Ruth Gledhill, Religion Correspondent
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks
The Prince of Wales was embroiled last night in a diplomatic row after the leaking of e-mails in which his senior staff made disparaging comments about Israel.
Internal e-mails between two of the Prince’s closest aides make clear that there was “no chance ever” of Clarence House accepting an invitation to visit Jerusalem. The e-mails, published in The Jewish Chronicle today, also disclose a fear that Israel would want the Prince “to help burnish its international image”.
The e-mails are understood to have been copied accidentally to the out- going ambassador, Zvi Heivetz, who left his post on Wednesday night. An insider said: “It is being talked of as an ambassador’s leaving present.”
No member of the Royal Family has made a formal state visit to Israel, although the Duke of Edinburgh went to Yad Vashem and planted a tree in memory of his mother in 1994. The Prince of Wales attended the funeral of Yitzhak Rabin and the Duke of Wessex made a private trip to Haifa.
It was in the hope of building on the traditionally strong relations between Israel and the British Royal Family that the Israeli Embassy in London invited Sir Michael Peat, the Prince’s principal private secretary, and his deputy Clive Alderton, to Israel for a four-day visit as guests of the Knesset, the Israeli parliament.
The groundwork could then have been laid for an official visit by the Prince, although any such visit could only be arranged on the recommendation of the Government.
The initial response from Sir Michael was enthusiastic. In an e-mail to Mr Heifetz and copied to his deputy, he says: “The invitation to Israel is hugely appreciated and Clive and I would love to come.”
However, by the time that Mr Alderton responded to Sir Michael six days later, the ardour had cooled. Mr Alderton wrote: “Safe to assume that there is no chance of this visit ever actually happening? Acceptance would make it hard to avoid the many ways in which Israel would want HRH to help burnish its international image.”
The embassy declined to comment on the suggestion that Mr Alderton had copied Mr Heifetz into this reply by mistake. A spokesman said it had “no idea” how the correspondence had reached The Jewish Chronicle.
Henry Grunwald, the president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews and chairman of the Jewish Leadership Council, said: “Prince Charles is a great friend of the Jewish community. I am sure he will be deeply disturbed that some people might interpret these unfortunate e-mails as conveying any hostility to Israel at all. I hope that his advisers will be able to co-ordinate their diaries so as to enable them to visit Israel in the near future.” Jeremy Newmark, the chief executive of the Jewish Leadership Council, said: “The tone of the e-mail is deeply unfortunate.”
The Times understands that Mr Alderton has arranged to telephone Mr Grunwald this morning to “clarify” his position and apologise for any offence caused.
The Prince of Wales has throughout his adult life been at pains to build good relations with other faiths. In 1998 he attended an Orthodox service at St John’s Wood to mark Israel’s 50th anniversary. He is a patron of the Jewish Museum and supports World Jewish Relief.
But in a leading article, David Rowan, the Editor of The Jewish Chronicle, comments that the e-mails “raise serious questions about both the culture within his office and assumptions that senior staff seem to hold about the Jewish state”.
The e-mails “are even more troubling when one considers that, just two weeks ago, the Prince’s mother hosted a glittering state banquet for Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah, attended by the senior British royals”.
He also points out that in February, the Prince and the Duchess of Cornwall spent ten days touring the Arabian peninsula. He asks: “Would it not be diplomatic for the Royal Household to signal now that, despite suspicions to the contrary, there really is no political, ideological or (dare we say) faith-related barrier to their organising the first official royal trip to Israel?”
A spokesman for the Prince said: “This is simply an internal e-mail about a possible visit by Clarence House officials to Israel. Any potential visit by the Prince of Wales would be undertaken at the recommendation of the Government.”
Mr Heifetz had left his office yesterday and was not available to comment to The Times. But he told The Jewish Chronicle: “We have very good relations with His Royal Highness Prince Charles. We hope to see him one day in Israel.”
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
In the world of politics,each and every move is counted for.The Iseaelis won't hesitate a bit to utilize and make use of for their own propaganda.
I'am sure HRH and his assistence knows these facts ,but the fact remains : Why to make a big issue out of such silent invitations???
Tayseer Abu Qurs, Kuwait, Kuwait
The comments made were undoubtedly true. However regrettable it is that they became public it is, at least, pleasing to see that common sense advice is being given to H R H.
Israel would have used the visit purely for political ends.
Riley, Kyiv, Ukraine
Taling about leaked e-mails, this is my 'Memo to Charles'
http://irenelancaster.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/11/memo-to-prince.html
Meanwhile, the left-wing Israeli newspaper, Haaretz, has received nearly 500 comments on the story, nearly all extremely negative about Prince Charles and the UK. 500 is a record, I think.
Dr. Irene Lancaster FRSA, Haifa, Israel
The best way for Israel to bolster its image is for it to vacate all territories illegally occupied in the 1967 war. Even today, large "settlements" are being expanded in the entire West Bank. How can HRH Prince Charles visit a country that is openly indulging in land grabbing?
SM Hussain, Hyderabad, India
Nothing has changed. Politeness should not be interpreted as friendliness. The expression "Clive and I would love to come" should not have been taken as a suggestion that "HRH" would ever visit Israel in the first place. So long as some oil sheik (or just about any other Arab) would bat an eye at such a visit, an official visit won't happen. Silly of the Board of Deputies to even hope otherwise.
Stuart, West Bloomfield,
There is no doubt that that the Israeli's would have extended this invitation as part of their ongoing campaign to maintain close relations with the UK and the US whilst continuing to extend their policies of apartheid against the Palestinians.
Clive Kitchin, Port Augusta, South Austrtalia
Don't flatter his royal highness. A visit by the Prince of Wales would burnish nobody's international image.
Ron Freedman, Toronto, Canada
The Royal Family has entertained the despotics Saudi's, is now considering Israel - a state illegally occupying another state. Why not Burma as well? Prince Charles is afgain being asked by the government to brush politics aside and exchange small talk and compare medals with the generals there. When will the Royal Family say they will no longer do the amoral Establishment's dirty diplomatic work for them?
Ben Parish, London, Kent
Prince Charles "burnishing" Israel's reputation? More chance of it happening the other way around.
Catherine, Chicago, USA
What exactly is the issue here ?
J. Heifeitz, London,