Devika Bhat and agencies
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
Thousands more students in England are to be entitled to maintenance grants, the Government said today, under a £400 million drive to boost the number of young people entering higher education.
John Denham, Secretary of State for the newly-formed Department of Innovations, Universities and Skills, said that he was raising the income levels for eligibility for maintenance grants, so that two-thirds of students in the country would receive financial aid.
From next year students from families with household incomes of up to £25,000 will be eligible for a full maintenance grant – an increase on the current threshold of £18,360. The move is expected to entitle 50,000 more students per year to the full grant, worth £2,825, and means that a third of all students would receive it.
Speaking in the Commons, Mr Denham added that those whose families had incomes of up to £60,000 a year would also be eligible for some form of grant in the future, paving the way for partial support for more than 100,000 extra students – including those from middle-class backgrounds.
Mr Denham also announced that graduates will be entitled to take a break from repaying their loans for up to five years, to help meet the costs of buying a home or starting a family. “This will help graduates make flexible choices over their finances at key points in their lives and careers,” he said.
In his first statement to MPs since taking up his newly-created post, Mr Denham said that the extra grants, available to those starting university next year, would cost more than £400 million per year.
“We are wasting the talents of too many young people for whom university study should be a realistic ambition, not out of reach,” he said. “Hard-working families on modest incomes have concerns about the affordability of university study.”
The government has set a target of getting 50 per cent of 18 to 30-year-olds into higher education by 2010. Since 2006, students have faced tuition fees of up to £3,000 per year, covered by a loan which can be repaid after graduation.
Mr Denham also announced that 16-year-olds who are studying for A-levels and receive education maintenance allowances will be guaranteed some form of financial support if they decide to go to university, in order to encourage more teenagers from poorer backgrounds to consider applying for degree courses.
Mr Denham told the Commons: “These reforms promote aspiration, offer opportunity, provide support to students from hard-working families.
“They promote the world-class standards of our colleges and universities and they help deliver the skills and knowledge that business and society need in a global economy.”
David Willetts, the Conservative spokesman for universities, said his party welcomed measures that would improve access to higher education but it was a “pity” there were now two different Government ministries to oversee some of the measures. Upon Gordon Brown’s appointment as Prime Minister, the Department for Education was split into the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF), and the Department of Universities.
University leaders welcomed Mr Denham’s announcement. Professor Drummond Bone, president of vice-chancellors’ group Universities UK, said: “This is excellent news - for students, for graduates, and for the whole higher education sector.
“This extra money will tackle head-on any perception that financial barriers make it impossible to go into higher education. Raising the threshold will mean many more students will be eligible for non-repayable grants - and will go some way to ensuring that all students with the ability to succeed in higher education are given the opportunity, and the means, to do so.”
Sally Hunt, general secretary of the University and College Union, said: “We are pleased the Government has recognised the struggle many students and their families have trying to make ends meet whilst at university. Making more students eligible for maintenance grants will hopefully prevent students from having to stack shelves or flip burgers when they should be in lectures and seminars.
“We hope the Government will not make life harder for new graduates when it considers what to do with the current loan repayment agreements. Increasing the amount of interest students must pay on loans will further exacerbate the problems they currently face regarding buying a first home or starting a pension.”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip

Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I agree with Sarah from Herts, this is so unfair on students who went to university during the Blair years but were given no grants towards living costs (and who did not have parental financial support). The government talks about equality for all yet the new student grant (for those eligible) does not reflect equality for those students who were given no maintenance grant and now have a large student loan as a result. Why is this inequality allowed?
Stephen, Cleveland,
I am starting University this week and although it is great that the government have finally decided to help lower middle class families like myself who were getting little or no help, I miss it by one year! As I will be studying in London on a 4 year course I will be in approximately £40,000 of debt when I graduate as I only qualify for £812 pa grant, everything else must be paid back. In the new system I would have almost all my tuition paid. If I had know then I would have taken a gap year, why did the government not tell us this before we applied! So I agree with Sarah, the government should re-adress the balance. Why wait 2 years after introducing the new £3,000 tuition fees before increasing the earning thresholds?
Chloe Vincent, Henley-on-Thames, UK
It's great that the government are back-pedalling their student finance policy - but what about the students from the past 10 years, all of whom (unless parents could pay for them) owe at least £12,000? If the reversal is a tactic ommission that the past funding was a mistake - prohibitive, unfair, difficult and limiting for our futures lives - shouldn't there be a way to redress the balance for those unlucky enough to have gone to university in the Blair years? I'll owe over £12,000 when I leave this year; under the new system, I'd owe less than half that amount. Reading the new proposals makes my heart sink.
sarah, Herts,
Thanks for the useful advice Kaytie. Most unis make out that halls of residence is far cheaper. Thankfully Iâll be entitled to the full govt grant. I would have been even if the government didnât decide to make university more accessible. I don't think I'd even consider going to uni if financial help was not available. I'm the only young person in my family so I don't think it's unfair that Iâll receive help (including the EMA I received at sixth form). It is very unfair for those parents with a larger family to support. Hopefully the govt will come to their sense soon enough.
Laura, Northampton , UK
Surely the amount of children in the household should be taken into consideration?
A household with an income of 24k and one child is surely going to be more financially stable and able to provide than one on 27k with four children?
It's the same with EMA, the amount of people living on these earnings just doesn't seem to be taken onboard at all.
John Jones, Southampton, UK
great news on the extra student finacial help but it's not fair to this years intake of students saddled with £3k fees per year why shouldn't they benefit too?
Sign the epetition to help
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/students-grants/
rose, norwich,
Having signed an agreement to pay over £1200 each term for 'catered' halls in the first year at Liverpool University, it was later discovered that there would be not one lecture, seminar or any set piece of work for the 3rd term of the course. Having spent many months arguing the case with the univsertity for a refund on the 3rd term payment, it was denied. This money was part of a student loan and was totally wasted on this unnecessary accommodation.
Shoddy practice is the term that comes to mind and it is HIGHLY recommended that future students ask 'IS IT NECESSARY' before signing ANY kind of Halls Accommodation Contract.
Private residences are, per week, cheaper, are yours for the full 52 weeks of a year (NOT just the 32 weeks of the academic year), and can offer far better facilities and freedom. Forget the catering, most students don't bother with breakfast anyway. Far better to spend your money on food you will eat at a time you want to eat it.
Kaytie, Coventry, Gt Britain