Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Local councillors campaigning for election in May must be forced to talk rubbish. Across Britain, outrage is growing over the crass attempts by many councils to shirk responsibility for weekly refuse collection; meanwhile, they want to spy on householders and levy steep fines on anyone caught putting out rubbish early. A survey by The Times has found that, in the past year, more than a dozen councils have raised a total of £185,000 in fines, and others are eager to take advantage of new legislation allowing them to enforce penalties, sometimes simply for leaving empty wheelie bins on the street or failing to use recycling facilities properly.
The punitive zeal comes at a time when councils are also proposing a “bin tax”, allowing them to charge households according to the weight of rubbish put out for collection. Already, 30 councils have taken the first step by introducing wheelie bins with microchips that weigh the contents. They are offering locks to families who fear others will secretly dump rubbish in their bins. The councils claim that they have to be intolerant to avoid paying steep fines proposed by the European Union for any authority exceeding quotas of waste sent to landfill sites.
Their arguments, like their tactics, are disingenuous. Far from encouraging households to recycle more of their rubbish, they will so alienate most residents that the very idea will be discredited and people will regard green arguments merely as a pretext to introduce money-raising fines. The result could be an upsurge in fly-tipping, the dangerous burning of waste on bonfires and potentially violent disputes with local officials. Beyond this, however, there is a fundamental principle at issue. Public hygiene and the safe disposal of waste is a primary (and increasingly the only) duty of a local authority. Regular collection is the mark of a civilised society and when order breaks down, the first signs are piles of rotting rubbish at the roadside. The proposal, therefore, to cut rubbish collections to only once every two weeks is disgraceful. It will mean misery for millions of households forced to keep bags of stinking waste a breeding ground for maggots and vermin in fetid bins or even stacked up in their kitchens. With another hot summer in prospect, the consequences are all too obvious.
Councils argue that recycling and the use of compost heaps will persuade Britons to cut their waste to the far lower levels found in Germany or Scandinavia. They say that fewer collections will mean less noise, pollution and congestion by dustcarts. This is not the motive. It is purely to save money on wages, fuel bills and disposal costs. It is an attempt by councils to cut corners as well as services (while raising large sums from new fines) at a time when many are paying ridiculously exorbitant salaries to top executives.
Central government is equally to blame for these squalid proposals, giving nods and winks to local officials. It has also refused to challenge the absurd new EU fines on those ludicrous landfill targets. The proposal is misconceived. Modern landfill sites are not the stinking eyesores of the past. They can be clean, pollution-free and properly landscaped. Of course recycling is better. But this dishonest way of foisting it on households does not brings support, honesty or transparency to the green debate. Voters should insist their councillors start talking seriously about rubbish.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
When I were a lad, the binmen would come into your back garden, take the bin out, empty it, bring it back, and shut the gate behind them. Now the poor dears are so molly-coddled, they're not allowed to lift even one bin bag for fear of injuring themselves. When I recently forgot to move the bins 5 yards from my garden to the roadside, did they bother to empty them as a service to me? No, they ignored them, despite them being in full view. I wonder what they actually get paid for.
The pattern here is all too clear - rising council taxes, and an increasingly poor service, with the tax payer doing all the sorting and shifting of rubbish, the transport to the tip of whatever they won't take, and the cleaning of the maggoty bins caused by a bi-weekly collection. Councils, in their delight at being able to impose and enforce ever more bizarre and stringent rules, seem to have forgotten that they work for us, and that they should be providing us with a service, which is currently rubbish.
Hugh Tonks, Cambridge, UK
Here here. Those who can afford to opt out of most council 'services' pay twice and do. But collecting the rubbish is the one thing we expect the councils to organise. It wasn't long ago that they would collect the rubbish twice a week. If they can't organise the refuse collection, we may as well send the whole town hall to the landfil sites.
Philippa Pirie, London, England
If you read the small print of the Institute of Waste Management report, you will see that they also recommend charging the public for use of recycle dumps.
Brynley Heaven, Lincolnshire,
There is now an e-petition to Tony Blair to ensure a weekly collection of household refuse.
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/WeeklyRubbish/
We cannot sit back and let this Government and our councillors treat us in this way
Eric, Oxford City,
Here here. We can opt outr of most council 'services' and those who can afford to, pay twice and do. But rubbish is the one thing we expect our councils to organise. It wasn't long ago that rubbish was collected twice a week. If they can't organise the rubbish, we may as well send the whole town hall to the landfill sites.
Philippa Pirie, London, England
I assume the author lives next to a landfill? or is prepared to have one built nearby? The idea that council workers sit at their desks thinking up ways of charging people is ludicrous and childish. The EU Landfill Directive is the main driver for reducing waste going to landfill- you can't blame local authorities for this. Councils have to find ways of reducing costs or raising revenue to get recycling rates up, and landfill rates down. nods and winks from govt? It's easy to write silly uninformed arguments about these issues, but considering local authorities face massive fines/charges if they exceed their landfill allowances, what does he propose they actually do instead? Other than his suggestion that landfills arent 'eyesores' any more, he comes up with no actual solutions. It would be good if he also explains why he believes "Public hygiene and the safe disposal of waste is a primary (and increasingly the only) duty of a local authority". What on earth is this based on?
toby hall, London, UK