Nicola Woolcock
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
The Times produces the most highly regarded guide to universities, according to a report presented to vice-chancellors.
University leaders said that The Times Good University Guide, edited by John O’Leary, was the most influential of its kind. It is also the oldest, having begun in 1992.
The report, commissioned by the Higher Education Funding Council for England, said that such league table guides had a huge impact on universities.
The authors questioned 91 universities and colleges. They concluded: “There was relatively high agreement that achieving good rankings [in the guides] was important . . . There was also agreement that rankings may affect institutional reputation and even damage these beyond repair.”
The report, presented to a conference at the University of Warwick, said: “The survey respondents indicated that the most influential league table was The Times Good University Guide.”
The research team was led by senior figures from the Open University Centre for Higher Education Research and Information. They criticised university guides for focusing on full-time undergraduate provision and institutional, rather than subject-based, rankings. This meant that those offering specialist, postgraduate or mostly part-time teaching were excluded.
David Eastwood, chief executive of the council, said: “As a funder of higher education we have an interest in ensuring that the sector is accurately presented to prospective students and policymakers.”
John Denham, the Universities Secretary, spoke to university leaders at the conference about widening admission to teenagers who would not have previously considered higher education.

Our new interactive map means all the info you need is at your finger tips

Advice on money, health, safety and red tape, plus inspiration for your big trip

Choosing where to live, getting through the first day, guide to clubs and societies, how to make friends and much more
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Best selling guide, now updated
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
In response to Joe from Oxford: Your talk of 'Great' universities, 'national treasures' , 'traditional backgrounds' and competition with the United States betrays an odious elitism. Instead of subsidising Oxbridge in the same manner as we do other HEIs what we should be doing is promoting excellence and access for all at other universities around the country. At present these universities are undermined by Oxbridge, which has the resources to offer more to its staff and students. This has a detrimental impact on regional economies. Oxbridge should have less HEFCE funding and instead increase the proportion of its spend that comes from its independent wealth (and should still offer its services free). We could then encourage more gifted young people to study at excellent and well-resourced regional universities. Oxbridge would hardly suffer as it would still be enormously wealthy, and many other more deserving universities would benefit. Of course, more money all round would help this!
Don Craigton, wakefield, u.k.
Nicola Woolcock, It appears to me that you are a very selective reader. When I read your article I wondered whether we had read the same researh report. Hardly any mention about the criticisms of the ranking exercises!
peter, birmingham,
In response to don craigton:
*Sigh*, when will the public learn. If we want our best universities to keep up with the finanical power of the big American universities, we need to give them more money not less. The alternative, is for Oxford, to, like the big US unis (bar Berkley) become private. However, this would mean that only rich students could get in. Undoing all the good work the Oxford Access Scheme (of whom yours truly volunteers) has done in increasing the number of applications and places for students with non traditional backgrounds entering the university.
Why is it that in America, the great universities are celebrated as national treasures, wheras the great British public can only show reverse prejudice and bigotry towards the "Ivory Towers" who are frankly, from personal experience, working there behinds off to make the university appear like a realistic aim for kids from all backgrounds.
Our enemies in this: The Media
Some teachers who have unfonded personal view
Joe , Oxford,
The University Guides unfortunately do serve to perpertuate some of the imbalances within the system and obscure some of the high quality teaching and research that goes on in the smaller and less renown universities. The same is true of mediocre departments in the more celebrated institutions, where poor performance is often masked by the overall profile. What's the solution? As the article suggests - we need to look very closely at subject level data. But also, we need to expose some of the financial injustices of the system. There are a number of universities in the U.K. with a great deal of independent wealth and income who nevertheless are still provided with funding for teaching and research in the same manner as the less wealthy institutions. Yes, I'm thinking of Oxford and Cambridge! More needs to be done to redress the balance and I am glad that HEFCE is providing more funding to those universities with large numbers of students from disadvantaged backgrounds - more is needed!
don craigton, wakefield, u.k.