David Rose
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
The Department of Health has promised to overhaul the system for making complaints about NHS care after a survey found that more than two thirds of patients think that the process is pointless.
The report by the Patients Association described the NHS complaints system as “cumbersome, variable and takes too long”. Of nearly 500 patients polled, 69 per cent said that they had wanted to complain about the healthcare they had received in the past five years.
For those who complained, 29 per cent described the process as totally pointless, 20.5 per cent as pointless and 19 per cent as slightly pointless. Only 2 per cent said that the experience had been “very useful”.
More than four fifths (81 per cent) believed that there was not a culture of openness in the NHS when errors occurred and that staff were not encouraged to report mistakes.
The association's report concludes: “While patients will always accept that errors will occur in any health service, what they will not accept is the fact that staff are not open about admitting such errors occur.”
On the matter of recent MRSA outbreaks and other healthcare-acquired infections, 47 per cent of patients blamed NHS trust managers. Nurses and cleaning staff were blamed by 16 per cent of respondents, and 10 per cent believed that doctors were responsible.
Three quarters of respondents felt that trust in doctors and nurses has decreased compared with five years ago. As a result, 96 per cent said they believed that patients questioned the actions of doctors and nurses more than they used to.
The Department of Health said it would be reforming the system so that patients' concerns were taken seriously. An official said: “We know that people find the current complaints system confusing. Some may also avoid complaining because they feel too intimidated or worry about damaging their relationship with their GP or social worker. This must change.
“We are introducing a streamlined approach that will remove the need to follow a rigid set of procedures and replace them with a more open, flexible and personal service.”
If patients fail to resolve complaints at a local level they can forward their concerns to the Healthcare Commission, the NHS regulator.
The Patients Association called for NHS trust boards to be publicly accountable for an “open, transparent and timely resolution of complaints”. It also wants an end to system where standard complaint responses vary depending on the region. Katherine Murphy, the group's communications director, said: “Every complaint matters. Ignoring complaints results in wasted resources, frustrated patients and cynicism about the system.”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I would advise patients and members of the public to use the PALS service.From my experience it is much better and you nearly alway receive instant response.The staff running the Pals Service in our area really care about the patient/community as most of them live local,that makes a big difference
Mary E Hoult, Leeds,
The manager is always responsible - that's the definition of a manager. His or her job is to put things right before they go wrong: cleaning, catering, disorganised dispensing, overtired doctors. This is far more important than motivation and stupid goals.
Rosemary, Liverpool,
they're system is nto up to scratch. but we could have so much worse.Majority of the time they're on point and it really depends on your case.Someitmes they dont reply,because its really unecessary,in terms of actually making a difference. you cant please everyone.
Zafna Hassen , London Town,
In January 2008 I sent feedback to my GP together with copy correspondence I'd had with my MP. Because I had not received a response not even an acknowledgement by May 2008 I wrote to the practice manager. She responded by saying the GP would write to me shortly. I am still waiting.
Maria Gabrielczyk, Nottingham, UK