Nicola Woolcock
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Find the best schools in your area
Sloppy dress is at the root of poor discipline in schools, David Cameron said yesterday in a policy document on education .
Teachers should act to stop children who walk around with their shirts hanging out or ties askew. The paper suggested that pupils should stand up automatically when a visitor enters the classroom, and that schools should all appoint head girls and boys.
Children’s good or bad behaviour could be logged as credit or debit points, then shared regularly with their parents. The paper said: “We have observed that the best-performing schools tend to have strict school uniform policies, with blazer, shirt and tie, and with zero tolerance of incorrect or untidy dress. Other best practices include a system of prefects and a head boy and head girl.”
The report also said that such schools normally gave an hour for lunch, as opposed to 30 minutes at many weaker schools, but did not allow children to leave the premises during the break. It said: “Schools must have the freedom to choose which specific practices will best suit their school ethos, and schools which choose to innovate in any area, and thereby improve outcomes, should be applauded, and learnt from.
“But those schools which shun best practice and also fail to deliver high standards should lose their alibis for failure.”
The report was introduced at Mossbourne Community Academy in Hackney, East London, a borough where schools have a history of poor academic attainment. Mr Cameron praised the achievements at Mossbourne, which opened in 2004. It won plaudits from Tony Blair, was recognised in an outstanding Ofsted report and is now six times oversubscribed. Mr Cameron said that its practices exemplified how schools should be run.
The report said that clear boundaries should be set so that pupils recognised the absolute authority of teachers. Schools with good behavioural records often set up dedicated rooms for those removed from lessons for discipline reasons, it said, adding: “They [such schools] go beyond these rules to embrace other policies which contribute to an ordered and purposeful ethos, such as uniform requirements and insisting that pupils stand up when visitors enter the classroom.
“We suggest that there should be clearer reward schemes for good behaviour in schools. Schools can benefit from establishing credit and debit schemes, setting out clear rewards for good behaviour and performance, and clear sanctions and punishments for bad behaviour. The weekly record of credits and debits could be shared with parents, so that families are given a regular update on their child’s behavioural record.”
Andrew Haldenby, director of the independent think-tank Reform, said that the report was unlikely to be a success. “It proposes the dissemination of good practice, defined by government and checked by a stronger Ofsted, ranging from discipline to school uniforms to the length of lunch breaks. Government is not the best judge of what works in schools; there will be intense pressure to make such ‘good practice’ compulsory.”
Jim Knight, the Schools Minister, attacked the proposals, saying: “The Tories are proposing to cut £4.5 billion from the Building Schools for the Future programme, putting at risk hundreds of school-building projects up and down the country. There is no bar on new schools opening in areas where there are surplus places, but stripping local authorities of their role in co-ordinating education means that the Tories are attacking their own local councils, who would find it very difficult under these proposals to plan the improvement of their schools in a coherent way.”
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I'd say that the little things matter to the well motivated.
In the States I had an excellent education with no uniform: there was little competitive dressing - but maybe my mother ensured I could not rebel in this way as best she could. After all, it took some 55 years for me to be able to combine purple and orange at a good price!
But I also taught in an excellent primary school. We had houses, head boy and girl and team captains. the children loved it, the Head was respected and loved. We tried having the children stand up when a teacher entered the classroom, but it didn't work. They were bobbing up and down incessantly and didn't get on with their work.
I remember with affection the child who wore the whole school uniform with pride. He'd truant regularly to try to find his mum. Every time, this same kind Head would go off in his car to find him and bring him back. "I don't want to go to your poxy school.!" he sulked. "Neither do I" replied the Head.
People, That's teaching
Carlyle Braden, Croydon, UK
Yet another reason why I'd never vote Tory. What a ridiculous argument, this totally avoids the real problems with education that conservative governments created (and Labour has failed to fix).
Ruth, London,
The reason selective single sex grammar schools get better results has nothing to do with strict uniform policies. It has to do with strict selection procedures to choose highly motivated pupils. Those pupils would do well with or without uniforms. Do Oxford and Cambridge students wear 'strict uniforms'? When I was growing up in the States we also had single sex grammar schools and they also got the best results -- but uniforms were unknown. Mixing teenage boys and girls generally is counterproductive, and boys generally do better in a male environment with male teachers. Uniforms are secondary.
Joe Feld, London,
My 11 year old daughter (three level 5's, decent mixed non-selective school) won't tuck in her shirt because it isn't comfortable, and because she wants to fit in with the crowd. She is mildly anti-teacher too (also part of the peer pressure thing) but it is noticeable that when teachers treat the kids in a positive way and conduct interesting lessons, they are respected and even liked. Moral of the story? Concentrate on appointing excellent teachers, don't nag or be authoritarian and the shirts will tuck themselves in on the quiet.
Jane, Lisbon, Portugal
I find it hard to believe that we still worry about whether one piece of (culturally determined) clothing is inside or outside of another piece of (culturally determined) clothing. What are we trying to teach here? What is the essence of the problem? How has our society produced so many children with destructive behaviours and little desire to learn, and why are they allowed to affect the others?
Paul, Nottingham,
Research indicates that the wearing of school uniform DOES NOT lead to an improvement in behaviour or academic achievement (David L. Brunsma, University of Alabama and Kerry A. Rockquemore, Notre Dame, 1998: Effects of Student Uniforms on Attendance, Behavior Problems, Substance Abuse, and Academic Achievement).
Research regarding the effects of positive feedback from teachers (Swinson J and Knight R, 2007: Teacher Verbal Feeback Directed Towards Secondary Pupils with Challenging Behaviour and It's Relationship To Their Behaviour) indicates that the most effective strategy of getting anybody to do as they are told is to be positive. The research also found that pupils behaved better in well run lessons.
So where did David Cameron obtain his evidence? Or is this another have a go at the kids and enforce more rules to cover the fact that there are too many teachers who are not making the grade when it comes to teaching?
Sally, Norwich,
i think that having clear regulations on school uniform does to some extent brign about a better educational system because students also learn along the process, how to respect their teachers. Schools where there is children disobeyign and making fun of teachers and where teachers cannot control lessons tend to ususally contain less structure and strict rules on uniform. Although many schools have and are attempting to have more strict regulations regarding school uniform, others have give up becuase of the lack of order within the school.
When you compare a grammer school such as King Edwards, of whom has strict rules upon uniform and compare this to any other comprehensive scondary school, where there is a lack of uniformatory, you notice the vast difference in attitudes and language as wellbetween the students.
shummi, bham,
Why not do away with uniform and remove the problem completely?
Dunc, Sheffield,
i believe discipline is very important within schools, as kids will always rebel, its called growing up... give them something minor to rebel over such as uniform, and minor discipline issues, and it will g a long way to stopping the greater problems in alot of cases.
however, the problem of under-performing, slovenliness and lack of discipline is much broader than just a school based issue, which this report fails to acknowledge... if little tim or suzie go home to a house where their parents care little for academia or their childrens success or welfare (for selfish reasons or genuine difficulties), then the children are failed.
those children whose parents want their children to do well and have manners, send them to the best schools possible, and will also invest the time and effort into their children from a very early age, no matter what the personal cost.
this problem and answer are much broader than the conservatives have identified; but it is a good start.
Shelly, london, uk
Just to respond to Terry Dell,
Perhaps you would be surprised to find that alot fo the best comprehensive schools also have these rules, it is not just the domain of Grammar schools.
i went to a comprehensive with head boys and girls, strict blazer uniforms and we had to stand when guests entered a room.
Ryan Castle, Birmingham, West Midlands
How about stopping them riding their bikes on the pavement this shows a complete disrespect for the law. Mind you I blame the lazy police who can't be bothered to do anything about it!
D Case, Newquay,
So what is new ?
C. Fowler, Wakefield, West Yorkshire
You're talking grammar schools, right ?
Terry Dell, Weybridge, UK
Bravo finally, someone has realised that creating a disciplined environment involves controlling even the smallest issues.
By holding pupils to account on the smallest matters from an early age insures that the relationship between teacher and pupil, position and discipline are established very clearly. I live in a country where parents are worried that pupils are too conformist and discipline is too strict on pupils.
What does one see when pupils here are going to school. They are all immaculately turned out. And I mean immaculately. Children will always be rebellious, but if it is limited to hair on collars and neckties being pulled up, this is good. The problem today is that teachers are expected to deal with knives and swearing and slovenly appearance is apparently endorsed.
This escalation is proof an overall malaise that can be rectified firstly by making sure that all pupils adhere to a simple and strictly applied rule of clothing.
ThaiTaff, Cardiff,
I don't like Cameron, but i must agree with him here. Both the students and teachers need to take pride in their dress.
Hamad Lone, Thornton Heath, England
The key to the success of private schools is not just money. It is called the Independent sector and it is growing by the day
Sally C, York, Yorks.
A lesson here for our Police forces too. Communities which deal purposefully with minor infractions maintain a level of community pride and involvement which deters serious crime and improves quality of life.
The little things do matter.
Bob, Reading,