Mark Henderson, Science Editor
Win one of ten pairs of tickets to the London Double Header

Enjoying a little sunshine may not be as bad for you as people think. Research from the scientist who alerted the world to its role in skin cancer has suggested that its health benefits may outweigh the risks.
The hazards of moderate sunbathing have probably been exaggerated, according to a study that shows how sunlight’s effect of boosting vitamin D production may actually protect the body against cancer.
While ultraviolet (UV) light from the Sun is the chief cause of malignant melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer, the new work from the US shows that synthesis of vitamin D can compensate in other ways.
The vitamin appears to protect against tumours of the breast, lung, colon and prostate, the study found. The overall effect of sunshine on cancer risk may therefore be positive.
The findings come from a team headed by Richard Setlow, of the Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York, who played a leading role in establishing that UV radiation can damage DNA and cause melanoma.
Though Dr Setlow still considers sunlight a serious health risk, and advises people to protect themselves against excessive UV exposure, his new data show that it can also have health benefits because of vitamin D.
The work could lead to new formulations for sunscreen, so that it filters out harmful UVA radiation that can trigger melanoma, while allowing through more of the UVB radiation that stimulates vitamin D production. It does not suggest that sunbeds are safe, as these rely on UVA radiation.
Though many people regard a tan as healthy, medical opinion changed in the 1950s and 1960s when sunlight’s role in skin cancer was discovered. Dr Setlow led much of the key research.
Public health campaigns have since encouraged people to cover up or wear sunscreen when exposed to direct sunlight. In Britain, 8,900 new cases of melanoma are diagnosed annually and it causes 1,800 deaths.
However, some scientists have begun to question whether safety advice is too extreme. While the link to melanoma is not disputed, sunlight is also the principal source of vitamin D, which research suggests improves prognosis in many cancers. It may even help the body to fight melanoma.
In his latest study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Dr Setlow calculated vitamin D synthesis at different latitudes. People living near the equator in Australia produce 3.4 times more vitamin“ D in response to sunlight than UK residents. Incidence of all skin cancers also increases towards the equator.
The scientists also found that incidence rates for other cancers, such as breast, lung and prostate, increased from north to equator too. When they examined survival rates, however, they found that people exposed to more sunlight had a better prognosis.
Dr Setlow said: “In previous work, we have shown that survival rates for these cancers improve when the diagnosis coincides with the season of maximum sun exposure.”
Joanna Owens, senior science information officer for Cancer Research UK, said: “A little bit of sun goes a long way. The amount of exposure you need to top up your vitamin D is always less than the amount needed to tan or burn, which increases the risk of skin cancer.”
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests

50% off top restaurants, book online

2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
The Finest Luxury Homes In London and the SE
From £995,000
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Great Investment, River Views
New York Christmas Shopping
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
As my grandmother used to say: a little of what you fancy does you good.
Maureen, Germany,
surely one of the reasons those suffering other forms of cancer survived if diagnosed during the sunnier times could be because in sunshine people tend to be happier and more positive and so will have more of a will to fight the disease.
nathalie, Belfast, N.Ireland
Too bad our schools do such a miserable job of teaching the scientific method, and our newspapers do an equally bad job of reporting it. Here is the way research works: 1. notice a trend; 2. develop a hypothesis; 3. test it (sometimes this involved many subjects and a very long time); 4. decide whether to keep the hypothesis, throw it out and start over, or tweak it; 5. do more studies to confirm your results; while simultaneously 6. cautiously beginning to apply your results.
When research in the middle of this process gets published as a snapshot view, it looks wishy-washy. Let us not forget that things like antibiotics and vaccines were developed in a similar two-steps-forward, one-step-back way.
And yes, almost every substance/food is fine in moderation -- but how do you define moderate?
Dawn, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Keith has taken a general proverb, which is actually very good common sense advice, to the extreme - ironic really.
Even so, heroin/cocaine in moderation is fine, I'm sure (especially seeing as it was 'invented' by doctors in the first place). Unfortunately most people are not able to take these in moderation due to the addictive affects. Therefore, on balance, it is safer to not take it at all.
If, for example, sunlight or chocolate(?) were addictive in the same way, then you would advise none of these either. However, both are completely fine nay, beneficial, in moderation.
Controversial but common sense will always prevail over politics and science!
Geoff, London,
Yeah Lila, wht about heroin and cocaine in modertion
- Keith Bentham, Wigan, UK
Yes Keith, under the right circumstances heroin and cocaine in moderation is good for you, provided it is prescribed by a medical practioner for pain relief.
Richard , Jersey, CI,
Winstonian - 'common sense' prevails that everyone is different . if you had the knowledge and experience of a scientist then you would appreciate that this variation is also observed in experiments and can be very difficult to interpret, therefore conclusions can be contradictory. The human body is a complex machine and does not reveal its secrets easily. (As an aside, many scientists are in fact disgracefully paid and salaries often do not remotely reflect or reward the number of hours worked or the level of education obtained and required.)
Snix, Cambridge, UK
Yeah Lila, wht about heroin and cocaine in modertion.
Keith Bentham, Wigan, UK
This is just more evidence that the world is full of "experts" who don't seem to be able to do anything right, particularly relating to health matters. "this is bad for you ... this is good for you". I don't think there is any health research that has not been discredited to a greater or lesser degree by a subsequent study. These people are paid vast amounts of money to eventually tell us what we really suspected all along by using straighforward 'Common sense',(a term that academics have great difficulty defining). This doesnt stop government legislating on the back of such dubious research and in the process wringing out more tax from the public .. for their own good?! As Lila has pointed out - 'everything in moderation' is the best advice anyone can be given !!
Winstonian, Darlington, Great Britain
Everything in moderation, we all know and have known this for ages!
Lila Joseph, Weert, The Netherlands