Alexandra Frean, Education Editor
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
Graphic: Percentage of children offered their first choice
Nearly half of children in some local authorities in England have missed out on their first choice of secondary school this year, according to a survey of local authorities by The Times.
London authorities did particularly badly. Only 51 per cent of parents in Wandsworth, 59 per cent in Kensington and Chelsea and 63 per cent in Barnet got into their first-choice school, while Westminster disappointed nearly a third of applicants.
In Birmingham 35 per cent did not get their first choice, while in Kent 30 per cent of children were disappointed.
Other councils claimed that almost everyone got into their first choice. Only 7.7 per cent of children in West Sussex and 6.4 per cent in Norfolk did not get offered a place at the school they wanted.
Of the 560,000 children applying for a secondary school place in England for next September it is estimated that 100,000 did not get their first choice.
The figures illustrate the scale of the challenge facing the Government in making good Labour’s pledge that all parents will have access to a good school for their children.
Dozens of disappointed parents contacted The Times yesterday to express their frustration over school admissions. Most were not given any of their preferred schools.
One woman said that her daughter had been allocated a place at a school 20 miles from her home, more than one hour’s journey by car each way and necessitating a round trip of 200 miles a week.
Several had been given places in schools that they had never heard of in neighbouring authorities.
One said that she now has four children going to four different secondary schools, and several others had been allocated no place at all
Many had no intention of sending their child to the school that had been allocated to them, with several saying that they would educate them at home. Others were busy searching on the internet for a private school.
Yesterday the independent school Brighton College announced that there had been a 43 per cent rise in inquiries from parents after the disappointment of local parents following the introduction of a lottery system for allocating school places in Brighton and Hove.
Under the new system 22 per cent of parents missed out on their first choice of secondary school, compared with 16 per cent last year.
Richard Cairns, the headmaster, said that the college would break a 160-year-old tradition by admitting pupils at the age of 11 instead of 13 in order to accommodate the surge in demand, and create an initial extra class of 24 pupils.
At the same time, unions issued a warning that parental disappointment has been heightened by the creation of a single nationwide admissions day, on which parents throughout England learn if their child has a place at their preferred school.
John Dunford, the general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said the focus on an admissions day had “raised the stakes”, with more parents now expecting to be able to make a choice in schools and more likely to feel let down. Dr Dunford also criticised comments in The Times yesterday from Jim Knight, the Schools Minister, that disappointed parents should use the appeals process.
“Parents who have not got their first-choice school should not take up the minister’s suggestion and appeal automatically. The vast majority will be disappointed. It will overload the system and waste a lot of time for head teachers and governors.
“Only if parents feel that the admissions process has not been properly followed should they appeal,” he said.Thunderer, Page 17
What the parents say
Angry parents e-mailed The Times yesterday, to express their frustration. The vast majority did not get a place at any of their chosen secondary schools. Some were not offered a place at all, while others were given places in schools they had never heard of in other authorities.
“We put down our three choices and our reasons for them. We discovered to our horror that our daughter had been offered a place at a school that we never considered and that all our efforts and all our preferences had been totally disregarded. We are following the appeal procedure in the hope that we eventually get at least one of our preferences. Steph and Tony Pilkington Leyland, Lancashire
“I was distressed to find that my child had received his fifth-choice school. Luckily I realised that we may not get in and completed my appeal last week. We were told that if we failed to put down our nearest school we would not have a place at all. There is no real choice for parents based on this.” Edna Griffiths Haringay, London
“Our child was offered a place at a school in Warwickshire (which I did not list as a preference) which is over 30 miles from where we live. Our three preferred schools were not allocated. Of course we are going to appeal. Paula Bailey
“My son is a reasonably talented sportsman and intends to take up a career in sport, probably as a PE teacher. We decided on a sports college, but were allocated a place at an arts college, where sport is very much a secondary subject. Anonymous
“Our son had been offered a school that was not one of the three choices made. It is not even in our local authority area. Instead it is within the Watford area some 2.5 miles from where we live. We have since discovered that at least five children who go to my son’s junior school had selected the school that we selected as 1st choice, as their second choice, and have been allocated places there, although we are closer to this school than all of these other children.” Anonymous
“My daughter hasn't got into any of the six schools we selected, let alone our first choice. She is, effectively, left with the dregs, despite successfully representing her school in sporting events and playing leading parts in school plays. This is an enormous blow to her self-esteem, as she is asking why so many have rejected her.” A Parent, Croydon
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
My son is exceptionally talented an all rounder and has been allocated a place at Croxteth Community Comprehensive a failing Liverpool mixed School. I am not the only parent facing this nightmare several other Catholic parents whose children attend Emmaus on Croxteth Park have been allocated this. This despite selecting 2 Catholic boys schools, one of the school's attended by his older brother. When asked Liverpool education dept stated oh we didn't have your religion, oh yes we did so you got that school because you live in Croxteth Park. Hold on we have to pass De La Salle a local Catholic boys school - conspiracy by LCC to keep school open that's what it looks like. I will not be sending my son to this school and LCC can provide home tutoring for him if he does not get allocated a place in either of my choices. As a practising Catholic I strongly object to people who have changed their religion and achieved their school of choice. This system is a joke
Judith Powell, Liverpool,
One would expect Local Authorities to ensure that, for any given address, there is a school at which the occupant can be virtually guaranteed a place. This may or may not be a 'good' school, but it ensures that every child has access to a reasonably nearby school. If that is not the case, then it is a problem with the local arrangements for determining catchment areas and not, per se, the system.
As long as parents are enabled to make their preferences with the knowledge that they have this local school available, then they should be able to have a reasonbale stab at applying for others with the knowledge that their catchment school MIGHT be the only one that can take them.
How else can allocation of state education work more fairly?
Bottom line, though, is that if all schools were perceived as at least acceptable, dissatisfaction would reduce substantially whatever the system in place.
But it still wouldn't stop parents from hoping for a different school.
Chris, Bournemouth, UK
As for the Brighton lottery system, the main point is that they still give priority to siblings, then catchment, then out-of-catchment. Only within those categories do they pick randomly rather than on the basis of distance. So, if there is space for all the catchments, there is no question of a non-catchment child being accepted at the expense of a catchment; the random allocation merely decides which non-catchments to offer if there are spaces remaining. Under their previous system which was based solely on distance, there was the situation where someone living, say, ¾mile from each of the nearest three schools was not near enough to qualify for a place at any â giving them whatever is left several miles away.
Chris, Bournemouth, UK
Parental choice is only a reality when the best schools have spare capacity. Otherwise the school must choose the parents. Necessarily.
Malcolm McLean, Bradford, UK
This problem goes back over ten years when school catchement areas were opened to people from any town or area. Instead of holding "lotteries" for places at much sought after schools the Education Department should be concentrating on improving the educational standards at so-called "poorly performing" schools. Perhaps if Education, Education, Education was really this Government's top priority, instead of War, War, War, we would see the much-needed all-round improvements.
Neil, Cheltenham, England
zone the school intake areas and scrap parental choice. parents naturally want their kids to go to "performing" schools, this just agrivates the situation for the struggling schools who get low achievers from parents who dont care. If each school got a genuine cross section of the school age population their results would much more likely be near to average and would more accurately show good practice. As usual on social matters New Zealand has it right.
mike gee, bournemouth, uk
Just maybe the South of England has become a 'little' too crowded?? Its HOME TEACHING time again or perhaps its time to move.
Billy Bop, London, UK
Colin Salmon is right - we should definitely bring back the grammar schools. In the forty years that have passed since the switch to comprehensive schools, we have had enough time to establish whether the theory on which they were founded was true or false. That theory, in a nutshell, was the political assertion that intelligence is "socially conditioned", rather than "genetically inherited". Anybody who still claims the theory is true should be sent to Russia with instructions to offer to work on the restoration of the defunct Soviet Union.
Edmund Burke, Kingston upon Thames, England
I agree with Lynne from NZ. In Australia it's similar to the NZ system. We've just moved to the UK and watching this debate about school choice rage it occurs to me that in Britain bureaucracy rules over logic every time. Many of the policies and practices here are just that- years of bureaucracy and 'that's the way it is" without stopping and thinking what outcome they're actually trying to achieve by having those processes. Certainly they're not for the benefit of British people! After being in Australia for so long with its innovative approach and smart systems, it seems I've gone back in time 20 years being in Britain today. We've lived in many countries and the UK has been by far the hardest to live in- lack of service, lack of choice and lack of government vision and leadership.
Lee, Westminster, UK
This just goes to show what a nonesense this 'choice' is. Common sense would dictate that some schools will appear to be better than others. However, these schools cannot magically expand overnight to take into account all of the extra people that want their children to be educated there. In rural areas, there is no choice. You have one school that covers a huge geographical area, where the next available school may be in excess of 20 miles away. Where is the choice here. This is a flawed policy, brought in for populist reasons, which has never got a chance of being fulfilled to the satisfaction of all parents/children.
David Leslie, Perth, Scotland
The problem is that there are not enough good schools to go round. No use blaming the church schools. They are good schools and are rightly popular but without them there would be even fewer good schools. The answer is for the government to get off the back of schools and give them the freedom to run themselves. Independent schools make all decisions in terms of what is best for the children's education and not politics. State schools have to teach about sexual orientation, global warming, the evils of capitalism and colonialism, multiculturalism and all the other politically correct things and then have to try to fit in some maths, English and science.
George, Bolton, England
We have to look at the Faith school situation. I pay my taxes and this money is part of their funding but my children are not eligible to attend as we are not church goers.We were told not to even bother applying.
They are therefore selective entry schools, sorry 'exclusive' entry schools.
Living in Kensington and Chelsea we have one Community secondary school. Needless to say it's over subscribed and my son didn't get a place. There are plans to build another faith secondary school in the South of the Boro. I have lost Faith because there seems to be little Hope and a loss of Charity when it comes to my children getting a good local state school secondary education. Bring back the Grammar school where selection is at least on academic grounds and all children are eligible to at least apply.
Colin Salmon, London,
Good article. I will share it with other moms on singleparentloving.com
Elva, New York, US
From the other side of the world this sounds unbelievable, surely it is compulsory for all children up to the age of at least 16 to attend some form of educational institution and here it says that some children have not been allocated to any school?
In NZ all schools in heavily populated areas are zoned, i.e they have to accept all pupils within their zoned area, with a percentage of places being available to out of zone enrolments via a ballot system. This ensures that everyone gets to attend their closest school and also have the opportunity to apply to a "better" school. It may drive up property values in perceived better areas, but it works for the kids.
Lynne, Auckland, New Zealand