Peter Riddell: Political Briefing
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks
It is taxes after all. The new Populus poll suggests that George Osborne’s talk of tax cuts rather than David Cameron’s speech was the motor behind the sharp Tory bounce in the polls. And this may have already started to wane on Thursday evening.
The final poll, based on a sample of 1,000, produces the same voting intentions – Labour 39 per cent, Conservatives 36 per cent and Liberal Democrats 15 per cent – as the version published yesterday based on 803 interviews (on Tuesday and Wednesday). However, there are tentative signs from the final 197 on Thursday, too small a sample to be robust, that the bounce may have peaked by then. (For more details see www.populus.co.uk).
When one splits the total between those interviewed before and after Mr Cameron’s speech, it is clear that the Tory advance to 36 per cent entirely occurred beforehand. Although Mr Cameron’s personal rating improved slightly after the speech, the Tory rating remained flat, while Labour support fell.
This suggests that the key events were beforehand, notably the tax-cut promises. Some 72 per cent of voters, including a similar number of Labour supporters, back the idea of “making wealthy people pay more in tax in order to take most people in Britain out of the inheritance tax net”.
A Populus poll for the BBC Two programme The Daily Politics, taken on Wednesday and Thursday, shows that the pledges to raise the inheritance tax threshold to £1 million and to exempt most first-time homebuyers from stamp duty is backed by 55 per cent of voters. Nearly three fifths (58 per cent) say it is a good idea for the Tories to make tax cuts central to their election campaign. Those aged between 18 and 34 are more likely (71 per cent) to welcome tax cut promises. The Times/Populus poll shows that three fifths of the public think that they themselves, and the country as a whole, pay too much in tax. This view is held most strongly by skilled manual workers and by Tory voters.
About a third of voters (32 per cent) believe that if the Government has any additional funds, all should be used to increase spending on public services. A quarter, including the same proportion of Tory voters, say that all funds should be used to reduce taxes; 44 per cent (including half of Tory voters) favour sharing additional money between higher spending and reduced taxes – which is the policy of all the main parties. Three fifths (62 per cent) support the idea of raising taxes on gas-guzzling cars and flights and using the money to fund tax cuts on income and other things.
Nevertheless, the BBC/Populus poll shows that despite the Tory bounce, only 44 per cent think there is a real chance that the Tories could win the next general election. Yet there is a warning for Mr Brown. Nearly three fifths (57 per cent, including 64 per cent of men) think that if he calls an election, “he will be putting the interests of the Labour Party ahead of the interests of the country”; 37 per cent disagree.
No wonder that the Brown team is awaiting further polling evidence this weekend to see whether the Tory bounce, and the impact of tax, is fading. How Mr Brown must wish that he had not boxed himself in.
Peter Riddell has been a leading political commentator and an Assistant Editor for The Times since 1991. He writes mainly, but not exclusively, about British politics and has published several books on British politics, including not one, but two, on Margaret Thatcher
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
How can Brown have destroyed his credibility, he doesnât have to go to the polls until June 2010. Every windbag in politics is currently bleating their opinion which will be forgotten the week after next.
Rachel, Rochester, England
The margin of error of a standard poll of 2000 people is about 3%. This will be higher in a snap poll (because you can't re-call people to avoid sample bias). So the margin of error in the last 197 people polled will be a good 10%. It is ridiculous, and indeed I'm sorry to say statistically illiterate, to try to draw any conclusions from it.
NBeale, London, England
Gordon Brown's repeated refusal this week to answer the simple question - whether he would call an early election, and his subsequent decision not to call one, tells us four things about him.
Firstly he is slippery politician who will not give a straight answer to a straight question.
Secondly, as there is clearly no need for an early election, he is prepared to put his personal ambition before the national interest.
Thirdly he is indecisive.
And finally he is weak and lacks courage.
John Lamb, Liverpool,
And Derek Draper is still telling him to run. Derek Draper? Blur's adviser?
It's official : Prime Minister (Crash Gordon) Brown Unelect is a busted flush - it's just the Blur spin meisters want to make sure he is never resurrected!
Pete Balchin, Solicitor , Bristol, UK
He's shot himself in the foot hasn't he.He has waited over 10 years to become PM. He may only have 26 days left.Tony must have a smile on he face.The timing of his exit was judged to perfection.
steve, Eure, France
Since when have the Labour party or GB ever listened to the voters about taxation. Labour promises have never included tax reductions only tax increases and this time round the rich have been allowed to get richer while the middle classes have been taxed and taxed again.
Why it has taken the Tories and the general puplic so long to recognise this is beyound me, GB has got this counrty into a finnacial mess and wants an election now before his chickens come home to roost,because when they do we will all pay more tax for his failure.
Dave, mold, Flintshire