David Rose and Richard Mabey
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall

The European Commission will state today that there is no such thing as a safe suntan, by banning the words “sunblock” and “100 per cent sun protection” from bottles of sun cream.
Requiring sunscreen labels to conform to a common standard of information would, the Commission says, put an end to consumer confusion and help to reduce skin cancer, which kills up to 1,800 Britons a year.
Those creams that claim to offer total protection from the sun’s harmful rays do no such thing, while brands that use the term “sunblock” will have to find another description. Meglena Kuneva, the Consumer Affairs Commissioner, said: “Consumers must be made fully aware that no sunscreen product can provide 100 per cent protection against hazardous ultraviolet (UV) radiation.”
The best rating system – Sun Protection Factor (SPF) – describes only the protection against UV-B rays, not the more harmful UVA rays, which cause premature skin ageing and can interfere with the immune system.
The Commission will require all sun creams to state by next summer whether they provide low, medium, high or very high protection, and give their SPF against UV-B rays. They will also have to display what protection they offer against UVA rays. Exposure to both types of radiation can increase the risk of developing skin cancer. Cancer Research UK says that the skin cancer rate has more than doubled in 20 years, with more than 75,000 new cases diagnosed last year.
Recent tests by Which?, the consumer association, found that many sunscreens failed to offer the protection or even the SPF promised on the label. Some creams that claimed to have an SPF of 15, the recommended minimum, had in fact an SPF of 6.
The Commission will advise consumers how much sunscreen they would need to apply to get the protection indicated on the label. For an adult the recommended minimum amount is 2mg per cm² – the equivalent of six full teaspoons.
Nina Goad, of the British Association of Dermatologists, said: “Removing terms like ‘100 per cent protection’ will help dispel the myth that using sunscreen means you can lie out in the sun for hours without having to worry about skin damage. No sunscreen offers total protection.”
Are you protected?
The Best
Garnier AmbreSolaire Moisturising Protection Milk Label SPF 15 Actual SPF 18.1 UVA rating Good
L’Oréal Solar Expertise Advanced Protection Lotion Label SPF 15 Actual SPF 17.8 UVA rating Good
The Worst
Boots Soltan Sun Lotion Label SPF 15 Actual SPF 8.7 Boots says it has retested the lotion and found it exceeded SPF 15
Wilkinsons Wilko Sun Protection System Label SPF 15 Actual SPF 6.3 Wilkinsons says it will retest the lotion and expects it to pass
Malibu High Protection Lotion Label SPF 15 Actual SPF 6.9 Malibu says it has retested the lotion and found it exceeded SPF 15
Source: Which?
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

50% off top restaurants, book online

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Thank you.
Most of the females from some developing countries like Myanmar have to believe the advertisements of some cosmetic companies. These ladies usually use lotions with big believes.
So due to your article, we have to take care in using them.
May I rewrite your article with Myanmar language in Myanmar journal.
Dr.Khin Myint Oo, Yangon, Myanmar
So what about makeup supposedly having SPF protection and face creams too? Are they a waste of money?
Anne Bradburn, Birmingham, Midlands