Win VIP tickets
Sir, The House of Lords has decided not to hear the appeal from the High Court’s decision in the case of Stephen Green v The City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court (Jerry Springer, the Opera), as it was not felt by the House to have “sufficient public interest”. We believe that the House of Lords erred in declining to hear the appeal, since the High Court’s decision was bad law; indeed, one commentator described the decision as “without legal merit”.
The last blasphemy case was brought 30 years ago and it would appear as though the Establishment of this country has moved a long way since then. Many believe that the law is an anachronism which has no place in a modern Britain. We believe that the contrary is true.
Recently there has been another blasphemy case which we believe has fallen foul of the law, namely the grotesque statue of Jesus Christ with an erect penis in the Baltic Art Centre, Gateshead. Many Christians demonstrated against this and the strength of feeling ran high. Many expressed their desire to destroy the statue, but desisted, knowing this not to be lawful. Those same people have expressed a desire to assist in a private prosecution for blasphemy. The police have shown no interest in dealing with these grievances, as far as we are aware, and the art centre displayed the statue until the end of the exhibition. We strongly believe that it is in the public interest to prevent such lewd and offensive displays.
It would seem that because Christians are peace-loving their faith is now considered fair game by the liberal Establishment and arts world. The law which is in place to protect that which is central to millions of people in Britain (15 per cent of whom regularly go to church) will offer no redress against gratuitous offence against God and their faith. With only three prosecutions in 100 years, it can hardly be said that the law has a chilling effect on free speech. Indeed, Richard Dawkins has never been threatened with a blasphemy prosecution. The law is there to stop only the most outrageous, spiteful, gratuitous acts which serve no legitimate aim in a democratic society, other than to insult the Christian faith.
Michael Phillips
Solicitor to Stephen Green
Consultant to the Christian Legal Centre, Reading
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
If we are honest ,none of us would not be upset ,at the very least,if someone we loved was ridiculed or obscenely potrayed
Millions have died rather than reject Him and yet because we dont resort to violence were seen as a target Next time your loved one is cursed how do you react.
David Burtenshaw, Dunfermline, fife
Maybe I'm just an American, but I can scarely imagine putting someone in jail just because they say or make something that someone else finds offensive. My suggestion to Mr. Phillips is that he grow a thicker skin. I hate to see Christians join the Muslims, Africans, etc. in playing the victim game.
I myself am a conservative Christian (Calvinist). The sculpture in question was in poor taste, but, well... The Lord WAS (and still is) both 100% God and 100% Man. He has to have had an erection at some point. (Without, of course, ever indulging in sexual fantasy.)
Michael, Atlanta, GA
The case, I believe is not of blasphemy, but an affront and insult to the faith of another that is protected, I believe, also in the United Kingdom as it is in the United States.
If that faith happens to be followed by the majority of the public, the act could be restrained and prohibited on grounds of public order.
It would be tantamount to showing a member of the Royal family in the nude which, I believe, enters under criminal law of defamation and violation of the honor of individual. In the old days it would invite a duel till the death. (Hence the moslem enragement about the carricatures of the Prophet Mohammed.)
For an atheist, in whichever way anything is presented is not blasphemy in his eyes. It is in ours who have the faith. The need than arises to do penance and reparation for our sins, as well as for the soul that is lost.
I hope this could contribute to resolving this issue?
Respectfully,
Maria Yvonne Tan.
Maria Yvonne Tan, Los Angeles, CA, USA
None of us likes to be disrespected if we are completely honest with ourselves, so why would we disrespect God, our creator, or His son, Jesus Christ who took upon Himself our sins? Many people nowadays trying to keep up with what seems to be increasingly acceptable in society either say "they don't do God" or try to mess Him up in one way or the other. This is not right! Be advised that "God is not mocked & whatsoever a person sows, that he shall reap". "Don't take the kindness of God for granted [e.g his longsuffering in the face of insults from his creation] Can't you see how kind he has been in giving us time to turn from our sin?". Don't let us be deceived in thinking that we can insult God and there will be no repercussion, just because for the above reason He is slow to act. If we human beings had even a minute portion of the insults & disrespect God has had, and we had the power He has, there wouldn't be any humans left on earth! RESPECT GOD - A word is enough for the wise!!!
F Balogun, Kent, UK
"When the next terrorist attack takes place in UK, dont say where is God, why did He let this happen. He wont be there to protect you. He will not stay where He is not welcome."
I love this argument... (clap, clap, clap) Very good, Ms Purcell.
I'm an Agnostic, but it is so galling to see Christians holding their OWN faith hostage to try to make a point.
Tell me something... if your child says they 'hate you' - even intentionally - do you abandon that child in times of mortal danger because you think you're not wanted or needed?
No?
Then why do you think your GOD will?
Is this a failing of your GOD... or of your belief in him?
Jim, Omaha,
I am a Christian and actually do not see why Christians are bothering about the blasphamey laws when Jesus HImself said that He would forgive all blasphamies apart from the blasphamy against the Holy Spirit.!{Mat. 12:31} .
Elizabeth Obisanya, London, England
No doubt the artist involved in creating the above statue will be more than pleased at the reaction s/he has achieved. However, is getting such a reaction worth the revelation of the artist's poor taste and poverty of spirit? May God forgive him or her, and show them something more inspirational to work on.
Eric Mival, Walcot, Lincolnshire
Common decency and respect today in this world system sadly is a thing of the past. The word of God tells us that in these last days men shall be lovers of themselves, adulterous, blasphemers and idolators, following false religions, etc..so it is expected....but so sad for those who think it smart and intelegent to take God out of the picture, blaspheme God and the things of God. When the next terrorist attack takes place in UK, dont say where is God, why did He let this happen. He wont be there to protect you. He will not stay where He is not welcome.
Ms Pursell, Tulsa , OK Usa
Mr Taylor of Boston UK seeks to reduce the matter to a question of 'hurt feelings' when of course it concerns truth.
Take the religious perspective of Christ away for a moment and consider even so how offensive such 'works of art' are to the dignity of humanity! No serious and informed person denies the wonder and character of Christ the man of history - is it right that such a man is portrayed as sensuous and unrestrained?
Daniel Morriss, Northampton, UK
Evidently some commentators are not too bothered about a statue sporting a stiffy..SInce that is the case let us be consistent and ensure that this style of visual form is available everywhere, live on the streets and well represented in local and national papers. After all ,it's Art ! Or is it ?
Adam Hodge, Witney, Oxon, UK
Dear Mr Phillps
Many thanks for your letter I entirely agree with the sentiments you express.
What was the 'scuptor's agenda / motive raison d'etre?
Andrew E Bloxham, Emsworth, Hants
When some in our generation want to live without God and promote lifestyles that are without God and advocate behaviour or 'art' that demeans God, they just need to consider that one day they will meet God and they will spend eternity without God.
Hugh Martin, Belfast, N.Ireland
The law of blasphemy is an outdated piece of legislation that shoukld have been abolished years ago. I wold question the strength of faith of any religious person who feels they need special laws to protect them from "hurt feelings" .
Freedom of speech means giving the right to say things others may not wish to hear and as the old saying goes "blasphemy is a victimless crime".
As for those who would argue that no artists would dare depict a picture of Mohammed, are they saying that they would like to see the head of the Church of England issuing a few fatwah's then?
Simon Taylor, Boston, UK
Any statue of a man with an erection is crude. That is gutter thinking.
Nova Lawrie, Bayswater, United Kingdom
Thank you for publishing this letter in your newspaper. There are many of us who agree wholeheartedly with Stephen Green's solicitor, but unfortunately our letters and protests are rarely acknowledged which may reflect that there are not many of us who agree. The opposite is true.
eileen wojciechowska, Bampton, Oxfordshire
Can you imagine what would happen if an arts centre portrayed a figure of Mohammed in keeping with what was displayed in Gateshead?
Rob James, Torbay, Devon
While I am one of the 'minority' that Mr James refers to, and as such, I suspect that I don't entirely agree with his belief system, I do side with him on this issue. Jesus was FULLY man when he walked the earth. He laid aside his divinity. The Bible is very clear about that.
To suggest that he submitted to temptation and fell into sexual sin would certainly be blasphemous, but to suggest that he was never tempted would be to contradict the Bible, and would therefore be blasphemous in itself.
Mark Hardy, Toronto, Canada
The letter from Michael Phillips is eminently reasonable and convincing, and would surely appear so to great swathes of the British Public who do not generally post their views on Internet websites. I believe that the two comments so far show no understanding of the moral and spiritual teaching of Jesus Christ. Please read the Bible with an open heart and an unprejudiced mind!
Alexander Frame, Bromsgrove, UK
Throughout history, blasphemy and other religious conformity laws have been a means of suppression of free thought and expression and to maintain the power of ruling classes and institutions. As a Unitarian minister in Islington, I look back to times not so many centuries ago when my religious ancestors who questioned the doctrine of the trinity were burnt at the stake in this country!
There are other ways to deal with offensive displays of all kinds. If - as is obviously implicit in this letter - the author believes that Christians are superior to those 'others' who would react violently to religious depictions they find defensive, the best course of action is to hold up that tolerance and non-violence as a shining example, rather than use implicit threats of destruction of property as an excuse to get special protection for the majority.
Andrew Pakula, London, UK
If you are one of the minority who believe that jesus christ was god then you also must, according to your religion, believe he was also a man.
You may be astonished to be informed that adult males have sexual feelings often resulting in erect penises. If you find it offensive to see christ portrayed showing his human form rather than his godly form maybe you should take a reality check to see if even you believe in your own religion.
richard james, london, uk