Peter Riddell: Analysis
Win a year of free pizza at PizzaExpress
Voters are increasingly fed up with the main parties and their ability to solve the country’s problems, according to the latest Populus poll for The Times.
The survey, conducted over the weekend (for more details, see www.populus.co.uk), suggests that the public is dissatisfied with Gordon Brown’s Government, but is not yet enthusiastic about David Cameron and the Tories.
Labour is no longer in freefall, as it was two weeks ago, but its rating is comparable with the worst days of last winter and spring, towards the end of the Blair premiership.
The Conservatives are enjoying their strongest period of this parliament, but the monthly averages suggest that they are consolidating at about 40 per cent, rather than building on their earlier gains. They are some way from Mr Cameron’s 45 per cent goal.
Two revealing pointers reflect the ambivalent state of public opinion. First, the preference of government question has been a reliable indicator of how elections are likely to go even when the ruling party is doing badly in voting intentions. For instance, back in February 2004, 77 per cent said that they were dissatisfied with Labour, but 60 per cent still preferred Labour to the Tories as the government.
A pivotal central group is now dissatisfied with Labour but still prefers them to the Tories in office. But there are now 17 per cent don’t knows or neither, compared with 5 or 6 per cent in 2004.
Secondly, Labour has lost ground sharply over the past three months as the best party on nine key policy issues. But the Tories have improved their position only marginally in most areas.
While the Government has lost the confidence of the public, notably on the economy, the Tories have failed to persuade sufficient voters of its readiness for office. Populus notes that Labour is now one point or so above the level of the Major Government at the same stage of the 1992-97 parliament, while the Tories are polling about eight points below the level then of the Labour Opposition. With the Lib Dems more or less where they were then, the difference is made up by the rise of other parties.
The Brown leadership still believes that its position is recoverable. So we are in for some heavy pounding on policy issues, starting today with the ten-year children’s plan and welfare reforms on Thursday. Mr Cameron will give his own ideas, but the public is waiting to be convinced.

Peter Riddell has been a leading political commentator and an Assistant Editor for The Times since 1991. He writes mainly, but not exclusively, about British politics and has published several books on British politics, including not one, but two, on Margaret Thatcher
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2008
£44,990
2008
£48,489
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
Circa £100k
NHS
London
£23,500 + benefits
MI5
London
Some of the finest Apts & Penthouses
Across London
Great Investment, River Views
Luxury properties within exclusive development in
Chislehurst Kent
A new experience in Luxury Living
Multi–Centre
from Only £829pp
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - search houses for sale and rooms and property to rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
James Smith of Liverpool states that Labour have proved their competence over the Tories.
I assume you either have no communication with the outside world or you are refering to the Australian Labour Party.
Mike , Adlington,
I suspect that Peter is not entirely fair on his comparisons. I detect a strong leaning to the Labour fold and this is unfair if he is to try and keep us informed he should show NO bias
Bob, Ponteland, England
The bottom line is people in Britain don't really understand politics any more and they will dislike whomever is least popular in the press that week.
I think that when the time comes to elect they will elect Labour as they have proved competence and the Tory's have not.
Polls count for nothing because you are asking someones opinion and that morning they will likely have watched or read news and they will just echo the overall feeling of the recent publicity negative or positive.
James Smith, Liverpool, UK
Useful buffering for Labour, again
Tom, Abingdon, UK
No one is 100% sure about Cameron as he continues to flip flop on policy statements by the day,another U turn yesterday on policy on Scotland one U turn last week on Nuclear Power.His spin doctors check the wind direction everyday and Cameron always goes with it. He has done so many U Turns this year he must be getting Giddy!
Bill Rees, Truro, Cornwall
Lets have democracy in the form of Proportional Representation, instead of just an Electoral System which gives us politicial parties we don't really want and which really just represents big business interests, NOT people.
Neil, Gloucestershire, England
Why have a government in Britain now that we have been conquered by Germany and France? Any British government is now just an appendage to Brussels, UN, WHO or the World Bank etc: Welcome to the Global Village but know that you have no say about any of it until you decide you would like to live in your OWN country and are willing to do something about it...............Mum
Mum, South London, England, Britain
Quite simply, the party system prevents people from choosing specific policies, and until people are able to do so, not only will more and more people become alienated from the political system, but the best policies will not be adapted.
We could make a start by selecting key policies using referenda until a more sensitive system can be evolved which, I suspect, would need to involve some form of proportional representation.
Lee, London,