John Wilkins
Take a trip to New York and see the city from the air
All human beings, the philosopher Donald MacKinnon used to tell his Cambridge students, have a desire for a true judgment on the lives they have lived. They want to submit to the verdict of an arbitrator who will have inner knowledge of the cards they were dealt, and the conclusions they drew about the way to play them; who will comprehend at the deepest level their motives and intentions in face of the pressures upon them and who will have mercy when they whisper the truth.
Such a judge is not obtainable on this earth, MacKinnon observed. This would seem to be what Pope Benedict XVI is driving at in his recent encyclical letter on hope, Spe Salvi, when he says that “I am convinced that the question of justice constitutes the essential argument, or in any case the strongest argument, in favour of faith in eternal life”. This last section of the encyclical, in which the Pope also reflects on human suffering, has resonance in Lent.
The encyclical, like its predecessor Deus Caritas Est, on love, is written in a beautifully precise, taut style. Here is a German professor at his best, drawing from his reflection on a wide spectrum of ideas as he contends with the atheist current in the West which, he is convinced, will be ruinous. The hope on which he dwells is specifically Christian hope.
In contemplating the Judge who is Jesus Christ, the encyclical comes close to poetry. Benedict telescopes the extended chronology of Purgatory into that one moment in eternity - “the heart's time”, he calls it, outside all chronological time, which no longer exists. “Before his gaze,” Benedict writes, “all falsehood melts away. . . The holy power of His love sears through us like a flame . . . At the moment of judgment we experience and we absorb the overwhelming power of His love over all the evil in the world and in ourselves. The pain of love becomes our salvation and our joy.” The Judge, it turns out, is also the advocate on behalf of all souls which have retained their aspiration towards love and truth.
Benedict is talking about the Last Judgment here, but intimations of the encounter of which he speaks can be had even during a person's lifetime, as when fire came down on Blaise Pascal in Paris from about half past ten at night till about half past midnight on November 23, 1654. Overcome by the experience, Pascal encapsulated it on a slip of paper, which he sewed into the lining of his coat, so that it would go with him wherever he went.
Benedict does not believe that any secular substitute for the Last Judgment can succeed. In the West, the Christian conception of a divine judge has faded into the background, he writes, and has been replaced by a conviction that human beings must themselves establish justice. Such a protest against a God who allows so much injustice and suffering is “understandable”, Benedict thinks. But no one will ever find a secular judge who can perform the function that MacKinnon described, nor an answer for centuries of suffering, nor a guarantee against the cynicism of power.
Lenten abstinence is one way of experiencing solidarity with the suffering people of the world. The “centuries of suffering” are considered in the preceding passage of the encyclical. Great strides have been made to control, reduce and conquer physical pain. Yet in the world today there is no less suffering than before, the Pope thinks. Indeed, “the sufferings of the innocent and mental suffering have, if anything, increased”.
There is no “Christian answer” to suffering, but there is a Christian way of using it. Benedict quotes a letter written by a 19th-century Vietnamese martyr in prison under such conditions as to justify describing his situation as being in Hell. Yet the martyr could still praise: “Bless the Lord with me,” he exhorted his readers, “for his mercy is for ever.”
The test of being human, the Pope reflects, is one's attitude towards suffering. A society must be able to accompany and console those who suffer. If it cannot do that, it is not a human society.
One can only guess whether the Pope might have partly in mind here the suffering of his predecessor, John Paul II, who was afflicted with Parkinson's disease d for several years, till in the end he could not speak. Yet he continued “blessing the Lord” till the end. I have a relative, an atheist, who says: “I am not afraid of death any more, because he wasn't.”
Pope Benedict is an Augustinian, and in his writings one can hear St Augustine's radical pessimism about the corruption of the human condition in its natural state. Or perhaps one could better describe it as a “radical realism”, in line with the Lenten injunction to each person in the congregation: “You are dust and to dust you will return.” It is a realism that opens the way to the essence of the Christian faith as a tragic optimism which never loses hold of hope of new beginnings and a final consummation.
John Wilkins was Editor of The Tablet, 1982-2003
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers


Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Actually devine justice was one of the principle reasons I came to faith.
Simply look around. Bad people get away with so much. Good people suffer horribly. There is no balance in this material life.
But everything else in the whole of creation IS balanced, why shouldn't human choice be?
Then I thought about the question. If there is no justice or reward for good behaviour (and punishment for bad behaviour) by what means do we define something to be good or bad? If "good" acts go "unrewarded" then why should we consider them good?
Put bluntly, an atheistic world, (to me) made no sense. There is no right or wrong and human choice, unlike everything else, does not balance, which seemed both startling and unreasonable.
Thus my journey to faith began with a conlusion: that unless I no longer believed in right or wrong there had to be a "god".
I did believe in right and wrong so decided there must be a god.
After much searching I came to call that "god" Christ.
Nathan, Inverness, UK
@Francis of Chorley: I don't claim to know what is knowable or not - but I can ask *how* you know what you claim to know. How do you know Hitler must have had a pretty horrible shock after his suicide? How do you know that justice will be done?
If your method of obtaining knowledge is convincing, I will begin to think you might be on to something. But my experience suggests that you do not have any way of knowing what you so confidently assert. I don't deny that you *believe* what you say - or indeed your right to so believe. But knowledge is something else.
Norman, Anstruther, UK
Is Norman of Anstruther claiming to be able to lay down for us all what is knowable and what is unknowable? The fact that he may not know about a Last Judgement does not prevent God from revealing such things to us.
Just to support Benedict XVI in his view of justice being the strongest argument for an afterlife. In the film Der Untergang, about the last ten days of the Third Reich, Adolf Hitler is discussing suicide with (?) Eva Braun. "Just one cyanide capsule, or one bullet, and then "ewige Ruhe" (eternal peace)" he says. After being responsible for the deaths of so many million human beings, did he really think he could escape Divine Justice and go into oblivion or "ewige Ruhe"?
He must have had a pretty horrible shock after his suicide when he found himself faced with all his crimes, all the suffering and misery he had originated for millions of people. Is he in hell for ever, or in Purgatory for aeons? I do not know, but I do know Justice will be done.
Francis Marsden, Chorley, England
James of Girvan: so when the headline, for example, says "Divine justice is perfect and tempered with mercy" we should add "we hope" under our breath, since it's no more than wishful thinking?
"These people" refers to people who make authoritative pronouncements on totally unknowable matters, and back them up with arguments that are no more than whistling in the dark.
Sorry, that came out grumpier than I meant. :-)
Norman, Anstruther, UK
Norman, Anstruther UK does not recognize the difference between "argue" and "argue". The former uses emotion and the latter uses intellect. "These people", surely there is
only one Pope in the only teaching Church in the
world ?
James McGarva, Girvan, Scotland
"All human beings [...] have a desire for a true judgment on the lives they have lived." I guess I'm not human then. My view of myself is like a weed that has sprung up, and will presently wither and die. End of story.
"I am convinced that the question of justice constitutes the essential argument, or in any case the strongest argument, in favour of faith in eternal life." What argument? A desire for eternal life is not an argument.
Where do these people get off?
Norman, Anstruther, UK
I wouldn't agree that the 'sufferings of the innocent have... increased'. Let me put it this way: how many people would actually like to live back in another period of history - particularly if you couldn't be one of the nobility? There are a lot more people who are badly off today, true... but there are also a lot more people, period. Nothing is perfect, but that doesn't mean there can't be or hasn't been progress. As Steven Pinker pointed out, the murder rate in England has dropped by about three orders of magnitude since the 1300's, and not many people argue that England is more religious now than in the 14th century.
Raymond Ingles, Detroit, USA/Michigan