Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Sir, Half the young people in the UK today have not been taught about teenage pregnancy and wouldn’t know where to find their local sexual health clinic.
These figures from a UK Youth Parliament survey of over 20,000 young people may go some way to explaining disproportionately high rates of teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections in this country.
We believe that all children and young people are entitled to receive Sex and Relationships Education (SRE) as part of the statutory provision of Personal, Social, Health and Economic Education (PSHE Education) in schools. No school should be able to opt out of delivering good Sex and Relationships Education to their pupils (including primary schools, faith schools and academies), which should be taught throughout a pupil’s time in education.
Only staff with specialist training should be charged with delivering such education, and relationships should be taught as part of SRE. Above all, young people’s experiences of the current Sex and Relationships Education provision must form the basis of any change to the curriculum.
Young people are bringing their findings and proposals on Sex and Relationships Education to Jim Knight, MP, Minister for Schools and Learners, this week. We urge the Government to listen to what they have to say and make changes on that basis.
Andy Hamflett, Chief Executive, UK Youth Parliament
Charlotte Atkins MP
Catherine Robinson, Assistant Director Children & Sexual Health Services, Ashton, Leigh & Wigan PCT
Annabel Kanabus, AVERT
Rt Hon Kevin Barron MP, Chairman, Health Committee
Dr Colm O’Mahony, Spokesperson, BASHH
Kieran Morgan, Director of Public Health, Bath & NE Somerset PCT
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
You propogate sex through your sister paper 'the sun' and then blame everyone when it is going wrong.
Teaching he curriculum should NOT include sex
Jim T, sol, WM
If sex education is as poor as reported in this correspondence, what hope is there for successful school based implementation of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination from autumn 2008 to prevent another sexually transmitted disease, namely cervical cancer?
Dr J H F Smith, Sheffield,
Actually, there is NO EVIDENCE from anywhere that sex "education" reduces teenage conception rates. And there is plenty of evidence that the teenage pregnancy strategy which has focused on sex "education" and the provision of birth control drugs and devices has been a mammoth failure. The argument that children are not receiving sex "education" is not sustainable, not least because schools are bound to provide the subject.
The evidence that children are having more graphic sex "education" unfortunately comes from the sex "educators" themselves, I'm afraid. Their materials are in the public domain and speak for themselves. The sex "educators" want children as young as five to recieve sex "education". This was the recommendation from the "independent" advisory group on teenage pregnancy, a body wholly drawn from the abortion, birth control lobby, which "advises" the government on the strategy and "monitors" its implementation.
Justine, London, UK
I work with young people and I would like to add my support to this letter. As a society, we need to give young people information about positive relationships and as sex is fundamental to the survival of the human race, everyone needs to appreciate the responsibilities that come with this powerful emotion. How can this happen, if all we are saying is sex is for marriage? I talk to many young men, whose only knowledge of sex is through pornographic images and DVD's. Where else can they find out about sex they ask? We live in an extremely sexualised society with sex selling everything from cars to newspapers. Why is it that we do not think it important to give information and support to the next generation about how they can protect themselves from sexually transmitted infections, unplanned pregnancy and abusive relationships? Sex should be a fulfilling part of life. Young people tell me they are looking for - Respect, Trust and Love. Let's help them. Clare, Surrey, UK
Clare Witcher, Ottershaw, UK
Ostriches! Ostriches! Deaf as well as blind.
Can't you see It's much too late once the embarrassing but undeniable hormones start fizzing away.( you have to take into account the early developers here).
The basic biology should be taught at primary school, naturally, every year as questions arise, as they do in Holland, where early pregnancies of children are rare.
Years 6+ can then concentrate on responsible friendships
& relationships & emotional development
It goes without saying it must be well taught & teachers specially trained.
The experience of those children denied school sex education by parents opting them out here, appears to make them the ones feeling left out & be more curious to find out for themselves
Sylvia Norkett, guildford,
The argument that sex education results in more teenagers having sex is such an enormous myth! There is NO evidence from ANYWHERE that teaching about sex causes more teens to have it! It makes me so angry that people are naive enough to think teens haven't heard of sex before it comes up in a classroom. Sex is everywhere in the media, and teenagers are likely to hear about it from their friends long before they hear about it in school.
The whole point of this survey is to show that teens ARE NOT receiving education! Where is the evidence that it is getting more graphic and being taught earlier (other than in the pages of the Daily Mail)?! There is none, because it simply isn't true - apart from basic biology, schools don't have to teach sex ed at all.
I think those that say education isn't the solution have a point - the problem is far wider and deeper than a lack of knowledge. But this is not an argument against teaching kids the importance of self-respect and later sex.
Belle, Horsham,
By the resoning of the academics teen pregnancies and STD's sgould have gone through the roof in the 1950's and 1960's when little sex education is taught , in fact the reverse was the case. It is also appaling that they should be calling for faith schools to be forced to teach sex education, that is up to the school. When will we as a nation stop thinking the schools, the advertising industry, celebraties and premiership footballers are solely responsible for bringing up our children. Many teenagers get pregnant because that is what their mothers did, or no body at home bothered to set appropriate boundaries, instead of time we give our children televisons then look for someone to blame when they grow up with no self control. a child is a direct reflection of it;s parents no one else, education and millions of pounds in funding will do little to change that eternal truth.
Uche George, London , England
25 years ago I was in secondary school and they taught sex education at 15 years old, we already knew more than they were going to teach. Over the years they have been teaching sex education younger and younger as there is always a steady stream of stupid people getting pregnant younger. The numbers of teenage pregnancies is increasing despite all the liberal attitudes to teaching this, the only result has been younger and younger sexual activity.
Let us look at the facts and stop this rubbish, you are not supposed to have sex until you are 16 officially so anyone sanctioning this before then should be arrested.
We do need to teach sex education but let us choose a suitable age; I would recommend 14 or 15 with strong emphasis that they are not emotionally or physically ready. To teach this at 12 will just increase sexually transmitted disease and sexual health problems.
Shame on this society.
joseph Kellie, Edinburgh, Scotland
A landmark policy aimed at tackling the root causes of the high teenage pregnancy rate and spread of STDs.
It clearly has extensive support and it is to be hoped that the government will legislate accordingly.
Dave, Southampton, UK
Liberals believe education is the answer to every problem. Children have never had more sex education than they do now. They are given ever more graphic teaching at ever younger ages. And what is the result? - record levels of teenage pregnancies , abortions and STDs. I donât say sex education causes this unhappy state of affairs but it is blatantly clear it does nothing to prevent it. Education is not a panacea.
Alan Trent, London, UK
I have a number of concerns...
1) Why teach sex education to primary school children before sexuality is even an issue for them? This seems completely inappropriate.
2) What is the content of this sex education going to be? Is it the 'Alton Towers' type of sex education that basically teaches it devoid of any morality? We have high numbers of teenage pregnancies and STD's in this country at least in part because of the way our society portrays sex... and that is at least partly the fault of the way our schools teach it.
Andrew Brown, derby, UK
The joy, peace, stability and strength gained from learning the art and craft of sexual self control should not be reserved to monks and nuns.
Father Bryan Storey, Tintagel, UK
Mr McLean is quite right: sexual intercourse is for marriage. But wild, passionate lovemaking is for all other circumstances.
David Masu, Zürich,
What if someone does not want to marry? Do you have a nation of monks and nuns? Really!
NR, Bristol, UK
The sexual behaviour of other people can be taught in a fascinating way, through Hamilton's theory of inclusive fitness. About their own sexuality, children need to be taught only one thing. Sexual intercourse is for marraige.
Malcolm McLean, Bradford, UK