Nigel Hawkes, Health Editor
Your last chance to get tickets to Top Gear Live
NHS trusts could be risking the safety of mothers and babies by using maternity support workers to do the work of trained midwives, according to a report.
An independent study for the Department of Health found that a number of trusts across England were converting midwife positions into posts for lesser-qualified maternity support workers.
When challenged by midwives, Patricia Hewitt, the Health Secretary, has always insisted that support workers would not be used as substitutes for professionally qualified midwives. The report found, however, that in some places they were doing tasks deemed to be within the role of midwives and requiring specialist knowledge and training.
The report said that a lack of consistency in the training and role of support workers had the potential to leave midwives and hospital managers uncertain about their competence, and placed patients at risk from a low standard of care.
King’s College London, which surveyed trust managers in England, noted that there was no statutory requirement for support workers to undergo training, nor any regulation to ensure public protection.
Midwives have legal responsibility for the work of their support workers, but systems to enable them to fulfil this task were variable, the report said. It recommends a national framework to set training and standards and said that the tasks that could be delegated needed to be identified urgently.
The NHS collected little data on support workers’ cost-effectiveness and the report called for scrutiny where they were being trained to take on complex new roles. It found that they made an important contribution to maternity care and managers were enthusiastic about their role, reporting that they freed midwives to spend more time with women and babies. Their role included breastfeeding advice and support; outreach services to vulnerable women; running antenatal and postnatal groups; assisting midwives at home births and in birth centres; and working in operating theatres.
Ms Hewitt promised last month that support workers would not act as a substitute for qualified midwives, as she outlined plans to guarantee expectant mothers a “full range of birthing choices” by 2009. She described reports to the contrary as completely untrue: “They are there to support the midwife and free up a midwife’s time for the work that only she can do. They are not a substitute for a midwife.”
Professor Jane Sandall, who led today’s research, said: “There is a danger that support workers could cease to become ‘another pair of hands’, freeing the midwife and other members of the maternity team from administrative and routine duties in order to look after women. Instead, they may be called upon to substitute care provided by midwives, without sufficient investment in their training or development.”
A Department of Health spokeswoman said: “This study shows that in only a tiny proportion of trusts were inappropriate tasks such as minor examinations being undertaken by maternity support workers. It is completely unacceptable if a hospital is using a maternity support worker as a substitute for a midwife and the Chief Nursing Officer has written out to all trusts to clarify this and asked that they review the working practices of all support workers, ensuring maternity services are provided safely.
“We are very clear about what the role of a maternity support worker is: to support the maternity team in their day-to-day duties, such as clerical work, supporting women with breastfeeding, increasing access for vulnerable women and enhancing the quality of care. In trusts where maternity support workers have been introduced, up to 64 per cent of midwifery time was saved each week and new mothers gained greater choice over where to give birth. This means that midwives have more time to undertake tasks that only they are trained to do.
“Every baby must be delivered by a registered midwife or a doctor. This is a legal requirement not an option.”
Jon Skewes, director of employment relations at the Royal College of Midwives, welcomed the report, saying: “It identifies some major problems regarding the introduction of support workers in England. “Chief among those is the uncertainty about what support workers can and cannot do, and what a midwife can delegate to them. There is a need for greater control, and the report suggests there needs to be better standardisation of training.”
— 3 years - Minimum length of training to become a midwife
Source: Royal College of Midwives
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - search houses for sale and rooms and property to rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
This must be very sad reading for maternity care assistants who work hard and do a great job in supporting women, babies and midwives. They are not delivering babies and there has never beeen any plan for them to do so.
Amanda Hutcherson, Aylesbury, UK
During the past year or two there have been reports of nurses and midwives being made redundent, posts being left unfilled and the number of studentplaces being cut. Now we learn that an independent report commissioned by the department of Health shows that women and babiles may be put at risk by support workers being employed to carry out the work of midwives.
The public is supposed to be protected by a curious organisation known as the Nurses and Midwives council. this organisation, paid for by nurses and midwives, protects the ppublic by taking action against individual nurses and midwives whose standard of practice falls below the accepted level. However, thei body can do nothing to prevent unqualified staff being employed to carry out the duties ofnurses and midwives providingthey are not called nures or midwives.
The curious thing is that if an unemploued nurse or midwife worksas a plumber the the council can hold them accountable for their standard of practice as a plumber.
Thomas Murray, Exeter, England
A doctor delivered my daughter, but it was support workers who helped me through the long sleepless nights afterwards, nights of endless crying and panic. They were also the people who taught me how to breastfeed. They were magic - so warm, hard-working and kind - and desperately underpaid. Proper recognition of their role and training is needed.
Helen, Edinburgh, UK
It is extraordinary to me that politicians retain any credibility at all when they treat health workers in the casually cynical way that they do. There are few occupations that are peopled almost exclusively by those that have a vocation but nursing and midwifery must surely be top of the list. The fact that neither group has ever undertaken strike action because they feel more strongly about their patients than their wallets is surely proof of this. Despite the undoubtedly serious effect that such action would have on patients and mothers I can't help but feel that both groups would serve themselves, their sucessors and ultimately those they care for by undertaking a strict work-to-rule policy. Maybe then the legions of redundant hospital managers and the blinkered politicians who value the paper-shufflers over the professional carers will place more value on them.
John, Hove, UK
Support workers are the un-sung heroes of the NHS. They need to be recognised for the value that they give.
A solution to this would be regulation. They would then have a national training programme. The DoH togethet with the NMC need to sort this out sooner rather than later.
These people are not just filling gaps or plasters on open wounds, they are the bcakbone of the NHS.
Nurses are 'too-posh-to-wash' and midwives are too uppity to carry our basic care and tasks.
Annie, Essex,