Sarah-Kate Templeton, Health Editor
2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now
All expectant mothers will be offered the choice of giving birth at home under new guidance to be issued this week.
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (Nice) will say that all women should be given statistics about the risks and benefits of having a home birth.
Supporters of natural childbirth welcomed the decision, saying that since the 1970s a policy encouraging women to opt for hospital birth meant that fewer than 5% of babies were born at home.
Midwives say up to 60% of women could have birth at home with no ill effects, or in birthing centres staffed by midwives.
Belinda Phipps, of the National Childbirth Trust, said: “This is a helpful departure because home births and births in midwifery units follow a more normal physiological process. For the vast majority of women, giving birth is a normal process, not a medical situation.”
Mervi Jokinen, the practice and standards development adviser for the Royal College of Midwives, said the guidelines will at last give women a genuine choice about where to give birth. “At the moment some doctors do not give women a range of choices,” she said.
Nice is responsible for determining what should be offered on the NHS. The guidelines are expected to say that women should be told that a home birth may carry a slightly higher chance of their baby dying in childbirth than if they chose to give birth in hospital. However, it will state that the evidence is not conclusive.
Women will also be told that, with a home birth, they have a higher chance of giving birth naturally and are less likely to have a caesarean section. Women giving birth at home are also less likely to suffer internal damage.
The guidelines are also likely to say, however, that up to 20% of women who plan to give birth at home are likely to face complications during labour which will force them to transfer to an obstetric unit. When complications do arise during a home birth, the outcome of serious complications is likely to be worse than if the woman had chosen to give birth in an obstetric unit.
Nice will acknowledge that there is currently a shortage of reliable research comparing the safety and benefits of home births and hospital births in the NHS. It is expected to recommend that a national monitoring scheme be set up to compare the different options.
The Nice guidelines will implement a promise made by the Department of Health in April that by the end of 2009 all women will be given a choice about where they give birth. They will also be guaranteed a named midwife to care for them throughout their pregnancy. When the midwife goes on holiday she will be obliged to introduce a replacement.
The DoH has also promised that, in two years’ time, women will have one-to-one care during labour by a midwife, backed up by a new, less qualified grade of staff.
The shake-up to maternity services follows government research showing that thousands of women feel abandoned and scared during childbirth in NHS hospitals. A survey of almost 5,000 mothers found that 20% felt they had been left unsupported during labour.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Fully escorted tour 6 nights from £569

Everything you need to know, own or do

50% off top restaurants, book now

2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
Up to £30,000
GLE
London
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
This is a step backwrds, all for the sake of money. I must take exception with the articles statement that 60% of babies could be born at home. That statistic is a retrospective statistic only. NOONE can be absolutely certain that an individual case won't have problems with the delivery. For those few who do have problems the hospital can be lifesavi ng for the infant.
Prof (Dr) Max Clark, Dayton , Ohio