Alexandra Frean, Education Editor
2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now
Increased numbers of parents are having to pay up to £20 extra on school uniforms because children — whose larger-sized blazers, shirts, trousers, skirts are subject to VAT — are growing bigger.
Campaigners for the school uniform industry argue that the tax is unfair because it penalises children who are big for their age and does not take account of children being bigger now than they were when VAT was introduced 35 years ago.
Nick Buckland, of Price & Buckland, which makes school uniforms, said: “More and more children are paying VAT on their uniforms and we do not think this makes any sense. We now stock blazers in sizes up to 48in and are often asked to make bigger sizes to order. We recently made a size 56in blazer for a girl.”
A spokeswoman for the Schoolwear Association said that parents were unaware that school uniform was VAT— exempt only on sizes that the taxman judged would fit children under the age of 14. “This out-of-date tax ruling, dating back to the 1940s, also ignores real changes in child sizes,” she said.
The rules disadvantage those from the lower socioeconomic groups, who suffer the highest incidence of weight problems, she said, adding that about a third of children aged 11 to 15 were overweight.
Parents have to pay the full 17.5 per cent VAT on clothes designed for children aged 14 and over, including school uniform items such as blazers with a chest size of 38in and over and skirts and trousers with a waistband of 29in and over. Ties of 45in length do not attract VAT, but those of 52in do.
A recent survey of school uniform suppliers by the market research analyst Mintel suggests that these cut-off points no longer correspond to the measurements of an average 14-year-old.
Mintel concluded that over the past ten years there had been “a definite increase in average sizes”, with one independent retailer telling its researchers that children had gone up two sizes since the 1940s.
Helen Serrano, who has been running the School Togs uniform shop in Worcester for nine years, sells larger sizes routinely to children aged under 14. “Children are getting taller and wider. Many parents are aware that they are paying VAT on larger sizes and they don't think it is fair,” she said.
Nigel Evans, MP for Ribble Valley, has tabled an early day motion, which has been signed by 62 MPs from all parties, calling for a cut in VAT on school uniforms. He said: “Kids don't come in one size. We know there is a growing problem of obesity, so the anomaly in the VAT rules that exists is getting worse and the only winner is the Government.”
Brian Lightman, president of the Association of School and College Leaders and head teacher of St Cyres School, a mixed comprehensive near Cardiff, said: “Schools have been under pressure from the Government to keep the price of school uniform down by making sure that it is available from lower cost sources such as high street stores. It seems at odds with this aim to have a policy that adds to this cost,” he said.
A spokesman for Revenue & Customs said that the size at which children's clothes incurred VAT was last changed in 2002 and that tax officials were in regular contact with manufacturers about sizes.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget


2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
Up to £30,000
GLE
London
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Parents should object to schools demanding that the children wear purple blazers with a special braiding - only available from 1 or 2 outlets, VAT exempt or not. Does exemption on proof of age mean that you have to take child along? Mine would rather pay the VAT themselves!
diana, derby,
Here in British Columbia Canada clothing is taxed by age not size. Providing your have proof of age the clothing is provincial tax tree. That seems to be a much fairer arrangement.
Helen, Vancouver, Canada
My two year old is already taller than most three year old he meets, I imagine that we will have to buy larger sized clothes for him when he is older, many of my family are well over six foot so this seems to be a family trait, which will cost us dear.
Mark Jones, Cardiff, Wales
The problem extends to tall children as well as children who are overweight. Charging VAT on larger sizes will not encourage parents to change their children's nutrition, it will just penalise children who are naturally much taller. I had size 9 shoes and was 5ft 11 by the time I was 15.
Amy , London ,
I think this is a very serious issue my 10 year old wears size 7 shoes and for sports tops especially football shirts wears small men, so for the past year we have been paying VAT on trainers, football boots, and football strips. Children are much bigger now. There must be some tax relief for us.
Adekemi Adeniran, Redhill, Surrey, UK
Isn't it a bit fascist this school uniform thing?
kevin, Lincoln, UK
I don't understand why the clothes are only VAT-exempt up to 14. In the 1940s, that was the school leaving age, but now that kids have to stay at school until at least 16, why hasn't the VAT exemption also been changed?
Kat, Oxford,
@JC - My daughter - 5'8" @ age 11 - BMI is perfect - this is not just about overweight children!
@Sarah - Improvement in nutrition results in larger healthier children!
@JJ - an education yes, but not necessarily at school.
@all - get your facts straight before polluting the net with your opinions!
S Fernley, Ashton-Under-Lyne, UK
If you can afford to overfeed them, you can afford to pay the VAT, I'd have thought.
JC, Burnley,
If parents learnt to feed their children properly and took more of an interest in nutrition, then their children wouldn't be overweight and they wouldn't have to pay the extra cost for extra large uniforms.
Sarah, London,
Children by law have to attend school, nearly all schools have uniforms, children are children no matter their size. Loopy laws have always been around seems like nothing has changed!
JJ, Auckland, NZ
Why embarrasses kids?
kitty hogan, seattle, usa