Rajeev Syal and Ben Quinn
Your last chance to get tickets to Top Gear Live
An investigation into how personal information about the judiciary came to be sent by post began last night as further details emerged about lost discs containing taxpayers’ details.
The Times has been told that at least ten discs holding personal information about millions of people — not two discs as originally suggested — have yet to be accounted for after they had been sent from Revenue and Customs’ offices.
The Government was forced to begin a separate investigation last night after a businessman claimed that he was posted two discs containing highly sensitive information about judges, barristers and solicitors.
Frank Milford, whose company was hired in 2006 by the Department of Constitutional Affairs to overhaul its administration, said he had asked for a list of its suppliers. He received a package from a firm called Liberata, which handled the department’s finances, containing two discs listing personal details of every person, business or company paid by the department over the past five years. He told The Sun newspaper that the discs were neither encrypted nor password-protected.
Recorded on the files were the addresses, phone numbers, e-mail details and bank information of people such as Lord Falconer of Thoroton, the recently retired Lord Chancellor, and Lord Woolf, the former Lord Chief Justice. Mr Milford, 46, said that even after his work finished in July he was never asked to return the discs.
The Ministry of Justice, which has taken over the responsibilities of the department, confirmed last night that it had begun an investigation.
Last week the Government admitted that it had lost two discs containing details of the country’s 25 million child benefit claimants. The Conservatives have demanded that Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, return to Parliament tomorrow to give a second statement to MPs on the loss.
In another embarrassing twist, it emerged last night that at least one letter sent to the house of a child benefit claimant apologising over the lost data contained private information about another parent. Stuart Gray, 35, said he had opened the letter from HM Revenue and Customs to find the name, national insurance number and child benefit code of Karen Cromar, who used to live in the property.
This newspaper has been told that there are actually ten missing discs, including the two sent from offices in Washington, Tyne and Wear, to the National Audit Office in London and six lost in transit from tax offices in Preston. The discs were not registered properly or encrypted, leaving them open to fraudsters.
Staff from the Washington office are searching for another disc that contains “limited but sensitive” information related to child benefit claimants. Yet another, with the tax details of several hundred people appealing against previous Revenue & Customs decisions, is also being sought.
A source close to the investigation said: “There are other CDs yet to be accounted for — we have been told of ten so far, but basic checks are being carried out before any formal announcement.” Police will today continue their search of the premises of TNT, the private courier company, after finding no trace of the discs at child benefit offices in Tyne and Wear.
A government review is also under way into whether sensitive information about NHS patients could be sent overseas for processing. Doctors have expressed concerns that sending patient information abroad would create a “risk to confidentiality” — particularly if records were sent to countries with a different culture of protecting personal data.
The Department of Health says that there are no plans to export the processing of patient files, but a leaked internal NHS document, seen by the IT magazine Computer Weekly, reveals that the review is being held.
It states: “Organisations should be aware of a current review into the possibility of NHS patient data being processed overseas by approved organisations.” It was “considering the requirements for, and implications of, such possible arrangements”.
The leaked document was issued internally by NHS Connecting for Health, which runs part of the £12.4 billion National Programme for IT. It gives advice to NHS organisations registering staff and clinicians for smartcard access to the IT programme.
Organisations that send personal data abroad for processing remain legally responsible under the Data Protection Act for ensuring that it is secure.
The Information Commissioner’s Office said that it would be contacting NHS Connecting for Health to check that its position had not changed.
The Department of Health said that patient data was not sent abroad and denied that there was a review: “There are no considerations relating to the National Programme for IT for patient data to be processed abroad.”
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2008
£44,990
2008
£48,489
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
Some of the finest Apts & Penthouses
Across London
Great Investment, River Views
Luxury properties within exclusive development in
Chislehurst Kent
A new experience in Luxury Living
Multi–Centre
from Only £829pp
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - search houses for sale and rooms and property to rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Where did the revenue and customs office send the dics too ?
Mr Milford had two disc which were not encryted nor pass word protected where were the other 10 discs sent too why were they not encryted and protected? maybe the NHS need to check that the people that work for NHS have Bristish Ciztizenship because am aware that some surgeries are employing people who are not.
Where,s Chanceller Woolfe and why does Chancellor Darling need to come too parliment tomorrow without Chancellor Woolfe? This maybe be another breach of humanitarian wellbeing and safety.
Amanda , Altincham, Manchester
Whats all the fuss about, Banks and other financial institutions have been sending data abroad for ages now.
This may be a very naive view of the situation, but my financial details are much more valuable to a criminal than my medical records.
Is it worth the £12.5b already invested by the government for the provision of a central patient record? I can well understand why some companies would want to send their data abroad, there are huge cost savings in doing so which could easily be passed back to the tax payer and is just as secure.
Finally, the reasons why some diagnostic providers send their images abroad is because there are not enough trained radiologists in the UK to keep up with the demand!
Andrew, Milton Keynes, Bucks
I have taken heed of the publicity about the need to protect my details. I never put anything in the bin with my name and address. I have a firewall. I have virus and malware protection. I never disclose my pin. I regularly check bank statements. I even get asked for proof of identity when notifying a change of address.
I find it amazing that anyone handling sensitive data should be unaware of the need for scrupulous attention to security, especially in government offices handling such important details. Unbelievable!
Filey, Scarborough, England
I don't want to sound like a conspiracy nut but isn't it a little convenient that now these discs have been lost the Information Commissioner has been given new powers that he was denied several weeks ago?
There may be more to this that meets the eye!
Matthew, Rhondda Cynon Taff,
Sending NHS data overseas for processing? Well, the government already has our personal data, so how does sending it overseas make it any less secure - it will be policed by the same bunch of incompetent halfwits that are losing it over here.
Peter, London,
Surely this is par for the course with a bunch of duffers "running" our country? Things can only get worse, though that might not be a bad things if some of the 30% that still support nulab can be pursuaded of the serious error of their ways. One way or another this collection of incompetents has GOT to go, for the sake of our survival.
Roger Jones, kettering,
Didn't the DWP propose to send data to India for processing? I bet this is still 'on the table' awating an opportunity to commence this in the name of cost reduction without thoroughly reviewing the risks.
Romans, Leicester, UK
"Doctors have expressed concerns that sending patient information abroad would create a ârisk to confidentialityâ â particularly if records were sent to countries with a different culture of protecting personal data.".... - And the problem with that would be? Given recent events "different" can only mean "BETTER"....
Adrian, London, UK
Mr Evans remarks ... 'How can there possibly be 25 million child benefit claimants in a country with a population of 60 million?' ... I think the twenty five milion actually includes the children ...
Michelle, London,
NHS to send info abroad? Don't they already send diagnostic data for interpretation abroad? Specifically the ISTC's?
margaret, Chester, England
People have data stored about them in the belief that it is safe. At the least it should be safest in places where we HAVE to give it, such as the government. We should have laws preventing businesses trading any personal details whatsoever, and the government should be leading the way in data encryption quality.
If we cant trust them with our private information, what the hell would happen if ID cards were introduced and a batch of them were stolen? people could BE you!
The government is totally inadequate in this area, always working for itself and not its people.
We shouldnt be held ransom to another countries company. If we can afford a war, we sure should be able to afford a couple of encryption programs and keep the data as well protected as our sovereign state.
Tom, Manchester, UK,
How can there possibly be 25 million child benefit claimants in a country with a population of 60 million?
Martin Evans, Newmarket, Suffolk
It is not only the revenue and customs that is demonstrating a cavalier way of dealing with our personal details.
The pension service has "mislaid" my birth and marriage certificates that I was required to send in connection with my state pension application.
Should these documents fall into the wrong hands it leaves me vulnerable to identity theft besides the worry of no longer having these important documents.
When I mention this to colleagues and friends it appears that this may be a regular occurence.
Keith Ogden, Charnock Richard, England
I thought there were laws restricting sending confidential data outside the EU without consent.
My employer had to get written consent before sending any employee data to the head office in the US.
Martin, Poole, Dorset
The Prime Minister should be personaly prosecuted for any breach of the Data Protection Act by the government "pour encourager les autre"
Stephen Green, Correns, France
I used to work for a company that did data processing for most of the big charities in the UK. It was routine to email this data to a processor overseas, and for them to email us back the results. At no stage was the data encrypted or password protected. Similarly, we would send data to customer on CD in unencrypted and unpassword protected form (this included medical records and credit card details).
The laws in this country surrounding the transfer of data to overseas organisations as well the transfer of data within this country are useless. Violation of data protection laws result in a slap on the wrist at worst. There is nothing (apart from bad publicity) to deter organisations from not caring about whether senstiive data lands in the hands of criminals.
Mike, Birmingham, UK