Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Click for more debate from Times Online and the Battle of Ideas
There is a spectrum of recycling attitudes that runs from jolly hockey sticks on the one end to a sense of utter futility on the other. It is, say some of my worthier relations, positively good bracing fun to save the teabags and the old lettuce for the compost heap, to avoid using a new plastic bag when you could make do with an old one, to imbue your every consumption with a frugality that reflects well upon you, and helps save the planet.
This optimism is assailed a thousand times a day by the various objectors to recycling. First there is the statement, delivered as finally as though coming from the lips of Nobel laureate, that whatever recycling is under discussion actually uses up more energy than not bothering. I was told very solemnly yesterday that building a hybrid car’s battery creates more emissions than could ever be saved by driving the thing. Better, said the objector, to run a nice, comfortable BMW.
Secondly, there is what should now be christened the new China Syndrome, in which it is pointed out that, on the global scale of things, mucking about putting glass in one place and orange peel in another is an expectoration into the vasty ocean. Did you know (yes, you almost certainly did) that the Chinese economy creates more pollution in a millisecond than could be saved by British recycling in a millennium? So don’t bother.
Thirdly, there is the response from those who react to being asked to do anything even vaguely public-spirited, like a hungover teenager asked to clean up her bedroom. It is nanny-statish, it’s telling grown-ups what to do, it’s trying to penalise people for wanting to live their own lives in their own way. As if (and this is what teenagers believe) we didn’t have to share the housework on this blue-green orb.
If pushed, I go with the idea that you should do your best, and that this places you in a better position when asking others to do the same. This is not to say that I don’t find it all a pain. I never really cared that much for cars, but part of me quite fancied a BMW at some stage in my life if I could ever afford it, and now I don’t think I can justify it. I’ll survive.
Click here to read Rob Lyons's response: Recycling is a waste of time
A Battle of Ideas debate on "Recycling is a waste of time" will take place on Saturday, October 27 at 17.15
---
David Aaronovitch is a columnist for The Times and Times Online
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Of course we need to re-use and recycle. It may be hopelessly little and too late, but when the earth has got rid of most of us (which it may well do, like some cancerous tumour) those who are left at the end of it (here's hoping) will need to have learnt how to live sustainably.
Penny, Bristol,
Agreed with Jennifer Rice. I am more interested in curtailing my consumption than recycling things that are finally beyond use.
The simplest example is also a current consumer trend. If the demand for paper/plastic shopping bags is eliminated (call me quixotic, but it seems simple enough to me) because people are using long-lasting cloth bags made of sustainable material instead, then there doesn't have to be an energy and resource-munching industrial plant to recycle them.
Currently, the sky-high inefficiency of sorting recyclables means it's really not the answer. And recycling isn't necessarily an eco-friendly process, either. (Books printed on bleached recycled paper are more harmful than paper from sustainably harvested forests.)
Focus on the individuals described in the first paragraph - those who save the teabags - and put stock in reducing and reusing... not recycling.
Summer Robinson, Seattle, Washington, USA
I'll do my bit too .... but it is reliant on local government taking all the different sorts of recycled waste.
A recent piece on the BBC news praised local shops for being more environmentally friendly by using brown paper bags - my local council does not take brown paper for recycling so as far as I'm concerned it's just as bad (though would probably rot quicker in the local landfill site than plastic packaging).
Unfortunately what we need is joined up thinking where the recylcable packaging matches the local waste collection which is matched by the market in recycled waste.
And then, of course, the benefits will be wiped out by growth in China or other developing countries.
Unfortunately pessimists have got it right - but one has to keep on trying I think.
nick, Warwick,
If this "debate" on environment is as good as it gets, then we're surely doomed. Environmental issues are much more than recycling "stuff", they're about doing without stuff, unless you're prepared to pay to keep it for many years. Cheap Chinese is environmentally exorbitant, as David Aaronovitch points out. We don't have to buy it all. We mostly don't need it, it doesn't last, we throw it out, and no one else wants it then. Maybe a BMW is good value in those terms. If you can keep it running for twenty years, your kids can have it. Very little we are consuming today has such a future. And neither do we, unless we start counting the long term economic costs of being so environmentally profligate and irresponsible. Time is valuable, but most valuable when it is used to protect the future.
Jennifer Rice, Melbourne, Victoria, AUSTRALIA