Nicola Woolcock
Pick up your copy of Joy Division: Closer at WHSmith today
Britain’s young workers are among the lowest achievers at GCSE or equivalent in a league table of countries published today.
The results show that Britain has plummeted to 22nd of 29 countries, from 14th place 40 years ago, despite its pupils attaining ever-higher grades. They raise fears that an underclass is emerging, increasingly unsuited to the job market as manual work declines and competition grows from abroad.
While 97 per cent of South Korean students were awarded the equivalent of five good GCSEs, only 73 per cent of British exam candidates achieved the same results. They were surpassed by those educated in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Australia, Canada, Ireland, Scandinavian countries and much of Western Europe.
Education experts say that in a growing global economy teenagers who do not achieve a good secondary education will become marginalised and increasingly impoverished. The report, by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, said: “A comparatively large share of individuals in the UK did not complete upper secondary education and face considerable and increasing penalties in the labour market. For those, employment rates are, at 60 per cent for men and 45 per cent for women, below the corresponding OECD averages.”
It added that the gap between jobs available to candidates with a good education and to those without qualifications had widened in Britain in the past decade. The employment rate for those without good GCSEs fell from 61 per cent in 1995 to 52 per cent in 2004 and 35 per cent of people not attaining this academic level earned half or less of the national average.
Andreas Schleicher, head of analysis for the OECD education directorate, predicted polarisastion between the university-educated and those who failed to achieve a good secondary education. “It is an issue of globalisation,” he said. “The average British citizen has to compete with the best-educated people in China. Those with poor qualifications will find it harder and harder. There have been huge changes in the labour market and the prospect for those without good qualifications is declining.”
The annual report on educational standards compared the qualifications at age 16 of people now aged between 25 and 64. The number of British men and women who attained the equivalent of five GCSEs at A to C grade had risen from 60 per cent among those leaving school 30 or 40 years ago, to 73 per cent for those aged 25 to 34. Improvements in other countries had soared, however, pushing Britain from 14th to 22nd in the table. Only Turkey, Spain, Iceland, Italy, Portugal, Poland and Mexico scored lower.
The report also found that Britain had one of the largest gaps in earnings between those educated at university and non-graduates. It said: “In the UK the earnings advantage is 77 per cent, a very high level. Only five countries have higher earning differentials.” Having a university education enhanced women’s earnings more than it did those of men, but only in Britain. Women’s pay was still, however, much lower than that of their male counterparts.
The report also questioned 15-year-olds across all the countries to find out how many intended to go to university. Only 32 per cent of British respondents wanted to study for a degree, one of the lowest levels of all countries.
Government spending on British universities rose by only 6 per cent in ten years, the second lowest in the ranking of 29 developed countries, while private spending soared, rising by 85 per cent during the same period, 1995 to 2004, the report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development found. It said that Britain was losing out to other countries in its attempt to produce more graduates. Its figures show that Britain slipped from having the third-highest proportion of graduates per age group in 2000 to tenth in 2005.
The public-private funding trend was also reflected in schools, the report found, adding: “At all levels of education, private spending in the UK rose faster than public spending.

— More money is spent on preschool education in Britain than in any other developed country, according to figures published today. Almost £4,000 per child was spent at nurseries and preschools catering for three and four-year-olds in 2004.
The amount tops the league of spending by 25 countries, compiled by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, and is much higher than the £2,375 average.
The report’s authors could not say whether such early education was effective.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
Competitive package
Npower
Midlands
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Multi–Centre 9 Nights
From only £925pp
View thousands of properties online with your Vacation Rental People
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Robbie McAndrew it is overly simplistic to say 'change the exam system' that will do nothing to help the root causes of underachievement, which as Vipul pointed out so rightly is to do with a conveyor belt system meaning that youths merely get shunted through.
The problem is schools are expected to be social workers these days and to fulfil requirements of all things. We need to get back to the days where if you were very slow and couldn't read or write you *stayed* in primary schools, and where you held back troublemakers a year- because trust me for a troublemaker nothing is more humiliating and designed to make you work harder, than being shamed in front of your friends.
Why don't we look at the real issues behind education;- that illiteracy in primary school leads to illiteracy in secondary school and therefore no achievement. So instead of 'special iniatives' how about we just teach them to read and write and count *first* instead of worrying about the religious angles.
Annie, Bristol,
Early intervention effective? In the school that I work in, standards are dropping like a stone. This year's intake are almost savage and don't listen to a word you say. Believe me, the Government is completely wasting our money....as usual.
Judy , Liverpool, england
Having the same problem . . . I am teaching English in Korea and not only are the Koreans afraid of being individuals at the social level, they still teach everything by rote - including English.
This is not to say that drilling is not effective, but the trouble is that you cannot (say) learn anything but the most basic rudiments of functional language in that way. You certainly cannot teach essay writing by rote!
Andrew, Changwon, South Korea
No wonder there are so many young Brits who are reluctant to go to University. With an average debt of around £20,000 for graduates leaving university, who can blame them. Are the young in other countries above GB in the table subject to such financial pressures?
Jarl, Manchester, UK
Britian GCSEs? I live in Britain but didn't study them and my younger compatriots still do not. They study Standard Grades. Where do we Scots come in this list of mediocrity?
Andrew, Scalloway,
More credible than ministers' claims about improing standards. It confirms everthing that anybody over the age of 35 has long suspected; compared with, say, 25 years ago, GSCEs are pathetically simple, A-Levels have been devalued to the extent that universities no longer trust them, and many students flounder when required to do anything other than regurgitate the pre-digested thoughts of their teachers. Why the problem? Many factors play a part; the lauding of 'yoof culture' by the media, no discipline in the classroom (or the home), obsession with the supposed allure of celebrity figures of popular culture, the distractions of the internet and 24-hour TV, and the blinkered belief of government that 'imporoved' grades in dumbed-down exams 'prove' that our education system works. It doesn't. I recently completed a second degree as a mature student. The only students I was impressed with on my course were pupils from grammar and public schools. The state school students were all at sea.
andrew mashkov, London, UK
Well said Steve Hunt.
When one reads rubbish like lessons on how to be happy, and the idiotic physics exam reported here a few weeks ago it's not surprising the UK is going down fast.
As a UK-born naturalised Australian I find it all very depressing.
Gerry Watts, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Some suggested actions :
!. Non-English speaking students must spend a year learning English before they join main stream classes. subsequently they will progress at a much faster rate.
2. Concentrate on the basics, 3Rs and forget political correctness such as fringe subjects and special prayer rooms for Muslims or teachers with Hijab dress , for example.
3. Students who do not pass exams. must repeat the year, instead of having a conveyor belt system which multiplies problems year after year. Below-the-standard students use disproportinately large resources now due to lack of capabilities, which has negetive effect on other students.
Vipul Thakore, London, UK
Its about time seeing that we are a part of Europe that we adopted the European system of education rather than us messing about with GCSE's and A Levels Scottish Highers etc. Educate our young people to the same level as the French and Germans. Then we may be able to compete successfully with the rest of our neighbours
Robbie McAndrew, Wallasey, UK
I think it's about time our "leaders" realise that we are a country spirraling out of control, not only in education but in many areas. It is my belief that we have gone soft, being bullied by other nations into trading in our own beliefs for better priced imports in industry. A majority of kids in the UK have no respect for authority at all, and this is where the problem lies! Take away this nancy boy approach and grab our youth by the scruff of the neck and give it a good shake....after all, what is there to be afraid of?
Steve Hunt, Notts, UK
If you look at the full OECD tables you will see that Korea's is the triumph of mediocrity---few very high achievers and few failures; perhaps perfect for industrial success, but not educationally encouraging in other ways. When I spoke to Korean attempting an MA in this country some time ago he admitted that what he found most difficult was 'thinking for myself'. he had been drilled not taught.
Dectora, London, UK