David Brown
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Family doctors are receiving cash bonuses not to send patients to hospital despite National Health Service research that suggests incentive payments can reduce the quality of care.
GPs are paid £1 per patient to spend time reviewing their decision to send someone to hospital and a further £1 for every name on their surgeries’ list if they reduce their previous year’s referral rate. An average surgery with 10,000 patients will receive up to £20,000 for taking part in the scheme.
Eighty out of 82 practices in the Oxfordshire Primary Care Trust area signed up for it this month. Similar incentive schemes have been set up across the country despite the NHS’s National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) giving a warning about the risks. “Financial incentives to encourage GPs to reduce referral rates can be effective, but this is a high risk,” it says. It concludes that reduction “may apply to both necessary and unnecessary referrals”.
Oxfordshire PCT introduced cash incentives after a rise of 8 per cent last year in the number of referrals to Oxford Radcliffe Hospital NHS Trust and Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre NHS Trust. Nationally, hospital referral rates increased by 16 per cent.
If doctors hit their targets, then the PCT will be left with a bill of £1.2 million. However, the trust believes that the expense is justified because the increasing amount of patients being sent to hospital is estimated to cost £6 million.
GP surgeries across London, Essex, Oxfordshire, Devon and Wiltshire are said to have signed up to incentive schemes that are at least partly based on reducing hospital referrals.
Laurence Buckman, chairman of the British Medical Association’s GP Committee, said: “I don’t think patients’ services should be treated as a commodity which is incentivised if you don’t do something. A large number of patients are referred to hospital for investigation. If you don’t know what’s wrong, you cannot know how to handle the problem.”
Martin Roland, who led the NIHR investigators, said yesterday that patients were right to be worried about payments to GPs simply for meeting quotas on reducing referrals.
“If [the payment] triggers some sort of thoughtful process, such as talking to a more experienced colleague, then that is commendable and may save unnecessary referrals,” said Professor Roland, director of the National Primary Care Research and Development Centre. “But I would be cautious about incentives simply to reduce numbers if they are not tied to some sort of clinical review. The danger is that patients who would benefit from referral to hospital would no longer be referred.”
Sue Woollacott, chairman of the Patient Support Group at Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, said: “It seems to imply that GPs aren’t making good judgments and need financial incentives in order to do that. If I were a GP and getting payments for the practice, it would seem like some sort of bribe.”
Andrew Lansley, the Shadow Health Secretary, said that it was “inefficient and unethical” to pay GPs to refer fewer patients to hospital. “If patients find out that their local health bureaucracy is paying their GP not to refer them to hospital they will be rightly outraged,” he said.
The schemes come after the Government’s admission that the average GP now earns more than £103,000 but that patients in two-thirds of primary care trusts cannot see their doctor within 48 hours.
Stephen Richards, chairman of the clinical executive for Oxfordshire PCT, said its research on 120 patients referred to hospital dermatology clinics found that at least half could have safely been seen by community-based services. “Junior, less experienced doctors do have higher referral rates than their more experienced colleagues and one of the focuses of our schemes is to encourage discussion with senior doctors with these relatively less experienced doctors,” he said. “By insisting that a senior colleague is doing a review of the decision-making progress, we are extremely unlikely not to refer someone who needs to be referred.”
A Department of Health spokesman said: “Most people prefer to be treated at home or in the community rather than in hospital if possible. GPs should base their referral decisions on what is clinically appropriate.”
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more




Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
My husband was left almost without help for 10 days, and after very dangerous process spreaded , GP (very nice woman, but a little bit inexpirienced) reffered him to the hospital, they fixed his problem quickly. We both pay huge taxes every month, we don't want to be in this situation ever again
Elina, London,
Surely they would be better spending the money on a few cameras so the GP can send pictures of wounds, readings and appropriate tests etc to a clearing house where an expert can make a decision to make an appointment or order more tests.
Properly managed ten times more cases through at less cost.
Alex, Slough, UK
Alice
One Pound , no, but a couple of thousand, yes. If it didn't act as an incentive it wouldn't be done.
Bob, London, England
Some of the comments on this board are simply ridiculous from the ill informed. Do u really think a doctor who has spent years working just to graduate, let alone train as a GP is really going to take a chance with his GMC registration and not refer anything mildly dangerous for the sake of a POUND?
Alice, London,
Last time I saw my gp, about my foot, he asked if he could take my blood pressure and do a blood test. This was not because it was at all relevant to my foot but because it got him a government handout of some sort. I said he could if he would split it with me. He wouldn't.
John Ledbury, Kings Lynn, England
I went to the drs for a few years with an open wound . the dr always gave me canestan cream to use . in the end i went to the hospital myself . they said i had skin cancer and made an appointment and i had an op had it surgically cut out now its ok . gp never said a word about it .
chas, coventry, england
This scheme is absolutely outrageous and should be stopped immediately by the Government. How can Gordon Brown spend so much of our 'public' money bailing out the 'greedy' banking sector and then go on to allow such a dangerous practice. The people of this country deserver better Gordon.
Christine Taylor, Rochester, Kent
In the old days there was never the problems we have today, you could just walk in to the surgery with no apointment, the doctors worked vey hard in conditions that were difficult compared to todays state of the art technology. Cost cutting perks never work just cost more in the end to put right!
Mary, Stockport, United Kingdom
I think this scheme is ridiculous. I had to push and push for a referal myself, leading to a 12month delay. My GP was 99% certain I didn't have skin cancer. Within 2mins of meeting the consultant I was told he was 99% certain I did. I'm lucky. I worry for others with more agressive forms of cancer.
Christie, Oxford,
The G in GP stands for General. GP's refer to a specialist when unable to fully treat the patient, or for further diagnosis. Who will suffer? The elderly and infirm. Why refer someone who does not have long to live anyway, if you can save £1? Unthinkable rubbish!!
Ron, Milton Keynes, UK
Money and Healthcare, do not belong together, and so many non-medical people have so much to say about the medical field, if you don't know, you would be better off just keeping your mouth shut. Wrong referals, firing Doctors, they is no such thing as a wrong referal, and far too few doctors
Daniel, Manchester, Lances
Maggie, Oxford. Of course it does! Just as bankers have brought the financial system to the brink of collapse by focusing only on each year's bonus targets, the government's' target driven mentality is exactly the same. Saving 6m this year = success, even if next year the follow on cost is 12m!
George, Brighton, UK
Maybe doctors will use their common sense and their huge amount of experience and knowledge to do the right thing? I'm only guessing though, but I've always seen doctors as the 'good guys' so to speak
tim, leeds,
I have read many things about the NHS, the Govt. bonuses for putting patients on lists, but bonuses for not referring to "hospital" by which I assume is meant "consultants". This is a case of administration going mental. May I suggest the proposers of this scheme be sectioned and referred to a doc
M. Cawdery, Portadown, Co. UK, EU
"However, the trust believes that the expense is justified because the increasing amount of patients being sent to hospital is estimated to cost £6 million."
Caitlin Lang sued and won 3.3 million for not been sent to hospital. Does the trust still see it as a saving?
Maggie, Oxford, England
NHS - a service for the public, no? A sevice performed by the public to benefit NHS employees and contractors - yes.
Eddie Reader, birmingham, england
So basically the doctors would not do their jobs properly and refer the patient to hospital but now they will get an extra 20,000 and so will take more care.
Simple solution - If patient is referred and should not have been then simply fire the doctor. Problem solved at no cost.
joe, edinburgh, scotland