Lydia Slater
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000

When James Nathan won the hotly contested MasterChef final, he had tears in his eyes. And he wasn’t the only one. On sofas across the country, viewers sobbed as the barrister who gave up everything to pursue his dream of culinary stardom achieved his goal.
“It’s the most exciting competition so far,” judge and chef John Torode declared. “Every year it gets better and better.”
The viewing figures appear to bear him out. Hidden away as it is on BBC2, MasterChef has garnered a growing cult following over the past eight weeks.
By the final last Thursday, 5.7m people had tuned in. This is partly a result of MasterChef’s zippy format.
Contestants must be confident dishing up meals in the jungle for the British Army, toiling in the world’s most demanding kitchens and creating instant haute cuisine from a collection of random ingredients.
There is also pleasure to be found in watching the hyperbole of the presenters. Torode’s USP is taking enormous mouthfuls and weeping if he likes something. His sidekick, the bald and twinkly “ingredients expert” Gregg Wallace, has a repertoire of appreciative grunts and gasps whenever he gets to sink his teeth into a gooey pudding.
Recent tabloid revelations about Wallace’s past as a football hooligan and his penchant (according to his ex-wife) for spanking and ladies of the night have only added to his naughty allure.
MasterChef’s popularity this time around, however, is mostly thanks to the three equally appealing and different finalists: Nathan, 34, a softly spoken hippy-ish type whose mastery of classical French cuisine appeared to rival Gordon Ramsay’s; Jonny Stevenson, 32, a podgy Belfast bank manager and single father who taught himself to cook perfect bistro cuisine in a matter of months; and Emily Ludolf, a wunderkind whose eccentric creations brought tears of joy to the eyes of Torode no fewer than five times. Now 19, she was taking her A-levels during the filming. Naturally, she scored straight As and got into Oxford.
But it was Nathan who carried off the trophy after sailing through challenges including catering for a wedding at Blenheim Palace and creating a meal for a galaxy of top chefs, holding 17 Michelin stars between them. His final, perfectly pitched menu — smoked mozzarella ravioli, tea-infused venison and a chocolate and orange pudding — secured him the title.
“I’d been saving the mozzarella ravioli in case I got into the final,” he said. “But I was really worried the dishes were merely competent, not exceptional enough to win.”
Indeed, Ludolf was in many ways the real star of the series. Although her cooking was more original, however, she didn’t have all the practical skills.
“The competition is about finding someone who can step into any kitchen anywhere and do the job,” said Torode. “And James has that passion in him — he so wants to be a chef.”
The day after the final was broadcast, Nathan pitched up at his parents’ Bristol home, which he was using as his base for interviews. He seemed a little the worse for wear, having spent the previous night carousing at Torode’s London restaurant, Smiths of Smithfield, with his wife, Linsey, and fellow finalist Stevenson.
Ludolf had been unable to join them, as a party was being thrown for her by friends who dressed up as dishes she had cooked on the programme. Given that these included a chocolate mud pie adorned with crystallised tarragon and tagliatelle made from jellied beetroot strips, it must have been a sight worth seeing.
Nathan was feeling disconcerted, having just been hugged by a burly stranger when he stopped to fill up with petrol. “It’s amazing how many huge men watch MasterChef,” he said.
Having been sworn to silence since last September, when the final was filmed, he was finding it hard to articulate his emotions now that he was free to talk.
“I think I’m suffering from post-traumatic stress,” he said. “I still can’t really believe I’ve won — it feels like some huge con. But this could be my passport to the big time.”
Every week in the show’s introduction, Torode promised that “whoever wins, it’ll change their life”.
He is probably right: eight out of the nine MasterChef finalists of the past three years have gone on to careers in food.
The highest profile is the photogenic Thomasina Miers, whose new cookery show starts in mid-March. She has a Mexican restaurant, Wahaca, in Covent Garden and a second opening in November.
“I got enough offers to amaze me after I won,” said Miers on the phone from Mexico, where she is researching new dishes for Wahaca.
“A few people who should have known better asked me to run restaurants for them, which given my lack of experience seemed extraordinary. But winning MasterChef doesn’t make life simple.”
Indeed not. While he was waiting for the final to be shown, Nathan was earning a living working in a garage in Glastonbury, while his wife and their daughter, Sophie, 2, remained in their house in the mountains near Malaga in Spain.
Only now has he been able to capitalise on his efforts. Within 24 hours of the programme’s broadcast, he had secured work with Michael Caines, the Michelin-starred chef at Gidleigh Park, the country house hotel in Devon. Caines had been particularly impressed by Nathan’s turbot in truffle sauce with scallop tripe and chervil cream.
“We’re going to see how we like each other,” said Nathan. “My end goal is to get a restaurant of my own, but I have to learn how to cook like a pro first. It’s all very well being a talented amateur but I can’t manage 15 pans at once. And there’s the business side — how do you order food, how do you run a restaurant, how do you get a Michelin star?”
The family home in Spain will now be sold and Nathan has also discussed plans for a new restaurant with Torode. “Let’s just say, I might invest,” said the professional chef.
For those of us who find getting a family dinner on the table a sweat at the best of times, this determination to join the ranks of the (mostly) poorly paid and over-worked chef brigade might seem a little odd.
“I get an instant buzz from all the equipment and tools in a professional kitchen,” said Nathan. “It’s like the Grand Prix and that gives me a real kick. And my mind is rushing all the time, the only thing I’ve found that absorbs me completely is cooking because you have to concentrate on so many different things at once.
“When I started in the competition, I would set a timer but, by the end, I just knew by instinct when to get things out of the oven. And I could tell from the sound behind me what stage my onions were at. I got really tuned in, psychologically.”
Cooking was a survival strategy Nathan developed in early childhood. “I was the youngest of six children, and my mother had always wanted a boy but only had girls until I came along. So I was the apple of her eye, very much tied to her apron strings. My earliest memories are of being in the kitchen.”
He started off baking miniature loaves to put in his Action Man’s toolkit, then graduated at the age of six to cakes, which he created every Sunday from his Winnie the Pooh cookbook to allay the sibling rivalry of his sisters. “The cakes made everyone so happy. That was really why I enjoyed cooking — I like to please people.”
A career in the law was not the most obvious of decisions, but he did it on the advice of his father, who thought it would give him more options in later life. “But I was doing crime and all I seemed to do was get people upset.”
He shocked fellow pupils by riding through the Inns of Court on his skateboard and, after 2½ years, decided to abandon his career and follow his original ambitions.
“I knew I was going to cook for a living, but I was 33, getting on a little bit. I didn’t know how to super-accelerate myself to the top,” he said.
“One night, Linsey and I were watching MasterChef and she suggested I applied. And that was it.”
Ludolf also applied on the off chance. She had been watching the programme and sneering at the banal dishes the competitors concocted when her sister challenged her to do better.
Her recipes included rhubarb soup topped with a floating coconut cream — “I had to experiment for ages to get the ratios right so it would float” — rabbit with langoustine mousseline and carrot, lemongrass and ginger purée; and chocolate and paprika sorbet.
Dishes were presented to look like mud pies or campfires, explosions of colour and, to judge by Torode’s ecstatic reaction, taste. “You scare me,” he often said. “You’re incredible.”
The rather more conservative Wallace didn’t always enjoy her taste combinations.
“I knew I was taking a big risk,” said Ludolf, now back at Wadham College, where she is studying English literature, “serving up things like my chocolate mud pie. But I’m not worried about looking stupid.
“What I really enjoyed about MasterChef was having the opportunity and freedom to create the dishes I wanted to, without having to think, he’s allergic to this and she doesn’t like that.
“I love cooking and making messes. I’m constantly tasting and nibbling. Cooking for me is a medium for passing on emotions and ideas to other people. I love using random, obscure ingredients, because you can recreate that sensation you have as a child, when you taste something for the first time.”
As a result of her success, her original plans for a career in the media or visual arts have gone on the back burner. “I’ve learnt so much from doing the programme. I’m not going to have a restaurant — I’m messy and disorganised and those characteristics don’t work well in a kitchen environment. But maybe my talent for cooking is something I could follow up.”
She is not likely to have much choice in the matter; some canny chef will snap her up for her ideas alone, let alone her culinary skills. Sian Williams, presenter of BBC Breakfast and the Six O’Clock News and a selfconfessed MasterChef obsessive, deferred her early bedtime by a whole hour to catch every episode.
“What I loved about it was that you saw people grow as personalities, you got to know them and what it’s taken for them to get there. I found the it really emotional. And it’s quite a gentle programme.”
What has been particularly refreshing about MasterChef is how far it diverges from today’s reality TV formula. Even though it is a sudden-death show, in which half the contestants are dismissed after cooking a single dish, nobody is humiliated or screamed at. The writer Frederic Raphael describes it as “the only good arts programme” on television. “You see people who actually have to do something difficult. Everything else is hype-dominated.”
Karen Ross, editor of the series, said: “It was a conscious decision to have one thing on TV that isn’t mean.” And as Torode concluded: Sometimes it’s nice watching real people do something positive.”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
This was the third season of Masterchef I've seen, and it was the best. Emily was outstanding and I was surprised she didn't win, but anyway James is a fantastic cook as well.
Now about the show. The worst thing is that it ends and you'll have to wait for just a bit more than ten months before the new show starts. Second worse is that the show takes only 30 minutes. It might as well be an hour for each show.
Greg and John are just fantastic and they could be qualitative lined up among other famous couples like L & H, Starsky & Hutch, Adam & Eve, the Righteous Brothers and so on. They are a perfect team together.
Whatever.... Masterchef is a wonderful show and it should be going on for some decades to come.
Best regards from the Netherlands
R. Stotijn, Oldenzaal, the Netherlands
The only thing wrong with this programme is the failure to change the opening comments from Torode and Wallace - they are becoming *very* annoying, and a new script is needed.
Otherwise, what fantastic entertainment - educational, tense and with contestants having to show real skill, determination and endurance to win.
For God's sake, don't let it be taken over by the 'celebrity brigade' or subverted in the pursuit of greater viewing figures. This is truly great television that needs no 'dressing up' to remain so.
John Brown, Hinckley, Leic., England
This was the first M/chef I've followed and it was fanastic.... so much so I told my son about it.
Well he had a different take. Two or three years ago the final was down to 2 chefs. On the filming day of the final the female chef was ill; too poorly to attend the shoot. So the other finalist, male, was asked to cook her dishes and his own. Not sure how the editing went but guess who won...... yes the absent cook. Now what do we all think of the show.
Maggie Hughes, Bristol,
what a rip off i have been a chef in london for twenty years and the all boys club picked him,will not be watching the new show next year.Emily at her age showed a style which put the men to shame and i expect to see her with 3 stars in a couple of years.how long will it be before he puts his young family first and takes his old job with big cash back.what a waste.
robbie, london, uk
i agree with the idea that this is the only reality programe worth watching. it shows real people with real passion and real talent. thats as real as REALity should be.
Emily was fantastic. Shame she dosn't plan to open a restaurant. It would be somthing worth visiting.
James was obviously the best cook with all the tricks and skills.
Johnny was the weakest of the three, but very impressed with his improvments throughout the show.
Bring on next year...maybe i will give it a go!
Jimbo, Newcastke,
I had the exact same thought as Rob,Brum,UK - the minute Emily started talking she reminded me so much of Jamie Oliver, they could be brother and sister! What a FAB show!
Janene Cherry, Swansea, West Glamorgan
Just like to comment what a really brilliant and perceptive article Lydia Slater produced (ie, she agreed with us in every detail!)
For all the reasons she stated, we found Masterchef totally compulsive and most enjoyable viewing - and the best man won, although Emily was amazing. Full marks to the judges who may be hyperbolic but are not histrionic - firm but fair.
Pity that BBC iPlayer was slow to put up episodes - it meant that sometimes the following episode had been broadcast before we could catch up
Mike Gaffney, Farnham, Surrey
Millfield School will be very proud of another fine ex-student.
A., Andalucia, Spain
Emily Ludolf, was she separated from Jamie Oliver at birth?
Rob, Brum, UK
Sally in Cambridge: I absolutely agree with you about reality TV shows - they are despicable - the one other exception, however, is 'Last Man Standing'.
It's being repeated on BBC2 from tonight (Sunday) and I think you will be similarly fascinated by its "real people facing up to the challenges using their brains and abilities" and their courage - you'll see real heroism as the series progresses.
Sue B, Pontypridd, Wales
Emily was the most daring and experimental!
ravioli and cheese so bloody boring!
surely chocolate is an easy winning pud to make!
all that expensiive pretentious food when so many people are starving and the rest haven't a clue how to cook so they just buy junk and get so fat and even more stupid!
how did that educate the masses who pay the license fees?
great programme for the 5m who watched it!
Frank, Brighton, UK
Lovely article and what a fabulous programme - on this the southern tip of the African continent, we too sit glued to our sofa. Love John and Gregg. Love the way the programme moves on at the rate of knots too keeping the excitement up.
Brilliant, brilliant - and thank you.
Michael, Cape Town, South Africa
He much deserved the title. I was glad he won. I thought it was a close call between him and Emily, the lady who did wonderful things with beetroot. I think she lost at the last leg due to putting pepper in her chocolate sauce, to make it reminiscent of a camp fire. I wish I could have told her, it should have been ginger, ginger goes with chocolate and gives that heat, pepper and chocolate, as the judges said, do not need to be tasted together.
Clare , St Ives, UK
The right person won, but wow! Emily was something else. My wife and I were riveted to the show.
Peter Kyle, Wantage, UK
brilliant programme, brilliant article.
thanks
tim, wigan,
THIS COMPETITION JUST KEEPS GETTING TOUGHER!!!!
I am so sick of these guys yelling slightly off camera.
Rebecca, London,
I absolutely agree that 'Masterchef's' attraction lies in 1) the fact that there is no nastiness from the judges 2) the contestants have to face a range of increasingly difficult challenges and 3) the programme doesn't rely on glamour and glitz but real people facing up to the challenges using their brains and abilities.
It is the ONLY reality-TV worth watching. All the rest is rubbish, crass and insulting to licence-payers. Long may it remain on BBC 2 and not become cheapened by populist programming.
Sally Guyer, Cambridge, UK