2 for 1 tickets to Casablanca, this coming Monday
The short statement on MPs' allowances made yesterday by Michael Martin, the Commons Speaker, reflects an acceptance at Westminster that something must be done to restore confidence in parliamentary expenses. Finding agreement on how to proceed, however, will be challenging. It will also be bitterly resented by many MPs who feel that they make a financial sacrifice in order to enter public service but are portrayed as leaching from the taxpayer. Greater openness is inevitable. It will not, though, be the end of the matter. The balance between salaries and allowances has evolved in a manner that is profoundly unsatisfactory and that almost encourages ethically suspicious behaviour. The best solution would be a root-and-branch reform.
Last year the typical backbench MP earned a salary of £60,675. This is more than double the national average wage but modest when compared with professional men and women based in London. That payslip was, nonetheless, augmented by an incidental expenses provision of £21,339, a staffing allowance of £90,505, an additional costs allowance of £23,083, a communications allowance of £10,000 a year, a substantial motor mileage allowance and the right to claim unlimited sums for travel taken on parliamentary business. While it would be inaccurate to assert that these expenses are self-policed, they can serve as recompense for the absence of a notably higher salary. These allowances can also be useful for generating local publicity and thus are a covert public subsidy for re-election campaigns.
A more honest approach is required. It would be better if MPs were paid more and a number of these allowances were to be either scaled back, changed or scrapped. Such a bargain would not increase the overall cost of MPs to the taxpayer but it would eliminate the need and the temptation to treat allowances as a device for supplementing incomes. A new compact should be combined with a regime of total transparency about expenses, a more inquisitive auditing process for receipts, and tough rules on outside earnings, so that these would still be permitted as long as they did not give rise to a conflict of interest.
There will never be a consensus on the right salary for a parliamentarian. International comparisons do not help much here either. The most intriguing system of political payment is found in Singapore, where it is based on a basket of salaries of top performers in other sectors, with a bonus linked to the level of economic growth (which may explain why this has averaged 8 per cent in the past two years). This means that the Prime Minister of Singapore is paid almost five times what is offered to the US president (the humble MP there is on £77,000 a year). British MPs might also look enviously at counterparts in Japan (£128,000) and Italy (£106,000).
An alternative would be to peg an MP's salary to that of a public servant who works at least 40 hours and is required to be based in London. A person in that grade earns £99,960 a year. Higher pay for MPs would make it harder for them to justify nepotism in the workplace and obscure commercial arrangements. It would mean that the political classes stop bleeding talent to the professions, as sensible people choose a life with a better salary and less personal intrusion. There might be an irrational outcry at first but once the new structure settled in, it would lead to less conflict and scandal than the current formula. It would provide MPs with an honourable wage - in both sense of that term.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love.
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Place your announcement

Great escapes, perfect kit and heroic obsessions
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/57
£22,950
The Midlands
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
£60k plus excellent benefits
Barclaycard
Stockton / Northampton
£
£55,000 - £75,000 plus bonus and benefits
Diligenta
Based in Peterborough
£45,000 - £70,000 plus bonus and benefits
Diligenta
Based in Peterborough
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Smart prices on ATOL protected holidays
Excellent online info & holiday selection.
Walt Disney World Resort Florida SALE!
From £619 per person!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Members of Parliament spen less and less time in the House.Thier hours when at the commons are interspersed with many hours spent sopping highly subsidesd alcohol. This is then reflecte in the disgaceful legislation which is shunted through time after time. They should spend time on important issues such as the gross level of child poverty in this country.Whilst so many others are desparate to become Members there is no need to increase the payments to such a dishonourable bunch of rouges. A pay cut would is simple to jusitfy.
PATRICIA MARY MACGREGOR, doncaster, South yorks
MP's salaries were once pegged to that of a public servant, but they then decided that that their equivalent was underpaid.
Speaking generally, it seems that - no matter how far they promote themselves - their salaries will never match their egos.
John, Dorset,
A reduction in the number of MPs is required on productivity grounds alone. All those members representing Scottish, Welsh and N.Ireland constituencies should be reduced by at least half. Following devolution, a large proportion of law relating to these areas is now conducted by their respective devolved Parliament/ Assemblies.
The vast majority of legislation passing through the Westminster Parliament is now generated by the EU and they are just rubber-stamping it. So overall representation at Westminster could also be dramatically cut.
The efficiency and rationalisation changes should enable the remaining MPs to have higher salaries.
Donna, Effingham, Surrey
Why - unlike any other job - is each MP paid the same, and why is there no job evaluation and independent performance assessment as is common place in all other comparable walks of life ?.
The Party Leader should be given a salary budget . He/she could then allocate it depending on an individual's contribution giving more to encourage people with potential who, unlike, I suspect, many if not most MPs, are employable elsewhere and less to those coasting on large majorities with no real incentive to give that extra 10 %.
It is because MPs live this feather bedded existence, with no financial accountability that they have lost touch with how their constituents live. Many nowadays would welcome the four to five years security of job tenure which MPs have, along with their generous pension provision and severance payments when appropriate
john, Oxford, England
By all means increase MP's salaries - but only if this is accompanied by a reduction in their numbers of at least a third, and further wide-reaching reforms, including a limit of their parliamentary service to a maximum of two terms. This wlll eradicate the present situation of 'career' MPs beholden to their party - and in particular the Whips - for the duration of their extended political lives, and upon which they are dependent for earnings to fund their mortgages, holidays, school fees, second homes, pensions and all the rest - not to mention patronage. These steps will encourage a freedom of thought and speech amongst MPs - with a commensurate liberation from cabinet oligarchy - and ensure that they also have to earn a living in the real world to which they they are eventually obliged to return. Finally, no MP should be eligible for subsequent elevation (if that is the right word) to the House of Lords.
W L Pender, Salisbury,
Term limitation seems an attractive possibility!
The article bemoans the political classes bleeding talent to the professions. There should be no political class as such. These people are supposed to represent us. How can they represent us if they are cultured to rule us?
Anything that frustrates a professional politcal career is to be welcomed then real professional people of real talent might just be prepared to make the reverse transition and bring their sorely needed attributes into the political arena.
Mel Rowing, Pickering, North Yorkshire
MPs should receive no salary at all. They should come from the ranks of the successful; those who have lived and worked in the real world and who are able to support themselves. Most MPs have no idea what it is like to hold a proper job. They are professional politicians whose goal in life is to hang on to their seats and the perks it provides at any cost. How they perform is important only to the party, not to the people whom they are supposed to be representing. An MP who is not afraid to lose his seat will take a much firmer moral stand when it comes to examining party policy. It should be a vocation, not a job.
Sipu, Cape Town,
With many powers of Westminster now residing in Scottish, Welsh or European parliaments how many MPs do we actually need?
Every time they give power away they should take a commensurate pay cut (effectively they are demoting themselves).
Christopher M, london, uk
Halve the quantity and double the quality - and salary. If they need to be in London they stay in the 350-room Westminster Hilton - a new Public Private Finance scheme. Their secretarial and administrative functions are appointed for - not by - them, just like the rest of the world. In addition, they qualify for a bonus which is linked to the percentage of the electorate that turns out to vote. Finally, at PMQ, the PM has to actually answer the question that is asked, no more and no less, without saying "that is why". That should do it for now.
David Masu, Zürich,
Dear Damian, How refreshing ! Yes you are right - Here in Hampshire we have seventeen (17) MPs - why ? Most are nothing more than automatons voting to please their masters and impress ,with an eye on promotion. I have been ranting for years about politics, think on - we have parish councils, town and city, county councils, regional authorities, national parliament, the Eu, and all the aids, advisors and the dreaded "experts" along with the uncivil service - Works so well too !
william, Southampton, UK
"An alternative would be to peg an MP's salary to that of a public servant who works at least 40 hours and is required to be based in London. A person in that grade earns £99,960 a year."
That's 40 hours at the office- homework meetings, work related dinners, etc as well.
It would also be a good idea to halve the number as we've extraordianrily high representation compared with the USA etc. It might also be appropriate for politics not to be a career but taken on on the culmination of a career with all that experience behind th individual. The younger MPs look naive and 'very wet behnd the ears' and show surprising little knowledge of the world.
Additionally & particularly NuLabour might as well have almost no people on other than their Front Bench and a sprinkling of the difficult brigade as the rest just vote as told and save the odd sycophantic effort at PMQs are useless. Could be electronic.
Damian, Eastbourne,