Philip Webster, Political Editor
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
The Conservative Party’s stance on grammar schools was mired in fresh confusion last night when some of its leading politicians admitted that more might be built.
After two weeks of insisting that the party was not interested in building more grammars, and would not promote them, the Conservative high command accepted that more might be allowed “if the demographics required it”. The apparent shift prompted Labour to accuse David Cameron of a humiliating U-turn and of giving in to traditionalists.
The new message emerged after a second frontbencher, Dominic Grieve, the Shadow Attorney-General, appeared to challenge Mr Cameron’s position by suggesting that his local education authority in Buckinghamshire should be entitled to build more.
The Conservatives denied a U-turn, insisting that it had made clear previously that more grammar schools could be built in areas where selection existed if rises in population demanded it. But as recently as Sunday Mr Cameron was stating that “the prospect of more grammar schools is not practical politics” and on Wednesday George Osborne, the Shadow Chancellor, said: “While the existing grammar schools are safe with us, we will not promote the opening of new ones.”
Mr Cameron was fighting claims that he quietly ordered a small change in policy to avoid having to sack Mr Grieve, after he had already dismissed Graham Brady, the Europe spokesman, over the issue.
Alan Johnson, the Education Secretary, seized on the row, saying: “After two weeks of pressure from his unreformed and unchanged party, David Cameron has caved in. After attempting to exert his authority over his party he has now humiliatingly given into them.”
Mr Grieve, MP for Beaconsfield, defended Buckinghamshire’s selective school system in an article for his local paper. He told the Buckinghamshire Examiner in an article published on May 26: “Our local schools are very good and provide excellent education for the students. This is why I am pleased that although my own party is looking at ways of improving education nationally through reforming the existing comprehensive system, there is no question of changing the selective education system in Buckinghamshire against the wishes of the community.”
He added: “We must also ensure that if further grammar or secondary schools are needed they can be supplied within the county.”
A spokesman for the party said that Mr Grieve’s comments were not at odds with the policy outlined by David Willetts, the Shadow Education Secretary. While a Tory government would not wish to spread selection within the state sector, he said, it would not force areas such as Buckinghamshire to give up existing grammar schools. Maintaining the status quo in areas with selective systems would permit the creation of a few new grammars where they were needed because of population growth.
He said: “Dominic Grieve is abroad. He has not been contacted. He will not be sacked. Nothing he has said is out of line with the party’s position.”
Mr Willetts said that Mr Grieve had been entitled to make the point he did. “Dominic has said absolutely nothing that is out of line with Conservative Party policy,” he told The World At One on BBC Radio 4.
“I do understand that in parts of the country where they’ve got grammar schools, as demography changes, so they will come forward with how their grammar school system needs to change.I am fully aware that in a place with rapid demographic change, like Buckinghamshire, you are inevitably going to face questions about whether you need to build more schools or not.”
Mr Cameron told the Today programme on BBC Radio 4 last week: “I made very clear that we were not going to have a policy of a handful of extra grammar schools, that I thought that was backward looking and something we would not achieve.”
Policy review
May 17 David Willetts repeats David Cameron’s leadership campaign
policy of not building more grammar schools, prompting angry response among
1922 Committee.
May 22 Cameron writes in The Times that it is time to move on from
“sterile debate about building a few more grammar schools.” He says on Today:
“I lead. I don’t follow my party,” adding that building a few grammars would
be backward-looking.
May 27 Graham Brady produces data supporting grammar schools
May 28 Brady rebuked by Chief Whip
May 29 Brady resigns
May 31 Dominic Grieve says that his local authority should be able to
build more grammar schools
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
David Cameron may yet survive to understand that he is the leader of OUR party. At the moment he behaves as though he is the leader if HIS party. That is, of course, another possibility - a party of one.
Victor, NW Kent, Swanley, England
As a former Grammar School girl, I have found the whole saga risible. David Cameron is really the last person to talk about social mobility, given the privileges into which he was born. He wouldn't know how valuable an opportunity it is to go to a good selective school when you've been brought up by a single parent in a council house. I made the most of my chances but sadly, the State schools where I now live are mediocre at best and I made the decision to educate my children privately. I consider myself fortunate to be able to do so but I want everyone to have the same chances I had to have a quality education irrespective of income and social background. Grammar schools contribute to higher standards not detract from them.
Lesley, London,
Camerons "SHELF LIFE" is over. So many U - TURNS in the last twelve months. You could not rely on him to run the country we would be back to the old Tory Stop Go policies. His failure has been to rely on spin and PR rather than producing constructive policies.
Bill Rees, Pieusse, France
So, Dave has picked a fight on a non-issue and lost it.
Apparently educational selection was OK if one could afford to pay for it. Now, in what Letwin might call an "Old Etonian paradigm switch" educational selection may be extended in areas which already have it, like Buckinghamshire.
The likes of Graham Brady, Michael Ancram and Nigel Evans who have stood up for grammar schools deserve praise for honesty and consistency.
Peter Gooderham, Cardiff, Wales
Having attended a grammar school, and being a fervent proponent of them, this apparent change of heart is excellent news. Cameron's former stance on grammar schools was the first of his arguments that I have not agreed with.
Warren Allan, London, England
So just what exactly is Cameron's position on Grammar schools? He seems to have rather confused himself, the poor lad.
Dave, Manchester, England
Why dont politicians take time to carefully assess all repercussions and opportunities for the lives of the people who will be on the end of their pronouncements. and carefully research statistics before they go public.Instead we have this particular mess with Cameron making a fool of himself and Osborne also. Respect cannot be won by this muddled thinking and behaviour. If this is an example of future Conservative behaviour then they might as well give up now before they can do any more damage. The British public are no fools and should be respected for their wisdom and ability to see through opportunists
Marian Oakley, Abbeyfeale, Limerick, Republic of Ireland
Perhaps Tony Blair is advising Mr Cameron's team on educashun policy; their recent pronouncements have all of the PM's hallmarks: lots of headlines, plenty of rhetoric and little of substance. El Gordo must think all his birthdays have arrived together
Mike, Appleby,
Many of us conservatives always said that Cameron was the wrong choice for leader.
The oppurtunity was there for the conservatives to elect a leader on a true meritocracy basis - Davis was born on a council estate and has demonstrated the kind of qualities that this country needs people to copy, without the buffoon qualities shown by Prescott.
Cameron was born with a silver spoon in his mouth which alienates so many potential voters who believe in advancement by ability, and at the moment we are looking at another 5 or 6 years of labour.
tony, birmingham, uk
Time to say goodbye to Cameron and the NUTories.
Robert Boyd Ex Tory, Derby, Derbyshire
Another piece of nonsense from DC -now all the parents who want grammar school education for their children will be moving to places like Buckinghamshire-he is always asking TB to say sorry i was wrong,now its his turn .we soon will see how he has affected his support by this ridiculous policy-I had so much hope for this man ,but this is another in a long line of disappointments -definately not Ming!! Perhaps a new leader whilst we still have a chance
phil, manchester, uk
All Cameron had to say was, that existing grammar schools could be extended to keep in line with demographic changes. The fact that some extensions would be built in sites remote from the existing school would still leave the policy intact, providing the name was unchanged.
Thankfully the Party has a new director of communications. It certainly needs a good one.
Peter Stroud, Hook,
Gosh - what a load of over-excited twaddle. Making policy about how our kids are educated is a complicated business. The Tories are in opposition - they are supposed to be thinking through new policy positions. They can U-turn all they want till they get it right. The Labour Party, on the other hand, has been in government for ten years, and is solely responsible for creating the present disastrously failing system.
Gordon Stewart, London,
With Labour on the back foot, the Tories merely need a decent, electable leader with sensible policies and government is theirs. Instead they have Cameron who rushes about trying to look "right on" and telling people what he THINKS they want to hear, and ends up making Labour laugh and the rest of us despair.
Steve Lee, Gillingham, England
Is anyone still predicting that Cameron is going to win the next general election hands down? I haven't noticed any such claims lately from even his most ardent supporters. My guess is it won't be long before the Tories look back in fond nostalgia to the days of Iain Duncan Smith!
K Philips, London,
Tories shouldn't worry - New Labour have done U-turns almost every week since May, 1997 just like a dog chasing its own tail.
nick, Woodford, England
This word grammar is way out of date. They should be called algebra schools.
Henry Percy, London, UK
Osborne looks like a fool this morning after trying to act tough and threatening to block the opening any more grammar schools.
Cameron's authority is in tatters, but despite this, today is a good day for both conservatives with the Cameron clique's grip on power at last beginning to slip and, more importantly, also for poor but bright kids of future generations who will now still have a chance to compete with the private schoolers and achieve their full, specialist, advanced potential.
Chad Noble, London,
muddle muddle toil and trouble, hardly a clause 4 moment for Cameron
Graeme Stewart, Glasgow,
What a fiasco, you couldn't make it up. No doubt the new spin-doctor from the News of the World will keep exasperated Tories highly amused while the current ship of Etonian day-dreamers sails blithely on to electoral disaster. Come in Mr Cameron - your time is up!
Bill Holmes, Derby, U.K.
Forget Clause 5 'moment' more like a 'm. foot' or shoot yourself in the foot ... (lol)
http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/susan/joke/foot.htm
M A Patel, Dewsbury, England