Nigel Hawkes, Health Editor
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
Drug regulators in Britain have ordered an arthritis drug to be withdrawn, after growing evidence that it can cause liver damage.
Prexige, made by Novartis, has been linked to 20 cases of severe liver damage worldwide since it was introduced in 2005, including two deaths and three cases where patients needed liver transplants.
In Britain there have been 23 reports of adverse liver reactions since March last year, according to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. None has been severe and there have been no deaths or transplants.
But, combined with growing international evidence, the data prompted the agency to suspend the licence for the drug yesterday. Novartis asked patients taking Prexige – about 5,000 in Britain – to contact their GP to discuss alternative drugs.
The downfall of Prexige (lumiracoxib) is the latest problem to hit a group of drugs once thought to provide the answer to controlling pain in arthritis without dangerous side-effects. The most prominent casualty was Vioxx, made by Merck, which the company withdrew after it was linked to heart problems.
Last week Merck agreed to pay $4.85 billion (£2.4 billion) to settle the bulk of lawsuits arising from injuries claimed to have been caused by Vioxx.
Prexige, another member of the group of drugs known as coxibs or COX2 inhibitors, is estimated to have been used by 8.5 million people in 30 countries since it was first used in Brazil in July 2005. It has since been withdrawn there and in Australia, Canada and Turkey after reports of liver damage.
It never won a licence in America, where the Food and Drug Administration took the view that Novartis needed to provide more data to show that it was better than drugs already on the market.
Worldwide there have been 159 reports of Prexige causing liver reactions, of which 91 were considered serious. Although the rate of reported adverse reactions is low compared with the number of prescriptions issued, Prexige appears to be doomed.
The agency said yesterday that there would be a Europe-wide review of the risks and benefits of the drug. Its action was prompted by evidence that even at the lower dose approved in Europe (100mg), Prexige can cause reactions, sometimes within a month of a patient starting to take it.
The demise of Vioxx and the likely disappearance of Prexige leaves Pfizer’s Celebrex and Merck’s Arcoxia as the only COX2 inhibitors still on the British market.
The class of drugs was designed to improve on older nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as ibuprofen and diclofenac, which can cause ulcers and bleeding in some patients. By selectively inhibiting only one enzyme and not two, the COX2 inhibitors ought to have been safer and equally effective.
Many patients are now back on NSAIDs, because of the disappointments of COX2 inhibitors. Both groups of drugs essentially are pain-killers, used to control the discomfort of arthritis.
Germany and Austria also suspended Prexige’s licence yesterday, dealing a blow to hopes that it would become a big seller. Its sales in Europe were modest, however, amounting to only $8 million in the first nine months of this year.
Novartis said in a statement that the latest analysis of patients taking the 100 milligram, once-daily form of Prexige showed that there had been nine severe cases of liver damage reported worldwide.
That is equivalent to 5.19 events per 100,000 patient-years, which Novartis argued was within the rate to be expected for NSAIDs.

Millions touched by painful disease
9m people in Britain suffer from arthritis
400,000 have rheumatoid arthritis, in which the body attacks itself,
causing painful inflammation
200 types of rheumatic diseases, the most common being osteoarthritis
Source: Times Database, Arthritis Care
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

50% off top restaurants, book online

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
When is the NHS going to stop messing about with drugs that cause severe adverse reactions and start considering other proven therapies with less adverse events, such as acupuncture. Acupuncture has been approved by the WHO as effective in the treatment of chronic pain, such as arthritis. It must be said though that there needs to be more awareness in the general public to ask for qualifications and check on the british acupuncture council for qualified practitioners in their area.
Diana, London, UK
There is another side to this coin. If the regulators adopt such a strict precautionary principle that only drugs that are 100% safe are allowed on the market, then many patients who would have benefited from a new drug will be left suffering without treatment. I have a friend with severe non-surgical back pain who only responds to Celebrex, which was off the market for some time, leaving him significantly discomforted. Also, why do regulators not apply the same criteria to herbal remedies, nutritional supplements etc., which are also associated with significant side effects?
crofty, greensboro, north Carolina, USA
Bob
If you really worked in the pharma industry, you will know that COX-2 inhibitor drugs were developed to reduce the 30,000 worldwide deaths a year related to gut bleeding from your so-called "many painkillers", such as aspirin, ibuprofen or paracetamol. Each of these are known to cause liver or gut probelms, and it is questionable whether or not aspirin would have ever reached patients if based on the standards of today. Even worse, the regulators allow these drugs to go over the counter so patients can purchase these directly without a prescription in supermarkets !
As Neil said, we, should be looking at the potential benefit versus the potential risk. The regulators if they believe that the potential risk of a medicine is outweighed by its benefits, should clearly define in which patients this is the case, and ban it forpatients where risk outweighs benefits. They appear to be applying different standards to new drugs versus existing drugs and patients remain at risk
Colin, Singapore, Singapore
17,000 benzodiazepine tranquilliser deaths up to 1996 - Home Office Data. Tens of thousands of adverse reaction reports worldwide during this time. These drugs are still there. 153 adverse reports worldwide on Prexige - licence suspended. Clearly the MHRA has a different understanding of patient safety to the rest of us.
Colin Downes-Grainger, London, UK
I am sorry Neil, I have spent 30 years in the Pharma industry and have seen a robust ethical industry degenerate into disarray with the pursuit of lifestyle drugs over lifesaving drugs. Many painkillers exist, ones that cause catastrophic liver failure are not required. The reporting system for adverse events only catches a small percentage of the problems. The internet catches many more. Actually assigning blame to a particular drug after the event is very difficult. This is no way to regulate an industry that could give so much more benefit to people who are ill. I feel for the scientists involved when a drug is found to have unwanted side effects but it shouldn't reach the market for this to be discovered. As i said in my original mail I doubt these side effects were a surprise to the researchers....
bob taylor, castelnau, France
10 deaths worldwide a year compared to the tens of millions of sufferers who would benefit from relief from this debilitating disease - Bob, you need your head examining.
Neil Marshall, Cambridge, UK
It beggars belief that huge Pharma companies manage to release drugs to market with major side effects without knowledge of the issues. Perhaps the issues are known but because of the commercial pressure they are played down. Couple that with an adverse reporting system which is patchy and doesn't catch most of the issues and the marketplace has to find the issue the hard way. There is not enough good science here and too much profit taking. More patients should sue, that seems to get noticed.....Also the regulators need to take responsibility and reform the system for adverse reporting so that patients can make their voice heard.
bob taylor, castelnau, France