that Cherie sees herself as one. Her book gives that impression. It’s true that she has achieved a great deal: to become a QC from a difficult background, even with an exceptionally good education, and even at a time of positive discrimination in women’s favour in the law, is something rightly to be proud of.
Her love of her husband and her extended family is endearing. People who know her say she is kind and funny, but publicly (and in this book) she embodies most of the things that people – men – told me in my childhood were wrong with women and why women could never hope to compete equally with men. I tried, and many of my women friends and acquaintances tried, to prove such people wrong. Cherie has done a lot to prove them right. She is the kind of woman who gives other women a bad name.
Women are so emotional, so impulsive, so irrational, I used to be told. Women are not logical; they are inconsistent and easily taken in. Women are so obsessed with status, with their husbands’ status and with material possessions. Women are indiscreet and gossipy in a way men are not. All this is true of Cherie Blair.
There was Carole Caplin. There was the outburst at the party conference about Gordon Brown lying. There was her use of the name Cherie Booth QC on Downing Street notepaper, a perfect example of a woman trying unfairly to have it both ways. There is her shocking gabbiness, her tabloid revelations about toilets and childbirth and fancying her husband rotten.
On top of that she is quite obviously obsessed with making money and buying properties, exploiting her husband’s office in the process with a sense of entitlement that is astonishing. In all this, rather like Diana, Princess of Wales, she is something of a heroine of our times, an emotional and cultural weather vane. In that sense she does matter.
minette.marrin@sunday-times.co.uk

Minette Marrin is a journalist, broadcaster and fiction writer. She is a columnist for The Sunday Times, and has also written for The Sunday and Daily Telegraphs and The Spectator and The Asian Wall Street Journal. She regularly contributes to television and radio programmes
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Both Blairs are narcissists, dangerous because powerful (or they were). Right = whatever they feel or want. It may have 'felt right' for the PM to lie to lead us into war, but the death and destruction and sorrow it caused is laid at his door. Full stop.
Nancy, London,
As an American, my view of the English legal profession continues to plummet. They all need judgment, not just the judges. The good ones are scarce. It is shocking what is being done to me in the name of English justice. I feel like I am fighting the American Revolution by myself all over again!
Elaine Decoulos, London and Massachusetts,
Cripes Minette, it's only a book - with a few interesting tales from a minor celeb. Calm down!
Angus, Strasbourg, France
James, Liverpool
Ref: Cherie QC retaining a sense of humour, you are right. Every time I see or hear of her I am left doubled up with laughter. The real kicker is, I, like the rest of the population are laughing at her, not with her. She has helped to put the final nails in Liebour's coffin
John , Durham, UK
Dear Minette ( petite chatte in French), I cannot help wondering whether the cattiness so many women columnists have exhibited about these memoirs do not stem from a kind of class prejudice? CB has dared to say what middle class girls would leave unsaid. The sisterhood? Red in tooth and claw!
Marguerite , London ,
I fully support Mrs Blair's effort to open up Brtish politiccs.
More power to her elbow.
stephen bull, fontes, france
What a load of cobblers. How disgusting of her flogging her memoirs etc...... I'm sure you came out with the same nonsense when Maggie and her gang were flogging books just such as these. No doubt you were at the front of the queue when the jailbirds Aitken and Archer were flogging books recently!
A Thomas, Lanchester,
What an incredibly well written article, Minette... Once in a while an article comes along written with words that emphasize the lost virtues of humans and you have managed to write those words beautifully.Yet, I don't think a journalist's job is to be indiscreet but only to write unbiased truth.
1mean1, London, United Kingdom
Britains answer to Hillary Clinton. With what I have heard, she has even less charm or wit than the original. " The profound bigotry. antiintellectualism, intolerance and illiberalism of liberals ", fits her perfectly.
Desmond Taylor, Houston, USA Tx
Cherie Blair has achieved what I thought was impossible - she's made me feel sorry for Tony Blair
Juliet , Cardiff ,
Give her all her subs back, she clearly needs the money, and expel her from the party, but be quick, Gywneths seat is up for grabs on Friday.
Douglas Miller, Fulham,
"She gives other women a bad name" Did Tony Blair "give other men a bad name" when he took us into an unpopular war?
Or is it only women that have to go through life ensuring they are perfect role models for every other person who shares the same gender?
Maz, Yorkshire, England
Ms. Blair/Booth QC is coarse and uncouth, but she is not fit to be a recorder or a judge because above all, she is dishonest. The non-declaration and non-payment of the VAT on her Chinese shopping spree bars her from sitting in judgment over others.
Chie, Tokyo, Japan
She is clearly selective in the Roman Catholic tenets that she observes - modesty clearly being one she ignores. Many people come from poor and dysfunctional backgrounds. Most of us just got on with it. She is typical of the kind of working class hero for whom it is all about the money.
Derek, Edinburgh,
In writing this ghastly, hypocritical mess, Cherie has elbowed aside Heather Mills as the nation's great hate figure. I'm sure she didn't intend to do this, but unlike Heather, she's clearly sane.
As such, I wouldn't let her anywhere near any court in the land.
jonathan anthony, london,
Cherie usually acts for the employer against the employee, naturally as that is where the money is!
It is mentioned that she brought up 4 children well - google
Kathryn Blair 2003. The taxpayer is forking out £400 000 pa for Tony in the Middle East, because Bush wanted him there, so he should pay.
lindiwe, sevenoaks,
Interesting memoirs should have salt and pepper. Her memoirs pepper the Prime Minister with shrapnel (already walking wounded), and have no salt, which leads to a lack of good taste.
Chris Gillibrand, Brussels, Belgium
There seems to be a assumption that to be a Barrister is to be exceptionally clever. The overwhelming need for a lawyer is to possess a good memory and work hard..
In addition to be a Judge it needs wisdom, experience , tact and maturity. That is why Mrs Blair seems unsuitable..
Peter Bolt, Redditch, UK
Cherie is a well educated lawyer, a mother and a wife. Her career now may be made out of questionable methods but her base career is made out of things most women cannot even dream or dare to achieve. Her current writing shows she is acting quite normal and female- which we should welcome!
Melanie, london, UK
I disagree with you. It seems to me that Cherie Blair has been villified by the press for years. It seems somehow that because of her background she is being told by journalists that she should "somehow know her place". Male lawyers (judges)resent able women too. Envy and snobbery still reign.
Jane Ashby, Lincoln, England
Cherie Booth is actually a role model for modern women. She has had a highly successful career in a difficult, male dominated profession, she has had and clearly raised well four children, as Prime Minister's wife she performed all sorts of duties completely free. And she has kept a sense of humour
James, Liverpool, UK
I actually looked into the process of making a formal complaint about her conduct to the Office of Judicial Complaints.
David Townsend, Kabul, Afghanistan
I don't suppose any of the entirely appropriate views on her suitability for promotion will count for anything.
New Labour has 'modernised' the justice system to make sure that their people get appointed irrespective of ability or integrity.
MarkS, York,
How Cherie Booth can be taken seriously as acting as "The Court" in any matter with the amount of baggage surrounding her is unbelievable. Just the words abuse of power & office, are sufficient for anyone to demand Booth QC stands herself down in any trial. Isn't Booth QC a Privy Councillor also?
Steve, Bournemouth, England
I don't want to spoil the fun by sticking to the facts and treating Cherie Blair as a human being rather than a favourite whipping boy, but I do fail to see how loving her husband and talking about contraception make her indiscreet, vulgar, and a disgrace to her sex and the law.
Fiona Rintoul, Glasgow, Scotland
Cherie is ghastly. When her husband was PM she exploited his name and status for money. She is greedy ('free clothes' episode in Australia) and has a poor relationship with telling the truth (Bristol flats). Who on earth would want to accept her 'judgement' on anything. She is not fit to judge.
Donna Walker, Effingham, England
Having fleeced the British peoples coffers in the name of human rights, I think the only place this woman should stand in court is the dock!
stuart, london, uk
As they say, you can take the person out of the ghetto but you can't take the ghetto out of the person.
Watch your hubcaps.
Tab-A Sadam, Todmorden, UK
Cherie Blair abused the office that her husband held for her own marterial gain. She is totally unfit to practice in law.
Mark, London, UK
"Positive discrimination in womens favour in the law" -- illegal behaviour within the field of law? Unlikely. Positive action to try to offer women and minorities equal opportunities by encouraging them to apply for posts and promotion for which they are equally qualified? I should hope so.
Fanny Herring, Norwich,
Me thinks Minette Marrin is jealous!
Byron, Cheltenham, Glos.
The theme of this article is wrongl for the public complain about cover-ups in public life. If Mrs Blair is telling the truth and, for my part, I have no doubt she is, then she ought to be congratulated for rasing the issues she has. She can also act as a judge for she is idependently-minded.
David Wilkinson, Cramlington, Northumberland
I'm not sure about the virtues of this analysis. True, she has acted in ways one could query as compatible with high judicial office. But there is much to be said for knowing more about how top judges believe in than we now do. All important decisions are influenced by how one thinks.
Chris, London,
Two talented, self-made people who got to the top. What's the problem? Is it just that they weren't born Tory millionaires?
Janet, London,
As a male observer of Cherie's antics I can only conclude that she is not fit for purpose - if the purpose is to be a judge in our (largely) fair society. If I was unfortunate enough to be in front of a judge for some misdemeanor (indiscretion, tricksy deals) it could not be Cherie.
Gordon, Weybridge, Surrey
Dashdot, I would usually agree. But Mrs Blair must have had great influence on Mr Blair, and then, there is her ambition to become a judge. We have to expect more of people in high office.
But a disgrace to women? I think Mrs Blair is a normal woman myself....or even a normal person!
Alan Robinson, Bjerreby, Denmark
'Snobbery' -dashdot, London. What are you on about ? - I hope you don't have to 'appear' in front of her - you might get the message......
Victor M., Chelmsford, Essex.,
Nothing to with 'snobbery', more to do with what is right. This ghastly woman should never be in the position of sitting on a judicial bench. The very qualities required preclude her has she has none of them: impartiality, a sense of duty and the ability to keep information confidential.
Tom, Isle of Skye,
Are you saying that anyone from liverpool is just inherently an awful person
j. smith, UK,
She is ghastly & awful and comes across as a true 'WAG' but in the City she is very very highly regarded as a lawyer who takes on difficult HR cases and quite often wins them
John, Guildford, UK
unfortunately dashdot reveals his /her own prejudice in confusing Minette Marrinns article with snobbery
alan burden, mijas pueblo, España
How true a simple ghastly example to all women,greedy irrational and definitely unfit to be a member of the legal profession or judge,a very unprofessional woman and disgrace to the Catholic church.
Ann Crak , Mugla , Turkey
What on earth does 'you can take the girl out of Liverpool but, alas, you can't take Liverpool out of the girl' mean? What a ridiculous statement. From what I can see Cheries biggest crimes are that she continued to hold down a successful career and is from Liverpool.
Mel, Manchester,
The real surprise is that anybody is surprised. The Blairs were always vulgar, nasty and brash, cosying up to celebrity, on the make for table scrapings from the rich and famous, with a moral compass that consistently pointed to the gutter.
Eric, London,
Minette Marrin, as ever, hits the nail bang on the head. Cherie is simply ghastly.
You can take the girl out of Liverpool but, alas, you can't take the Liverpool out of the girl.
Alexander King, Cork, Ireland
What a perfect piece for demonstrating that snobbery is far from dead in our land.
dashdot, London, UK