2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now
Between now and the election on May 1, The Times will be assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each of the main candidates vying to be Mayor of London. We will then endorse one. Ken Livingstone, as the incumbent, will be running against his record as much as against his rivals. So what does he have to show for eight years in office?
It is easy to forget how controversial the congestion charge was. This was a bold and professional job. The mechanics have worked smoothly, the charge is now popular, and has become a model for other places. However, the recent extension of the zone is less convincing. The overall impact on traffic has been very disappointing. While the number of people travelling on the buses has risen, so too has the number of large, empty bendy buses on the road. On London's streets, the ambitions have been admirable, the outcomes far from satisfactory.
Below ground, the picture is mixed. The Oyster card for passengers is a liberating innovation. The recent bankruptcy of Metronet, one of the private operators, probably supports Mr Livingstone's argument that the Treasury was wrong to foist a Public Private Partnership on the Tube. But his court battle with the Government wasted time and money, and he was too indulgent of Bob Kiley, his American ally in that battle, who continued to earn large sums from City Hall long after his usefulness had dimmed.
Mr Kiley's tale points up a salient fact: cost control is not Mr Livingstone's strong point. There are serious questions about the value for money delivered by Transport for London. Its own running costs are considerable. Tube fares have risen steeply, but revenues have barely outpaced costs. Buses that were barely subsidised in 2000 now eat up over £600 million a year. Mr Livingstone has also failed to tackle the RMT union, whose strikes have repeatedly held London to ransom despite drivers' pay levels already verging on the absurd.
On crime, the mayor has surprised his critics by being conservative. He has backed Sir Ian Blair, the head of the Metropolitan Police, and has paid for more officers, especially for neighbourhood policing. Statistics suggest that many crimes are falling, despite public perception being at odds with those figures.
Mr Livingstone has been an intriguing mixture of the sensible and the absurd. He used this to advantage to win the Olympic bid. But his judgment is unreliable. He has been overly fond of property developers, Muslim firebrands and Hugo Chávez.
His cavalier handling of opponents, his reliance on a cabal of Trotskyite mates, and the series of allegations about misuse of public funds by his regeneration agency, give an impression of increasing arrogance in a man who has been in power in London for more than 25 years.
This is the most damning indictment of Mr Livingstone. Over time he has seemed to assume a right to the office of mayor. The former firebrand has developed an entitlement problem - and with that a cult of personality, a coterie of questionable apparatchiks and a misplaced sense of London's affection for him.
Ken Livingstone is a talented politician who has made shrewd use of his limited powers. But he is eminently beatable. The challenge for Mr Livingstone is to promise change. The task for his rivals is to convince the public that they offer a credible alternative.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love.
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Allow Times Online TV show, Perfect Pets help you make the the right pet decisions
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Place your announcement

Great escapes, perfect kit and heroic obsessions
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
£60k plus excellent benefits
Barclaycard
Stockton / Northampton
£
£55,000 - £75,000 plus bonus and benefits
Diligenta
Based in Peterborough
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Ken IS the best choice for London, that much is clear.
There is a difference between being a media darling and a political success. Boris does an excellent job on TV but that doesn't necessarily make him the best man for the job.
As Paul rightly argued, transport is Ken's star turn. He needs to win in May to ensure this good work is continued, especially his plans for the extension of the London Overground network.
London is an incredible city with excellent prospects for the future, I have every faith Ken will deliver!
Sam Cullen, London, UK,
If transport's the key issue, judge Livingston on his full record. London has the fastest rising public transport use in the western world. It has achieved a modal shift to public transport unmatched by any other major city. The C Charge and Oyster are admired and coveted globally (Paris is working with London to start the same). Without Livingston, London would not have won the Olympics & legacy, would not have Crossrail, Thameslink or East London Line Extension. Livingston has delivered new bus routes and increased frequencies on existing ones and has ensured co-ordinated river transport. And before you say anything, I also happen to be a fierce critic of his (the congestion increasing Band A & B exemption for example). I just could not see that right wing, Kyoto hating, 'dressed up as a green cyclist' buffoon Boris Johnson delivering any of this. As a user of public transport everyday and everywhere in London over 20 years, my opinion is that Livingston has changed it for the better
Paul, London,
Still, not to worry. London has been a mess ever since Ken first arrived on the scene. And as for being a Talented Politician. Even a duck knows how to lay an egg. And with Eleven Billion £Pounds to throw about, even a duck looks Talented.
Now, the congesrion charge. Much of the trouble is caused by the so called, Traffic Management. Where you bunch all the traffic into convoys, leaving sections of clear road. You have seen the gantry signs, "Traffic hold up ahead. Speed restriction, 40MPH". These people are determined to introduce congestion charges on much of the road network before too long.
A couple of times, I have posted on the Times Website, that Taxation is not an obligation that is legally enforceable. You
can avoid Direct Taxation by a very simple manoeuvre.
Regards, ATFlynn. "Norfolk's Mutineer"
Anthony Thomas Flynn, Nr. Diss, Norfolk, England
London is not better because of Ken Livingstone; it's better because the City of London, Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster Councils have all made an effort to improve our lives.
Ken has done nothing but whine in the corner with stories about how awful things were before he took over. Poppycock.
All he does is spend OUR money on meaningless trips to see Fascist dictators claiming credit for things completely out of his control.
The congestion charge is a waste of time and money - the latter being spent in ever increasing amounts by his army of self appointed racila advisors. Why do we need one of those I ask myself? These days there should be an advisor for white Anglo Saxon middle class males with a decent education.
Robin, London,
The congestion charge would have been introduced whoever was elected Mayor, it was written into the Act of Parliament that set up the role. Apart from that and massively subsidising public transport the achievements seem to be a bit thin on the ground.
David Leslie, Perth, Scotland
Sorry to say but i think Howard from Bexleyheath has a deluded view of Ken Livingstone.
Ken did not do any of those, the people of London and technology (in the case of crime) did.
ANDREW, Hackney, LONDON
Over all its hard to give ken more than 6.5 out of 10 ..
Barry - you have said congestion charge is popular amongst those who want to get rid of cars, which is hardly surprising! but next time look out of your bus and see what is causing the jam - is it delivery vans, taxis, roadworks, traffic light phasing, or perhaps you are stuck behind a cyclist in the bus lane?? london road space for cars has really shrunk while costs have balloned. also as most vehicles are travelling on business - are you happy for london's cost of living to continue to rocket??
Conducters - we have got rid of conductors yet london buses have gone from breakeven to needing subsidises of £600m - its true but does it make sense?? personally I would prefer to see them back 1000 conducters at £30k = £30 million, big deal.
manov, London, UK
STRENGTHS. Free OAP travelcard on the Underground, a brilliant idea. Just what use is a free bus pass in April to Home County OAPs without buses? Congestion charge great, so we donât use it. Long gone are the days when we could drive from Hertfordshire, and then park in the inner courtyard of L.C.C. County Hall. Moved on to Shell building bombsite, then National Theatre, then the arches of Waterloo Bridge. Then came a new County Surveyor, pointed to the cars on the bridge and said, those many years ago, no congestion, those cars have to go. Our cars, we went.
WEAKNESSES. What a superb Kenâs Palace restaurant, a thousand times better than Morrisonâs L.C.C., and a great glass of red wine in Ikea goblets, London at its best, far better food than the British Museum. Real tender meat and variety of vegetables, a great gravy, and a pudding and cream custard worth travelling for. Then one day the fifth horseman, economy, entered, and out went the Ikea glasses, and great cooking. Curb the horseman, not transport. Hopefully he has not tried the rocky mountain slab cake at the National Gallery. Thanks Staff for the pitstop on the Thames path walk.
Gut Liam, Hertford, England
In reply to Michael in London, the congestion charge is popular with the great majority who don't commute into central London by car, and who recognise that if you want to make bus travel quicker and more attractive you must relieve them from being stuck in traffic jams. None of the candidates, so far as I know, plans to abolish it.
Tony says he doesn't feel safe on the top deck, yet wants to abolish bendy buses which don't have a top deck. Bringing back conductors would be a total waste of money as there are so few cash fares for them to collect now.
Barry, Wallington, UK
I agree with Howard, Bexleyheath.
Just go, Ken.
Drew, London,
He is not that bright at end of day.
He has surrounded himself with capable advisors much cleverer than he. His difficulty is understanding the advice he is being given! Running a large metropolitan scenario requires someone better able to understand the complexities of civic necessity and civic concerne. Too much for Ken, I think
Allan
Allan, liphhok, england
You credit Ken Livingstone with the "liberating innovation" of the Oyster card. Smart card ticketing for the Underground, in the form of Oyster, stems from a private finance initiative signed by London Underground in 1997. So it isn't all Ken's achievement.
Cynthia Hay, London,
Mr Livingstone told us that he was going to put conductors on every bus in the centre of town. What we have now is silly machines that don't work most of the time, Mr Livingstone also told us that Routemasters would be safe with him. Now we have silly long buses that are not suited to London's roads and a couple of token 'Heritage Routes' which use Routemasters. We need conductors on our buses to keep us safe from the yobs who seem to infest the things. Am I alone in not feeling safe on the top deck, even in the middle of the day? I also object strongly to being forced to pay (from my council tax) for a daft newspaper which seems to spend most of its time telling me what a democrat Hugo Chavez is. I won't start on all the race business, which serves to divide rather than unite us, nor the decision to mark the anniversary of July 7th with an event telling us about how Islam is the religion of peace. Livingstone is a loony lefty and we should consign him to 'the dustbin of history.'
Tony Hillbear, London,
Regarding the Underground; I have often wondered why government, at some level, do not apply for court injunctions to bar or at least delay strikes. If nothing else, consider the loss to the Treasury by the system shutting down over an electric kettle, etc.
Dennis, Portland OR, US
Ken has transformed London - winning the Olympics and bringing prosperity and lower crime across the capital. It's difficult to remember now how miserable the place was before he took over - how timid and depressed the city felt.
Now we are poised to overtake New York as the business, fashion and music capital of the world.
Go Ken.
Howard, Bexleyheath, UK
"He has backed Sir Ian Blair, the head of the Metropolitan Police" - that in itself is an indictment!
Also, who exactly is the congestion charge "popular" with? This is certainly news to me - most of the revenue eaten up by administration costs, traffic almost back to pre-charge levels, businesses damaged, people wrongly fined all the time. A huge costly shambles forced upon people of London in the name of class warfare.
Michael, London,