Alexandra Frean, Education Editor
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
Click here to see The Times GCSE and A-Level results table
School Gate blog: Parents trust the Conservatives more than Labour when it comes to education.
The extent of educational inequality in England is laid bare today with figures showing that in one area of the country barely 3 per cent of children achieved five good GCSEs last year. In the highest-performing area 100 per cent of children achieved five good GCSEs, against a national average of 46.5 per cent.
An analysis of government data by the Conservative Party suggests that the achievement divide between pupils in the richest and poorest neighbourhoods, often living only a few minutes apart, can be vast.
In the Holme Wood area of South Bradford, West Yorkshire, a predominantly white working-class area, only 3.3 per cent of teenagers achieved the expected benchmark of five good GCSEs including English and maths last year. Only a few miles away in the Ilkley area, on the other side of the city, the figure was 86.3 per cent.
In the top-performing area, in part of Richmond-upon-Thames, London, all children achieved five good GCSEs. But in a different part of the borough, the figure was 36 per cent.
The data is published today before the release of local authority official GCSE scores for 2008.
Michael Gove, the Shadow Schools Secretary, said the scale of inequality was truly shocking: “It is a scandal that there are pockets of the country where just a tiny minority of children achieve the basic level of qualifications aged 16.
“These figures show yet again that children born in deprived areas get nothing like the opportunities of those born elsewhere. It is vital that we reverse this block on aspiration. That is why our first priority in schools will be to tackle the gap in performance between rich and poor,” he said.
Conservative plans to allow new state-funded schools to open in deprived areas, based on the Swedish system, with extra cash for children from more deprived homes, would reverse a growing social class gap, he said.
The figures show that the pattern of the education achievement gap is much more complex than the traditional north/south divide. Even within wealthy areas, there can be pockets of disadvantage and educational underachievement. The fifth-worst-performing area is located in Oxford, while the second is in Milton Keynes. Similarly, the fifth-best-performing area is in Trafford, Greater Manchester, a grammar school area.
John Dunford, general secretary of the Association for School and College Leaders, said that raising educational performance and aspirations in white working-class households in areas such as Bradford was one of the biggest challenges facing the education system. Schools, he said, could not do it on their own, but needed input into the entire community: “Many of these families have just given up, many will be in their second and third generation of unemployment. The size of the task facing teachers is huge.”
The figures come after concern expressed last year by Christine Gilbert, the Chief Inspector of Schools, that poor children had “the odds stacked against them” in education and that pupils were becoming divided along economic lines in schools.
Although the Department for Schools has said that closing the attainment gap between the rich and poor was a priority, the figures show just how far it has to go. Jim Knight, the Schools Minister, said that the gap between rich and poor was closing, but “of course there is more to do, which is why we're introducing one-to-one tuition and catch-up support for kids at risk of falling behind”.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
We don't want to separate the "clever" from the "stupid" as that leads to discrimination and, more importantly, intelligence isn't just an ability to do well in exams. It is the system itself that needs changing- grading should be based on much more than just academic work and exams.
James, Birkenhead,
Very, very few children from a background where parents did not care about education ever got into a Grammar school! Records show that in "poorer" areas up to 50% of bright children were not sent to the Grammar school by parents even if they passed. Schools have improved, but parenting has not!
Belinda Brackley, Aylesbury, England
They get the same opportunities, they get an education, but at the end of the day its how much effort the pupil puts in that determines the reward they get.You will have to tackle the mentality of these under achieving areas rather than the schools.You cant teach someone who is boneidle or not there
chris, Rochdale, UK
What's the point in selecting 20% to get out of this appalling state system when it means you have to leave about 60% of willing students behind, condemning them to failure because of the disruption of their peers?
We need deselection where disruptive students are removed to 'special' schools.
Andrew, Fareham,
The idiocy of Labour - even if you get rid of grammars the middle classes will still get good results because their parents are willing to make sacrifices to ensure their kids do well. The "poor" do not have that - and those who would have escaped via selection are now trapped in the comp system.
Tony, London,
State schools in the UK already get extra money to target the brightest pupils. The money is not ring fenced so it ends up being used elsewhere.
David Kinsley, Derby, UK
The only way to reverse this is to bring back selection at age 11 so that the brightest poor pupils get a chance to be educated away from the destructive anti-education attitudes of their peers and some parents. How many more years of proof of 'comprehensive' failure are needed?
MarkS, Leeds,
Yes Jim Knight, there is more to do. After ELEVEN years of Labour education policy. The usual New Labour speil of 'we are doing our best, there is more to do blah blah blah'.
Blah.
And how does '1-1 catch up' help when 97% are failing to get 5 good GCSEs in some areas?
I hate Labour...
Stephen, Norwich, UK