David Charter and Valerie Elliott
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
The definition of GM-free food was relaxed last night as European ministers decided to allow a greater proportion of genetically-modified material into products that could still be labelled “GM free”.
EU agriculture ministers decided that food could include up to 0.9 per cent of genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) instead of the 0.1 per cent currently used as the gold standard by leading supermarkets. Ministers also agreed a Europe-wide system for labelling foods as organic so long as they contained at least 95 per cent organically-produced material – the same threshold already in use in Britain.
The 0.1 per cent figure for GMOs represents the lowest trace detectable and green campaigners believe that it forces producers to do all they can to keep their food “pure”.
Although it will remain prohibited to use GMOs knowingly in organic farming, adopting a 0.9 per cent threshold for labelling food “GM free” will encourage lower standards in keeping produce truly organic, they argued.
Mariann Fischer Boel, the EU Agriculture Commissioner, said that it would be too costly for farmers to achieve higher purity in their organic produce.
Ms Boel said: “It can be very tempting to say ‘zero tolerance’ but that wouldn’t work in real life. To avoid accidental contamination it would be so expensive to produce organic products that it would damage the market completely. It would simply kill the sector.”
Helen Holder, GMO campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe, said that the ministers had opened the door for more GMOs in organic food, arguing that “accidental or technically unavoidable” contamination would be routinely interpreted as meaning “acceptable”.
She added: “Now that the EU has declared traces of genetic contamination in organic crops acceptable, organic farmers will find it increasingly difficult to keep their crops GM-free.
“The EU must urgently introduce cross-border legislation to protect organic and conventional farmers from genetic pollution.” Marco Contiero, of Greenpeace, added: “The lax attitude taken by the European Commission and some member states disregards the preferences of European consumers and may put the whole organic sector at risk.
“In practice, low levels of genetically modified material could start slipping into all organic food.” Food industry experts, however, were last night confident that supermarkets would maintain their stricter 0.1 per cent threshold for GM material in organic produce. This standard is also the one accepted by the Soil Association, the UK’s leading organic certification scheme, and is the threshold that also operates in Austria and Italy.
A new EU logo to denote organic foods, however, will make it easier for shoppers to find organic produce in supermarkets. But as it is not due to come into force until January 2009, many producers are hoping that the EU will speed up the design of the logo so that they can use it voluntarily before that date.
Francis Blake, president of the International Federation of Organic Agriculture in the EU, and standards officer at the Soil Association, said that, although organic associations strived for 100 per cent organic ingredients, there were some products that did not have an organic status. These include acorns, passion fruit, dried raspberries, dried redcurrants, Persian peppers, horseradish seed, fructose, rice paper, some pea proteins, sugars and starches.
The labels will apply mainly to organic ready meals, processed foods such as an organic apple pie, organic cereal bars and organic muesli.
A cereal containing less than 95 per cent organic ingredients cannot be described as organic. However, a fruit bar with 80 per cent organic oat flakes could be described as 80 per cent organic but it would not qualify for the EU logo.
The new standards, however, make it easier to introduce farmed fish products under the organic label. In Britain farmed salmon is already certified by the Soil Association and the Organic Food Federation.
Lawrence Woodward, director of Elm Farm Research, said that he hoped the new labelling system would be subject to strict inspection rules. He said that the EU had not yet agreed these implementation regulations.
Acquired taste
— The organic food market in Britain is worth almost £1.6 billion annually
— It grew by 30 per cent last year, compared to a 3 per cent growth for all UK food and drink sales
— Two out of three British consumers now knowingly buy organic food
Source: Soil Association
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Made from Italian Summer truffles

50% off top restaurants, book online
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I don't understand why our european and national institutions can not listen the majority of 493 millions persons living in Europe and who don't want GMO !
Estelle, Paris, France
Lets get real on this. Firstly, there is no such thing at 100% purity, hence the reason all agricultuyral products have thresholds for the presence of unwanted material (including for the presence of substances that are dangerous to human health like dioxins). Secondly, those in the organic sector that advocate no GM presence (to the limit of detection) should recognise the hypocracy of their argument. If you want no detectible level of GM in orgainc produce then apply the same standard to the presence of non organic ingredients (which are allowed up to 5%) and for unwanted items like pesticide residues. In addition, why not actually stop allowing the use of some pesticides which have a much worse environmental profile than the products used by many conventional farmers (eg, bordeaux mixture).
Graham Brookes, Gloucester, UK
I agree with the policy becausee in the US it has been shown that some GM producer revel in the fact that Organic produce be contaminated. this way they can say that Organic produces don't exist since they can't get approval. it leaves the market free of competition (Refer to Articles by George Monbiot on the subject).
In fact, non GM farmers are being sued for growing GM food albeit because of unknownly contamination from the neighbours' fields!
read this:
http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2001/08/21/market-force/#more-732
olivier, london, UK
The EU might consider traces of genetic contamination in organic crops acceptable. I do not.
Anyone causing contamination to organic crops does so either carelessly or with the purposeful intent and should be charged by the appropriate body.
The above is just a way of opening the door to GM foods, which the people are against.
Jim Gilmer, Clydebank, Dunbartonshire
There is a need for a new organic standard - 100% organic - and a new organisation to represent consumers. The Soil Association is a big con.
David, Andorra La Vella, Andorra
So far the organic producers have has no problems in keeping to the 0.1% rule so why should we change unless the EU is planning on allowing far more GM crops to be grown in the next few years. Contamination of Organic crops by non GM crops will eventually lead to a court case regarding compensation and stating that 0.9% is still organic will simply mean the organic farmer will have to fight harder. Despite the EU ruling I hope that the soil association and the supermarkets in the UK will retain checking for 0.1%.
I buy organic produce simply as I am unsure as to what goes into the other products despite the extra costs and if there is a possible 0.9% GM contamination I will stop purchasing organic.
A simpler solution would be to simply mark the percentage of GM crops used in each produce and then let the consumer choose.
joe kellie, edinburgh, scotland
Well, I'll just have to make a few million developing a new food standard and charging real organic producers a fee to show the ceritification that they can then pass on to the consumer. Brilliant idea, thank you Euro desk jockeys, thank you. You ride that desk!
Richard, Woodham, UK