Nicola Woolcock
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Middle-class parents obsessed with getting their children into the best schools may be wasting their time and money, academics say today.
They found that children from privileged backgrounds excelled when they were deliberately sent to inner-city comprehensives by parents opposed to private schooling.
Most of the children “performed brilliantly” at GCSE and A level and 15 per cent of those who went on to university took places at Oxford or Cambridge.
To give their children “the best start in life”, many parents choose to live in catchment areas of high-performing schools, “find God” to gain their child a place at a faith establishment or make financial sacrifices to pay for their child’s independent schooling.
However, the researchers decided to analyse the progress of the offspring of “those white, urban, middle-class parents who consciously choose for their children to be educated at their local state secondary, whatever the league table positioning”.
This group attended average or poorly performing schools in working-class or racially mixed areas. Here they thrived academically and were often given special attention by teachers keen to improve the school’s results, according to the study by professors in education from the universities of Cambridge, Sunderland and West of England (UWE).
The only failure was in social integration, which had been the very reason most parents sent their child to the school. Most children from middle-class families mixed only with pupils from identical backgrounds.
The research found “segregation within schools, with white middle-class children clustered in top sets, with little interaction with children from other backgrounds”.
Professor David James, from UWE, said: “But we wanted to discover what motivates parents who instead choose to send their children to local comprehensives that appear to be performing poorly.
“Most children who had this choice made for them have gone on to perform brilliantly in GCSEs, A levels and then on to university entrance, including a much higher than average entry to Oxbridge.”
The researchers interviewed 124 families from London and two other cities. Eighty-three per cent of the parents had degrees and a quarter were educated to postgraduate level.
They included three Labour Party activists and two who worked in a social exclusion research unit. In 70 per cent of families, one or both parents worked in the public sector. Most described themselves as left-wing or liberal.
The report found: “Some parents were motivated by a commitment to state-funded education and egalitarian ideals and many had an active dislike for privileged educational routes on the grounds that they were socially divisive. Many wanted their children to have an educational experience that would prepare them for a globalised, socially diverse world.
“These parents positioned themselves in a way we termed ‘a darker shade of pale’, as part of a more culturally tolerant and even anti-racist white middle class.
“They felt strongly that higher-achieving schools would not provide the kind of experience of the ‘real world’ that their children needed.”
However, the researchers said such parents did not consider that they were sacrificing their children’s education, with many seeing it as a worthwhile, if risky, strategy.
“Many parents said they could and would pull out if things did not go well,” the report said. Some parents who attended privileged schools made the choice as a “conscious reaction to their own schooling”. Others wanted their children “to compete in ordinary circumstances”.
It added: “Anxiety was not absent, especially when their children were attending schools that were pathologised — or even demonised — by other white middle-class parents.”
But even though those sending their children to comprehensives were open and tolerant of other backgrounds, in some cases researchers noted “elitism and a sense of intellectual and social superiority — a sense that would be confirmed by their own child’s relative success”.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
These findings reflect the situation in many of the comprehensive schools in our area. To express it with the minimum of tact, the top set in each year constitutes the Grammar School stream, with motivated pupils, dedicated specialist teachers and admirable results.
Although the feature is general in different schools, it does not mean that there is equality of provision across all the schools; this varies principally with the size of academic cohort. The situation is similar to that which occurred when all comprehensives tried to run their own six forms with numbers sometimes so small that many options were not economically viable. The answer was joint cooperation with the formation of sixth form colleges.
The answer that is emerging for secondary schools is similar. Schools will cooperate to pool resources, providing shared centres, so that pupils form viable groups in all options -academic and non-academic. This is the purpose of the School Consortium movement.
David Barfield, Greater Manchester, U.K.
spin, spin, spin......
judy, Liverpool, England
Seems a bit meaningless - presumably they were favoured by Oxbridge for having been to a poorer school.
Peter, Cambridge,
If sending children to private schools does not improve their chances of admission to Oxbridge and other Universities, then it must also be true that children in state schools do have a fair chance at getting a place at Oxbridge and University.
If children from state schools do have a fair chance, what is the justification for pressurising universities to discriminate in favour of children from state schools and against those from independant schools ?
BrummgDoug, Birmingham, England
As a middle class child who went to a 'rough' Shropshire comprehensive (which would probably count as a rather a nice school in the inner cities!) I can honestly say the experience was horrendous. I had two identities, home and school. I had to talk in a 'common' manner at school in order to avoid being beaten up, and many of the teachers seemed to view being (a)bright and (b) middle class as some sort of defect that needed to be beaten out of me. I survived, but the experience has certainly left its scars and I wouldn't want my own children to experience the same. By the way - I got exceptional GCSE and A Levels and a 1st at a good university - but these were in spite of, not because of, the school.
sarah, Shrewsbury,
Whats the whole 'white' middle class parents? Are they suggesting non-white people don't strive for the best for their kids? It's only bad when a 'white' person does it?
Sounds a bit like positive-racism if you ask me.
Arthur, Newcastle,
As a middle class child who went to a predominantly working class school it was only natural to befriend only other middle class children - the working class kids had been raised on the streets while we had been raised in our back gardens - I remember the working class kids as being a very rough bunch with a strong tendancy to form bullying gangs. This experience has probably coloured my politics ever since.
Arnold Ward, Weybridge, Surrey, UK
Labour party activists so committed to the cause that they will send their children to tough inner city schools are not typical parents, not typical middle class parents even.
Parents have more influence than schools. The children will be brought up in a very stimulating world of political meetings, visits to the House of Commons, avant guarde arts, and so forth.
That's not to decry these parents. They are doing the best for their own children and simultaneously trying to make things better for the disadvantaged. However we cannot conclude that poor schools are not really poor.
Malcolm McLean, Bradford, UK
I worked hard to send my children to private schools. Not neccessarily for the quality of education, but more so for the discipline and the culture of the institution.
Hamad Lone, London, England
The incentive to work hard and be able to afford a home near a good school is being taken away - soon the middle classes won't bother to work and save.
Turn over of staff at inner-city schools is extremely high because of the poor behaviour of some children; inclusion of children with server behavioural problems is a big concern of mine as my child has been bullied by a disturbed child.
My children mix with all sorts of children but their best friends are the ones who behave themselves and stay out of trouble.
VJay, London,
"Privileged children"? What judgements are bundled up in that description? The Times gets more like the Guardian every day. If it wasn't for the crossword, Libby Purves and Matthew Parris I'd take the Telegraph.
Charles Pooter, London,
These findings are very different from our own children's experience and that of many of our friend's children. Because of this we are having to make huge financial sacrifices to send our children to private school.
This is not a criticism of the many worthy teachers out there working in the state sector, but a reflection of our societies attitude to disruptive children.
David Chadwick, Nairn, UK