David Rose
Win VIP tickets
Patricia Hewitt was accused yesterday of aggravating regional inequalities in NHS care to meet her promise to stem health service deficits in the last financial year.
The Health Secretary faced a barrage of criticism from economists and health professionals over her stewardship of the NHS after disclosing that it had underspent its budget by £510 million last year. The figure fulfilled a government pledge to avoid a third year in the red, but provoked outrage over “excessive” cuts and their impact on waiting lists.
The latest unaudited data show that more than one in five NHS bodies in England are still in debt, with about one in ten classed as facing long-term financial challenges.
Jonathan Fielden, of the British Medical Association, described the cost-cutting strategy as “wreaking havoc on the NHS and return[ing] it to boom and bust health economics”.
The combined debt of the 22 per cent of NHS organisations who failed to break even in 2006-07 was £911 million. In the previous financial year the NHS ran up an overall deficit of more than £500 million, and the gross deficit – the total of all those organisations which ran up debts – was £1.3 billion.
However, the NHS, which had a budget of over £70 billion for 2006-7, has only managed to balance the books by taking money from elsewhere.
A leaked e-mail, reported yesterday by The Times, suggested that in addition to lost jobs and raids on training budgets, the climate of cost-cutting has stalled progress on the flagship policy to ensure no patient waits longer than 18 weeks for hospital treatment.
Both Ms Hewitt and Andy Burnham, the Health Minister, yesterday issued strong denials that the target, due to be met by the end of 2008, was being affected. They said that analysis of waiting times was now more transparent than ever before, and showed a dramatic improvement.
However health economists said that the budgetary crack-down was likely to continue this year and would have a “knock-on effect” to stall waiting times.
The e-mail, sent out to trusts with advice on how best to deflect media interest, showed that just 48 per cent of patients are currently being treated within 18 weeks from GP referral. The memo states that waiting times still vary widely around the country, with some patients having faced waits “in excess of one year” for operations such as knee and hip replacements.
Full details of the situation will be published by Ms Hewitt today, and are expected to show that those areas suffering from the greatest financial pressures have some of the longest waits. NHS Trusts in Yorkshire, Norfolk and Surrey have delayed appointments and denied patients basic operations, including treatments for varicose veins, wisdom teeth and bad backs, in an attempt to address their debts before the end of March.
Alan Maynard, Professor of Health Economics at the University of York, said that hospitals were being told to “pedal lightly” by local health authorities in order to achieve savings.
“If your financial situation goes into disarray, you look at ways to correct it, and for NHS trusts, cutting elective surgery has been one of those ways.
“Meeting the 18 week target will continue to be made difficult by a climate of cost-cutting. Under the payment-by-re-sults system, hospitals would like nothing more than to rev up the number of operations they are doing because that is the way they bring money in.
John Appleby, chief economist at the health think-tank the King’s Fund, said that the Government’s new waiting time figures would show the time from referral to treatment for the first time and cut out “hidden waits” that sullied previous estimates.
“But while having half of patients being seen within 18 weeks may seem encouraging, the targets become harder to meet the closer we get.”
Peter Carter, general secretary of the Royal College of Nursing, said that yesterday’s budget figures “expose the tragedy and farce of NHS finances”. He condemned the Government’s refusal to give nurses their 2.5 per cent pay award immediately instead of staged over the year.
“With a NHS surplus of more than half a billion pounds and the threat of industrial action on the horizon, it is surely time for ministers to do the decent thing and give nurses the fair pay deal they deserve,” he said. “Stop-go economics is no way to run the NHS.” NHS Trusts have been spending more than £1 billion a year on agency nurses due to poor planning, a group of MPs said. The Public Accounts Committee said that the bill grew by 40 per cent in the five years to 2005 – despite the number of permanent nurses in the health service rising by one fifth over the same period.
The numbers
£510m The amount by which the NHS underspent its budget in the past financial year. The Treasury’s annual funding to the health service is more than £70 billion, but the balance was only achieved thanks to surpluses in other trusts and a £450 million contingency fund built up at regional levels
£911m The gross deficit – or the total debts run up by the 22 per cent of trusts who ended the year in the red
£547m The amount by which the NHS had overspent its budget in 2005-06, the second year it had done so. The gross deficit for that year was £1.3 billion
17,000 The number of jobs shed at hospitals to recover from this deficit and break even. NHS trusts were also delaying operations to erase them from the balance sheet in the final months up to March
£1.8bn Extra funding that the NHS was due in 2006-07, but which was held back to pay off previous deficits and create a safety net for this financial year. Regional health bosses working for the ten strategic health authorities, which oversee NHS trusts, were told to make savings on central budgets
17 NHS trusts were categorised as “financially challenged”, with the worst long-term debts.
The five worst were:
Hillingdon PCT (London) £52.1 million (21% of turnover)
Hinchingbrooke (Cambs) £13.3 million (18%)
Royal Cornwall NHS Trust £36.5 million (17%)
Kingston PCT (London) £21.1 million (12%)
Weston Area NHS Trust (North Somerset) £6.7 million (10%)
Source: Department of Health, NHS Information Centre.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more




Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Have a look at the calibre of doctors who did not get a job in round 1 and risk being unemployed and totally ruined come August. A new database was started today on Remedyuk front page at www.remedyuk.net Page does not require registration and all doctors participating are registered with Remedy. It is growing by the minute! Click "No jobs in round 1?"
The DoH still recruiting doctors from abroad!
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1901479.ece
;-(
Sad day for Medicine, Brighton, UK
It seems to me that there is a lot of jiggery pokery going on for want of a better term. About 10-20 years ago the NHS was quite capable of coping with the then population but now due to the criminal negligence of this and past governments of allowing every tom dick and harry into this country all social services are now over burdened. The government should also realise that the NHS is not a business and probably cannot be turned into one and no matter how much money is poured into it the NHS will never break even. I think the way forward is for the working population to pay for its own health care as is done in other countries. I found myself in hospital recently and was dismayed at the way I was treated. However it seems no matter how you protest nothing gets done. Ordinary people are just ignored until election time.
Gina Myrie, London, United Kingdom
There must be hundreds of thousands of NHS patients who were affected by the action taken to stem the deficits. My problems were relatively minor. A delay of over four months for a tooth to be extracted under sedation because the treatment had to be postponed until April. A delay in an appointment with an Orthotics Department because they had been ordered to hold all referrals between December and March.
This manipulation is not new but NHS staff appear more ready to be honest about it.
Laurie, Tunbridge Wells,
Well done Ms Hewitt. You've managed to save £510 million.
Does that mean that all the staff that were sacked can have their jobs back now and that the 12 000 Drs about to be made redundant can also expect a job in your thrifty NHS?
Just to put the cuts into context : I, as a GP, had to prescribe some essential dressings for a hospital renal patient yesterday because the renal ward had run out of money and couldn't buy anymore dressings !!
Ms Hewitt, the numbers may look better, but your NHS is a disgrace.
Dr P Morgan, Chichester, West Sussex
It is utterly bizarre is it not?
We are forced to subscribe to the NHS. It then declines to treat us for various conditions more or less at whim. We then find out that the reason it is refusing to treat us is that it does not wish, for some crazed reason, to spend the money we have subscribed!
Imagine this is a car insurance company, or a home insurance company. No sir, I am sorry, we cannot pay for your house fire repair. Yes, we know we said we would. We are saving the money so we can have higher surpluses this year. Yes sir, its a problem. Well, you'll just have to pay for it yourself won't you? Or move into a hotel.
Incompetence? No, fraud!
George Johnson, London,