Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
The nationalisation of Northern Rock is a colossal indictment of the company's mangement, the country's system of financial regulation and the Government's economic competence. For six months, Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling have been at pains to point out that the problems in the financial markets did not originate in Britain. The credit crunch, they have rightly noted, has been a global phenomenon, triggered by the downturn in the US housing market. German banks and American financial businesses have gone cap in hand to their governments too. But it has been in Britain - and only in Britain - that the market turmoil has resulted in a run on a high street bank and, now, the humiliation of taking a private financial institution into public ownership. Not so long ago, Britain liked to boast that its financial regulatory regime was the envy of the world. The credibility of new Labour has been rooted in the Government's record of impressive economic stewardship. The desperate decision to nationalise Northern Rock will tarnish both Britain's and Mr Brown's reputation.
The blame does not, by any means, lie solely in Downing Street. The root cause of this failure is the hapless and reckless management of the company. The Bank of England and the Financial Services Authority failed to spot trouble brewing and then bungled the rescue. The long weekend in mid-September when the troubles at Northern Rock first emerged now seems like one of the most profound missed opportunities to intervene in modern economic history. No one seems to have known who was in charge or what to do in an emergency. The golden rule of banks in dire straits is to act swiftly, preferably secretly, to impose a solution. What has occurred instead is a melodrama more akin to the personal distress of a C-list celebrity than to a financial institution.
Ever since Mr Darling stepped in to guarantee that Northern Rock customers' money was safe, the Treasury effectively took responsibility for the bank and the Government had three options: shut it, sell it or run it. In theory, the Government should have closed it down. A failed business should not be rewarded with a public subsidy. Mr Brown and Mr Darling apparently calculated that this was the worst possible outcome, as conducting a firesale would put taxpayer funds at most risk. The second possibility was a sale, but the buyers were few and far between. The only viable offer involved Sir Richard Branson getting government support which ensured that taxpayers were exposed to all the losses, while Sir Richard stood to make the bulk of the gains. Having mulled that indefensible proposition, Mr Brown and Mr Darling understandably concluded that this was not “value for money” for the taxpayer. So they have, as predicted by this newspaper, ended up nationalising Northern Rock not out of conviction, but by default.
Nationalisation is meant to be a temporary measure, but the Rock is likely to be in public ownership for months, if not years. There is no obvious exit for the Government. Neither a flotation of Northern Rock nor a sale of the bank will be possible any time soon. The Northern Rock debacle is too easily compared to the humbling of the Conservative Government on Black Wednesday in 1992. The problem of a broken bank in Newcastle is not as significant or intense as a currency crisis. But Labour is likely to find that its economic embarrassment lingers just as long: Black Sunday marks not the resolution of the problem, just the close of the first chapter.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Why did the government not consider the idea of re-mutualising the Rock. This would, potentially, have been a very popular move...
David Timson, Belfast, UK
Mr. Darling and Mr. Brown run a bank? They couldn't run a bath!
mnairb, Hove,
"In theory they should have closed it down" - no not "in theory" they shouldn't .
They should have closed it down or allowed it to fail as would any other badly run business in the private sector. Full stop.
No "theory" necessary.
They didn't because it was in Labour's North East heartland plus a failed bank doesn't shore up the spin about Mr Brown's economic competence.
Political expediency has landed all taxpayers with extraordinary liabilities.
They should resign - not in theory but in fact.
Rob Green, Braintree, England
Let us be clear, this problem is not something that started in the US and travelled here without any responsibility accruing to the government, regulators or the finance houses. Our financial establishments, under the noses of the Bank of England, the FSA and the government, bought a wadge of dodgy financial instruments with the companies' money. They bought in such quantities that they threatened their balance sheets and independence.
The regulatory system instituted by Gordon Brown should have prevented this happening. Once it happened the government should have acted quickly and decisively. The bank should have been forced to wind its business down in an orderly and timely way to minimise losses and then ceased trading. If as the government says all the mortgages are good then we would have got our money back most quickly with minimum risk.
Perish the thought of Brown and Darling running a bank when the only asset they care about is short term political advantage.
Colin MacMillan, Redditch, Worcs
We've been here before. British Leyland. With the good intentions that pave the road to hell, Governments of both colours 'saved' failing motor companies by amalgamating them, uncorrected, into ever bigger failures that cost we taxpayers ever more. When there was only one mega-disaster left this couldn't be repeated, so the 'Ryder Rescue' was pulled out of the hat. It didn't work either, inevitably, so was replaced by a clone that failed even more spectacularly and expensively, that was replaced by a clone . . .
Pay off the Northern Rock creditors, forgive its borrowers all repayments, compensate its workers beyond their wildest dreams and pay Sir Richard Branson billions for the shares he bought for millions; it'll still be cheaper than letting the Treasury, the Bank of England, the Financial Services Authority and the gimcrack special outfit Darling will surely create, blunder on for the decades they swear they won't take - but will.
Noel Falconer MEcon, COUIZA, France