All the die-hard Clinton fans out there seem to think that speaking ability is suspect, a sign of inexperience and/or inability. They put forward a cautious vision of technocratic competence, reassured that the return of the Clintons will mean a return of a former president to the White House. Because all the votes for Hillary's "experience" are really votes for a third term for Bill Clinton.

What American needs right now is someone who can inspire its best energies, rally its forces to fix the many problems it faces. The vision of technocratic expertise put forward by the Clinton campaign is that of the doctor who manages to keep a body on life support alive. Hook up this tube, connect that breathing apparatus, etc. Clinton supporters show all the short-term self-obsession of the baby boomer generation---will my entitlements last through my retirement? Obama appeals to those who have a longer time to live---and worry about what the world will be like for their children and grandchildren.

Matt, Chicago, Illinois

Obama is the best thing that could happen to the Republican Party and John McCain. Obama has no experience, and is running for the job that requires experience. Obama is no JFK, that is for sure. Obama is a far left ideologue, as far as you can go. Kennedy was a moderate. Kennedy was a freshmen senator too, but he had already served 3 terms in Congress. And JFK was a veteran of war. Obama has nothing to offer except speeches and sound bites, he has no chance of winning in November.

Phil Shannon, Duxbury, Mass USA

To say or to believe the reincarnation of US former President John F Kennedy in the form of Barack Obama, to many American does seem to be an emerging reality rather than a dreaming myth. The latest election-2008 primaries and the overwhelming majority winning of Barack Obama in different US's stated do hold sufficient warrants to indicate that senator Obama does has a closer degree of political atavism (reflected by his oratory and other personality traits that would befittingly redefine him to be the second John of Kennedy of this age) as currently shown by his driving speeches in America.

Syed Qamar Afzal Rizvi, Karachi, Pakistan

I have one simple question...that question is: why do we as Americans and as people whose country was founded on our faith in God, want any part of electing a president who does not share the same faith? Is this not a complete slap in the face to our four fathers and all they accomplished to make our great nation what it is? Allowing our great nation to be ran by someone who shares the same faith as that of the people who sought to destroy and bring a great depression upon our people is asking for trouble. 9/11 was the result of naive sad individuals who were glorifying the same "god" Obama serves. Who is to say that we are not inviting our enemy into our home? I do not feel he is the right presidential canidate nor is he equipped to run a nation founded upon Godly principals. Please remember those whose lives were lost in 9/11, please remember our men and women who are giving all they have to fight a war that should have never began before you vote yes and support Obama...

Pamela, USA, WA

The venom being poured over Barack Obama indicates to me that his honeymoon is over and people are beginning to realise that he is a serious contender. Both Clinton and McCain underestimated the power of an unknown when an electorate is faced with unpalatable 'knowns.' (I cant resist a bit of Rumsfeld-speak.) McCain would be a one term president who alienates a significant section of his own party and Hillary has morphed into Billary, to the huge disappointment of independently minded women. Enter Barack Obama.

Obama may be inexperienced, but after the Dubya Disaster, this is looking like a plus. He has refused to campaign negatively and has a broad appeal that neither of his opponents has been able to match. His supporters are disparaged as cult followers, yet they have put together an impressive grassroots campaign that the others surely envy.

Go Obama. You have brought an interest and enthusiasm to US politics that hasn't been seen for a long time.

Diane Martin, London, England

HRC rode high, intinially, mostly because of anti-Bush sentiments. But as voters, myself included, got to know B. Obama better, many of them changed their minds and voted for him. He truly represents change, that is so urgently needed in Washington.
Even though, I am a hard core democrat, I've always respected Mr. McCain. I'm immensly diappointed by how quickly he has changed his opinions and stand on many issues to fall in line with the party brass. As I see it, we can no longer see him as independent thinker, contrary to the article's author opinion.

Adam W., Arlington Heights, IL,USA

Action's speak louder than word's. Obama will never be a j.f.k. his word's? we will ...we can... do what? I have a dream? it is time for him to understand what hope is. help is more important.....unless we hope we get help. I think we all have a dream...don't know about you but mine has become a nightmare. That is what i think america is having....either we choose hope or help.. I vote for HELP....hmmmm has anyone said that yet?

jean_ohio usa, chillicothe, ohio

What nonsense. Obama is a far left liberal. He is a socialist. He will "talk" to our enemies. He wants new, sweeping entitlement programs. He wants to raise tax rates on the "rich" which means the middle class will get the hit. He supports open borders and multi-culturalism.He is a continuation of the same old garbage the left has been pushing for decades. Even in the face of the collapse of western Europe

JFK served in the Navy in WWll. He lowered taxes. He understood our capitalist economy. He understood our enemies want to kill us. He was one of the last of the now dead breed of democrat realists.

If JFK were alive today, he would be a conservative.

Michael Mattei, Golden, USA?Colorado

The Clintons, especially Hillary only desire the nomination for nothing more that self-indulgence and self-gratification. The I would support either McCain or Obama before ever supporting Hillary. She cares nothing for the American people. She changes her message every time a poll comes out. She now sounds like John Edwards, I don't think Hillary Clinton knows who or what she is. She is an OLD TIME POLITICIAN. Her ideas ar nothing more than rehashed Bill Clinton ideas. Many of those failed during his 8 year tenure. What makes her think the results would be any different now. Hillary and Bill Clinton will attempt to steal the nomination from Obama. If she does so, I see Obama beginning a independent run for President in November. He would split the democratic vote and pick up many republicans and independents. He could beat both Hillary and John McCain in a three way vote. Yes, the Clintons will attempt to steal the nomination and very well may succeed.

ELS, Birmingham, Alabama / USA

Faded charisma and weary message are the drink and menu at the start of the long wait for dinner at Hillary and Bill's, where smiles are few and frozen, the food gets dropped and burned in the kitchen, nothing's fresh anymore and the staff get blamed for everything. Over at Barack's, you don't need a reservation, the kids make fantastic waitpersons, the kitchen's full of energy and fragrance and what's set before you is homecooking, plentiful and at its best. Experience is what it is. Where do you prefer to eat?

J. M. , Red Hook, NY USA

Obama may "speak" better than Kennedy, but what he says is far inferior: it is cotton candy. Kennedy had more experience and was a war-hero. Obama is a wisp of nothingness. The young people everyone harps on about do not actually come out to vote in numbers anywhere near their internet postings. I will agree about McCain. If Obama usurps Clinton's historic role as the first female nominee for president, I will vote for McCain. The prime lesson from George Bush is the great danger of inexperience in the captain's chair.

Catherine, Chicago,

Obama is not fit fill John Kennedy's shoes. It is an insult to the memory of John F. Kennedy to even mention Obama's name in the same article. There will never be another John F Kennedy. Obama is just telling the public what they want to hear, as usual...

Marci Burnett, Sebring, USA, Florida

I'd very much like to compliment the author of this opinion article. It is surely a prime exhibit of asserting developed personal opinions to a mass audience without the distracting influence of other media. I truely agree its time for something different in Washington- whether it is Obama, Clinton or McCain in the White House in January 2009- this person needs to assert themselves into the world scene independent of media opinion much like the author of this article has done. Great article. Three cheers for an entertaining American politics.

AJ, Irvine, CA

The "audacity of hope"? What on earth (or in space, as per your metaphor, JR) is that supposed to mean? That's exactly what most people here are saying, hope isn't audacious, it just is. Actions are audacious, and aside from withdrawing from Iraq when it no longer makes sense Obama hasn't actually suggested much. He (and JR, who went to great lengths to replicate BO's repetitious speaking style) says we'll 'fix' education and healthcare and all other problems like it's as simple as deciding to do it. Believe me, we'd have done it already if all it took was 'audacious hope'.
Don't thank this man for relieving your political apathy. Rather, wonder what that says about you. Government isn't supposed to be stirring or inspiring or entertaining, it's supposed to work well. Promising an end to all bad things might win you the election in this stupid land we hold so dear, but it really shouldn't. All this postmodernism is killing me inside.

No, you really can't. Welcome to reality friends.

Matthew Hill, West Lafayette, Indiana

The Republicans are fortunate this year to have John McCain as head of our party. We are also fortunate to have a new opposition party – The Un-Democrats. Our opposition candidates, Obama and Clinton, are in a bitter fight to lead the un-democratic party.

Just look at the Byzantine, convoluted, tortuous selection process and politics of the DNC. Is it a democracy to have Super Delegates trample over the rights of the elected?
The un-democratic party could be called the autocratic party – because the Super Delegates know best. Some are better than others in an Orwellian point of view. Just for kicks, let’s disenfranchise Florida and Michigan - after all – this is the un-democratic party.

The Byzantine Empire collapsed under its own bureaucratic weight of impossible rules and regulations. It appears the same thing is happening to the former democratic party of Truman and Kennedy.

Andy, Tampa, FL

OBAMA's record in the Illinois Senate????

It was a republican senate in Illinois.. so I'm sure Obama didn't have much influence

Doug, Orlando, Florida

Here is a novel idea and one that cuts across partisan lines. I have not heard it from anywhere in the media, but what about Senator Obama as president with John McCain as vicepresident. Now there's a winning ticket.

Peter Wallace, Oakville, Ontario, Canada

To quote J Cortland of Ohio--JFK was not, fortunately, a lilberal democrat much to the dismay of democrats. He governed to the middle, and mostly to the right, not the left. If you go back and study his policies, most mainstream democrats would cringe. Obama might have JFK's oratory, but that's about where the comparison stop.

J.Riashi, Grosse Pointe Woods, USA/Michigan

"There could be an attack on Mr Obama himself, but he is protected by the Secret Service."
Wasn't JFK also protected by these guys?

Moleman, Breda, Netherlans

In Winsconsin Hillary said "Words are cheap" - I can't believe she keeps saying this. This just seems to be so scary and ignorant. The right words can cause huge changes to happen without having to resort to strong-arm Clintonian tactics to get things done. We have to respect that there are still going to be Republicans in office and we need someone who RESPECTS them just as he respects Democrats, who respects people from all walks of life.
I respect Barack Obama because he has the courage to speak about people that people find easy to scapegoat (Muslims), easy to openly hate (gays), or easy to ignore (people in Indian Reservations). Not to mention that we still haven't gotten very far in equality among races particularly black and white. He doesn't try to pretend he is always for the majority, he fights for the underdog. I am a white (straight)american and I feel these are the American values worth fighting for.

b, Bay Area, USA

Ah, yes. The Kennedy years: the Bay of Pigs, the Cuban missle crisis, the beginning of the Viet Nam debacle. Had he not been assasinated, I suspect history would have proven much harsher on JFK. If Obama is the sequel, no thank you.

William Wylde , Los Angeles,

Kennedy is heavily over-idealized because of his tragic death. Youth and idealism work fine if they go untested. It is also extremely dangerous.

Joe, London, UK

There are only two kinds of scholars; those who love ideas and those who hate them.
Emile Chartier

b, Bay Area, USA

McCain's plans to continue the war for many years to come will simply continue what Bush began: the shrinking of our middle class and increase of poverty. We can't afford this war financially or morally. It is ripping our nation in half, and it is causing more hatred of the U.S. abroad. In 2008 alone, the Iraq war will cost the average American family more than $15,000; that's more than half of their annual income. We need a President who has to power to negotiate and who would use force only as a last resort. That is certainly not McCain; it is Barack Obama.

Jan Quarles, New York, USA

Sometimes you just have to go with what feels good.

Robert Eric Johnson, Grand Junction, Colorado

We are tired of dynasties. We had Bush I and Bush II.
Clinton I cleared the ground for Bush II.
Why on earth would Clinton II do any better than Clinton I who
had all the opportunities in the world to change the country and
squandered them all.

We do not want to be another Pakistan.
We are still a republuc, not a monarchy.
This is a factor in the Obama appeal.

No Queen Hillary!

Michael, Hartford, CT

Er, uh (JFK impersonation), John F. Kennedy was an neoconservative and a supply sider. He engaged in military aggression against the Communiofascists around the world. He cut tax rates 20% on the wealthiest Americans in order to spur growth, i.e., he implemented a trickle down economics program. He accused his Republican opponent of failing to spend enough on defense. The JFK of today is ..... George W. Bush. Barack Obama is the James Earl Carter of today. He refuses to conceded that Reagan was a good president; because he would return us to Jimmy Carter's 1978 USA and the world.

The Objective Historian

The Objective Historian, New York, New York

One accomplishment of J.F.K. that seems to be overlooked is that a nuke exchange did not take place doing the Cuban Missile Crisis. God knows there were generals on both sides that were champing at the bit to go at it and have done with it. Just imagine a world after such an exchange and you might have a better view of J.F.K. As one who will be seventy in May, I think Obama is the better choice.

Michael, Louisville, U.S.A./Kentucky

Kennedy did nothing? Mr. Yenmore and the like miss the key point of President Kennedy's Presidency as well as the key point of this article. Presidents lead. They are the voice of our nation and drive action. To simply attempt capture of a President's impact through mere legislative accomplishments is to diminish our democracy. President Kennedy inspired this nation and generations to give back to this great country that has given us so much. We have spent the last several years trying to protect ourselves rather than grow. Barack Obama will provide light that will allow us to flower so we can emerge from the dark clouds that have stunted us. We are in as much danger, perhaps more, than we were eight years ago and all we have to show for it is massive debt. Wake up from your own darkness and make a contribution.

Greg Hayes, Sacramento, CA

The UK Obama Meetup has 200 people. It's growing exponentially. Obama mania is sweeping the U.S.

I agree that party superluminaries, known as superdelegates, might be throwing away the election should they go against the express votes of the majority of Americans who voted in primaries and caucuses across the U.S.

Hillary's had it, but is in a state of denial and grabbing. It's a true tragedy - this whippersnapper comes along and takes away her prize that she was a good party member and waited for.

That's politics.

Hope over status quo; young people mobilised again; Americans who haven't voted in years swarm to the polls.

Beware Republicans! Those who've supported Bush and his programmes - Beware! November is coming!

Carole Bell
www.Americans-Away-From-Home.com

Carole Bell, London, UK

It is a baseless canard that Barack Obama has no well-thought policy positions. They are there for examination at his website, and they are not far different from those put forth by Hillary Clinton. The difference between the two is not about policy: it is about the ability to inspire, unite, and lead not just the American people, but the people of the world in battling dangers that are beyond any one country to overcome: international terrorism; global poverty; global disease; global warming. Barack Obama is equipped as no other to take on these vital issues.

Stephen Harvester, Westfield, MA

JFK came from a family that had been fully immersed in politics for at least four generations (and still is). Everything else was secondary to politics for the entire clan. JFK probably knew more about politics by the time he graduated from grade school than Barak will ever know. Barak just like JFK? I don't think so.

William Weber, Simi Valley, CA

Interesting article.

Kate, New York, USA

For me the mere idea that Hillary could win the nomination and become President makes me sick.The reason is simple.We hold our constitution highly.Her presidency woul be nothing more than her husband assuming office for a third time through the back door
Our forefathers would be turning in their graves for not having anticipated this unconstitutional scenario.
I like Hillary as a registered democrat, but the reality is that Bill 's campanig has shown the true image of the Clintons

Comlan Michel, Concord , NH

To compare Obama to JFK is wacky. This guy has only told me what is wrong, not how he really intends to fix our problems. This wonderful country of which I am so proud is going down the tubes in the high speed lane.

J Cortland, Novelty, Ohio

Rees-Mogg's column is not unlike an Obama speech -- long on rhetoric, short on specifics. A return to the "1960s with McCain"? Please. The devil is in the details -- when you can get them. Obama's political ads present a recycled laundry list of 1960s-era agitprop. A new candidate with old ideas -- but what does that matter when, as usual, emotion trumps ideas on the left?

David Nevers, Omaha Beach, France

McCain is a one term president and the wrong choice for Republicans, who continue to fail in having foresight. The article is correct that Clinton would divide and make the fight for the presidency that much more difficult. Robbie in his comments performs that neo-con trick: instill fear and avoid facts. Don't you people read and think? This is why Brits and others around the world laugh at the U.S. because 50% are one-issue voters who fail to use reason, who fail to believe in hope, but who succeed in "staying the course" of dogma and failed doctrine.

Ronald, Atlanta, Georgia

Last I remember JFK wasn't a great president, but merely romanticised as one due to his assassination; bay of pigs anyone?
I've always considered myself a democrat, but if Obama gets the nomination I will be voting for McCain.

Andre, San Francisco, CA

A great analysis in this article. What a decision for the USA.
Personally as an ex-Brit, I think that we have to move forward into this 21st century. I loved John McCain, but he's getting old. Clinton is a repeat of episodes with "Bill". I think the new president is going to have to be full of energy to cope with all these problems, -- apart from Iraq, I wonder how much difference there really is between McCain and Obama.? This summer is going to be very interesting!-- we're all going to be watching very carefully>

Christine barth, Columbus, Ohio. USA

The premise is wholly ridiculous. JFK was a war hero, tested by fire and who served a number of terms in the House before the Senate. Obama is likable enough, but I would say he is more like Sanjay or some other American Idol.

Prospector, Coldfoot, Alaska

"A new generation of ideas"... ?

Name three.

John G, London,

With 1 speech, HRC inspired me to turn my life around & become a child advocate. She can effect change because she inspires us to do more than push a vote button and wait for the change ding from the hope microwave.
If Obama's speeches inspire a social revolution, great! Hopefully his military policy will outshine the Bay of Pigs & he'll show better judgement than JFK did in ignoring allies, using military force to overthrow Iraq's government & putting Sadaam Hussein in charge. Should BO win by likening himself to the original guy who got it wrong in Iraq?
Little-known Clinton trivia:
'60-canvassed Chicago to help uncover voter fraud described by earlier poster. What's crazy...she
-canvassed for Nixon who had the moral high ground
-was 13
'61-organized babysitting for migrant farmers
'74-staff on Nixon impeachment inquiry
'92-named "one of the more important scholar-activists of the last two decades" for work on child rights

So, she's no JFK-she's better!

Carrie, Detroit, Michigan, US

First of all, Edwards and Obama took their own names off the Michigan ballots. They did this because they didn't think they had a chance in Michigan anyway.

The controversy over seating Michigan's delagates went to the courts the judge determined that primaries weren't democratic processes and political parties had a right to create whatever rules they wished in their process of choosing their candidates.

Clinton did not campaign in Michigan, but there was a campaign for people to vote "uncommitted" on their ballot. This campaign was a bit misleading, since they seemed to mean that an uncommitted vote would count to seat delagates, whereas a vote for one of the candidates on the ballot would not.

Elizabeth, Muskegon, Michigan

Mcaine is just another warmonger who would keep us in Iraq for many years to come simply because to save face in the world. Hey, we made a mistake! Let's admit to it and get out without sacrificing more lives. Our economic perdicament will remain unchanged under his tutelage.
Hilary is just another " grey haired old man " in a pants suite. business as usual with no change.
Obama is the only hope for that 180 we need to turn the world around. And WE MUST TURN THE WORLD AROUND! Lack of experience also means no more of the same old rhetoric and deal making that benefit only the elite few.

Steve, San Diego, USA / CA

Please note that the media of today is not the unbiased media of years ago. All the newspapers, tv and radio stations are owned by big corporations and they routinely use their reporters to influence the public to vote a certain way. Why? Simple, because it benefits them in some way - one hand washes the other. For exmple, how do you think Obama has managed to get so much $ for his campaign? And why does he even need all that much $? Think people!! Stop thinking like a herd of sheep and waiting for some talk show host to tell you who to vote for while she's using your consumer $ to fund her million $ lifestyle.

Sue, Philadelphia, PA

This article is ridiculous. Has the author of this article actually read any of Sen. Obama's proposals? They are no different than anything any other moderate to liberal Democrat has proposed. Sen. Obama's scanty resume would raise eyebrows if he were running for Illinois governor. He is utterly unqualified to be president. But that is unlikely to happen. I am firmly convinced that, despite constant promotion of his candidacy by the supposed unbiased media, his lack of experience and convention political skill will ensure that he loses in a landslide.

Andrew Sandfoss, Cold Spring, USA/KY

As a woman who was pre-boomer but current to the real beginnings of the women's movement in the US, I am compelled to make this point: conservatives in the US have been painting Hillary Clinton with the "wicked witch of the West" brush since Bill Clinton first took office. Their attacks have only become more vehement since political jockeying for the 2009 Presidential elections began. I have seen vile things written about her "from one good old boy to another," far less likely than the evil lies that circulated about Obama.

I fear I've selected the wrong person again - to *win*, at least. I have no doubt she is the very best possible candidate and would be the best, most effective president. She's smarter than any of them, politically even more savvy than her husband, and completely aware of what a president must do to make change.

Obama has a fairy-tale like image, but far too little experience in Washington to know how real change is accomplished there. Pity that.

Ida L. Ash, Jacksonville, FL

Where did this myth come from that Obama has "no experience" or has "done nothing"? I saw evidence of the opposite in the Times Online yesterday. I quote: "During the first (8) eight years of his elected service he sponsored over 820 bills. He introduced:

233 regarding healthcare reform,
125 on poverty and public assistance,
112 crime fighting bills,
97 economic bills,
60 human rights and anti-discrimination bills,
21 ethics reform bills,
15 gun control,
6 veterans affairs and many others. "

Did all of them get passed? Of course not, but Obama has shown that he knows about law. Editing the Harvard Law Review probably did not hurt. Obama also seems to know that the only way to make progress is a fractious democratic society is to emphasize *process* over ideology. You get everybody to sit down at the table, and you look for win-win resolutions to common problems. Pouring money into "green" research and energy generation is an example. How much more productive that would be than what the U.S. has done in Iraq! Occupying the "bully pulpit" of the presidency and having good communication skills, Obama as a president will be in a good position to make things happen. He will do it the way Bill Clinton did when operating at his best, through communication and compromise. That is how the U.S. had radical welfare reform and balanced budgets by the end of the 1990s. Obama is criticized for not staking out extreme positions now for the sake of the campaign, but his strategy of coalition-building and conciliation is best for somebody who wants to get things done in the long run.

RD, Statesboro, Georgia

Hardly a JFK. LOL That is the silliest thing i ever heard.

misse, arkadelphia, ar

Yeah, that's the ticket! "Obama will raise taxes on oil companies", which will cause gas prices to go up. when will you socialists learn? when you penalize the companies that put Americans to work, it is the American worker that pays, not the corporation or it will force these corporations to leave the U.S. then you'll complain again. JFK CUT TAXES, believed in a strong military, and said "Ask NOT what your country can do for you..but what YOU CAN DO FOR YOUR COUNTRY"! Sounds anti-socialist to me! Obama is not the least like Kennedy, Obama is a SOCIALIST, but if one is shallow and swoons at empty words then i suppose one might think there is a resemblance. NOTHING IS FREE. When government offers "free" health care WE WILL PAY with our health and our pocket. OBama is nothing more than an inexperienced Hillary.

Deane Pradzinski, Highland, CAlifornia

Saw a link to this article at www.polijam.com Site has great political links and other news items. Obama is a good orator with prepared text, and apparently has difficulties during debates, where the text cannot be fully prepared in advance. But during the last few days, we started realizing that his best lines are the same as those of the current governor of Massachusetts. It seems that they both share the same campaign manager. Is the manager the author of the brilliantly written oratory? How much of it can really be attributed to Obama himself?

NY Bill, NYC, USA

Interesting comparison between JFK and Obama but as a Brit who has no right to say who should be the next President, it shows up in Obama's records of general appeal to generals from all walks of life, rich, educated, blue colar, white colar you name it...' that he has what it takes to be a president, the next Command -in Chief.

A. Amin, Cardiff, Wales (UK)

Though you are right to say that John McCain is a great American hero, there is an overriding issue that many here are deeply concerned about - the balance of the Supreme Court. Electing him would tip it 6-3 toward a very conservative, activist court that would influence every aspect of our government and society. A Democrat must win in November.

Judith Dickerson, Studio City, CA

I, like the author am a great admirer of John McCain.
I am a 100% disabled veteran who has worked closely with al-Qaeda terrorists and fully appreciates the nature of American power and the responsibility in its use that has been sorely lacking these past 16 years.
However, I could only vote for McCain if the choice were to be between him & Hillary Clinton.
My complete distaste for Clinton is based upon her complete lack of two (or more) of the 4 C's of American political leadership.
Courage, commitment, competency and candor.
Primarily, I believe the office of President of the United States should be held by a person who is trustworthy and can be counted upon to have the courage not only to make the hard calls, but to admit when circumstances have changed and alter course.
I could not support McCain over Obama because I do not believe McCain has the temperament to hold the office.
a man that cannot control his temper should not be in charge of the most powerful military in the world.

P. Walker, Memphis, Tennessee

For the record, JFK was a war hero (though some claim that is incorrect -- to each his own), a Congressman and a Senator. He was the son of an Ambassador and a legendary ladies man. He was also a smart political player.

Obama has never been in the military, was only elected to the Senate because the sitting Republican was embroiled in a sex scandal and the GOP ran the insane Alan Keyes against him. Before that, his voting record in the Illinois legislature demonstrates he has no spine: over 100 'present' votes instead of taking on controversial positions. Some call this political acumen, I call it cowardice. He has shown the same yellow streak in the US Senate, saying on the record he "didn't know" a vote on the Lieberman resolution was taking place? Really - inept staff or cowardice?

Recently, it has been shown that a series of staged fainting spells took place at his rallies, where exactly the same script is recited by the minister and "someone in the audience."

J Wagner, Phoenix, AZ, USA

Continued:
Now we have this con stealing lines from friends and foe alike. He is a charlatan, a mirage, a phony, and a coward. He is the most liberal senator in the US Senate (when he shows up to vote). He is linked with radical elements (Weather Underground, his anti-Israel church) and a shady slumlord (Rezko) whose trial is set to begin 3 March, just before the Texas and Ohio primaries. With any luck he will be indicted by the Pennsylvania primary.

So, if this fraud is the new JFK - best of luck to him. John McCain will fillet him in the primary, Republicans have a habit of making elections about national security and this guy is not prepared for such a row.

J Wagner, Phoenix, AZ, USA

Obama is definately the most JFK like of any candidate in recent history. For those of you who don't think that Hope inspires change, then you are as ignorant as the vote you have. I do believe that John McCain is the best Republican Candidate. I also believe that Barak Obama is the best Democratic Candidate. As for the best of the two. That depends on what you are looking for. Experience is a great asset to have, no arguing with that. However, a fresh start and a younger person to endure what is to come our next president would lead me to believe that Obama is a run-away with the presidency. Experience is over-rated. It only gets you so far in life. Fresh ideas for fixing everything from our economy, our healthcare system, and ending this war are things that I believe need imediate attention. Therefore, my vote will rightfully go to the best candidate on either ticket, Barak Obama.

Jeremy, Sioux Falls, SD

Obama might be young and new to the Washington politics however, I believe his methods of conducting busy in Washington would be fair and equal across all party lines and to the american people. This country needs a new style of government which the american people can believe and trust. I agree that the HOPE message can grow thin, but we as americans live in a free world country in which dreams, ambition, and visions are first initiatived in our minds to words and action. The motivation of accomplishing a task is a DESIRE and WILL to acheive in life PERIOD!!! Well they say it is hard to teach a (old dog new tricks). This country is ready for a CHANGE! OUT with the old regime and in with a new purpose and direction!

G.T., Dallas, U.S.

As a life-long democrat, I was too young to vote for JFK, but did campaig for him. I find it incredible that so many pundits are comparing Obama as the first black Kennedy. Unfortunately, I rather see him as the first black Carter.
I admire Jimmy Carter tremendously as an elder statesman and volutary worker for the poor and downtrodden, but let´s face it he was a disaster as a President. The blowback from his four years gave us Reagan, Bush and Bush. Whichever candidate from the Democratic Party is nominated, he/she will be elected our next President.
The situation in America is similar to the disgust from Nixon´s years. We elected a pie in the sky President and ending up getting a pie in our face.
I am really afraid that if it is Obama, we will end up with a one-term President and the Republicans will be back in power again while the Democrats are banished to the desert for 12 years. Please remember it was the wiley, experienced, knowlegeable, Johnson who got JFK's ideals enacted.

Paul Pekar, Panicale (PG), Italy

There's no doubt in my mind that Obama is the best choice. We may have our differences on the accomplishments of JKF but his contributions and impacts on the American politics at the time was enormous.
Obama will surely make it. He's a broad base and his message of HOPE and CHANGE is what we need in this time of history where the fundamental judgement that should have been used for war were blown out. We need a president who is not only smart but has the ability to unite across the aisle and the whole world in particular. A candidate that knows the importance of Economic policies and the need for a meaningful health care. Oh, go for Obama. You can see a leader if you see one especially if you are one in your family, your world and your community you belong.

George Q., Netcong, USA, NJ

Barack Obama - a John Kennedy for our times...BUNK.

Obama is the Jimmy Carter of our times, without the anti zionist racism.

Cyberdog, GB, WI, USA,

Given facts before us and present times, it is in the intrest of the world that Obama wins the election. He does not only offer hope to Americans alone but the world at large.

Capt. T. Kamanga, Lilongwe, Malawi

The only simarliarity between Obama and JFK is the youth. The writer doesn't know what he's talking about. JFK was a conservative democrat. Obama is a socialist democrat. JFK was more conservative than John McCain is. If Obama was President in 1960, the Cubans would have Russian nuclear missles pointed at us. Obama would still be "talking" to them. That's one of many distinctions between the two.

Eric, orlando, USA/Florida

Obama is glib if not downright silly. What do you Brits have against the Clintons? Without Bill's intervention you would still have unrest in Northern Ireland.

Anu Bose, Ottawa,

2 utterly dreadful democratic candidates.
1 lunatic republican President, so their candidates are barely recognised as having a chance.
A group of female voters voting for the woman just because she's a woman.
A group of black voters voting for the mixed race man just because they believe him to be black.

I mean, you really couldn't make this stuff up. America - land of the free and the insane.

Tom Franklin, London, UK

I am unhandicapped by any partisan interest or knowledge of US politics, but I feel sure that if any major reforms are made in the next presidency they are more likely to be made by John McCain than Barack Obama; not in any reflection of the two personalities but because of the importance of linkage in the political process.

Henry Percy, London, UK

Before "Chris from Chicago" compares anyone, he might want to do a little more reading. JFK was never shot down. He was a skipper on a PT Boat (PT109), not in the Atlantic, but the South Pacific. Second of all, even with 14 years of service in the Congress, he was still found unfavorable by a former president and First Lady (Harry S. Truman and Eleanor Roosevelt) when he ran. He was told to wait his turn, just as another former president and First Lady have been trying to spread to Obama (Bill and Hillary).

Also the JFK/Obama slogans are similar. Broad messages of hope. JFK-"We Can Do Better." Obama-"Change We Can Believe In."

Clarence, Washington, DC

I see where Lord Reese Mogg is saying we do not want to return to the 1990s. Is this perchance the same Lord Reese Mogg of the London Times and BBC who co-authored a book called The Great Reckoning which predicted the imminent collapse of the American economy during that suplus producing decade. If so then I can understand why he at least does not want to go back and relive that embarrassent.

will, seattle, washington

You said in the byline and in the article that Obama has ideas, but what are they? I keep hearing that in the media, but all I hear from the candidate are lofty platitudes that allegedly inspire the same young college students that didn't turn up at the polls to vote for John Kerry four years ago.

I would have thought that after 10 years of Tony Blair, the British would have been able to recognize style over substance.

Howard, Chicago, USA

JFK was a tax-cutting conservative Democrat who invaded Cuba. And you think Obama is like him how?

Bill, Farmington Hills, Michigan

My fear, is one day to read....Someone killed the president Barack Obama, likemade with J.Kennedy

Bartolomeu Santos, Salvador , Bahia/Brasil

I am one to whom Obama has gotten involved in politics. And while his focus may not be NASA as the first responder mentioned, he is shooting for the moon in health care, in caring for the environment by developing more green jobs in relation to energy and in his desire to see peace in the world instead of supporting preemptive war. He is shooting for the moon when it comes working on behalf of the poor by expanding access to jobs, creating a living wage and creating tax breaks for the poor. He is shooting for the moon in many ways, right here on earth and that is worth getting excited about. He is moving us forward with the audacity of hope.

JR Woodward, Los Angeles, USA

Have you ever noticed that internet is, like the real world, man oriented? Try searching for sports, movies or books with any search engine, and the results will show you little female presence.

This is why Goo-Woman, with the collaboration of Google through its Custom Search Engine Service, has developed a new women oriented search engine. The idea is very simple, search for anything, and the results will emphasize women related sites. For example, women movie directors, women scientists or women sport associations.

Of course, Goo-Woman doesn't want to substitute Google, nor any other search engine, it is just a symbolic and useful tool to remember that there is still a lot of work to do in equality between women and men.

www.goo-woman.com

Jane Richards, Los Angeles,

I'd like to point out that many Obama supporters - myself included - were apathetical towards the politics in this country before this man came along. While, yes, he's not the perfect candidate - a little short on experience being the biggest detraction - what drew us to him was the honesty in his words and actions, his mastery of policy (contrary to what many in his opponent's camp would have us believe), and his ability to put together and manage a near flawless campaign against a wealthier, much more connected and more campaign savy opponent.

While I respect Senator Clinton - I voted for her twice as a New Yorker - I think what we see in Obama is an opportunity to break out of the mold, to forge a new direction in what has been a stagnant political system for the past two plus decades.

Brian A Bucher, New York, NY, USA

This is probably the stupidest article I have ever read. First of all I don't even think Obama will be the next president. Also, people do not realize how conservative JFK really was when he was in office. If he came back and saw how liberal his beloved democratic party has became he would smack everyone involved starting with his brother Ted.

Derek Davis, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

If he is our next JFK, let's hope he has a thick skull.

Lee, Dallas, TX

Obama is like JFK in that his inexperience is exceed only by his ambition. As for new ideas, Obama's ideas sound a lot like the ideas of the noted "baby boomers" Hillary and John Edwards.

Larry Washington, Atlanta, USA/GA

Barack Obama is simply America's last, best hope in this election.

Indi, Tulsa, OK

It is a shame on your part to call this election like it has already been won. Obama is a man not yet with experience to be the president as likable as he may be, if he is really the man many think him to be he will be around for years to come and will be president when he has proven himself to the people. Words are words and we Americans are not as stupid as to be mesmerized and hypnotized by charisma without ever thinking of the true benefit of our nation. Sorry...Obama is no Kennedy.

marci, fort laudedale, USA FL

Dear Timesonline,

Are we having a cold Civil War in this country right now?

What could happen if Obama is elected President, could it turn into an actual war? Today on CSPAN, bigot callers came out in full force, this is disturbing.

Tommie, Houston, Tx

If you ask me, all three major candidates for the White House- McCain, Obama, and Hillary Clinton- give the entire world yet another chance to see us as a laughing stock.

Surely, we can find better candidates for national elective office than these three charlatans. We need to look beyond the political arena for fresh leadership. I don't pretend to know who who these new personalities might be. I just know we need to end the current political system by which we select national leaders- it's a circus. And like any circus, you get what you pay for. In our case it's a choice between a power hungry couple (the Clintons), an opportunistic, empty-headed orator (Sen. Obama), and a Republican Senator who admits he doesn't understand the economy (not to mention the irresponsible votes he's cast in Congress).

THink about it- we can do better!

Robert A. Wilson, Hartford City, USA/Indiana

I don't think Obama is Kennedy either, and I support Obama. As an independent I recognize the enormous partisanship of Clinton and the Clinton years. But unlike Rees-Mogg I disagree that the greatest strengths of Obama lie in his oratory. He's a statesman, a very different type from the technocrats who have been in power for a very long time. This is not just a choice between the past and the future, or the left or the right. Obama has made it a choice between two very different types of people--between bureaucrats (Clinton and McCain) and a leader (guess who?).

William Duane, Milwaukee, WI

Obama is not the JFK of our times. JFK was a veteran who was shot down in the Atlantic. He served in Congress as well as the Senate, and had much more exposer to foreign affiars. He admired others with a profile in courage, rather than ridiculing legislators for making difficult choices.

Who can stop Obama from becoming the President and Commander in Chief of our Armed Forces - the American people. The idea that an individual so cozy with the corrupt Chicago political machine, who brags about using drugs, and who has few accomplishments to speak of is going to go from community organizer who attends a racist church to the Presidency is ridiculas.

American's don't really know Obama - but they will. McCain is not Bush, nor is he Allen Keyes, and they are not going to treat Obama with the kid gloves that Sen. Clinton has been forced too. Hillary has a better shot than most talking heads give her credit, so I wouldn't be counting the chickens just yet. He is not JFK in any way

chris, Chicago, US/ IL

They (JFK & Obama) sound alike because of the same speech writer Ted Sorensen. Let Obama speak for himself, the similarity will end there. Obama does not have the skillset required by the next president to deal with the significant issues facing America. A must read is an article in the latest Economist magazine.

Vik, Vancouver, Canada

You must be kidding. Obama, the kennedy of out time. First of all, the Kennedy Presidency was not that great for the country. Secondly, Kennedy inspired the American people by sharing his political visions with them. Obama on the other hand inspires by using meaningless quotes from others that lack any substance or relivance to the problems that we face. It really amazes me that the American people would fall for a canidate that lacks the imagination to inspire with his own words.

Bill, Daly City, USA

If you liked G W Bush you will really like McCain.

billy mac, walnut creek, california

I'm staggered that a sane person cannot see through the immense froth and pseudo-religious mumbo-jumbo that is Obama. (See:
http://obamamessiah.blogspot.com/

To understand Obama, think of the hype around Tony Blair's election campaign of 1997 multiplied by ten. Like Blair, he is a handsome lawyer who can work a crowd. Like Blair, he is a master of the sound-bite, making manipulative use of patriotism and religion to get what he wants. He is evasive on what he really believes and, under the surface, scathing about many of his own countrymen's most cherished values.

To make a comparison within US politics, he is basically a black John Edwards.

He is allowing desperate leftwingers to project their 'West Wing'-type fantasies on to him by being low on content and high on hype. He will let them down. Let's hope he does so on the campaign trail and not in the White House or we'll all pay the price.

John RRT, UK,

Obama is no JFK! His official education plan indicates that he will gut the NASA budget and postpone the Constellation program (Constellation is the Space Shuttle's successor) for five years to fund early education. I thought education and other worthy programs would be funded with all the money Obama will free up by ending the war in Iraq?

But what disturbs me more is the utter lack of that JFK "to the Moon" spirit that was so inspiring.

With apologies to Star Trek, Senator Obama's motto might be, "To boldly go NOWHERE..."

Peter Thorogood, Scranton, USA/PA

Obama is no JFK. JFK cut taxes and was strong on national defense. In contrast, Obama has shown just the opposite policy characteristics. As a matter of fact (look at his policy recommendations), Obama would attempt to create and expand government programs in every conceivable subject area (except defense of course).

Keith, Brookline, NH, USA

On US national security, McCain is burdened by making the worst mistake in US national security policy in the last 60 years, the disastrous invasion of Iraq which was based entirely on lies of WMD and 911 connections, aided al-Qaeda, aided extremist Muslim militias and stopped US from getting Bin Laden. Afghanistan is now Taleban stronghold and Muslim extremists and allies of Bin Laden will soon rule in Pakistan which has the nuclear weapons that McCain and the Republicans claimed were in Iraq.

Obama got Iraq right. He opposed the war and laid out clearly the consequences of the Iraq invasion. All his predictions came true. Obama makes a very effective argument that McCain has demonstrated poor judgment in US national security.

Obama is the only candidate who can challenge McCain on McCain's failure in Iraq and the Middle East.

Brion Lutz, Portland, USA/OR

"Blacks need to apply their minds and vote Obama." Mab Shuku

mab, that is an absolutely disgraceful thing to say. individuals should vote according to what's best for themselves and everyone else, according to their consciences.

how, exactly, do you think the concept of all blacks voting the same way (for a black man) will counter racism?

the mass of voters you see as "black" is made up of people who may have very little in common with each other - even physically, which is no measure, they are different shades of black and with very different features.

you would appear to be part of the problem, rather than part of the solution.

jem, london, uk

Where to begin. JFK spent some time in the military, served in the house then the senate. His big rallying cry was ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country. BHO's rallying cry is government will have a plan for every problem you have. He claims he will pay for all those programs by taxing the rich but we all know the rich can only pay for so much and then we have trickle down taxes to pay for all those programs. Right now were he alive JFK would be a conservative republican. So BHO is no JFK.

Kabookey, pittsburgh, pa

God should vote for obama if he see he can change america coz no one knows only God. But I myself, I pray God to Vote for Obama none else.

Rose, Emonton, canada

Whilst few doubt Senator McCain's personal courage, it is inaccurate to claim that he is "probably a wiser man who knows more about war than any President since Eisenhower".

He may indeed have more personal experience of combat, and an understanding of military strategy, but this does not make him wiser.

This is the same man who in the CNN/Youtube Republican debate in November 2007 claimed that, with respect to the Vietnam War, "it was American public opinion that forced us to lose that conflict".

Such a view is simply inaccurate: negative public opinion about Vietnam did not lead to defeat, but was a product of the recognition that the conflict was unending and unwinnable.

Senator McCain is simply espousing a well-worn fallacy which refuses to accept any limits to American power, prefering to blame internal defeatism for failure.

This is not the view of a wise man: his election would not bode well for the security and freedom of America, nor of the wider world.

Sunil, Cambridge, UK

I'm not an American, I'm an Western Canadian and contrary to popular myth all Canadians are not French separtists who hate the U.S. Barack Obama is a young black senator. That's all he is. He has the backing of a lot of money and the best speech writers that money can buy. Experience? None. Deep down resolve? No, he'll do what his handlers tell him. He is not Jack Kennedy. Who would you want as Commander in Chief of the most powerful country on Earth? Be honest, there is only one I hope to see win. McCain. He's been around the block, he's been tested. He's shown he is not a yes man, the powerful can't control him, he is a maverick and the better man. It would be a shame if people voted for someone because of color instead of who would do the job better.

Robert Grimshaw, Victoria, B.C., Canada

Good grief. Behind every successful female politician are the hordes of chauvinistic male journalists who tried to stop her. You would think she was Madonna and this was the 1980s. In case the Times hasn't checked, more delegates have voted for Hillary than anyone else. For the moment, the Dem. Party is ignoring 360 ballors cast mostly for HIllary in Michigan in Florida.

Emma H., Ottawa,

Obama is hardly comparable to JFK. They are nothing alike in character, thinking, or policy. JFK was nurtured from youth on the milk of politics through his father, having come in contact at an early age with many important national politicians. JFK was a conservative and would likely today be a Republican. He believed in small government, lower taxes and a strong aggressive national defense. He was somewhat reticent on pursuing aggressive civil rights.
Obama is naive, JFK was savy about the evils of the world. He would not be calling for a summit with Islamic/Arabic leaders to hear their grievances. Obama is an empty vessel spewing worthless platitudes. He won is Senate seat without any real opposition, he won the Democrat SEnate primary without any real opposition and was appointed by the Democratic party to be the candidate for local office, without any real competition. Obama is more frightening than Clinton.

A view from the middle, Philadelphia, Pa

There is another "hypothetical" event that could end the presidential prospects of Obama: voters coming to their senses. Why in the world would anyone roll the dice with such an ethereal, wispy, untried nonentity? Because he's a good speaker? I value other assets much more highly in a president: integrity, gravitas, political courage, character, experience, intelligence, sound ideas, and non-partisanship. With Obama's far-left views, he would be unable to work with conservatives. With John McCain, we have everything we could ask for in a presidential candidate. God bless him!

Dan Mathews, Kent, USA/ CT

It is my opinion, as a very concerned 77 year old senior, Senator Obama has much to offer our country. Yes he is young in some voters eyes BUT: I believe his intelligence , message, willingness to put forth fresh ideas is the very qualities we need to bring our country back to stability, respect from the world, and on a solid course in which our society can function as the democracy we were supposed to be--""one nation under God" with equal opportunity, justice, good-will and prosperity for all. It will take a lot of hard work ,energy and time to repair the damage done to this country in the past seven years and personally I believe Obama is the best suited for this daunting task.

Patricia W. Fail, port matilda, pa

You all need to WAKE-UP! What is so wrong with a candidate amitting to his mistakes? If the current adminitration had done the same, we probable would not be in IRAQ.

Obama strikes me as a candidate that would take all of your concerns into consideration in order to lead this country out of the hell we've live in for the past six years. Open your minds and look at what you see for the future of America, then get ready to take you voice to Obama and we can all work with him to see the America that once influenced the world to be a better place.

Obama want us alll to participate and we shuld be ready. He wants to build scholls not prisons. Pay attention and be ready to ask what can you do for America. His so called inexperience should be refreshing to you. The experienced ones in this race represent the same old thing. They get rich while we stay poor and inprisoned in our own country. Who can be worst then Bush? Certainly not Obama. Phobia for change? MSM brainwash?
PeaceLA

LaDonna, New York, New York

John F. Kennedy didn't even win the 1960 election! So much for Americans embracing a new direction. 1960 represents a "stolen" election just like 2000!

Mark Barrett, Sedgefield, UK

I don't understand how we can nominate or elect people who don't really understand how our economy works. All social issues are superficial compared to the economy, which actually affects our lives regardless of our ethnicity or sex. What is bad for business is bad for everyone, especially the poor and middle class, who bear the brunt of attacks on business. Higher corporate taxes will simply get people fired. If obama were REALLY like kennedy, he would cut taxes and make everyones life better.

bob johnson, gillsworth , tennessee, usa

The swooning by European writers over Obama is silly, but predictable. I read articles published in well known European periodicals and understand how its readers have such a uninformed view of the United States. The article in question here has adorned Obama the next President based on his speeches that carry as much content as those of athletic coaches. How can the author be taken seriously? He sounds like a little school girl who has seen her first concert and rock star. I'd be harsher in my criticism if our own American journalists were not doing the same. The man is but three years removed from being a state legislator and there is a mad rush to make him President of the United States because he is an inspirational speaker? The cheerleading tryouts are almost over. Democrats need to be careful that they are not following symbolism over substance as it could cost them dearly in November. The election is theirs and they are about to lose it by nominating a novice with a nice smile.

Richard , Atlanta, Georgia USA

Obama's speeches devoid of his rhetoric and soaring delivery are bleak affairs, portraying a depressing American condition that exist only for the transient few, who cycle through poverty on their way to better lives. Studies have shown that the class of persons in "poverty" turns over rapidly in America and that folks are poor because of temporary dislocations that are eventually overcome with help from traditional means: family, friends, charity and government.

When BO talks about he struggles of young mothers and students who must work two jobs to succeed, I think, Good for them -- in a crucible of fire steel is forged. We used to call that initiative in America and it sold books by the thousands under the Horatio Alger brand.

Back in the day we applauded hard work and people's ability to pick themselves up and improve their lot in life. Now it’s just another excuse for a government program.

Pete Kent, Union, USA/KY

Here, here, Mr. Rees-Mogg, well said !! Mr. Obama has chrisma, vision and brilliance. AND, he happens to have a great background to be president also, with more years in ELECTED PUBLIC OFFICE than Hillary herself !! (He has 8 years as State Senator of Illinois, and 3 years as U.S. Senator. Hillary has a total of 6 years as U.S. Senator).

Obama has also worked as a Civil Rights attorney, community organizer, and Professor of Constitutional Law. He graduated in the top 1% of his class at Harvard Law School, and was elected President of the Harvard Law Review, a great honor.

Hillary has no such honors, nor does she have a distinguished academic record. AND, she FLUNKED HER LAW EXAM TWICE.

Those who claim Hillary is the "experienced" one really need to check the facts. Hillary was a CORPORATE LAWYER her ENTIRE CAREER in Arkansas, defending big corporations against lawsuits. AND PLEASE don't tell me her years as First Lady qualify her to be president !!

Karen Millican, New York, New York

McCain?...give me a break...8 years too late...and now he wants to follow the economic brilliance of Bush that has brought us to the worst recession in many years.....while keeping us all busy in more wars...Iran,Syria??
Americans wont fall for more of this fear and warmongering another time...

Obama or Hillary...heck no one could be worse than this clown..

Sun, St. Paul,

No, not a JFK. Not like that is as big a complement as you meant it to be. He will be more like this generations Jimmy Carter. He is riding a wave to the white house based completely on his charisma[Contrasted with Bushes complete lack of it]. He lacks any kind of qualifying experience, he completely misunderstands how economic engine of this country works. Worse yet, his Chamberlandistic foreign policy is terrifying. With any luck he will only plunge the world into a global recession.

Neil Beutler, Lehi, Ut

McCain=100 year War....

jay, Los Angeles, California

You are so right Tim YENMOR, the message of HOPE and CHANGE grows real thin as soon as a Republican is SELECTED

Vern Warren, Atlantic Mine, Michigan

Obama is a legistlator more than he's ever been a Governor, but his strength is something that Clinton certainly isn't very good at, and that's building coalitions. McCain would be effective, if he weren't so damned crazy. Hope and Change are ideas that change the political spectrum, and as a young person, we Need a new political spectrum because, frankly, everyone older than me has failed and my world is dying, thank you very much angry white people and disillusioned everyone else. We need Obama, because my generation does need hope. We've never had it. We've had leaders who lie, steal, and cheat. We've had leaders who measure success by how much money they can suck out of our planet by squeezing it to death, and, frankly, the generations older than me echo this disgusting greed. I'm ashamed.

Jeff, Ashland, Wisconsin

Oh, please! A "Kennedy for our time"? More like "a dreamer who has no plan for how to accomplish what he's promised." He has little more experience governing than the kid who flips burgers at McDonalds. Obama appears to have "done no wrong" in his life, especially his political life, because he has done nothing at all. We need experience. We need someone who can get things done. We need someone with a firm grasp of reality and someone who knows how to play the game. After the initial honeymoon, Congress will eat Obama alive.

Robbie, San Diego, CA,

Whatever the merits of your cursory argument that Obama is the new JFK, I'd like to remind you that JFK's presidency was largely a failure. JFK's presidency was mired largely in deadlock; it was Johnson who was able to accomplish most of JFK's agenda because he was a better statesman and better able to work across the aisle with Republicans. History is fairly clear on this point.

But, then again, it's really too much expect a deeper understanding of American history from across the pond.

MS, Austin, TX / USA

JFK? What did JFK do again? Not a single accomplishment comes to light from the brain of a Politcal Science/History double major. If Obama will be our next JFK all Americans should fear him. The last thing we need is another president who sat and smiled and said nice things and cheated on his wife. We need a man like John McCain, whatever party you align with he has the right stuff to be our next President. Obama will not make it, becaue after a while the message of HOPE and CHANGE, grow thin.

Tim Yenmor, McLean,

Whatever the merits of your cursory argument that Obama is the new JFK, I'd like to remind you that JFK's presidency was largely a failure. JFK's presidency was mired largely in deadlock; it was Johnson who was able to accomplish most of JFK's agenda because he was a better statesman and better able to work across the aisle with Republicans. History is fairly clear on this point.

But, then again, it's really too much expect a deeper understanding of American history from across the pond.

Matt, Austin, TX USA

I don't want to see another Clinton in the White House period.
I have been a Republican but need to see some changes in my adopted country USA.I think Obama is the only person who can do this changes. I am 73 years old & in this age in time I would like to see some changes. May the Good Lord bless Barack Obama & family.

Dolly G. Armesto, New York, USA

Baracq Hussein Obama is probably the most refreshing player in the madness that is the American presidential campaign. He is young, energetic and,certainly, well spoken qualities that are quite missing in the other aspirants. These qualities, coupled with the intense revulsion felt toward most of those holding the office since Mr. Kennedy,[ Reagan excepted] have our undereducated, TV sated, illiterate electorate embracing the junior Senator from Illinois with messianic fervor. It is almost as if we had a reincarnation of that former Senator from Illinois- Abraham Lincoln [along with Washington our greatest leader]. That, of course, could hardly be considered the case as the current voting population wouldn't have any idea as to the import of Lincoln to the nation or be able to identify [within a decade] the years of his service as President.
Sen. Obama -upon investigation however- offers the same old leftist, relativism that has infected the West for years. When will it end?

Gerald McOsker, Middletown, Rhode Island

Americans can already see that Hillary is really hungry for power.She had been First Lady for 8 years and she knows all the advantage the Wwhite House comes with.That is the only reason behind her mind. Barrack Obama will definitely do better than all of those McCain and Clinton.
The time has come that a Bright Black Man rules the world.

Achillard, Berlin, Germany

There is no one as senator Obama. There is no comparison between Obama and Clinton. I know that he will be the nominee but he needs to be cafeful with the Clintons. Their attacks against him can be very harmful. They'll all to break him down trying all types of arms. They need a third term in White House to have their taughter take their place at 35 years old in the oval office.

Moreover, Hillary is not a thankful woman. As we can see, when she felt in the South Carolina primary before Obama, she left that state and went to Florida where she wasn't supposed to compete. Normally, by courtesy she should remain in South Carolina to congratulate her contender and say a thank you to her voter, but she didn't.

More after, she went rapidly to Texas to campagning. She forgot all about courtesy: congratulate Obama and say thank you to her voters. She didn't say anything about that. She is ungatful. That kind of person do not deserve our credits, our votes, our presence in their meeting.

Reyo, Atlanta, Georgia

What's missing from the analysis is the Republican skill at turning idealists like Obama into hamburger. Stay tuned...

Rodger Lodger, New York, NY

it's interesting that those most desperate to defend obama's voting record seem most to want to misrepresent mccain. he doesn't want to stay in iraq, he feels obliged to. as for looking around for more wars to start, it seems rather unlikely. maybe you should try treating each candidate fairly, instead of just spinning your own guy?

it's not hard to see who can stop obama. he's had a very easy ride so far. hillary would not "become unelectable" if she stole the nomination; she is unelectable. I suspect obama will become unelectable in due course when the republicans have shed a little more light on his background.

obama may still get elected, of course. given the frequently ridiculous and ignorant comments by americans on here, it seems they are no smarter than the idiots who have repeatedly voted for ken livingstone or nu labour. it will probably make less difference.

the real story here is the lack of a decent candidate for either party.

jem, london, uk

It is ludicrous to compare Obama and JFK. I wish Obama and his Democrat supporters would talk about the real JFK, not the Camelot fairy tale. The real JFK invaded Cuba, sent the military into Vietnam and stared down Kruschev with his finger on the nuclear trigger. The real JFK demanded we stand up to Soviet aggression and "bear any burden" to ensure the freedom of the world. The real JFK challenged us to serve our country, not demand our country give us handouts. The real JFK radically lowered taxes while increasing military and research spending. Obama could not be more different. It's like comparing Elvis Presley and Josef Stalin. OK, they both had charisma, but so what?

Susan , Raleigh, North Carolina, USA

ARE YOU CRAZY! JFK was an experienced Senator, Obama is NOT! this is what you get with Obama; (in his own words)OBAMA THE CHANGE AGENT
Obama said he goofed on votes angered fellow Democrats in the Senate when he voted to strip millions of dollars from a child welfare office on Chicago's West Side. But Obama had a ready explanation: He goofed!
Also announced he had fumbled an election-reform vote the day before, on a measure that passed 51 to 6. The next day, he acknowledged voting "present" on a key telecommunications vote. He stood on March 11, 1999, to take back his vote against legislation to end good-behavior credits for certain felons in county jails. "I pressed the wrong button on that," he said. Obama was the lone dissenter on Feb. 24, 2000, against 57 yeas for a ban on human cloning. "I pressed the wrong button by accident," he said.

But two of Obama's bumbles came on more-sensitive topics, he backed legislation to permit riverboat casinos to operate even when the boats were dockside.

The measure, pushed by the gambling industry and fought by church groups whose support Obama was seeking, passed with two "yeas" to spare -- including Obama's. Moments after its passage he rose to say, explaining that he had mistakenly voted for it.

Obama would later develop a reputation as a critic of the gambling industry, and he voted against a similar measure two years later. But he was clearly confused about how to handle the issue at the time of his first vote, telling a church group that he was "undecided" about whether he backed an expansion of riverboat gambling. And, months earlier, he had voted in favor of a version of the bill.

Obama's vote sparked a confrontation after he joined Republicans to block Democrats trying to override a veto by GOP Gov. George Ryan of a $2-million allotment for the west Chicago child welfare office. being responsible," said Sen. Rickey Hendon, accusing Obama of voting to close the child welfare office.Obama replied "I understand Sen. Hendon's anger, I was not aware that I had voted no on that piece of legislation.

Jack, Cleveland , OH

I wish African-Americans could make up their minds and vote Obama. I'm specifically talking about the Black Congressional Caucus. Clinton has nothing much to offer, her campaign seems vapid and ladled with unprofessional and emotional rants, twaddling about experience and all that. She was part of the vote that took Americans to Iraq. Blacks need to apply their minds and vote Obama. I know many feel they somehow owe the Clintons something since Bill was a darling of the black community the world over. No! to a sequel this time around, the Bush dynasty and the second gulf war was enough.

Mab Shuku, Pretoria/Tshwane, South Africa

Obama did NOT vote against Iraq war. The man was not in the Senate at the time. And Obama is not the second comming of the Messiah. He's a fine speaker, energizer, pop artist who should be on a reality show rather than campaigning for President. He's been in the Senate for two [2] years and most of the time he's not been present for votes.

Hillary has been an excellent Senator for New York.

I certainly vote for reality and knowledge against pie in the sky and falsh words.

Hillary in '08!

Nona, New York City, USA

I am a Professor who has studied World Politics for over 20 years and have read AND ABSORBED thousands of comments concerning the election. I FULLY RESPECT the opinions of every comment I have read even though I may not agree with them! A few critical elements are obvious:
1) Very few Americans have taken a BIG PICTURE PERSPECTIVE of this election, on either a domestic or international level, so let me point them out and you can absorb them, even if you don't accept or agree with them.
Part 1
- Speeches are nothing without DETAILED PLANS and :shakers and movers who can make change by placing political pressure on current politicians. All the rhetoric in the world will not change a thing.
- The political machine in Washington takes years to understand and even longer to influence. Rhetoric evaporates the first step you take inside The Capitol. Lower House Reps and Senators will not be so easily influenced by a few hopes, not matter how the public has reacted.

Jude S, New York, USA

Let's face it, Obama's DREAM is simply a new way of spinning for higher taxes. Is there anyone left in America (no pun intended) who can put their hand on their heart and affirm their belief that Obama will solve America's economic woes? No. Of course not. When he says 'CHANGE' he means it. That's all American taxpayers will be left with (oops another pun) when Obama gets through with them. Small change.

Scot Richards, Beijing, China

JFK like pop stars are remembered in a false romanticism for the past and their 'potential' as great leader but they didnt have time to expose their faults. Obama is a hollow puppet orator with little else. Voting him in will lesson american prestige and power which in the longer term is bad for the west. The person you should compare him to is an english conservative PM from 37/38. The war in iraq has morphed (regardless of the original intention)into a battle between freedom of religion/movement etc. and autocratic control by unelected mulla's. This goes against the very fundamentals that created the USA and defines the west. Whatever happened to Roosevelt's atlantic charter or Ab Lincoln's govt of the people. Hiding away and pretending the middle east/pakistani islamic fascist will go away is blindly stupid at best. This is a new reformation wars and the sooner europe/US lefties realised this the sooner it will be over & the less dead. Can anyone imaging the pope with an army now?

craig, london,

People stand in awe, looking at Obama, wondering "what is it about this guy?" How does he transcend politics and ideology? Let's see how he does it. Could it be that our political machine has conditioned us to be so WOUNDED as individuals, and so fractured as a nation; that we've been conditioned SO WELL to keep our mouths shut as we witness destruction of sacred human lives, social injustices, and violations of basic human values? Obama represents a high order of pure HEALING MEDICINE. He acknowledges the supressed wounds that have made our souls sickly, and gives us permission to be and feel WHO WE ARE again. He empowers us to see ourselves as healthy human beings, whole citizens, and a healthy nation once again. Obama's vision for change is delivered with compassion, inspiration, resolution, and commitment. You can't deliver more powerful "substance" than that. This is powerful medicine for the burden that we've been shouldering. Bless you, OBAMA

Elizabeth, Providence, Rhode Island

If the US electoral system was not, like the UK one, bedevilled by the stranglehold of the political parties then we would see the choice being offered to the electorate at large of Clinton vs Obama.

Chris, Ashford, Middlesex, UK

excellent analysis. I think Barack Obama is unstoppable. He has the charisma and a message that cannot be ignored. Americans are obviously tired of the old briggade. Most of my American friends and colleagues actually believe that Barack Obama will surely be the next US president. Hillary will suffer a shock defeat in Texas and Ohio.

Jacob, Leeds, UK

I believe Barack Obama is our best hope.

My dad told me the other day that he has voted Republican in every presidential election since Eisenhower. Then he said something that surprised me: that he would vote, come November, for Obama over any of the Republican candidates in this election..... --if we Democrats give him that option.

I hope Barack Obama will be our 44th president.

Tony, Ramah, USA / New Mexico

....you're comparing Obama to the wrong democrat......can you say George McGovern ?

Keith scott, Denver, Co

Barack Obama could very well present the only opportunity the United States has at electing a president that can actually inspire its citezenry to be better Americans. The ground swell for change that Obama's campaign has become is evidence enough of his ability to do so. In short, Hillary Clinton is merely a candidate, and an ineffective and inadequate one at that. Obama is not just a candidate, but a veritable movement.

Beth Harper, Dayton, Ohio

Hey Bill,

Take a look here for numerous pieces of legislation he's introduced and accomplishments: http://www.barackobama.com.

I'm so tired of people saying "Obama supporters can't name and issue" or "What has Obama done?" when they, themselves, won't take a moment to do some research. It's right there for you. Look it up. Try reading one of his books.

If you're not impressed or moved, fine, but at least you're no longer waiting for someone's spoonfed version of who the man is. How much more does he have to do to earn the respect of at least doing some personal research on the man for yourself?

Ignorance is not a strong position.

Robert , Las Vegas, NV

Obama's call for change is indeed very inspirational
but I'd like to know just what he's going to change and how he's going to implement that change. Lofty rhetoric will only carry you so far. I am an Obama supporter but I want to start seeing some substance
on the oh so many problems that America faces.

Bruce L. Northwood, Silver Spring, USA

Did you say Clinton was our best bet to balance the budget? Are you serious? This Iraq war has mounted a debt that even our grandkid's grandkids will still be paying for it. Whatever. Anyway, Hillary should step down. She's destroying the soul of the Democratic party with her deceitful emotional smears. Her campaign instigates and adds salt to the national wound that Bush started with his "FOR US or AGAINST US" propaganda. If Hillary really wanted to serve America, she would recognize value in mending this rift in the Democratic Party and in our country, and concede to the fact that Obama is our best and only choice to do that. If she steps down now, her reputation might still hold as a good leader somewhere else in politics. But for now, her style has soured. Neither she (nor Bill) will never have Obama's gift. OBAMA has the natural charisma, ingenuity, power, and soul to inspire and unite our whole country. He is a president that I can be proud of. Bless you, OBAMA

Elizabeth F., Providence, Rhode Island

Mr Bill from Atlanta
You have a single asked an accomplishment by Obama... if I'm not mistaken
Voicing on "No To War!" in Iraq back in 2002 when all of us voted for ... Is that not an accomplishment
Bringing all the divided people together and creating a momentum that we ever witness.... is that not an accomplishment
Giving Hope to hopless people.... is that not an accomplishment
Organizing those Chicago people on common purpose to see light in their futre .. as a young volenteer... is that not an accomplishment
Somebody please help him to enlight my frind Bill about some legislation that he propose.. or vote for

Vote OBAMA!

YES WE CAN!

Chris, Wisconsin, Wk

In my view, Senator Barack Obama is the best person and candidate out there to be our next president ! Frankly, I am afraid that he might get assassinated in the future (because of discrimination, maybe?). However, I do believe in our Federal Agencies, and I think they have the capability to protect our beloved president. So, no sweat !

OBAMA 08!!! Go Obama !

Dan , San Jose, CA

As a Canadian living near the empire I am always nervous when JFK type mainstream politicians appear with a hyper-inflated rhetoric south of the border. Will Obama's "American Dream" which is presently convulsing the US Democratic party be a good dream (the social democratic "Hope" he seems to be fuzzily aiming at) or will it be a bad progressive American nightmare: Wilsonian exported democracy, moralism sprayed at Russia, China, the Middle East (Is