David Rose
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

Older women should not start taking hormone replacement therapy many years after the menopause because of the health risks, researchers say.
The results of a study examining the effects of HRT in postmenopausal women were finally published online by the British Medical Journal yesterday, five years after the trial was abandoned because of fears of increased risks of heart disease and cancer.
The women’s international study of long-duration oestrogen after menopause (Wisdom) began in 1999 but was halted in 2002 after the first signs of health problems caused by HRT.
But the researchers, who have had to compile the results in their own time, maintain that HRT is a safe short-term treatment for thousands of younger women in early menopause to relieve symptoms — such as hot flushes, vaginal dryness and night sweats — and to improve their quality of life.
HRT was promoted strongly by doctors in the 1970s and many women claimed that it transformed their lives. But in recent years the number of users has plummeted after a series of health scares. According to the GP Research Database of anonymised patient records, the number of women in Britain on HRT fell from two million in 2002 to one million in 2005.
The Wisdom study confirms earlier findings that women in their sixties who take HRT may suffer from heart and cardiovascular problems.
The team identified 5,692 healthy women with an average age of 63, who were 15 years after their menopause, and who were registered with doctors in Britain, Australia and New Zealand.
The women who had not had a hysterectomy were allocated to one of two groups. One group was given a daily dose of combined hormone therapy (oestrogen and progestogen) and the other received a placebo pill.
Women who had had a hysterectomy were divided between combined hormone treatment, oestrogen only and a placebo.
All the women were monitored for an average of 12 months, and the main outcomes, such as cardiovascular disease, osteoporotic fractures, breast cancer and deaths, were recorded.
There was a significant increase in the number of serious cardiovascular events and blood clots in the group who took the combined hormone therapy, compared with the placebo group. However, the rates for cerebro-vascular disease, breast or other cancers, fractures and overall deaths were not significantly different in these two groups.
In 2002 the Women’s Health Initiative trial, a 15-year research programme to address the most common causes of death, disability and poor quality of life in postmenopausal women, found that those taking HRT had more heart attacks and strokes than nonHRT users.
That study reported in June 2002 that HRT increased the risk of breast cancer, heart disease and stroke. The trial was halted early and millions of women around the world stopped taking the therapy. The Wisdom trial stopped too.
In August 2003 the Million Women Study, a national study of women’s health, found that the risk of breast cancer was doubled if HRT was taken for ten years — suggesting that it could have been responsible for an extra 20,000 cases in Britain alone.
But scientists now believe that some of these risks may apply only to older women who do not routinely take HRT. The Wisdom study authors say that more research is needed to assess conclusively the long-term benefits and risks. “The follow-up period in Wisdom was short because of the early closure, and the power of the study was greatly reduced by the curtailed recruitment, which also led to relatively few women being in the younger age groups,” they write.
In an editorial, Helen Roberts, of the University of Auckland, says that the new findings do not change advice to postmenopausal women. “Healthy women in early menopause are unlikely to face substantially increased risks when using hormones for a few years,” she writes.
“However, long-term use of hormone replacement therapy to prevent chronic disease is no longer recommended as the available randomised evidence shows that the negative outcomes outweigh the positive benefits.”
The figures
Heart disease In every 1,000 women, aged 50 to 59, who’ve been on HRT for five years, there will be one extra case of stroke. For women in their 60s, it goes up to four extra cases
Blood clots Women over 50 who take HRT have a slightly increased risk of DVT (blood clots in the veins). There will be an extra four cases per 1,000 women after five years
Breast cancer Between two to six extra cases of breast cancer per 1,000 women could be expected due to combined HRT (oestrogen and progesterone) use after five years
Ovarian cancer One extra case for every 2,500 women on HRT
Source: Wisdom; Women’s Health Institute; The Million Women Study, Oxford University
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more




Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I was prescribed HRT in 1991 pre-menopause because of menopause and endocrinal problems. I tried various forms, patches and tablets. I am now 60 years old and for the last 8 years I have been taking a lower dosage: 1.25mg for osteoporosis in combination with 2 calcichew tablets latterly, a once monthly Ibandronic acid tablet. I find it fantastic and have had no health problems with Livial (Tibolone) HRT. It has helped immensely with hot flushes and gives me a wonderful feeling of wellbeing and youthfulness; I am now training in my third profession.
Zennia Esterson, London, England
I hv been on HRT since 16 yrs no probs. why r we so stupid about ths. what is the woprry??? why frighten people into not taking ths wonderful treatment??? I am 60, feel fine, hp to continue to do so, much younger than my non-hrt counterparts! elizabeth smith, v.water
elizabeth smith, virginia water, surrey
My mother was given HRT at 49, started to feel unwell. 4 months later found a breast lump. Turned out to be cancer. After 10yrs of watching her go through chemotherapy, mastectomies (one going wrong) psychological damage, untold family upset.
The doctors said there wasnt any link - yet the whole time - no one has made any enquiries or reported that there may be a link between breast cancer and HRT in my mums case.
So if they only check by running tests vs Placebo - why isnt there any other form of reporting. The HRT drug companies make so much money selling this expensive drug - on the NHS. One doctor explained - if there was a link - it'd cause too many problems as women suffering menopause would fill surgeries with their 'menopausal moans and groans'?
I am sure if there was a treatment that made men feel better - but gave them prostate cancer - they wouldnt take it?
sarah, oxford, oxfordshire
I have been on HRT patches for over 20 yrs, now my doctor advises me to stop using them. I have come down from 100mg to 25mg and not feeling well at all.I had a full Hysterectomy when I was in my forties and I am now 64yrs.
My doctor has stopped the patches and given me Premarin 0.625mg. I have only taken one but the acid and upset stomach it gave me as put me off taking any more. What I would like to no is, is there many women like me who have been on HRT this long,and had no problems,and want to no if it is safe to carry on using HRT.
mrs s staton, nottingham, england
Can you advise. I have been on HRT since I was 38. I am now 66. Initially I was on Premarin for PMTand though my PMT was still there, everything else improved. Now I am on Kliovance and I no longer have PMT as there is no monthly cycle. It is marvellous. I am in excellent health and very energetic. I am still employed. I read all I can but my type of case never seems to appear in the literature. There is no history of cancer or heart disease/stroke/ osteoporosis in my family. Can I continue taking HRT?
Clare Robertson, Hove, Sussex
Thank you for your article on HRT on the 12th July. Is there more research done on women in their 70's with a hysterectomy on oestrogen only? ( I am 72, have taken HRT for 20 years-oestrogen only-but now take one every other day for want of further direction.)
sally M Marlow, london,
Can you advise which, if any, HRT would suit my situation i.e. benefits outweighing risks, please? I am 55 years old and had a bilateral oopheretomy 7 weeks ago following ultrasound scans over a 5 month period which revealed ovarian cysts. The histology report stated that nither the fallopian tubes or the ovaries indicated malignancy. Although I was told that I would be fit after 2 weeks as the laporoscopic day-case operation was not as invasive as having a hysterectomy I am still in much discomfort and have muscular pain. Prior to the operation blood tests showed that I was perimenopausal. I am now having frequent hot flushes and am very tired: also have lost about 8 lbs in weight despite no dietary changes and my breasts have shrunk visibly. As I still retain my uterus would it be necessary to take HRT with progestogen as well as oestrogen to protect against endometrial cancer?
Any advice or observations you can offer will be gratefully received.
Thank you,
Jillian Brader, Yate, Bristol, England
Congratulations on your attempt to present the numerical data. Too often we see headlines that say "risk increased five-fold". But the numbers actually say that the risk increased from negligible to something small. I
It is helpful to get the data that states that the risk of stroke goes up by "one extra case per thousand" women in their fifties. It would have been even more informative to know whether the base line level of strokes in that cohort is nil or 10 or whatever.
Johnnt, Bourne End, UK
In Germany older women with osteoporosis are treated with Hormones with fantsastic results- this is not mentionned anywhere- why?
a.O'Dwyer, london,
my wife has been on hrt since 1985 when she had an histerectomy although she only takes 2 tablets a week now and she is 70 in january
cliff williamson, great steeping, lincolnshire
In Germany older women with osteoporosis are treated with Hormones with fantsastic results- this is not mentionned anywhere- why?
a.O'Dwyer, london, engl