Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Leading universities are warning teenagers that they will not gain admission
if they study “soft” A levels in the sixth form.
The universities are insisting that pupils take traditional subjects if they
want to be considered for degree courses. Those applying with A levels in
subjects such as media studies or health and social care would rule
themselves out.
Up to one in six students took A levels this summer in at least one of 20
subjects listed by Cambridge as “less effective preparation” for entry. In
what will come as a surprise to some schools and students, the list includes
business studies, information and communication studies, and design and
technology.
The move to spell out “unacceptable” A levels emerged after the pass rate rose
for the 24th successive year to a record 96.6 per cent. The rise in the
proportion of A grades awarded was the second largest in 40 years.
In a backlash against the growing popularity of subjects such as sports
studies, and tourism and dance, institutions such as Cambridge, the LSE and
Manchester are telling applicants to concentrate on the more academic A
levels.
Admissions tutors insist that a lower grade in an academic subject, such as
history or mathematics, will be of more use than a high grade in an
apparently easier alternative. However, they believe that thousands of
working-class pupils are losing out when they choose their A-level courses,
because schools are failing to give them the best guidance. The proportion
of state school pupils and those from low-income families attending
university dropped to its lowest level for three years in 2004-05.
Tomorrow more than 700,000 teenagers will receive their GCSE results.
Cambridge has posted a notice on its website telling youngsters: “Your
choice of AS and A-level subjects can have a significant impact on the
course options available to you at university.
“To be a realistic applicant, a student will normally need to be offering two
traditional academic subjects. For example, mathematics, history and
business studies would be an acceptable combination,” Cambridge’s online
prospectus states. “However, history, business studies and media studies
would not.”
Geoff Parks, the admissions tutor for Cambridge, said that a significant
number of students were given no advice on what options might be closed to
them if they chose a poor combination of A levels.
Last week it emerged that just 42 per cent of 18 to 30-year-olds in England
were attending university in 2004-05, the second successive drop in two
years. Few, including the Government, now expect to meet the target of half
that age group attending university by 2010.
Generous bursaries for the worst-off and outreach programmes appear to be
making little headway in encouraging students from poorer backgrounds to
apply. Universities are baffled and the Government has ordered an audit.
Tessa Stone, director of the Sutton Trust education charity, which provides
summer schools to encourage more underprivileged children to apply to
university, believes that poor A-level guidance could be one reason. Dr
Stone says that Cambridge’s direct approach may appear hard, but it is
fairer to candidates in the long run because they are less likely to drop
out if they have studied the right subjects.
While many universities do not explicitly exclude subjects, Dr Stone says, in
reality they do. At Bristol, few A levels are explicitly discouraged, but
for a BA in English, the prospectus states that GCSEs and A levels “in
classical or foreign languages” are an advantage. In the same way, law A
level is “acceptable but does not give any advantage”.
Malcolm Grant, Provost of University College London and chairman of the
Russell group of research universities, said that students must not be put
off learning, however.
“I do think universities must be more explicit than implicit in guidance, but
they must also widen participation. There are also so many things that
switch kids off and being advised to do subjects that don’t match their
aspirations could be a disaster.”
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I did my A - levels 4 years ago - Biology, Chemistry and History.
My friend sat next to me in History, and when i told him that I deemed history to be much easier than my two science subjects, he laughed at said, "Well i have drama next, and we will spend the first half of the class playing games".
richard, swindon,
I wonder if the people commenting on "hard" and "soft" A levels are currently sitting A level exams?I am doing English Literature, Drama and History and in my honest opinion it took more deadication and hard work to achieve a higher grade in drama than in the other two!
Christina, Northern Ireland,
I response to 'Kaz, Beckenham, Kent'. Yes this may be true but you must realise that generally more academically able students will be taking subjects such as English Literature due to the demanding course and the necessity of enjoying reading. And of course vice versa for Psychology.
Joe Griffiths, Hull,
I am in the middle of my AS exams, doing Politics, Economics, Art, Drama and Theatre Studies and English. Two of these are considered to be soft, yet in my opinion they are the most difficult. Drama and Art are the only subjects which require more than jumping through the right hoops to get marks.
Charles, Bristol, UK
in June 2007, of some 48,000 psychology AQA A candidates, only 12.8% got As, whereas in the 23,000 people taking English Lit 16.1% got As..
Kaz, Beckenham, Kent
Hmm.... I plan on becoming a barrister/MP, so does History, Politics, Biology, English literature and AS Theology count as "hard subjects"?
Lily, Oxford,
I am frankly sick of people bad-mouthing the A-levels. The people who take them work extremely hard and I am sure that they are very challenging - if one takes "proper" ones such as Physics or Further Maths. I know in today's politically correct society the examination boards and schools need to be seen to be catering to the "less academically orientated". However, if they are "less academically orientated" they should not even be in sixth forms doing the A-levels. There are many other routes they could take instead of taking "soft options" and making those taking the traditional academic subjects have to endure being told that their qualifications are effectively useless due to grade inflation.
If you're going to take "soft options" for A-level, consider other ways into your chosen potential career. Btec National Diplomas et cetera. Leave the A-levels for the academically orientated who desire to take subjects that will actually rigourously challenge them. Not Basket Weaving.
Nick, Ballynahinch, Northern Ireland
I feel "soft subjects" put those students studying the more traditional subjects such as maths at a disadvantage when applying to university. Clearly subjects such as maths, English etc require dedication and hard work because quite frankly, they're harder and so are more difficult to attain high grades in. However the more "soft subjects" such as media studies or psychology do not and so are easier to attain a grade A in. When it comes to applying for a place at a university for a course which has no specfic A-level subject requirement such as Law, an application offering AAA in three soft subjects may receive a place instead of an application offering BBB in three traditional subjects, which in my opinion is quite unfair to those who are studying harder subjects. I agree it is neccessary for universities to take the subject as well as the grade into consideration when offering students places. In addition, traditional subjects proove to be more beneficial to students in the future.
Student, London,
The latest guidance on 'soft A levels' just goes to show that the more academic universities still exist in a world divorced from all other working sectors and the general public. There is clearly academic snobbery going on and a lot of stuffiness and one wonders how useful the more academic professors really are in the wider context of society. Also, why haven't schools been more clearly informed before about these (flawed) 'judgements.Utter bollocks!
W Edwards, Shepperton, UK
Its ridiculous that us students can get through two years of university and still not be competant at basics like maths and informatics. I feel my A Level subject choices definately put me at a disadvantage for my degree. I think I was discouraged from studying certain subjects when they would have been advantageous for my university career. I was told for example that I had to " eat sleep and breathe maths to take an A-Level in it" which i knew i didn't and so was put off, even though many now think i would have been able to complete the course given my grade A GCSE result. I personally think careers advisors give no real, useful advice- students would be better off seeking advice for their A-Level choices from University Professors and Post-Grad Students who know what subjects will get you further and help you make the most out of your education.
Kirsty Joseph, Swansea, Wales