What make me even angrier is that the government has just as much blood on its hands as T-Mobile and the rest of the mobile phone industry. There are hundreds of studies that show a direct links between Mobile phones and ill health including cancer and this government has not only turned a blind eye to them but legislated for the mobile phone industry’s interests. Due to such legislation it is now unlawful for an objection to a mobile phone mast to site health risks as a reason. Why else would the Health Protection Agency be so cagey? The whole system is rotten to the core and we are ones who are being made to suffer with out any possible recourse.

Simon Densley, London,

There is already sufficient concern about the impact of mobile phones on human cell structures for health experts around the world to be calling for caution and more research. This story will hopefully make everyone more careful about restricting use of mobiles, particularly for children. If research evidencing health effects really has been buried by T-Moblie, then they will pay a heavy price in the future in terms of both public responses to a lack of ethics and - potentially - legal actions.

Sara Render, London,

The Ecolog Institute has published a report in 2006, called 'EMF Handbuch'. There is consistent evidence that EMF (Electro Magnetic Fields) disturb the central nervous system and more. The values are from 0,01 W/m2 (high frequency, like mobile phone systems) and from 200 nT (low frequency, like home electricity). So, with safety margins, safety values like 100 mikroWatt/m2 and 50 nanoTesla would be reasonable. The 'EMF Handbuch' can be found here: www.ecolog-institut.de (choose Aktuelles). It is based on a thorough research and knowledge of all the scientific literature in the field and has been paid by the German Lottery (and not by the industry, the state or dependent scientific institutes). Consistent evident means the disturbance of the nervous system and more have been found in several and reproducible ways. The small difference from 'scientifically proven' is, that there is no consensus about a working mechanism. So, actually there is reason and ground for action.

F. van Velden, The Hague, Netherlands

I understand that the insurance industry will not insure the mobile phone industry against its products giving people cancer. Who then is going to pay for the victims' compensation?

Simon Densley, London,

Dear Sir
It is interesting that this report was buried.

It begs the question whether the HPA has seen it and what they are doing about it?

A review of 220 peer reviewed and published studies coming to those conclusions is certainly of consequence when you think that it only took 6 studies to classify benzene as a possible human carcinegen.

I look forward to hearing more about this report and hope the press will not also 'bury' it

For the full T-Mobile Report by the Ecolog Institute:
http://www.hese-project.org/hese-uk/en/niemr/ecologsum.php

Sally, London,

Please ignore the e-letter on bees.
It was supposed to be sent elsewhere
Will send another which I hope you will consider publishing

Sally, london,

I have presented the ECOLOG report to the UK Health Protection Agency and EU officials.

It was T-Mobile who told us that their mast was not responsible for the cancer cluster in Wishaw as it was operating within the guidelines. The mast was 100m from my home; I wonder why I developed breast cancer at the age of 38? The cancer cluster was discovered in 2002, the ECOLOG report was two years old!

Best wishes
www.radiationresearch.org

Eileen O'Connor, Birmingham,

this recent disclosure seems to mirror the $28.5million WTR project overseen by Dr George Carlo between 1993-99 with similar health findings that were also ignored by the US industry

panayis zambellis, luton, uk