Andrew Frankel
Pick up your copy of Joy Division: Closer at WHSmith today

There’s a very simple question I am asked more frequently than any other, and despite doing this job for nearly 20 years, I still don’t enjoy answering it. What happens is the manufacturer whose new car is to be tested flies you off to a nice part of the world (in this case Barcelona), puts you up in a posh hotel, feeds you excellent food and wine and then, just when its executives are expecting you to feel in their debt, they pop the question: “So, did you like our car?”
If you don’t like it, the situation becomes rather awkward, and they know this. They hope simple manners will force you to say yes. And once you’ve uttered that word, you’re either forced to contradict yourself in print or end up being kinder to a feeble product than it deserves.
With this new Chrysler Grand Voyager, I could see the question looming large from the moment I climbed up into its colossal cabin, fired up its diesel engine and lumbered off for the hills.
Just as its sister company, Jeep, was responsible for the first SUV, so the Chrysler Voyager was the car that gave the MPV to the world, beating even the Renault Espace into production, back in 1983. Since then it has grown and grown so that now not only has it been renamed the Grand Voyager, it is also longer than a Mercedes S-class. And provided you don’t make the mistake of driving it anywhere, it’s really rather wonderful.
There’s so much room in here, seven people can sprawl about extravagantly, yet there’s still enough space behind the third row of seats to carry enough tents to put an entire campsite under canvas. It’s well equipped in standard specification and if you’re prepared to splurge on the options list, there’s an almost unlimited quantity of goodies you can have. These will keep your passengers amused for hours – even if you, the poor sod who has paid for and drives the thing – are likely to have lost the will to live before reaching the end of your street.
You can have a dual DVD player so one of your children can watch a film while another plays games, and there’s a 20GB hard drive that will store 1,600 songs, and wireless infrared headphones so you can listen to your music undisturbed by what anyone else is doing. But my favourite optional feature is the second row of seats that turn to face those in the third row. A table pops up between them so your passengers can have a wonderful time playing board games or having lunch while you sit up front ferrying them rather slowly towards your destination.
And so to the driving. If I tell you the engine is a close relative of that used by London taxis, you’ll perhaps see where the problems start. Chrysler won’t release any performance figures for this car and, frankly, nor would I. By using a stopwatch and doing nothing more scientific than planting my foot on the floor, I timed it very informally at around 14sec to 60mph, which is tragically slow. Worse, the automatic gearbox may have six speeds but is so unresponsive and unwilling to kick down, it feels slower even than this.
That’s not the only problem. The engine is clattery and unrefined, even at the modest speeds at which the Grand Voyager can be persuaded to cruise. And while Chrysler’s engineers seem pleased with the new suspension they designed for the car, its handling is vague and ponderous.
But does any of this matter? Is anyone who is thinking of buying a Grand Voyager actually going to care that it’s about as much fun as clearing security at Heathrow? I think they will. Anyone who has driven a Ford Galaxy – a car Chrysler fails to mention in its list of rivals for this Voyager – will know the need to provide space and seats for a large family no longer requires the abandonment of driving enjoyment. Yes, the Grand Voyager can swallow all the people and possessions you could possibly want to throw through its electrically sliding doors. The only problem is that once they’re in, you’re not going to want to take them anywhere.
The question, when it came, was posed by Chris Alaniz, the Grand Voyager’s chief engineer: “So, Andrew, did you enjoy driving our car?” The answer came all too easily. Not really.
Vital statistics
Model Chrysler Grand Voyager 2.8 CRD LX
Engine type 2768cc, four cylinders, turbodiesel
Power/Torque 163bhp @ 3800rpm / 266 lb ft @ 1600rpm
Transmission Six-speed automatic
Fuel/CO2 30.4mpg / 247g/km
Performance 0-60mph: 14sec (est) / Top speed:112mph (est)
Price £25,995
Verdict Size really isn’t everything
Date of release February 2008
The opposition
Model
Renault Grand Espace dCi 175
£26,050
For Spacious, clever interior, good ride
Against Looks a little odd, quite expensive
Model
Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi Ghia £23,995
For Fantastic to drive, good value for money
Against No sliding side doors, not very spacious
GV takes me/wife/4 kids/double buggy/luggage/camping kit in comfort. Until the others produce a people carrier for 6/7 plus luggage there is no competitor. I love it - who cares if it corners like a supertanker. At £65 for 55ltrs diesel I also love getting 500 miles on the motorway.
Steven Barnes, London,
Jeremy you must hate the USA and their cars. I am originally from London Uk. As for comparing the Ford Galaxy with the Grand Voyager, quite frankly there is no comparison as the Galaxy is sooo much smaller. Sorry you say that diesel is slow. The reason Chrysler puts a diesel in the Voyagers in Europe and UK is that petrol is so bloody expensive, you poor sods cant aford the big petrol engines they sell here in the USA.If you want to campare the Ford size for size. Why not come over here and try the petrol version of the Voyager or our smaller Dodge Journey.even the older Chrysler Pacifica. From a Chrysler retiree.
George Lee, Medina , Ohio, USA
Have driven a Grand Voyager 2.8 Stow & Go for past 3 years and there's merit in all the above comments.
At the end of the day though there is nothing on the UK market to compare with the G Voyager. You have to experience it to understand - yes the engineering is antiquated (Just how DO they get so much less power per litre than everyone else?!) and the materials are not up to the industry standard BUT - for the school run and the holidays (ours has been to the Alps 3 times, summer and winter) it has no competitor.
We previously drove a Zafira - to access the back seats the middle row have to get out and fold their seat away - and the new Galaxy is just the same!
When single I drove a Porsche and loved it - but would not swap our Voyager for another - its either speed cameras or traffic jams and if you have to sit in a jam nothing beats the comfort and space of the Voyager.
It's the nearest you'll get to business class on the road!
If only the Germans or the Japs would make one!
Martin, Chester, UK
Why the obsession with performance, when you buy a grand voyager you're looking for size & space to move your family & their kit, not speed, thats what your other car is for. ( a merc that the family can't fit into) I have the current version of the grand voyager and have driven down to the alps to ski in the winter and to the west coast of france in the sumer in search of sun. It does what we bought it for perfecty I only hope they haven't reduced the 1600kg towing limit on the new version so I can still tow my carvan with it !!! Fords & Renaults may be quicker but they are to small.
Tom, York,
We have the older version of the Grand Voyager with a manual 2.5 litre diesel. Its not fast but its quick enough and returns 40mpg in everyday use. Why Chrysler can't provide a similarly economical version of the 2008 model I don't know.
Have looked at all the opposition but for practicality there is none in the UK. Galaxy and Espace are way too small. Are you supposed to leave some of the children behind to take the luggage? Both have non sliding doors and 3 seats in middle row which make access to the rear for squabbling siblings a nightmare.
Wanted - safe, spacious, economical family bus. Any suggestions?
Jim, London, UK
live in the uk, hired one last week on a trip to US, loved it. was the 3.3litre V6. couldnt fault it. would buy here if the price was comparable -- £16,000--. US model (LX) didnt have all the trick extras test car did but was great. would prob be best selling car in uk if had the us trim level equivalent to LX and at £16, 000. bigger than an S class for A class money. it'll be a winner.
the problem is in the uk chrysler try to market themselves as the premium brand they are not and have got it all wrong.
go drive the petrol and compare it for the money.
chris lomas, derbyshire, uk
Another example of the creaking American car industry giving birth to another pointless monster. This product would be best kept over the pond and sold to the people it is designed for. Europe doesn't want or need this kind of superbly equipped junk. Plus, what kind of mpg will the petrol version monster have? Earth destroying obviously!
German name? What does that matter??
Ian, Brighton, Sussex
Just what the planet doesn't need; another oversized, overweight gas-guzzler. No wonder it's so slow - it's as obese as the Americans who drive it. When are car manufacturers going to stop supersizing everything? Look at the original Renault Espace for an example of how an MPV can be made light and small enough for British roads.
Ben Garside, Loughborough, Leics
Frankel... a german name?!
Joshua, Jerusalem, Israel
Here in the US we dont have the deisel only the gas engine .
3 of my kids & 1 grandson & 1 son in law have them & they all love them.
Its by far the biggest selling minivan here.Inspite of stiff Japanese competition.
I think you are a bit predudiced against US cars .
At least we still have a car industry unlike the UK which produced such wonders as the marina & avenger.
Well at least you have the BMW designed mini.
Brian.
brian lee, medina, USA Ohio
Too bad y'all are stuck with the oil burner. The 4.0 gasoline V6 can manage 60 in 8.3 sec over here, not bad for a rolling living room.
Greg Heiman, Atlanta, USA/Georgia
As an expat who has recently relocated to the US, I purchased the obligatory Grand Voyager (old model) for my wife to ferry the kids around in. I have the petrol version and the engine in the 'limited' model in the USA is a 3.8 litre (i think) although you would be mistaken for thinking is is a 1.8L such is the pitiful way it uses it's capacity. The gearbox comments made above are totally true, it is truely terrible and the handling is nothing compared to it's rivals.
However, the truth is the electric sliding doors, electric hatchback plus wireless DVD headsets and all the other toys make up for the poor drive. If it keeps my kids quiet and the wife is happy to drive it and park it then who really cares about how it actually drives on the odd occasion when I get behind the wheel. It does it's job very well, better than any rival and if you must fulfill the need to enjoy driving then you buy a second car designed to be a drivers car not a glorified bus. Which is exactly what I did
Simon, San Francisco, California
Surely even a pampered hack could work out that the way to answer The Question is to smile pleasantly and say: "ah, you'll just have to wait till you read my review".....
The car companies may pick up your minibar tab, but it's the readers who pay your salary!
Graeme Bell, Dinan, France