Alexandra Frean, Education Editor
The Jesus and Mary Chain CD: Psychocandy at WHSmith today
Parents are abdicating responsibility for their children and dumping them at school for up to ten hours a day, a teachers’ leader said yesterday.
Mick Brookes, the general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said that schools were increasingly being expected to take over childcaring responsibilities from parents who could not cope.
“I can give you chapter and verse on parents who do abdicate responsibility and dump their children early at school and are late in picking them up,” he told the union’s annual conference in Liverpool.
He was immediately taken to task by Beverley Hughes, the Schools Minister, who said that such parents were in a small minority and that perhaps the Government had a duty to support those parents who wanted to return to work by ensuring that childcare was available.
“We are in a changing world. Many families where there are two parents living together want both to go back to work. Our job in Government is not to prescribe that, but to give parents as many choices as we can,” she said.
She said that children could benefit from childcare. “Research tells us that for toddlers and beyond, high-quality early-years provision makes a measurable and long-term positive difference to children’s ability to shine at school and to their social development, and the challenge for me in extending these opportunities for early-years provision is to ensure it’s of high quality.”
Under the Government’s plans for extended services, all schools have until 2010 to ensure childcare from 8am to 6pm is available to all pupils.
They can either provide it on their own premises or tell parents where to find it in centres run nearby by the voluntary, state or private sectors.
Mr Brookes said he was concerned that this would enable parents who had lost control of their children from an early age to offload them. “If you choose to have children, there’s a responsibility in the early years to look after them until they can be at school,” he said.
He added that many Eastern European parents arriving in Britain were shocked to discover that, rather than promoting the importance of quality childcare at home, the system advocated a “back-to-work culture” that may not be in children’s best interests.
Mr Brookes said he agreed with Ed Balls, the Children’s Secretary, that “government does not bring up children – parents do”. He added: “The Government must stop displacing blame and loading all the ills of society on to the backs of schools. The rhetoric of supporting parents and families must become a reality for all our children.” Clarissa Williams, the union’s president, agreed that schools were being expected increasingly to take on childcare roles. She questioned why the Government had to extend nursery provision from three-year-olds to two-year-olds. “Are parents so distrusted that we want to separate them from their children at the earliest opportunity?” she asked.
Ms Hughes announced that an extra £16 million was being made available by the Government to support families. Of this, £3 million would be made available to support children who had to care for an older relative. The remainder would enable schools, and health and social care agencies, to work more closely together to help the most vulnerable children.
“For children from the most fragile family backgrounds, we have to put in place highly tailored, multi-agency solutions that make a real difference to the child’s life,” she said. The pressure of Ofsted inspections is deterring teachers from applying to run schools, despite some head teachers’ salaries topping £100,000 per year, research suggests. Two thirds of senior school staff believed that the impact of the education watchdog on teachers’ morale was “at best neutral” and at worst “very unhelpful”, the study by the University of Central Lancashire found.
Nearly nine out of ten head teachers believed that Ofsted made it less likely that teachers would apply for the top job.
The National Association of Head Teachers, which commissioned the research of 500 heads and deputies, is worried that the new system of short, sharp inspections does not allow Ofsted’s inspectors to spend enough time in schools. They are not getting a rounded view of teachers’ work, relying too heavily on figures from test results and rarely observing lessons, the union said.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
Competitive package
Npower
Midlands
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
What do you expect in a country which takes two incomes to subsist?
DT, Kettering,
To Rob bain, Derby.
Before I had children I, too, underestimated the committment and sacrifice involved in having children. Where would we be in 100 years without children? Isn't it in the interest of employers to help to ensure that their future employees grow up to be well-adjusted individuals?
Kim Domnick, Torquay, UK
Why not reduce overheads BEFORE having children so that it is possible to live off one or one and half salaries ? If it's not possible then the reality has to be faced that the couple can't afford to have children. They need time and input from family not an institutional Stalinist pen.
Lisa, Paris,
Not all of us can work 9.30 - 2.30 and afford to live, of course we have to use after school and breakfast clubs. What planet is this guy on?
Liz, Ely, Cambs
The uk education system was put in place for children's benefit to stop them from having to work the mills. There is no such threat now, why send our babies into institutions which destroy the very qualities that employers love?
I took my children out of the system - they are happy, curious and safe
Diana, altrincham,
What a lot of cobblers about both parents "Wanting" to go back to work! In this rip off country, unless you are a bank executive, both parent HAVE to go to work.
Modern Britain, killing families!
Pete, s, England
To Kim Domnick, Torquay, UK
Employers are not in business to be family friendly, why should those without kids be put upon to keep you covered when you are off work because of your children. Thiking about other people works both ways, the whole world is not your babysitter or social worker
Rob Bain, derby,
It seems that Britain has no love for its children.
Just like the Victorian days then.
Children should be seen and not heard.
Children in Britain are second class citizens.
I home schooled when I came over here, as the standard was so low compared to Ireland.
Lilith Barrett, London, UK
I find it sad that everything including so called child support at home and in the schools is down to money. What happened to love and care in Britain.
Toni, Silves, Portugal
So Richard I guess you're suggesting that teachers should work 365 days a year raising other people's children? I strongly believe that parents need to stop finding excuses to dump all of their responsibilities on teachers. You brought a child into this world you have a commitment to it period.
Cameron Gill, Bridgetown, Barbados
The Head Teachers are right - many parents abdicate their parenting responsibilities.
Of course one could argue that with such poorly skilled or bad parents, are the children actually better-off away from such bad parents as often as possible?
If so, then we need proper funding for this.
Sam.
Sam Redman, London, UK
The real abdication is in having your kids taught by people who do not believe what you beleive, with material that will be forgotten shortly after they leave school. 10 years of drudgery to feed our worthless civilisation. Parents: teach your own kids, and bring back apprenticeship.
Greg Lorriman, Leatherhead, UK
The main problem is that parenting skills are few and far between in Britain now. Standards in the country have fallen and parents enforce even lower ones upon their children.
Some parents seem to believe that it is the school's responsibility to further their children and not theirs at all.
Jonny, Northwood, England
Basic problem ? To drive a car you need a licence to prove that you are competent and can behave responsibly. To have children you need no-one's permission at all. So anyone can have children, and as many as they like whether or not they can afford it. This is the problem nobody will face.
john, nottingham,
Schools seem to do an excellent job of "abdicating" responsibility for educating pupils every "teacher training day", local election and the like.
No mention of this though - and the cost to people of extra child care else days off work
Richard, Greater Manchester,
Ofsted inspections will not deter competent teachers from seeking to run schools. If these inspections deter the weak and incompetent then everyone gains: children, parents, taxpayers and society in general. Many state schools are failing as it is, without inspections things would be much worse.
Des, Edinburgh,
For children from the most fragile family backgrounds, we have to put in place highly tailored, multi-agency solutions that make a real difference to the childs life, she said.
government does not bring up children parents do.
A contradiction?
RB, Lauzun, France
The headteachers' words are important. Children do best when cared for by their own parents and the government must reverse its disastrous policy of considering any kind of child minding as better than that of parents. Pay mothers who care for their children not just those who care for others.
George, Bolton, England
Unfortunately, employers regard parents, absent from the workplace for too long, as unemployable . Furthermore, employers demand flexibility and prefer full-time committment.
For single parents, an early return to work maximises much-needed earning potential. We need some family-friendly employers
Kim Domnick, Torquay, UK