Win tickets to the ultimate village fete with welly wanging and more
A generation has now grown up besotted (©Milton) with Quidditch and Hogwarts. However, it is not astonishing that J.K. Rowling is using a court case to remind the writers of a zany (©Shakespeare) Harry Potter lexicon, now making the jump from cyberspace (©William Gibson) to print, that it is not common property and she did invent it all. She may succeed in persuading the court that her copyright is violated by some parts of the proposed encyclopedia. Indeed, she may have a respectable commercial case, but not much of a cultural one. However, unless she employs a mole (©le Carré) to oversee our every conversation and written exchange, she should not try to suppress a collection of her invented words. For Voldemort, Muggles, Horcruxes and all Rowling's other serendipitous (©Walpole) coinages are ours now; it would be pig-headed (©Jonson) not to let us use them as we wish.
English is so full of the neologisms of authors that if we had to credit each one, we would assassinate (©Shakespeare) our prose, and make readers chortle (©Carroll) mightily. Without being didactic (©Milton), Rowling can be assured that she is in good company in contributing words, gratis, to the language. The best she should hope for is that her words become as widely adopted as those of other authors. Perhaps the highest honour has been bestowed on the quark (©Joyce), used as the name for a sub-atomic particle. As there are quarks across the Universe, Joyce may be our most disseminated author. Rowling should be proud if Doxies, Thestrals or Butterbeer make it as far as a lexicon.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Place your announcement

Dedicated to luxury and the best things in life
2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
F/1989
£36,000
Hollingworth At Ombersley
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
90K plus bonus plus options
Confidential
London
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
£40,000 - £50,000 + benefits
Lloyds Pharmacy
Coventry
£38k
Barclaycard
Various Locations
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
yet another reminder that harry potter isn't literature. note to would be harry scholars. the author will sue you!!! hahahahahaahahahah! go count your money J.K.
Bill, Bologne, U.S.
Times, I do love you, but I think you mean [TM] and not (c). You can't copyright an individual word or phrase. fascinating etymologial editorial, otherwise, though!
heidi, miami beach, florida
If it were simply a question of attempting to protect naff neologisms, Ms Rowling would have no moral case -- nor probably would her lawyers have suggested she had a legal one. The claim to be judged in court seems to be double: 1) that far more than single words or phrases were being "borrowed" for the Potter encyclopedia; and 2) that it might be one thing to permit a fan-based online free-for-all kaffeeklatsch, but that it was something else if the whole thing were transferred into print (without, one gathers, any uplift in the degree of copyediting) and a price put on it.
Intellectual copyright, and traditional copyright, are in transition; but I admit to a small demur when people complain that they are unable to take other people's work for free and then charge for its use.
John Clute, London, UK
Er... Yeah, what she said.
Tyler Durden, NYC, NY State
Come now, the author is not primarily complaining about the use of words that she has coined but of the wholesale theft of large chunks of her prose which have been copied and pasted into an unofficial "lexicon" (aka readers guide, aka nothing of significant value) under the spurious argument of "fair use".
Surely, the author and originator of a fantasy world of her creating might consider it her prerogative to return to that world as the subject of future works in search of future profits. They did not produce these works of fiction solely so that others might paracitise the idea, add details in the margins and generally try and make into something new. At least not within the terms of protection offered by the copywright they hold over the material.
Bob, Reading,
Bravo, sir. I've lost what little respect I had for Ms. Rowling (and I'm a Potter fan) by her and her legal team's antics on this case. Emotional manipulation should not win her this case.
Nia, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion