Nigel Hawkes, Health Editor
Win one of 20 pairs of tickets to the London Double Header
Children as young as 15 months should be screened for high levels of cholesterol, a team of doctors from London has said. Doing so would be a life-changing intervention for a minority of babies who are born with an inherited tendency to high cholesterol levels, enabling families to plan ahead and take precautions against heart disease.
The test would also identify that at least one of the baby’s parents was at a similar risk, enabling them to receive treatment.
Cholesterol is not measured until middle age normally, when a high figure for LDL “bad” cholesterol is a signal to take action. Those with high scores are counselled to improve their diet and take more exercise or, more likely, be prescribed a statin. But some people with a family tendency towards high levels of cholesterol ought to be screened at a much younger age.
Familial hypercholesterolaemia, which is passed on in the genes, is a condition suffered by about one in 500 people. It causes very high levels of LDL cholesterol in the blood. Often the condition is not discovered until a carrier of the gene suffers a heart attack at a young age. Screening would provide a better way to find the vulnerable people.
David Wald, of Barts and the London Queen Mary’s School of Medicine and Dentistry, and colleagues, suggest that doctors could gain a double benefit by testing young children. Not only would they detect children with the condition during a routine visit for childhood immunisation, but they could also test parents. For every child who is discovered with the condition, there would be at least one affected parent. Treatment for lower levels of cholesterol would be started immediately in the parent but delayed in the child until they were older.
Adults with familial hypercholesterolaemia who are aged between 20 and 39 have a risk of dying from coronary heart disease that is 100 times greater than that of people without the condition.
The research, released online by the British Medical Journal, looked at 13 studies involving 1,907 people with familial hypercholesterolaemia, and more than 16,000 controls. If children were screened at any age between one and nine, detection rates for the condition were an estimated 88 per cent, the research showed. Follow-up tests on the parents of a child with the condition could identify the affected parent 96 per cent of the time.
For even greater certainty, DNA tests could be used to detect the actual mutations responsible. This would show with 100 per cent accuracy whether a child carried a gene that was known. But it would miss a proportion of children who carry mutations that are unknown and cannot be tested for. It would also add to the cost.
The team say that the easiest time to test is at the age of 15 months, when babies come to doctors’ surgeries to have their measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine.
Dr Wald, a cardiologist and senior lecturer at the school, said that he believed that parents would find the test acceptable. He and his colleagues have said that, over time, most families with a known risk would be identified through screening.
“If, after a few decades, the uptake of screening was high enough, the need to test children at 15 months of age would disappear because all or nearly all affected individuals would be known and it would be necessary to test only the children of families known to have the disorder,” he said.
“The strategy has the potential to prevent a major cause of coronary heart disease in young adults.”
June Davison, a cardiac nurse at the British Heart Foundation (BHF), said: “It’s estimated that only around 10 per cent of the predicted 110,000 people with the condition are currently identified. Steve Humphries, a BHF professor of cardiovascular genetics at University College London, is also working to tackle this problem with another approach, which offers genetic screening to family members of those already diagnosed. All approaches should be considered – because, once identified, the condition can be treated.”
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

50% off top restaurants, book online

2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
The Finest Luxury Homes In London and the SE
From £995,000
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Great Investment, River Views
New York Christmas Shopping
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Statin is evil and to artificially lower babies' (or anyone's) cholesterol with it is abuse. That stuff increases death rates significantly, especially through cancer. High cholesterol is not the cause of heart disease, and even the statin-pushing companies themselves have admitted this in the past. There are ways of reducing inflammation (the real cause of heart disease) that are not harmful at all, e.g. vitamin E and omega 3 fatty acids. God only knows the extent of the effects cholesterol deficiency will have on growing babies.
This WILL kill people. The corporate sell-outs and gullible puppets promoting this have future blood on their hands.
Rachel, Kent,
This is a good idea, but the disease affects only one in 500.
I am a coeliac, which means that i am allergic to the gluten found in wheat, barley and rye, so no beer or bread for me. It is not a serious disease for me, but it does lead to increased levels of cancer if undetected.
Serious studies have shown that one in a hundred of the UK population are coeliacs.
I was not diagnosed until I was 56, but I would not have suffered a lifetime of small medical problems, if such a blood test had been available when I was a baby. Incidentally, my doctor at the time, Dr. Egerton White, tried to diagnose the reason I didn't thrive, but the medical knowledge available meant he was unable to.
Now sticking to a gluten-free diet, I feel younger at 60 than I did at 50. I also have no migraines, stomach problems, skin problems and dandruff, gallstones, joint pains and many other ailments caused by undiagnosed coeliac disease.
A simple blood test would improve the lot of many
James Miller, Newmarket, Suffolk