Colin Brennan
Pick up your copy of Joy Division: Closer at WHSmith today

THE IDEA of banning all alcohol around the workplace is gathering force as the evidence against the demon drink piles up.
Earlier this year a report published by a group of experts from the Academy for Medical Sciences said that alcohol is more harmful than some Class A drugs.
Drink was ranked the fifth most harmful of the 20 drugs examined, ahead of ampheta-mines, cannabis and ecstasy.
According to the Health and Safety Commission, 90% of human-resources directors from top British organisations say that alcohol is a problem. The commission also claims it accounts for 8m to 14m lost working days in this country each year.
A survey carried out by YouGov for Pru Health found that each day some 200,000 British workers turn up to work hung over from the night before.
“That’s a frightening number of lost days,” said Nigel Lynn, managing director of the professional and executive division of the Carlisle recruitment group. “It is a huge loss of productivity.”
Although Lynn believes that a ban on drinking in and around the workplace – similar to the national smoking prohibition – may emerge in the future, he is not convinced that there will be completely dry companies, employing only nondrinkers, as some people have suggested.
“There is already a skills shortage. You don’t want to bring in another restriction,” he said. “In the end you have to ask people to be sensible and responsible about alcohol. Obviously, we can’t have drinking at work but there is no reason to ban a glass of wine over a business lunch. Companies should have a code of conduct about drinking and stick to it.
“Where there are problem drinkers, they need to be helped. Companies are already encouraging their workers not to go straight to the pub after work. They often offer perks of gym membership or set up sports events for them. We are all becoming more aware of the effects of drinking on our health,” said Lynn.
Reflecting this, more companies are formalising their policy on alcohol. In a survey carried out by the law firm Browne Jacobson, it was found that 57% of businesses ban drinking altogether during working hours, which includes lunchtime.
There are regional variations, with a much sterner view being taken in the West Midlands than the rest of England and Wales. The most liberal is the southeast, where only one in four businesses have drinking bans.
Peter Jones, employment partner at Browne Jacobson, defends the policy: “It is not so much a case of businesses wanting to be prescriptive, as aiming to ensure safety, quality and productivity at work.
“Businesses relying on drinking bans must ensure that these policies are consistently applied and that the reasoning behind them is clearly communicated to staff and fully understood throughout the organisation,” he said.
Sikin Andela, an employment-law specialist at Glovers Solicitors, said employers had a right to ban alcohol during the working day without fear of being accused of discrimination. But she said: “They should be careful when devising alcohol policies. It may not be possible to apply them to existing employees.”
In the public sector, outright drinking bans are not so common, and there is greater reliance on common sense.
Birmingham city council doesn’t ban all drinking during working hours except for workers who are driving or using machinery but people are expected to behave reasonably.
Its spokeswoman, Janet Priest-ley, said: “There are some occasions when it is appropriate to have a drink at work – a party in an old people’s home, for example.”
Brighton and Hove city council, which has 8,000 employees, takes a more stringent view.
Its deputy leader, Sue John, said: “We introduced a complete ban on drinking during working hours in 2005. It is deliberately a clear policy ruling out drinking, including at lunchtime. We don’t see it as a Big Brother policy at all. It is more about getting people to take responsibility for their own actions.
“It has worked well. There are a lot of benefits for the council, including a healthier work-force and a better image with the public. It also helps us to manage our health and safety and increases the productivity of our workers.
“Council staff are allowed to drink in their own time in the evening and at weekends. They are encouraged to take responsibility for their lifestyles. But when they are at evening functions because of their job, they have to stick to soft drinks,” she said. This does not apply to elected councillors, although they are expected to adhere to their code of conduct.
“The drinks ban is something that might catch on in the public sector,” she said. “We are in the front line here. It wasn’t inspired by a particular case. It came from our continued focus on gaining further professionalism in our work.
“If employees are known to have been drinking they are sent written reminders of the rules and given warnings under the normal disciplinary procedures. For us, this has been enough enforcement. We haven’t found it necessary to be so heavy-handed as to use a breathalyser but if people smell of alcohol they are asked to go home at once,” she said.
Helen Symons of Alcohol Concern said that banning drink during the working day would be a huge first step in helping employees with a drink problem, but other steps must follow.
“It must be regarded as a health rather than a discipline problem,” she said. “Workers need to be given support and not stigmatised and their confidenti-ality needs to be respected. Managers need appropriate training. Specialist treatment should be available and a clear policy publicised regularly,” she said.
Whatever has to be done, there is little doubt that it will be cost-effective. Government figures for alcohol problems in the UK estimate the annual total cost of reduced performance and productivity amounts to £6.4 billion.
That is a sobering thought.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
Competitive package
Npower
Midlands
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Multi–Centre 9 Nights
From only £925pp
View thousands of properties online with your Vacation Rental People
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Pamela,
I appreciate your point, but I think that we are almost definately healthier as a result of the nanny state rules. However who is going to pay for the increasingly older population?
A ban on alcohol in the workplace seems like ridiculous step, will we see inspectors in yellow coats enforcing this as well? A glass of wine at lunchtime is a nice way of relaxing in this increasingly high pressure world that we live in. Surely it relies on the common sense of the worker to know that overindulging at lunchtime will result in more work having to be done the next day.
A final thought to leave you with; will the MPs be exempt?
Clousseau, London,
Hang on, am I wrong or have I seen surveys that show that moderate drinkers live longer than teetotallers? So wouldn't that suggest banning drinking would be bad for us?
Besides most of the problems suggested here come from when people over-indulge on their own time, in which case a ban on drinking during work hours will not help at all.
As far as I'm concerned a lunch break is my own time to do with as I will so if I decide to go to the pub for a drink, on a hot summer's day or to celebrate a birthday for example, then I will.
Rich, Surrey, UK
Is this "brave new world" a happier and healthier place than it was twenty years or so ago? There is no evidence of it.
Then working days were normally eight hours, including one ,or one and a half hours off for lunch ,relieving any stress with a drink or two, chatting with friends or colleagues, and a smoke for those who liked it (one could also, of course smoke to one's hearts content in offices without there being any stigma) A little flirtatious banter between the sexes was not considered sexual harrassment and there was a camaraderie between the work force. The work got done and the workers were happy - are they now?? Or any healthier??
Pamela Anne Putnik, Marbella, Spain
i live in china we go to lunch everday we have a smoke in the offices and restaurants
we enjoy the work and enjoy the profits
You manufacture nothing EXCEPT MORE RULES England R.I.P.
MOORE , SHANGHAI, CHINA
So 10p in the £ for alcohol treatment eh! The government doesn't even spend a penny from that which is already raised on treatment and despite some quarters feeling that alcohol is more harmful than class A drugs specifically won't allow any of the Drug treatment monies to be spent on alcohol misuse. Shame on you Mr. Brown. Isn't is about time that the drink industry were forced in reducing the cost of a pint of non alcoholic drinks so that they represented better value than those with alcohol in them? A pint of cola is about the same as a pint of lager but there is no tax on this. So rather than take away choice from people why can't the nanny state redress the issue in better ways?
Nigel Dermott, Wickford, Essex
It's a shame that business has to put up with people all day.
Bruce Fox, Indianapolis, USA/ Indiana