Tim Hames
Take a trip to New York and see the city from the air
The history of the post of Speaker of the House of Commons is lengthy and also a shade ambiguous. It certainly dates back to 1377, but commentators have suggested that Peter de Montfort, who served as the “parlour” or “prolocutor” for an assembly that met 750 years ago in Oxford, should be considered the first holder of a version of this position. That gathering, in 1258, was dismissed as the “Mad Parliament” by supporters of Henry III because it attempted to undermine the King's authority.
The description is harsh. First, because that Parliament was wise to move against an incompetent, vain and weak leader. As one eminent Victorian scholar observed: “It would have been well for England if all parliaments had been equally sane.” Secondly, it must now be obvious that the genuine Mad Parliament was the one that elected Michael Martin to sit in its chair on October 23, 2000, despite 11 other candidates being available.
The Speaker is in the mire over his attitude to public money, which clearly has a medieval monarch's flavour to it. He has spent more than £20,000 of our collective cash to rebut negative press stories about him. He has used Air Miles secured in his duties to upgrade seven members of his family on flights, in breach of the advice that his committee offers to parliamentarians.
It was claimed on his behalf that when his wife submitted receipts for more than £4,200 of taxi fares, she had been accompanied by an “official” and was buying food for formal meals. In fact, her companion was her housekeeper and close friend, and the Commons itself provides the catering for any such occasions. Mr Martin has been paid £75,000 over six years in Additional Costs Allowance for a home in Glasgow on which there is no mortgage and he makes a further charge for it because it supposedly doubles as his office (another practice that MPs are, via the Speaker, counselled against). Yet, despite all this, he insists that he sticks not just by the rules but also their spirit.
The only person to emerge from this with any credit is Mike Granatt, the media spokesman who resigned as Mr Martin's mouthpiece because he had inadvertently misled reporters over his boss's expenses. Nine Speakers have died violent deaths: one was murdered, another was killed in battle and seven more were beheaded (two on the same day in 1510). This one is surely the first to have ripped to shreds his own reputation and standing.
To be honest, however, the true costs of this speakership are not Air Miles and taxis.
Mr Martin is probably no worse than dozens of other MPs, especially the older sort, who believe that a little creative accountancy with their expenses could usefully supplement their comparatively modest salaries. His conduct is harder to defend because he is paid more than twice as much as a typical humble backbencher, but I am sure that there have been many excellent Speakers who have also played the system. The real scandal is that the House elevated a man who was manifestly unfit for the role and seven years later it will not press him into overdue retirement.
There are essentially three functions for the Speaker in the modern era - managing the daily business of the chamber, taking charge of a plethora of committees and individuals who run the vast Palace of Westminster and serving as the public face for Parliament.
In all of these jobs Mr Martin has been a monumental failure. His decisions in the House itself have prompted not only Tories but also Labour MPs to question his neutrality. His handling of Prime Minister's Questions has frequently been an embarrassment. His feeble chairmanship of the committees for which he is ultimately responsible has created an atmosphere in which some Members treat the House of Commons as if it were a private club and not a public institution whose loyalty should be to the electorate.
The job of representing Parliament to the wider world is profoundly important. Betty Boothroyd, in particular, demonstrated that a capable and charismatic Speaker could work wonders for the image of the House. Most MPs would agree that her successor, sadly, has been a failure.
Mr Martin, it should be acknowledged, still has a few defenders left - but then so does Mohamed Al Fayed. Rather than do something, though, they prefer to simply muddle through in the hope that he will announce an intention to stand down at the next election, or preferably sooner. Few of them express their opinions openly because that is “not done”, besides which they fear that they might hurt their chances of being “called” in Parliament.
So nothing occurs, while the damage caused to the House of Commons by the expenses exposé becomes increasingly corrosive. It is stoking the dangerous sentiments in the public mind that “they are all the same” and “are all in it for themselves”. This is very unfair. Most MPs are dedicated people who provide excellent value for money. The rules do, nevertheless, need a comprehensive overhaul and Mr Martin is plainly not the man to do it. His deputy, Sir Alan Haselhurst, would be better suited to the job.
Parliament should not carry on procrastinating. Under this Speaker, the Commons is slipping from “order, order” to “chaos, chaos” in the opinion of the rest of the country. It took 14 years from the Mad Parliament for the incompetent, vain and weak Henry III to be followed by the infinitely more dynamic Edward I. Fourteen days would be time enough to be free of Speaker Martin.

Tim Hames joined The Times in 1999 and is a columnist and Chief Leader Writer. He was previously a lecturer in American and British Politics at Oxford University
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
All the furore about class, place of birth is a nonsense. This is just bigotry in the extreme. He should go because he has brought his position into disrepute. I cannot help but think that had some of these accusations been made against Betty Bothroyd that she would have had unwavering support across the parties becuase of her ability and integrity. MP's are called 'Right Honourable' because they are supposedly trustworthy. These ongoing revelations regarding expenses constantly undermine this assumption. As they can no longer be trusted, at least in the public perception, it is time for them to account for all their expenses, just as the rest of us have to do. I cannot claim £3.50 parking from my employer without at first producing a receipt. We now demand the same from OUR employees.
Carol, Leicester, UK
Well - as a Glaswegian who lives just two miles from the Martin family fiefdom can I say there will be few tears shed when he goes - and go he must!
Edwin, Glasgow, UK
Sunday 24 February 2008, at around 2pm
Oh what a give-away !
Readers will recall, from the last week's postings, about the reaction of nulabor in the Full Council
to the excellent coverage of The Star concerning the lost millions and nulabor placements
relating to BNDFC ( Burngreave New Deal for Communities ).
In the council chamber, a nulabor activist accused The Star of conducting a press 'witch-hunt'
against her nulabor colleagues for exposing the extravagances, wastes, lack of accountability
or representation, and proven incompetence. The worst revelation was that over £6million
( yes, 6 million ) of the money allocated to the deprived community was claimed for
management 'expenses'.
This has been reported in full to you.
The accusation of a press witch-hunt was the best defence that nulabor could offer as an
argument in a futile attempt at preventing an independent inquiry.
Today, on the Westminster stage of comedy, tragedy and drama, there have been damaging
press revelations - all absolutely true - concerning the expenses of The Speaker,
Michael Martin.
Of course, there is a call for an inquiry.
What is the nulabor response from the twice-sacked blanket?
It accused the press, on BBC, of being on a witch-hunt !!
Coming from that source, this makes the need for an independent inquiry, accompanied by a
quick resignation, compulsory.
martin brighton, sheffield,
As a former civil servant, albeit not in the U.K. I was bound by civil service regulations. Amongst those regulations was a stipulation that air miles earned on official government business were the property of the government. I have no doubt had I acted as Martin has in gifting such air miles to my family, not only would I have faced disciplinary proceedings but I rather suspect the Police would have been interviewing me over contraventions of the Theft Ordinance. Martin is following in the New Labour path previously trodden by Mandelson, Prescott and Hain to name but three. He is a disgrace to the office he holds.
Callan, Hong Kong, China
Shouldn't Mr. Martin be Speaker of the Scottish Parliament?
Phil Linehan, Mexico City, Mexico
I quite agree "His handling of Prime Minister's Questions has frequently been an embarrassment" On far to many occasions he has allowed Mr Cameron to make Party Political Broadcasts rather than ask clear cut questions.
Anthony J, Alton, UK
Out of order! Out of order!
christopher durant, chagford, U.K.
It is little wonder that Scots are heading towaeds independance, when the brolly brigade in London continue to behave like bigots
Wm O'Brien, Cumbernauld, Scotland
Is he that much different from the rest of the fiddlers - or is it just that we expect more from a person in his position of trust? - stop laughing, its not a laughing matter.
Marty, London, England
It is admitted, even by this government, that Martin has accumulated AirMiles from flightrs paid for by his employer (US!) which he then adopted for his personal use - in this case gave to his family.
If I did this then the Inland Revenue would treat my gain as a benefit in kind and demand 'their' 40%.
As they are not demanding a cut from Mick Martin, can I assume that they believe the speaker to be above the law - just as their colleagues in the Police believe Nottingham Social workers to be?
Mike Bibby, St Albans, England -not EU
If you accept that lots of MP's have claimed expenses to feather their nests by stretching regulation to breaking point and that includes current cabinet ministers and if you also accept that they cover a broad spectrum of background and nationality (including scottish) - If you sweep that all aside and ask the real question which Is "Has this man been totally impartial in carrying out his official duties at the House and competent in his various administrative duties"?
If he can only rely on the Labour Party for support I would have to conclude that he is not fit for his high office which should be to accommodate all shades of opinion and by so doing would logically command universal support.
philip, Ipswich,
I don't even live there; it's none of my business; and I think he should resign.
JT, Austin, TX, USA
And, while all this is going on, what about Britain?
Is anyone at the bridge, in the cockpit, at the wheel?
Garth Rex, Glendale Heights, USA
Yes, he should resign - but honourable resignations do sadly seem a thing of the past, too many of those who have resigned in recent years seeming to resurrect themselves.
John Bulcock, Sydney.
john bulcock, sydney, australia
Parliament does not really do its job of properly representing the British people. There are many reasons not least the apathy shown by the general public about such things. But high on the list of factors that are wrong is that the Speaker is quite unsuitable; so long as he remains there is no possibility of getting matters right.
Dr J Findlater, Carnforth,
Why should he resign, he should be sacked with no benefits at all like the rest of us if we did something wrong and were incompetent.
He is the worst speaker i have ever known, his bias toward the Labour party is glaringly obvious as he should be impartial. iI have no allegiance to any of the main three parties but the way he treats everyone but Labour is shameful.
Samantha Jones, Bucks, England
Some of the comments below are not fit for a national discussion forum. I am a Scot and abhor the greed and dishonesty of many of the MPs. The fact that they happen to be born in a particular place or be a particular race is of no account. I dislike being tarred with the same brush, and take offence at many of the comments now appearring. Please show a little manners and respect for the 99.9% of honest law abiding people who happen to live farther north than you.
Thank You.
Harvie, Glasgow,
The nation gets the government it deserves, and Parliament the Speaker.
David Williams, Eastnor, England
be careful on how one outs a speaker and if one does make sure a new speaker is selected on ability and not a political choice or we could end up with revolving doors at the back of the speakers chair as the speaker could be changed to suit the will or mood of the "house" at any time.
A. Kernahan, blackpool, lancashire
Are you sure you lectured at Cambridge? Martin is in no way reponsible for members treating the House as a private club.Press pundits are reknown for indulging thier extravagant tastes in the palace. Members have been treating the place like a private club for many hundreds of years. All newspapers have ignored the avaricious attiudes of members for years. I am firmly against the vast majoity {with probably only 30 left wing members being straight] stuffing thier pockets and stomachs at the tax payers expense. However the attacks on martin are based on class and snobbery. I do not read about George Young {allegedly a favourite for next speaker} being castigated for his use of tax payers money, but of course he went to Eton, old chap. You politcal scribblers are not for real. Ive had enough of "pots calling kettles",shame on all of you.
John Eadie MacGregor, Doncaster, South yorks
If Mr Martin cared at all about how the public perceive MP's, and the whole political system, he would not have, personally got into the position he is in now, or allowed the system as a whole to be seen so badly by the public.
The fact MP's are allowed to be corrupt, under their own rules and laws, means the system will always be abused somewhere down the line.
Arthur, Newcastle,
Tim Hames is absolutely on the money here in more ways than one. Not only has Martin played fast and loose with the pathetic financial controls and got away with it because of the system of self-monitoring our MPs enjoy but he has been a very second rate Speaker. When cronies like Lord Foulkes of Cumnock have to fall back on playing the class enemy card in seeking to blame Oxbridge educated southerners for this you know that the Government must be desperate. The need for institutional reform of this rotten system is pressing. Don't hold your breath though. Who'd give up the privileges these MPs enjoy unless they really had to?
Tim Morris, Marlow, Bucks
I saw an appalling interview with that smug 'toff' Benn this morning trying (and pathetically) failing to justify the dreadful behaviour of this speaker. Martin is an ignorant fool and and the worst and most biased speaker the House of Commons has ever had.
To try to justify him by saying he is the victim of some sort of class war is typical of Benn and his ilk. Their modus operandi is to try to blame the victim (in this case the taxpayer) as somehow reponsible for the evil that has been done against them. We see this regularly in reporting by the left wing press. Despicable.
Jay, London,
After working at the Palace of Westminster for several years in the late 1990s I decided never to vote again.
A large percentage of mps (irrespective of party) treated the place like a private club & expected every petty whim to be accomodated with no regard for public money.
None of this surprises me at all - depressingly its endemic to the culture of the place.
Spoiled vote, London, UK
Only goes to show that Gordon Brown has lost the knack of power by offering the Speaker support. And also shows how decayed politics has become that such a man could become Speaker (think of the grand personalities from left and right in the past who held the post) and then that he should have the temerity to try to hold on.
Chris Gillibrand, Brussels, Belgium/ Uncertain State!
No chance he will resign: He would never admit his own incompetence and corruption. No chance 'Gorgon' will sack him as well as being working class and Labour, he's Scottish.
Tony Jones, Grantham, Lincs
Martin is a bumbling and totally unprofessional Speaker. His misuse of public funds would get him arrested in most other walks of life.
He should resign, forthwith.
katherine langton, Blackburn,
He should go.
I find it ridiculous people are saying this is due to his background etc. What a load of rubbish.
I can't wait until Labour are out and take their cronies with them.
Chris, Amsterdam,
Another working class lad respresenting Nu Labour and devoting his life to caring for OAPs and the poor.
He, his wife and family have lived off the tax payer for years and she, apparently, prefers to ride by taxis than catch a bus as she did when employed as a factory worker on a production line. We don't mind that but do object to paying for her taxis.
c donnelly, beverley, UK
Irrespective of his background, he's another haggis-bashing Scot that we could well do without.
A pox on Joel Barnett say I!
Nu-Labour has turned me into an English Xenophobe, and you know what?
I'm now proud of it!
j.b.windmill, brierley hill, ENGLAND
This has NOTHING to do with his 'working class' backgroun and ALL to do with, if not illegally taking tax payers money,then immorally taking tax payers money.
I am so tired of all the talk and NO action on these MPs and MSPs .
They should be punished.
Neither you nor I get away with a penny as far as the Inalnd Revenue are concerned.
Why then are MPs allowed to make fools of us all with these so called perks?
Disgruntled Dorothy, Glasgow, Scotland
The whole of MPs expenses ,in all its forms, urgently needs a complete overhaul but under no circumstances by any committes chaired by the Speaker´
Generous expenses to MPs is used consistently to increase their quite generous salaries. I am minded by Frank Field when he was recently commenting on the misdemeaners of Conway. In Harold Wilsons day when there was a pay freeze.for MPs They were told that they could up their generous expenses to compensate.. It!s a complete racket and one in which REvenue and Customs should be involved.
Thomas Stallwood, Malaga, Spain
Mr Martin's constituancy address at Smeaton Drive is not in Glasgow but Bishopbriggs East Dunbartonshire. This is inaccurate information
C O'Neil, Bishopbriggs,
It speaks volumes that Martin's only supporters are Labour MPs. Their chorus of support does more to undermine him, even as it props him up in the Speaker's chair.
It also spoke volumes that the Labour party installed him in defiance of the recent convention that the speakership should rotate between the parties. Stand down and let's have a Lib Dem or a Conservative - the Labour party's reputation would also benefit from the departure of this speaker.
John Allen, Oxford, UK
It's time for Mr Martin to discover that he needs to spend more time with his family..... in Glasgow ..... not by flying them all down south at our expense.
Donna Walker, Effingham, Surrey
The 'working class lad from Glasgow' cannot do wrong as he is working class and Labour. Can he? Look at his supporters who say he is witch-hunted-Blunket who quit under a cloud and Beckett who employs her husband as her office manager.
If Brown is decisive he should whisper his fellow Scot to take a journey to Galsgow back. Claiming expenses for a house which does not have a mortgage is dishonesty pure and simple. This person has to go and go immediately.
Gary Smith, LONDON,
Mr Martin, like much of the current Labour government, is an embarrasment to our country and represents only his own, selfish interests. When will we, as a nation, stand up to this government and tell them that enough is absolutely enough? God-willing by the next general election, at the very latest.
James Reed, Stamford,
Martin has demeaned the office of Speaker. He should do the honourable thing and resign now whilst his conduct is fully investigated and appropriate disciplinary action taken.
J Crawshaw, Oundle,