Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona

Faith schools were accused yesterday of forcing parents to pay for places at the best state primaries and secondaries.
One Jewish school in London asked parents to contribute £895 a term when they applied for places for their children.
Yesterday the Government pledged to take action against the cash-for-places scandal, giving new powers to the independent schools adjudicator to enforce the admissions code. However, Ed Balls, the Schools Secretary, came under immediate fire for waging a “witch-hunt” against faith schools, with local authorities, religious groups and opposition politicians disputing his findings.
Yesterday Mr Balls made public a report into schools in Manchester, Northamptonshire and Barnet, North London, which found that one in six was breaching the admissions code, introduced last year to ensure fair access to pupils from all backgrounds. Mr Balls said that the vast majority of the 96 schools found to be abusing the code were faith schools, which have control over their own admissions.
A total of 29 schools in the survey failed to comply with at least two requirements of the admissions code.
There was no reason to think that the picture would be different elsewhere in England, he said. The most common abuse involved schools failing to give priority to children in local authority care or refusing to take children with special needs.
But in six instances schools asked parents to make “voluntary” contributions as a condition of entry. Five of these are Jewish schools and one a Church of England primary.
Other schools were offering places to children on the basis that a grandparent had once attended, asking for personal information about parents’ marital status, giving priority to children of employees or selecting children by gender.
Of the 87 faith schools in the three areas that breached the admissions code, 42 were Church of England, 32 Catholic and 13 Jewish.
One Jewish school, the Beis Yaakov primary in Barnet, asked parents to agree to make a contribution of £895 a term on its application form. With 437 pupils on its roll, the donations could bring in more than £1 million a year, roughly half the typical budget of a primary school of that size in London.
Another, the Mathilda Marks-Kennedy Jewish school, asked for a contribution of £670 per term.
Mr Balls said that thousands of parents would be put off applying when faced with such demands, even though the donations were supposedly “voluntary”. “What you can’t do is ask on the application form for parents to sign a declaration that they will pay a voluntary contribution.
“In my judgment as a parent, parents would not think of that as voluntary. I do not think it is consistent with free state education to Continued on page 2, col 3 sign commitments to pay hundreds of pounds per term,” he said. Mr Balls came under fierce criticism for naming and shaming individual schools.
Tom Peryer, of the London Diocesan Board for Schools, accused Mr Balls of playing to the gallery of secularist backbench MPs in his party who “have it in for faith schools”.
He added that many faith schools were unfairly tainted by the Secretary of State’s remarks. “It is like telling off all the children in a class when just five have been naughty,” he said.
He added that the accusations against several schools were simply wrong. St Mary’s Church of England School, had, for example, been criticised for failing to give priority for places to children in care simply because its application form said that documentary proof had to be provided to show that children were in care.
The Board of Deputies of British Jews said it was looking into the cases of schools asking for hundreds of pounds. A spokesman said that Jewish faith schools had to secure additional funding to pay for security and intensive religious instruction as these are not covered by the State.
He added that a certificate of Jewish status might have to be created to by-pass the need for schools to ask for proof of Jewishness through the production of birth certificates, which may also contain other personal data.
He admitted that “there should be no mention of voluntary contributions on admissions forms”, but insisted that in most cases the admissions rules at Jewish schools would require “only minor changes” to become compliant with the new admissions code.
Michael Gove, the Shadow Children’s Secretary, said: “Ed Balls started a witch-hunt against schools which were alleged to be handing out places for cash. But there’s no evidence that money played any part in determining admissions in any of these schools.”
The London Borough of Barnet, where the offending six schools were located, rejected the minister’s “sensationalist” claims as “totally false”. A spokesman said: “Our investigations have shown that the majority relate to technical issues regarding the wording of admissions forms or to areas where the admissions code is unclear.”
Manchester said that only eight of the 17 schools named by the Government were in breach of the code. “These errors have been acknowledged and will be changed for 2009 admissions,” it said in a statement.
The new admissions code, which came into force last year, aims to stop schools giving preferential treatment to middle-class parents. It banned interviews and requests for personal information such as parental occupations. It also put a halt to requests for money as a condition of admittance, and obliged schools to secure places for children in care.
The worst offenders
Top 20 admissions code breaches in Northamptonshire, Barnet and Manchester education authorities:
— Hasmonean primary (Jewish), Barnet, 10 breaches
— Mathilda Marks-Kennedy (Jewish), Barnet, 8
— Hasmonean High School (Jewish), Barnet, 7
— Independent Jewish Day School, Barnet, 7
— Menorah Foundation School (Jewish), Barnet, 7
— All Saints Primary (CofE), Barnet, 6
— Menorah Primary School (Jewish), Barnet, 6
— Rosh Pinah Primary School (Jewish), Barnet, 6
— Beis Yaakov Primary School (Jewish), Barnet, 5
— The King David High School (Jewish), Manchester, 5
— Pardes House Primary School (Jewish), Barnet, 4
— Bishop Stopford School (CofE), Northants, 3
— Osidge Primary School (Foundation), Barnet, 3
— St Vincent’s RC primary, Barnet, 3
— St Michael’s RC grammar, Barnet, 3
— St Mary’s CofE primary, Barnet, 3
— St John’s CofE school, Barnet, 3
— St Agnes RC school, Barnet, 3
— St Brendan’s RC primary, Northants, 2
— The Good Shepherd RC primary, Northants, 2
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Having read this article I am horrified as the head teacher of Osidge School we have been lumped together with other schools who have been requesting money
The article is misleading and erroneous.
An explanation of why we were highlighted was needed.
Elaine Rosenthal, London, UK
Alan in London,
chuch schools are 90 per cent funded by the government, which I wouldn't call "partially" and if their results are better it is because they are selective in the first place. As you point out, results are worse in "inner-city" areas where places have been made available to local and therefore non-selected pupils. If parents have a religious belief then that should be a matter for the home. School should be about educating all our citizens together, regardless of religious backgound. Faith schools are divisive and have no place in a modern society.
Ginny, London, UK
1. The Government doesn't fully fund faith schools - they are only partially state funded.
2. The Government wouldn't close or stop funding any of these schools because they are what keep the state public exam results reasonable (along with grammar schools)
3. Why on earth shouldn't parents who have a religious belief be able to send their children to schools where that belief is supported?
4. You can always find the odd example of a faith school which does badly - quite often these are in inner city areas and where the Governing Body has taken the decision to open up admissions to all i.e. those without a faith. Faith schools work.
5. My children both went to a faith school which requested a voluntary donation of £10 a month per child. Don't forget these sschools are not fully funded by the Govt - they have to get their money from somewhere. Most parents paid, but many didn't.
Alan, London,
Secularists complain about taxpayers money going to church schools.Well,i am a christian and a taxpayer.Why should I have to give way to the faith of militant secularism?All that is best in our culture derives from our judeo-christian heritage.Sadly,as the daily news illustrates,we are fast approaching a new barbarian age where the dignity of life is fast disapearing.And in that day,watch out!
raymond joseph douglas, northampton uk, uk
I wonder if The London Oratory would be one of those schools. Mind you, I guess the cachet of educating the Prime Minister's son would be sufficient for any "fees" to be waived.
By the way, look it up on Wiki, if you want to see the extent to which, with suitable funding and support, and appropriate intake, the quality of academic and social education offered by a comprehensive school can equal and probably surpass that available from even the best public schools.
Geoffrey, Modena, Italy
Ed Balls could be working for Der Steurmer with his singling out of so many Jewish schools.
What is wrong with Happy, High Achieving Schools ?
All the report does is whip up antisemitism. In Normanton, Ed Ball's seat, he's got no Jewish voters to offend.
Nigel Grizzard, Alwoodley, Leeds
Nigel Grizzard, Leeds UK, England
England must be the only country that a child can get into a school because his parents believe in a higher being but not on the childs personality, on being working class or in care but not on hard work, on living in the right area, not on ability.
What is wrong with making children work hard to get into a school, ahhh yes it creates competition and thats just not communism or Mr Brown's socialism.
Solution
1. Abolish faith schools
2. Make all schools independant funded by central government.
3. Allow each school to determine the best way of selecting and educating the children. Let the children decide
4. Abolish Gcse's and A levels
5. Replace with junior degree, (12-15 yrs) 8 subjects and senior degree (15-18 yrs)
6. Junior degree must include maths, english, finance and religion, (all religions)
7. private school fees should be 100% tax deductable if meets above criteria
John Heenan, bath, uk
Just shows you how out of date the 'religious' minority are in this country - thinking that they deserve to be expempted from the law just because they provide a form of education which is devisive, narrow minded and helps to contribute to a increasingly polarised society,
Simon Albion, London, UK
It is predictable that religious apologists would complain of a, "witch-hunt by Ed Balls to satisfy his secularist backbenchers."
What is really the issue here is that taxpayers money is being used to subsidise religious division. If a school is receiving state support then it should openly comply 100% with the admission rules as laid down by the state. If they don't then all state subsidies should be withdrawn.
Kevin O'Brien, Ashford, Kent, England
"..........I wonder why parents are so keen to get their children into faith schools? Could it be because they offer a better education? "
Er, no, Frank from Solihull. The Bishop Wulstan school (Catholic) in Rugby was closed by school inspectors last year because of repeatedly failing standards. But you don't see the Catholic education authorities trumpeting that, because it would go against their agument that faith schools are better than non-denominational ones.
And inspectors have just gone in to a Seventh Day Adventist school in London, reported in the Times this year, where all is not well.
We should stop calling these schools faith schools - "social class" schools might be a better description.
Alistair, Edinburgh, Scotland
when did the term "faith school" enter common use? call them religious schools,faith schools makes them sound touchy-feely,not the divisive wedge they are in the modern world
bob hawkins, Beckenham, U.K.
It seems like many other walks of life, under New Labour even Education has become corrupt. Whatever next?
Neil, Gloucestershire, England
JDZ, maybe you are looking at a different list - or maybe you just need to go to school. Since when is 5 catholic shools out of the 20 "most". In fact most are Jewish
richard, kent, UK
Corruption being investigated by Govt. Now that's funny!
Russ, Glasgow,
Hmm..........I wonder why parents are so keen to get their children into faith schools? Could it be because they offer a better education? If so, why would that be?
Frank Upton, Solihull,
I would imagine that this publicity will encourage people to try to get into those schools - I would certainly prefer a school where the background is selected towards the best - I would cheerfuly put the futures of my children above that of the morality of this system.
Richard, London, England
Why shouldn't schools under threat from terrorists ask parents for a voluntary contribution towards protection for its children?
Likewise, if they wish to charge for religious studies, why should this be disallowed? It it's outside the government's school curriculum surely they are entitled to charge.
I'd like to know what Mr. Balls religious affiliations are and whether these are the cause of what looks like credo bashing.
leila , manchester, uk
Clearly such sinful behaviour is ultimately the fault of the Chief
Executive - but how can he/she be brought to book if he/she does not actually exist? Once again religion and common sense appear not to be able to co-exist - and schools should be a place for education not brainwashing..
Al, Weybridge, UQ
Of course we forever being brainwashed to think that those with "faith" set higher ethical standards than atheists.
At least this report goes some way towards setting the record straight.
Jack Harrison, Cambridge, UK
Notice that most are catholic schools hmmmm. religion no matter ( catholic, moslem,jew,hindo or what ever they call themselves) has alaws lead the people/souls astray.
JDZ, edmonton, canada/AB