Mark Bridge and agencies
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks

Evolution has not been “scientifically” proven and science has unnecessarily narrowed humanity’s view of creation, Pope Benedict has said in his first reflections on the origins of life.
In comments to students, published yesterday in German, the Pope – who took office in April 2005 – stopped short of endorsing intelligent design and said “faith alone” could not “explain the whole picture”.
But, he said: “We cannot haul 10,000 generations into the laboratory.”
He advised the students not to choose between creationism and evolutionary theory but to adopt “an interaction of various dimensions of reason”.

He said: “I find it important to underline that the theory of evolution implies questions that must be assigned to philosophy and which themselves lead beyond the realms of science.”
Benedict reflected on comments of his predecessor, John Paul II, who said that theories of evolution were sound as long as they took into account that creation was the work of God, and that Darwin’s theory of evolution was “more than a hypothesis."
He said: “The pope [John Paul] had his reasons for saying this. But it is also true that the theory of evolution is not a complete, scientifically proven theory.”
Benedict added that the immense time span that evolution covers made it impossible to conduct experiments in a controlled environment to verify or disprove the theory.
Evolution has come under fire in recent years by proponents – mostly conservative Protestants – of “intelligent design,” who believe that living organisms are so complex they must have been created by a higher power.
In the United States, supporters of both camps have often clashed over what students should be taught in state schools. New attention has been focused on Roman Catholic views of the issue since Cardinal Christoph Schönborn of Vienna said in a speech that restricting debate on Darwin’s theories amounted to censorship.
The Pope’s comments, recorded in the new book Creation and Evolution, appear alongside the reflections of Cardinal Schönborn and others who attended a meeting of students at the papal summer estate at Castelgandolfo outside Rome in September.
His remarks were consistent with one of his most repeated themes, that faith and reason are interdependent and that science, however vital, should not rule out God.
“Science has opened up large dimensions of reason... and thus brought us new insights,” he said. “But in the joy at the extent of its discoveries, it tends to take away from us dimensions of reason that we still need.
“Its results lead to questions that go beyond its methodical canon and cannot be answered within it.”
Since taking office, the Pope has sent mixed signals on evolution. In November 2005, Cardinal Paul Poupard, head of the Pontifical Council for Culture, told a press conference that the Genesis account of creation and Darwin’s theory of evolution were “perfectly compatible” if the Bible was read correctly.
But last year, Benedict fired his chief astronomer, Father George Coyne, after the American Jesuit priest made similar comments in The Tablet. The sacking was interpreted by commentators as a clear endorsement for intelligent design.
The comments of this Pope, like those of John Paul II, best adhere to the doctrine of theistic evolution, which sees God creating by a process of evolution. This is accepted – openly or tacitly – by Roman Catholicism and the mainstream Protestant denominations.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
"Evolution has not been âscientificallyâ proven and science has unnecessarily narrowed humanityâs view of creation, Pope Benedict has said in his first reflections on the origins of life. " i read this and i was shaking my head. This is coming from a Pope. isnt he supposed to be spreading the word of the bible? of course he would say that. he probably doesnt believe in it .
kevin, sedlaia,
Given the molecular evidence (you can ignore the entire fossil record if you like), if god did create life he either used evolution or wanted us to think that evolution occurred. I would favour the later seeing as he created the basics from material that could have created life by chance... I don't really see how reading the bible 'correctly' helps out. Does this mean ignoring the things that we know are wrong but having unbridled faith in the rest?
I also wonder about the new pope's position on Galileo. Seeing as the last pope was the first lean towards science on this point. Also seeing as he said that Galileo 'might' have been right, which seems less solid than his defense of evolution.
Ray, Perth, Australia
God, at least God in PanDeism, is smarter than you or I.... the smarter a structure seems to be, the more efficient and less wasteful it turns out to be -- so God would likely be completely efficient.... The most efficient way to create man is to create all the raw materials in a single easy to manipulate form, and set rules for them to follow which inevitably lead to the formation of successively more and more complex structures.... you don't see God making people and plopping them on the planet -- people begin as a single male cell and a single female cell, following rules which govern how matter can move!! Why would God inefficiently make everything in the Universe piecemeal (including humans), when God could much more easily set down rules and throw out a Universe worth of material which would make itself into everything in the Universe including (after the appropriate time) humans!!
PanDeism Fish, Chico,
Just doing his job! But he might have been smarter (if no more accurate )by saying that his god had invented evolution.
Jim Cowan, New Westminster, canada
Dear David Olsen,
Look in a mirror. Did you create yourself?
Ilga Rauchut, Bellevue, NE
Pope Benedict said,
"the theory of evolution is not a complete, scientifically proven theory.
Is he trying to say that religion is a complete, scientifically proven theory? How can he comment on the falseness of evolution when his very own religion cannot be proven in any way, scientifically or otherwise?
One thing is for certain: examples of evolution, however theoretical, can be demonstrated in labs everyday. Now can somebody show me a picture of God? Anybody?
Didn't think so.
David Olsen, Manchester, England
There are Roman Catholic Scholars in Biological Evolution who would probably reserve judgement until reading the book. I can tell you what we think right now. "Observed specication" is a fact. Look it up. We use science to explain facts like these and the fossil-record which includes other hominoid forms that existed at a time before we did... and quite frankly a time when we where not around. DNA analysis has already verified what Darwin knew. We can see our evolutionary changes in the DNA. That history is over 10,000 generations old and guess what? Our own DNA does not disprove evolution but it validates it. I think this analogy of the laboratory is not a good one. I hope his book talks about DNA. If it doesn't I would hold reserves on how much he actually knows about evolution.
Ben Holland, Cork, Ireland
The pope is a little late, a CofE bishop over a century ago preached acceptance of modern science: "If we are wise we shall endeavour to understand and to absorb these truths. They are our proper heritage as Christians, for they are manifestations of the Eternal Word....they will add breadth and strength and depth to our theology....If the time should come when evolution is translated from the realm of suggestive theory to the region of acknowledged fact, what then? Will it not carry still further the idea of providential design and order? Will it not reinforce with new and splendid illustrations the magnificent lesson of modern science-complexity of results traced back to simplicity of principles-variety of phenomena issuing from unity of order-the gathering up, as it were, of the threads which connect the universe, in the right hand of the One Eternal Word?&
LJD, New York, US,
On the origins issue, Pope Benedict makes the usual dithering Roman Catholic distinction between matters of faith and science. Theistic evolution substitutes faith in the power of time Time for faith in the power of Gods creative fiat. Its atheist counterpart, on the other hand, embraces the irrational dogma that matter alone, over eons, developed the mystical power to organize itself into a complex, designing organism.
Benedict, intimidated by both the simplicity of the Genesis account and the big mocking club of scientism, says,faith alone could not explain the whole picture. He confirms, thereby, Catholicisms hatred for biblical truth, and for the text of Hebrews 11:3 which clearly contradicts him: Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.
Harmon Gottlieb, Victoria, CANADA
Who cares what the pope says on evolution. He always has to bend reality to fit into his belief-system. For goodness sake, evolution doesn't attempt to explain the way the universe came into being - nobody knows that, although religions are arrogant enough to claim they do. Evolution is simply a well-tested theory to explain how creatures became what they are today. As to the theory being not proven, surely it is a well-known fact that a theory cannot be verified, only falsified. (All swans are white? Can't be proved. Find a black one, theory disproved.) If the theory of evolution doesn't fit into the fairy-tale world as seen by the pope - well so much the worse for the pope. I just wish he would stop trying to brainwash people - especially children - with his funny ideas. And worst of all, he's claimed to be infallible. But he's human, and to err is human, after all.
alan, cologne,
Chris Brazendale, Tauranga, New Zealand: "Those who arrogantly dismiss God on such a basis are foolish indeed."
Condemning "unbelievers" to burn in hell for all eternity because they don't see the need for the same emotional crutch for an all-knowing, all-seeing and completely invisible diety is the height of reason, isn't it Chris?
Dan, Hampton, UK
There is no need to prove the existance of God as this is a question of faith and not testing and observation as dictated by science. For it is written "You will not test the lord thy God".
For those who have faith there is no problem but those who's faith is in science they will have to continue to change their belief as theories change.
People have used Religion in order to justify their hatred of another group of people the fact is people kill people and this has nothing to do with God as he gave us free will and as for people who are born with disabilities, the problem is not them but how so called able bodied people treat them.
Biggs, London, England
He may just about have a point concerning the theory of evolution being limiting in some ways if one stops there. For while evolution is acceptable for anyone with any sense these days, the why and how of the first creation of life is still quite a mystery and worth thinking about as Pope Ben suggests.
However on the strict evolutionary aspect, I think the theory has been proved far, far more than anything in his mystical world and until he sends me god's direct contact details so that we can discuss thematter I shall continue to think that.
John Murphy, Lauris, France
Wonder how the Pope explains the fossilized remains of humans dating back millions of years, that clearly show that man has evolved from primates?
This is a never ending argument, here in the States, between the Fundamentalists and educated people. It's sad that some people take a 2,000 year old story and carve it in stone in order to give meaning to their lives. Life is precious on its own without using fairytales for validation.
It is, however, understandable that the Pope would adhere to his conviction.........it's called, "job security!"
Joie, Cincinnati, OH, USA
What option does he have really? in an increasingly educated world, they see themselves increasingly marginalized. Religion is increasingly becoming more of a persons cultural luggage (holidays, experiences shared with the family, vague notions about life after death) and less of a formal system for addressing the complex moral / political / cultural / ethical issues that matter today.
The church, any church, sees its former disciples, especially the younger ones, turn to science, history and reason to find guidance for the issues that matter to them. And the church has failed miserably to remain relevant to what matters today: the environment, morals and sexuality, race issues, social and financial equality, pretty much anything that strikes a chord with young and middle aged today.
The world is becoming a more tolerant and better educated place, and the church still in thrall of its medieval past, is spewing out the same illiterate nonsense. They will have the fate they deserve.
babis, Athens ,
What year are we in? 2007, last time I looked - so why is a 2000 year old emotional crutch, initially "designed" to explain what science, in its' infancy, could not, still being adhered to. Religion has caused more problems and wars than anything else throughout history, and still does - usually in the name of God or one of his other nom de plumes.
And if Intelligent Design is behind everything, pray (pardon the pun) tell where was the "intelligence" behind the Aberfan disaster, and what are the "design" principles behind malformed and disabled babies? Oh, I forgot - He moves in mysterious ways. That solves everything then.
Chris Garland, New York, USA
The phrase 'dimensions of reason' is particularly insidious, as is 'realms of science'. Reasoned thinking and rational scientific understanding are capable in all areas with enough effort, revision and time. The attempt to cast science as a set of beliefs in itself is a propaganda tool used increasingly by the religious right. Science is an approach, not a doctrine, an attitude, not a belief. Yes, there are holes in the theory, but they are pinpricks in comparison to the gaping, cavernous, ridiculously flawed errors in Genesis, and other creation myths.
KJ Keir, Aberdeen, Scotland
Where is the other rottweiler? he should get the same press. This is not about god, is about reason.
Humberto Ramirez-Castañeda, Mexico DF, Mexico
At least get the terms right. Evolution is not a theory at all "proven" or otherwise. It is an observation. Natural Selection is the theory that attempts to explain that observation. Just like the theory of gravitation attempts to explain the observation of gravity.
And if you think it takes millions of years for evolution to take place, you are sadly mistaken. The next time you are prescribed antibiotic medication, ask your doctor why it is so important to take them all, regardless of how you are feeling.
Devin, U.S.,
All these comments are so negative you have to wonder at the defensive mindsets that produced them. The Pope has been very reasonable about this debate I think. As a practicing Catholic I can only say that I am pleased that he has made the essential point that whether one believes in evolution or not, there is no justification for trying to argue there is no God. This question is beyond the realms of empirical observation. Those who arrogantly dismiss God on such a basis are foolish indeed.
Chris Brazendale, Tauranga, New Zealand
Read it correctly: The Pope does not endorse "intelligent design" and what is known as "creationism", although the article wants to give that impression.
Ken, London, UK
Fodder for another book from Dr. Dawkins, I suspect.
Boring! Il Papa. Genocide, suicide bombings, sex in the World Bank, Citigroup cutting 17,000 jobs while spending billions to make acquisitions in Japan and Taiwan - these are the results of intelligent design?
Give God a break; she deserves it.
Tom, Hong Kong, SAR China
"unnecessarily narrowed humanity's view of creation"?? It's just the opposite. Darwin was right when he said there was "grandeur in this view of life".If nothing else evoultionary theory has replaced superstition with reason.
Jim Verde, Johnston, USA R.I.
Just while we are at proving things: Until now, no one has been able to prove the existence of any god. So god/allah/jehova/... is not more than a convenient assumption for some people.
Jeronimo, Birmingham,
The last post is absolutely ridiculous! There is no scientifice proof stating that wisdom teeth are now redundant. If Evolution is true then at what point in the evolutionary process did organisms decide that they need eyes to see? Up to that point were all organisms blind? How about those organisms with hearts, lungs, and brains? The human brain is far more complex than the most powerful computer, yet nobody says that the BEAST in Brussels evolved from an Amstrad computer...
Face it people, there is not one shred of evidence for MACRO EVOLUTION (one species changing in to another) however, MICRO EVOLUTION happens all the time such as an extra chromosome which people with Downs Syndrome possess- nobody would dare argue that people with Downs Syndrome are not just as human as those without it or that they are "evolving" into a better and stronger species...
JO, Greenford, England
Is Benedict any different from Jean Paul II? After all, he was his advisor. What is surprising is that it has taken this long for Catholic theologians to be able to (publicly) reconcile the tenets of Darwinism with those of the Christian faith -- these have never seemed to me to be completely incompatible. What I do think is incompatible is the belief in "God" and the credibility of a self-appointed proxy for "God" on Earth in the guise of the Roman Catholic Church or any other organised religion, for that matter. I wonder how "God" feels about human beings using "him" to maintain their own power base and to validate many of the ill-advised or even evil things they say or do?
Kathryn, Vienna, Austria
There's no fool like an old fool. It's sad that he is heard and respected by millions of "followers".
Fettler, Los Angeles, USA
God didnt create man, man created God
Pontious , New York, New York
The world isn't flat, the sun does not revolve around the earth and the universe wasn't created in a week by an invisible super-being. Is intelligent design or existance of God a complete, scientifically proven theory? Not even remotely. No wonder they call it blind faith....
Dan, Hampton, UK
The world isn't flat, the sun does not revolve around the earth and the universe wasn't created in a week by an invisible super-being. Is intelligent design or existance of God a complete, scientifically proven theory? Not even remotely. No wonder they call it blind faith.
Dan, Hampton, UK
Oh Dear!!!
The earth is flat! Again
The Earth is the centre of the universe and the sun evolves around it! Again
Oh Dear!!!!
We must all be put to the stake! Again
Or is there a chink of enlightenment here? No one has come for me yet
Jim Golightly, Prudhoe, England
Nothing can be "scientifically proven" - that's the whole basis of science - a theory becomes accepted until a better one, which fits the evidence, comes along. Evidence is the key word here, which is something the church isn't big on. So far, the evidence points to evolution - creationism is a step back to the dark ages.
Mark, Cambridge,
The pope [John Paul] had his reasons for saying this. But it is also true that the theory of evolution is not a complete, scientifically proven theory.
Correct........ it is not scientifically proven ....however
Evidence of evolution : Everywhere
Evidence of the creation theory or the existence of god ?
There isn't any !! None at all.
Guy , hamburg, Germany
Faith does answer and explains about creations of mankind and other living species in this world. To find out read last the Testament of God the Holly Qur'an.
Mokbul Ahmed, Worcestershire, UK
Evolution is something that is happening all the time. Why do people deny that species change over time. Its occuring right in front of them. In our Holy Book - The Koran - God speaks of altering the species all the time; and He asks why do we not marvel at this? New forms of life are emerging continously. Science has now power to alter species through genetic. This should be celebrated and not feared.
Z Hussain, Rochdale, UK
John Paul II and Benedict rule ok. The trouble is that none can prove or disprove any of this!
Bob Chapman, Lowestoft, England
Get real people. Why do people constantly need to delegate responsibility for their existence to some 'unknown higher power' ? We are responsible for ourselves and those around us. Religion is about praying on peoples fears and peoples inability to accept that this is as good as it gets. Those running the 'religion' industry need to defend their power base against an ever better educated populace. It's vested interests leveraging peoples fears about dealing with life changes - we all have a 'use by date' - accept it and move on. There's no 'place in the sun' when you're dead. You're dead and gone. Enjoy life, make sure you help others to do the same, for future generations...
Ken, Cambridge, UK
Faith does answer and explains about creations of mankind and other living species in this world. To find out read last the Testament of God the Holly Qur'an.
Mokbul Ahmed, Worcestershire, UK
This is just what we need from this reactionary, backward Pope: more fuel to the flames that attack Catholicism. He is such a bad representative of the Church in the world today compared to Pope John Paul II. It's embarassing...
If humans were created by intelligent design, then why have I had to have an operation to remove impacted wisdom teeth? Ans: The human jaw has become smaller through successive generations which means that wisdom teeth are now redundant for many modern humans and only cause pain and infection. Equally, why do some women require Caesareans? These small points alone are enough to prove to me that the design of the human body was not intelligent but is a rough draft that has evolved imperfectly.
If only Pope John Paul could perform a belated Easter miracle and rise from the dead to rescue the Papacy...
MB, Scotland,